Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tabel 1 PDF

    Uploaded by

    Amalia Dwi Ariska
    6 views1 page
    The document compares SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swab samples. It shows that nasopharyngeal swabs detected SARS-CoV-2 in 3 samples that were positive and 6 that were suspicious based on their cycle threshold values, while conjunctival swabs detected SARS-CoV-2 in the same 3 positive samples and no suspicious samples. A McNemar-Bowker test showed a statistically significant difference between detection from the two sample types.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    tabel 1.pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swab samples. It shows that nasopharyngeal swabs detected SARS-CoV-2 in 3 samples that were positive and 6 that were suspicious based on their cycle threshold values, while conjunctival swabs detected SARS-CoV-2 in the same 3 positive samples and no suspicious samples. A McNemar-Bowker test showed a statistically significant difference between detection from the two sample types.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Tabel 1 PDF

    Uploaded by

    Amalia Dwi Ariska
    The document compares SARS-CoV-2 detection from nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swab samples. It shows that nasopharyngeal swabs detected SARS-CoV-2 in 3 samples that were positive and 6 that were suspicious based on their cycle threshold values, while conjunctival swabs detected SARS-CoV-2 in the same 3 positive samples and no suspicious samples. A McNemar-Bowker test showed a statistically significant difference between detection from the two sample types.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    Table S1.

    Comparison of nasopharyngeal and conjunctival swab samples for SARS-

    CoV-2 detection.
    Nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 McNemar-Bowker
    No. detection test
    + (%) ± (%) – (%) 2
    χ value P value
    Conjunctival SARS-CoV-2
    85.571 <0.001***
    detection
    + (%) 3 3 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
    ± (%) 4 3 (2.5) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.8)
    – (%) 114 79 (65.3) 6 (5.0) 29 (24.0)

    SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; +, positive(Cycle

    threshold [Ct] values <37); ±, suspicious (Ct values 37-40); –, negative (No Ct value

    or Ct values =40); ***, P value <0.001

    You might also like