Next-Gen Plus Participatory Performance Testing and Validation in Quirino Province

Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Regional Field Office No. 02
Tuguegarao City, Cagayan
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
TIN: 0000-845-895 Website: http://rfo02.da.gov.ph
Email: da_rfu2000@yahoo.com
ISO 9001-2015 Certified No CIP/5310/17/11/1015
PROGRESS REPORT
A. BASIC INFORMATION
1. Project Title : NEXTGEN-PLUS PARTICIPATORY PERFORMANCE

TESTING AND VALIDATION
A. PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTION (PVS)

 Irrigated Inbred (2 sites)
2. Proponent (s) :
QES : Monica Busania, Shannon Faith M. Reyes, Loida Basug,
Archival B. Sabado, Mark Louis C. Tega, Jr, Fidelino
Cabantac
DA-RFO 02 : Lovelyn A. Gaspar, Chonalyn Pascua, Corazon Cardenas
3. Implementing Agency
3.1 Collaborating Agencies : PhilRice/IRRI/UPLB
3.2 Lead Agency : DA-QES
4. Project Duration : January, 2019- December, 2020
5. Project Site (s)

a. Province : Quirino
b. City/Municipality : Aglipay and Diffun
c. Barangay : San Francisco and San Antonio
6. Total Budget Requirement : P 385, 000. 00
7. R & D Agenda to be Addressed:
8. Expected Technology/Information: Appropriate Variety for specific ecosystem

(i.e, Saline, Irrigated, Drought/Rainfed)
9. Description of Technology/Information: Varietal Trial
10. Potential Impact of the Information/Technology: Technically, use of appropriate

variety for the specific ecosystem can help farmers increase their yield
11. Type of Research (Basic, Applied, Policy etc): Development research

Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
B. TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION
1. Rationale
Rice productivity is everyone’s concern to attain rice self-sufficiency. Efforts made by

the Department of Agriculture resulted Region 02 to be the 2nd rank among the 17 regions in
the country. However, an average yield of only 4240 kg/ha (PSA Data ) is attained due to
wide adverse rice areas. The region has a total of 291, 674 ha rice land of which 74, 368 ha
drought prone, 43, 029 ha submergence-prone and around 14, 000 ha saline prone. Average
rice production in the rainfed lowland areas is less than 2.5 MT/ha, even much lower in
flood-prone areas at 1.5-2.5 MT/ha (Sawin et al, 2005, Maclean at , 2002) and saline-prone
areas a 1.0-2.0 MT/ha (Gregorio et al, 2002) compared with the average yield of 4.7 MT/ha
in the irrigated ecosystem.
Breeding institutions like PhilRice, UPLB, IRRI and other private companies
continuously breed varieties for different ecosystems. Rice breeding takes a maximum of
seven (7) years to produce a variety. Initially bred rice lines undergone to the different
process which include National Multi-Environment Trial (NMET 0, 1, 2, &3). The NMET 3
or National Cooperative Testing (NCT), the last phase of evolution of elite lines before these
are recommended as variety is participated by Da-RFO02. Promising elite lines with higher
yield of atleast 5% over the check variety, resistant to [pest and diseases and with good
eating quality are recommended as variety by the Rice Varietal Improvement Group (RVIG)
to the National Seed Industry Council (NSIC).
Rice varieties released as of 2016 totalled to 274 varieties breakdown to 81 irrigated

inbred, 81 irrigated hybrid, five (5) aromatic, eight (8) japonica, one (1) micronutrient, eight
(8) rainfed transplanted, seven (7) rainfed dry seeded, 26 rainfed drought prone, one (1) flood
prone, six (6) cool elevated and 33 saline prone varieties are ready to farmers use. However,
some varieties are not at the hand of farmers especially for newly-released ones.
The Department of Agriculture (DA), international Rice Institute (IRRI) and the
Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice) came up with a project under the Food Staples
Sufficiency Program (FSSP) of the Philippine that fast track the adoption of next-Generation
rice varieties which eventually results to the increase productivity of rice farmers.
The DA-Regional Field Offices are then tapped to implement this project through
Participatory Varietal Selection (PVS)Trials. In this case, farmers are allowed to observe and
select varieties based on their selection criteria. High yielding rice varieties that are preferred
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
by farmers are seed produced to ensure availability of seeds for farmers.
2. OBJECTIVES
General Objective:
To accelerate the introduction and adoption of next-generation rice varieties with

resistance/tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Specific objectives:
a. To introduce and demonstrate the performance of newly released rice varieties in

their target environments;
b. To validate recommendation domain of a variety under a specific agro-climatic
condition and ecosystem;
Expected Output:
 Five (5) high yielding rice varieties, preferred by farmers in the locality and with good
eating quality;
 Farmers adopted the recommended variety.
Potential Impact:
 Increased rice productivity in the different ecosystems.
3. Conceptual Framework
The project follows the input-process-output concept as shown in Figure 1. The

input is the intervention on the evaluation of different elite lines and newly released rice
varieties. The process contains the strategies to implement the project in addressing the
problem in the development of rice varieties appropriate to plant in the adverse
ecosystem. The project envisions the farmers in Region 02 to adopt the developed rice
varieties with resistance /tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
*Area for the *Evaluation of the PVS *Farmers adoption on

INPUT
OUTPUT
PROCESS
performance trial. the introducednewly
evaluation of rice *Conduct of farm walk released rice varieties.
varieties in the PVS *Availability of rice
Trial * Conduct of sensory
evaluation varieties with
*Seed production area resistance/tolerance to
*Seed production for abiotic and biotic
*manpower resources the preferred varieties
including technical stresses.
evaluated
*office supplies and *Availability of seeds
*Capability Building for mass production.
farm inputs
*Budget Monitored project.
Figure 1. Conceptual Framework

4. Methodology
The project was started in 2014 as a National Food Self Sufficiency Program
(FSSP) which consist of three (3) components and will be implemented by the different
DA-Centers/Stations.
PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTIONS (PVS)
PPTV_RM is a replicated trial conducted in a farmer’s field and essentially

managed by a researcher, an agricultural extension worker and the farmer. It evaluates
the adaptability of different rice varieties released recently in the intended ecosystem
given the farmer’s management practices with supervision from agricultural technician or
researcher.
The PVS following studies with the number of sites will be implemented by the
DA-Research Centers/Experiment Stations SCRC, NCES, CVRC, QES and NVES:
Research Target Sites (No.) Dry Season Wet Season

Stations Irrigated Rainfed Sal Irrigated Rainfed Sal
DS WS Total Inbred Hybrid SR Inbred Hybrid SR
DA-NCES 3 3 6 1 1 1 1 1 1
DA-SCRC 6 7 13 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1
DA-CVRC 6 7 13 3 3 3 3 1
DA-NVES 3 3 6 1 1 1 1 1 1
DA-QES 2 2 4 4 1 1 2
Total 22 22 44 8 8 3 1 9 7 3 2 1
Seed kits of varieties evaluated will be determined and packed by PhilRice and
forwarded to DA_RFO02 Research Division before cropping season. Meeting of
implementers will be done during distribution of kits. Data gathered will be based on the
protocol provided by PhilRice.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Number of Entries and Check Varieties for Quirino
Entry Breeding Maturity

Ecosystem Selection
No. Institution (DAS)
NSIC Rc442 (Region Top 5 IRRI 113
1
Performing Variety UPLB 111
2
NSIC Rc506 IRRI 110
3
NSIC Rc508 UPLB 110
Irrigated, 4
NSIC Rc510 IRRI 113
Inbred 5
NSIC Rc512 IRRI 112
6
NSIC Rc514 IRRI 114
7
NSIC Rc222(check)
8
NSIC Rc300 San Antonio, Diffun
NSIC RC400 San Francisco, Aglipay
Experimental Design
The trial will be conducted using a Randomized Complete Block Design with three
replications. Randomization for each of the PPTV trials per ecosystem in each region will have
to be done by the regional researchers. The plot size for each entry is 24 m2 or 4m x 6m (20 rows
by 30 hills at 20 cm planting distance between rows and between hills). The field book contains
the samples for plot randomization, samples for field layout, and data sheets for PPTV RM 2019
Wet Season. For validity of a trial, the initial criterion is that exact plot sizes and number of
plants or hills per plot should be followed. In cases where rice paddy of cooperator is not able to
accommodate a trial with 24 m2 plots, the plot size can be reduced to a minimum of 12 m2 or
3m x 4m (15 rows by 20 hills at 20 cm planting distance between hills and rows).
In a trial, test entries and checks are randomly assigned with plot numbers and the 3
replicates have different randomization. There should be no vacant rows between plots (entries).
Number the plots consecutively from left to right in all replications following a serpentine
layout. Stakes bearing labels (plot number and variety number) are placed at the first hill of the
left-most row of each plot. Mark and place all labels before distributing the seedlings for
transplanting. Variety number assigned to each entry should not be adjusted.
Considering that PPTV trials will be conducted in farmers’ fields, it may happen that the
allotted paddy or area may not accommodate the proposed field plan. In this case, the researcher
may modify the field layout but must ensure that one replication is accommodated in one paddy
or area and assigned plot numbers per entry is followed according to the randomization and field
layout.
Experimental Lay-out
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Site 1: San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino
Rep. I Rep.2 Rep.3 Rep.1 Rep.2 Rep.3

108 201 308 108 201 308
IL3 IL8 IL4 IL1 IL3 IL6
107 202 307 107 202 307
106 203 306 106 203 306
105 204 305 105 204 305
104 205 304 104 205 304
103 206 303 103 206 303
102 207 302 102 207 302
101 208 301 101 208 301
FRONT FRONT
Wet Season Lay-Out Dry Season Lay-out
Site 2: San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino
Rep. I Rep.II Rep.III Rep.I Rep.II Rep.III

108 201 308 108 201 308
107 202 307 107 202 307
106 203 306 106 203 306
105 204 305 105 204 305
104 205 304 104 205 304
103 206 303 103 206 303
102 207 302 102 207 302
101 208 301 101 208 301
FRONT FRONT
Wet Season Lay-out Dry Season Lay-Out
Nursery Establishment and Management

Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Prior to seeding, sun-dry seeds to break dormancy. The seeds could be seeded in either
wet or dry beds where they can be grown for 18-21 days. For Saline ecosystem, seedlings older
than 21 days can be planted. Seedbeds should be located in areas that are not subjected to
flooding or water stress. The seedlings are kept free from insects, diseases and other pests, and
properly irrigated. Fertilizers may or may not be applied at seedbed depending on seedling stand.
Some farmers practice cutting of seedlings at the root zone using a bladed tool (referred
to as “laplap” system) instead of uprooting seedlings prior to transplanting. For the trial, please
avoid this practice to minimize stress to the seedlings and to maintain health of seedlings at
transplanting.
Prior to pulling, prepare seedling tags or labels and secure tags or labels on seedling
bundles before transporting seedlings from the seedbed to the field. Distribute seedlings based on
plot labels and according to the field plan or layout. Check the entries and plots for any possible
mistake(s) before transplanting the seedlings.
Seedlings are transplanted at 2-3 seedlings per hill. Keep some seedlings near the plot
label to replant missing hills within 7 days after transplanting. Do not replant missing hills at
more than 10 days after transplanting. To minimize incidence of missing hills due to golden
apple snail (GAS), keep water to a depth of 1-2 cm at transplanting and do not irrigate until two
weeks after transplanting. Apply molluscicide immediately after transplanting especially for
areas with persistent GAS problem. For rainfed areas, make small canals on the side of the paddy
deep enough to keep water that will be used to irrigate the paddy at two weeks after
transplanting. Roguing should be exercised at appropriate stages of the crop.
Nutrient Management
Nutrient management will be based on the result of soil analysis submitted to DA-RFO
02 Regional Soils Laboratory. Rate of fertilizer per sites were shown below.
Site 1: San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino (80-10-60) WS (100-10-60) DS of kilogram of NPK
/hectare
Site 2: San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (60-0-0) WS (80-0-0) DS kilogram of NPK /hectare
Times Fertilizer Recommendation

Applied San Francisco, Aglipay San Antonio, Diffun
Wet Season Dry Season Wet Season Dry Season
Basal 2.0 bags/ha 14-14-14 2 bags/ha 14-14- 1.0 bags/ha 46-0-0 1.0 bag/ha 46-0-0
Application 0.5 bag/ha 0-0-60 14, 0.5 bag/ha 0-
0.5 bag/ha 46-0-0 0-60, 1 bag/ha
46-0-0
Ist Top Dress 1.0 bag/ha 21-0-0 1 bag/ha 21-0-0 0.5 bag/ha 21-0-0 1 bag/ha 21-0-0
2nd Top Dress 1.5 bags/ha 46-0-0 2 bag/ha 46-0-0 1.0 bags/ha 46-0-0 1.5 bags/ha 46-0-0, 1
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
1.0 bags/ha 0-0-60 at 1.0 bags/ha 0-0-60 at bag 0-0-60

booting booting
3rd Top Dress 0.4 bag/ha 46-0-0 1.0 bag/ha 0-0- 0.4 bag/ha 46-0-0 0.5 bag/ha 46-0-0
60
Harvesting and Determination of Yield
Plants will be harvested at 85 to 90% maturity. During harvesting, leave two border rows
at each end of the plot and harvest all plants in the inner rows. For a 24 m2 plot data, the total
number of plants harvested is 16 rows x 26 plants per row or 416 hills (or 16.64 m2). Count the
actual number of hills harvested to determine actual harvest area per plot per entry. The harvest
from each plot is placed in clean sacks with labels, bearing the plot number and entry name,
placed inside the sacks or attached/ written on the sacks. Thresh, clean harvest samples and
remove half-filled or empty grains with the use of winnow or seed blower. Weigh clean grains
or seeds and simultaneously take moisture content of grains using a moisture tester. Transfer
clean seeds into a clean sack or bag with proper label.
Agronomic data to be collected:
Flowering/Heading
Actual Date when 50% of the main tillers of the whole population in a plot are
flowering/heading.
Maturity
Actual Date when 85% of the grains on panicles of plants of the whole plot have ripened
or are mature, i.e. the color is yellow.
Date of Harvest
Actual Date of Harvest
Height
Plant height measured in centimetres from two sample plants, from soil surface to the tip
of the tallest panicle (awns excluded); this is obtained at 85% maturity.
Tiller
Average number of productive tillers per hill taken from two sample hills (same hills
where measurements of plant height are taken).
Lodging
Lodging incidence taken as the percentage of plants in a plot that lodged at least at a 45-
degree angle at maturity.
Plot Yield
Weight (grams) of grains at harvest (excluding borders) from the 16.64 m2 harvest area
(or 416 hills).
No of Plants
Actual number of plants or hills harvested, missing hills will be indicated. For 16.64 m2
harvest area, there are 416 hills.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Harvest Area
Actual harvest area of 16.64 m2, which may be adjusted in case of missing hills. Harvest
area is adjusted as:
Adjusted harvest area, m2 = (16.64 m2 x actual number of hills harvested) ÷ 416
MC
Moisture content (in percent). After weighing for plot yield, moisture content is obtained
immediately from at least two samples using a moisture tester.
Yield
Yield, kg/ha = plot yield x ((100-MC) ÷ 86) * (10000 ÷ harvest area)
Preferential Analysis
Preference data will be gathered using preferential analysis conducted on field days when
majority of the entries are 85-90% mature. A group of farmers is allowed to “vote” for their
preferred varieties by depositing paper ballots in a paper box attached to a stake in front of the
plot. After votes are tallied, the farmers are asked to discuss why they preferred the varieties
receiving the most votes. Preference analysis (PA) generates two kinds of data: (a) quantitative
preference score for each variety, expressed as the number of positive votes it received minus
negative votes divided by the total number of votes cast, and (b) list of agronomic
characteristics farmers liked about the preferred varieties.
Sensory evaluation is a useful tool to evaluate the cooking and eating quality of the varieties
tested in the PPTV-RM trial. The evaluation was conducted one month after. By doing this
evaluation exercise, researchers can identify and understand farmers’ preferences and
acceptability of the rice genotypes based on its cooked rice qualities. Top 3 highest yielding and
top 3 preferred varieties may be used in the sensory evaluation, but 4-6 varieties are
recommended for a less complex activity.
Data Analysis
The Data gathered will be subjected to Analysis of variance and the Duncan Multiple
Range Test (DMRT) was used to test further the significance between or among the treatment
means.
OBSERVATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
OBSERVATION
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Occurrence of Insect Pests and Diseases

Several pest and diseases were observed during the 2019 Wet Season Cropping, this
include: Green Leafhopper; Brown Planthopper and; rice bug. This pest was observed on NSIC
Rc222 check, NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc510 and NSIC Rc512. No recorded infestation of Green
Leafhopper of NSIC Rc400 and NSIC Rc514 varieties. Rice bug were observed mostly during
pre-flowering and dough stage of the crop particularly NSIC Rc222, NSIC Rc442 and NSIC
Rc514.
Rice Tungro diseases is observed on few hills on varieties NSIC Rc510 and NSIC Rc512
during active tillering.
Number of Days to Fifty Percent Flowering.
For the 2019 wet season cropping, NSIC Rc400 reach its 50% flowering at 88 days after
sowing. While 79 days to NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508 and NSIC Rc510.
Other varieties such as NSIC Rc514, NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc512 attain its 50%
flowering at 80 days after sowing and 83 days for both NSIC RC222 and NSIC Rc300.
Days to Harvest
For the wet season cropping, entry varieties at San Francisco, Aglipay were transplanted
last July 18, 2019 and were harvested last October 17, 2019 (92 DAT) except for variety NSIC
Rc400 that was harvested last October 26, 2019. Dry season cropping was established on January
7, 2019 and it was harvested on March 24, 2020.
Entry varieties for wet and dry season at San Antonio, Diffun were transplanted on
August 6, 2019 (WS 2019) and December 27, 2019 (DS 2019). These were harvested last
October 27, 2019 for WS 2019 and March 13, 2020 for DS 2020.
DISCUSSION OF RESULT
TABLE 1: Comparison of Plant height (cm) at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino for Wet
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020
Registered Actual Plant Actual Plant

Plant Height Height Means Height Means
TREATMENT
DRY SEASON
(cm) WET SEASON 2019
2019-2020
NSIC Rc222 check 101 101.00 b 119.00
NSIC Rc400 105 105.17 ab 113.83
NSIC Rc442 103 108.33 a 119.67
NSIC Rc506 99 93.00 c 118.67
NSIC Rc508 97 89.33 c 116.32
NSIC Rc510 105 109.83 a 116.84
NSIC Rc512 92 81.00 d 117.79
NSIC Rc514 95 81.17 d 120.99
ANOVA Result * NS
CV% 3.78 3.76
Means with the same letter are not significantly different.
*Significant at 5%
NS-Not Significant
Table 1. presents the comparison of plant height in centimetres during Wet Season and
Dry Season Cropping. Data showed that NSIC Rc510 registered the highest plant height mean of
109.83 followed by NSIC Rc442 with 108.33 cm. These were followed by NSIC Rc400, NSIC
Rc222 check, NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc514 with a mean plant height of 105.17cm,
101cm, 93cm,89.33cm and 81.17. The shortest plant height was obtained by NSIC Rc512.
Analysis of Variance shows that there is a significant difference among treatment means.
Further analysis using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) revealed that NSIC Rc510 is
significantly different over NSIC Rc222, NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc512 and NSIC
Rc514, however, comparable to NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc400.
Data during Dry season showed that NSIC Rc514 exhibited the highest plant height
followed by NSIC Rc442, however when subjected to ANOVA, results are showed no
significant differences among treatment means. This indicate that plant height of the eight entries
are comparable.
Graph 1: Registered Plant Height and Actual Plant Height on Wet Season 2019 and Dry
Season 2019-2020 at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Plant Height of Eight Inbred Rice Varieties during Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season, 2019-2020
at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
NSIC Rc222 NSIC Rc400 NSIC Rc442 NSIC Rc506 NSIC Rc508 NSIC Rc510 NSIC Rc512 NSIC Rc514
check
Registered Plant Heigth Actual Plant Height Means WS 2019 Actual Plant Height Means DS 2019
Graph 1. presents the registered and actual plant height gathered during Wet and Dry
Season. Based on the graph presented, all of the varieties increased in height (cm) during Dry
Season cropping wherein NSIC Rc514 registered the tallest variety while NSIC Rc510 for Wet
Season cropping.
Data gathered on plant height at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino showed that some of the
varieties is greater than the Registered Plant Height.
TABLE 2: Comparison of Plant height (cm) at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino for Wet
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Registered Actual Plant Actual Plant

Plant Height Height Means Height Means
TREATMENT
DRY SEASON
(cm) WET SEASON 2019
2019-2020
NSIC Rc222 check 101 103.83 bcd 120.13
NSIC Rc300 98 109.17 ab 124.00
NSIC Rc442 103 114.67 ab 114.27
NSIC Rc506 99 107.67 abc 125.4
NSIC Rc508 97 105.00 bcd 119.53
NSIC Rc510 105 118.17 a 116.6
NSIC Rc512 92 94.67 d 121.00
NSIC Rc514 95 96.17 cd 120.13
ANOVA Result * NS
5.79 4.2
*Significant at 5%
NS-Not Significant
Table 2. presents the comparison of plant height in centimetre at San Antonio, Diffun,
Quirino. Likewise, data revealed that NSIC Rc510 is the highest among the treatment with a
mean of 118.17cm, followed by NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc300 FV, NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508,
NSIC Rc222 and NSIC Rc514 with a mean of 114.67cm, 109.17cm, 107.67cm,
105cm,103.83cm, 96.17cm. The shortest in terms of height is noted on NSIC Rc512 with a mean
of 94.67cm.
Further Analysis using DMRT showed that, NSIC Rc510 is the tallest variety and it is
significantly different over NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc222 check, NSIC Rc514 and NSIC Rc512 but
found comparable to NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc300 FV and NSIC Rc506.
Analysis of Variance on plant height during Dry Season cropping showed that there was
no significant difference among the treatment means. This implied that the plant height of the
eight entries are comparable.
Graph 2: Registered Plant Height and Actual Plant Height on Wet Season 2019 and Dry
Season 2019-2020 at San Antonio,Diffun, Quirino.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Plant Height of Eight Inbred Rice Varieties During Wet Season 2019 and Dry
Season 2019-2020 at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
check
Registered Plant Height Actual Plant Height Means WS 2019

Actual Plant Height Means DS 2019-2020
Graph 2. presents the registered and actual plant height during Wet and Dry Season
Cropping, 2019. As shown from the graph are varieties that perform well during Dry Season as
compared to Wet Season. These varieties are NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc510, NSIC
Rc512, NSIC Rc514 and NSIC Rc222 check.
During the Wet Season, NSIC Rc300 FV and NSIC Rc442 are the tallest.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
TABLE 3: Comparison of Number of Productive Tillers at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino

for Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020
Actual No. of Actual No. of

Productive Tillers Productive Tillers
Registered
TREATMENT Means Means
No. of Tillers
WET SEASON DRY SEASON 2019-
2019 2020
NSIC Rc222 check 14 13 11
NSIC Rc400 15 14 10
NSIC Rc442 14 14 13
NSIC Rc506 13 14 10
NSIC Rc508 14 13 10
NSIC Rc510 13 11 10
NSIC Rc512 13 14 14
NSIC Rc514 13 12 12
ANOVA Result NS NS
CV% 12.23 17.94
*Significant at 5%
NS-Not Significant
Data on the number of productive tillers at San Francisco, Aglipay showed that there
were more productive tillers counted during the Wet Season cropping than the Dry Season
cropping.
NSIC Rc400 FV, NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc506 have produced 14 productive tillers,
likewise on NSIC RC512 that produces the same number of productive tillers both for Wet and
Dry Season cropping, while NSIC Rc222 and NSIC Rc508 produced a total of 13 productive
tillers followed by NSIC Rc514 with 12 productive tillers. NSIC Rc510 recorded the highest
plant height but lowest in terms of productive tillers with a mean of 11. However, Analysis of
Variance showed that varieties tested are insignificantly different.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Graph 3: Registered Tillers and Actual Productive Tillers of Eight Inbred Varieties during
Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020 at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino
Productive Tillers of Eight Inbred Rice Varieties during Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season,
2019-2020 at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino.
16
14
12
10
0
check
Registered No. of Tillers Actual No. of Productive Tillers Means (WS 2019)
Actual No. of Productive Tillers Means (DS 2019)
Based from the graph presented, it was observed that all of the inbred varieties tested
produced more tillers during 2019Wet Season Cropping.
TABLE 4: Comparison of Number of Productive Tillers at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino

Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
for Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020.

Actual No. of Actual No. of
Productive Tillers Productive Tillers
Registered
TREATMENT Means Means
No. of Tillers
WET SEASON DRY SEASON 2019-
2019 2020
NSIC Rc222 check 14 13 12
NSIC Rc300 15 13 13
NSIC Rc442 14 14 11
NSIC Rc506 13 12 14
NSIC Rc508 14 16 15
NSIC Rc510 13 14 11
NSIC Rc512 13 11 13
NSIC Rc514 13 13 13
ANOVA Result NS NS
CV% 8.2 14.21
*Significant at 5%
NS-Not Significant
Data on the number of productive tillers at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino showed that
during Wet Season cropping, NSIC Rc508 produced the highest number of productive tillers
with mean of 16, followed by NSIC RC442 and NSIC Rc510. Next in rank are varieties; NSIC
Rc222 check, NSIC Rc300 FV and NSIC Rc514 with 12 productive tillers. Least productive
tillers were noted on NSIC Rc512 with a mean of 11.
During Dry Season Cropping, NSIC Rc508 produced the highest tillers with 15 followed
by NSIC Rc506 with 14 productive tillers. NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc510 recorded the least
productive tillers.
ANOVA revealed that number of productive tillers both conducted on Wet and Dry
Season cropping exhibited comparable effect with each other.
Graph 4: Registered Tillers and Actual Productive Tillers of Eight Inbred Varieties at San
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Antonio, Diffun, Quirino during Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020.
Productive Tillers of Eight Inbred Rice Varieties during Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-
2020.
18
16
14
12
10
0
check
Registered No. of Tillers Actual No. of Productive Tillers Means (WS 2019)
Actual No. of Productive Tillers Means (DS 2019)
NSIC Rc222 check, NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc508 and NSIC Rc510 produce more tillers
during 2019 Wet Season cropping while NSIC Rc512 and NSIC Rc506 have more tiller during
Dry Season cropping.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
TABLE 5: Comparison of Yield per Hectare (kg) at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino for
Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020.
Actual Yield per Actual Yield per
Hectare (kg) Means Hectare (kg) Means
TREATMENT Potential Yield
DRY SEASON 2019-
WET SEASON 2019
2020
NSIC Rc222 check 10T/Ha 4,605.27 bc 5,954.96 bc
NSIC Rc400 9.5T/Ha 4,501.37 bc 7,376.26 ab
NSIC Rc442 10.8T/Ha 4666.00 bc 7,466.37 ab
NSIC Rc506 10.0T/Ha 6,151.49 a 5,935.33 bc
NSIC Rc508 10.4T/Ha 5,179.25 abc 5,032.75 c
NSIC Rc510 10.3T/Ha 5,489.08 ab 4,862.91 c
NSIC Rc512 10.2T/Ha 4,521.24 bc 7,991.86 a
NSIC Rc514 9.9T/Ha 3,827.18 c 7,503.29 ab
ANOVA Result * *
CV% 10.25 14.60
*Significant at 5%
NS-Not Significant
Table 5. presents the comparison of yield per hectare (kg) at San Francisco, Aglipay,
Quirino. Data Showed that NSIC Rc506 obtained the highest yield with 6,151.49 kg/hectare
followed by NSIC Rc510, NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc222 check, NSIC Rc512 and
NSIC Rc400 FV with a mean yield of 5,489.08kg/hectare, 5,179.25kg/hectare,
4,666.00kg/hectare,4,605.27kg/hectare, 4,521.24kg/hectare and 4,501.37 kg/hectare respectively.
Analysis of Variance of yield during Wet Season showed that there were significant
differences between treatment means. Further Analysis using DMRT revealed that NSIC Rc506
is significantly different to NSIC Rc222 check, NSIC Rc400 FV, NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc512 and
NSIC Rc514, while showed no significant differences on NSIC RC510 and NSIC Rc508.
For the Dry Season cropping, significant differences were also observed to NSIC Rc512
the highest yielding variety with a mean yield of 7,991.86 kg per hectare over NSIC RC222
check with 5,954.96kg/hectare, NSIC Rc506 with 6,151.49kg/hectare, NSIC Rc508 with
5,179.25kg/hectare and NSIC Rc510 with 5,489.08kg/hectare however, NSIC Rc512 showed no
significant differences to NSIC Rc400 with 7,376.26kg/hectare, NSIC Rc442 with
7,466.37kg/hectare and NSIC Rc514 with 7,503.29kg/hectare.
Graph 5: Potential Yield per Hectare and the Actual Yield per Hectare of 8 Inbred Rice
Varieties during Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020 at San Francisco, Aglipay,
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Quirino.
Yield of Eight Inbred Rice Varieties During Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season
2019-2020 at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino.
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
check
Potential Average Yield Actual Yield per Hectare (kg) Means (WS,2019)
Actual Yield per Hectare (kg) Means (DS 2019)
Figure 5. present the graph on potential average yield per hectare and actual yield per
hectare at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino. Graph showed that NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508, NSIC
Rc510 perform better during Wet Season cropping than Dry Season Cropping.
TABLE 6: Comparison of Yield Per Hectare (kg)at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino for Wet
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Actual Yield per Actual Yield per

Hectare (kg) Means Hectare (kg) Means
TREATMENTS Potential Yield
DRY SEASON 2019-
WET SEASON 2019
2020
NSIC Rc222 check 10T/Ha 5,154.25 bc 5,699.78 cd
NSIC Rc300 10.4T/Ha 5,744.32 ab 4,983.23 d
NSIC Rc442 10.8T/Ha 5,878.58 ab 5,570.61 cd
NSIC Rc506 10.0T/Ha 5,988.78 a 6,709.09 b
NSIC Rc508 10.4T/Ha 5,961.55 a 7,589.87 a
NSIC Rc510 10.3T/Ha 5,995.84 a 6,460.42 b
NSIC Rc512 10.2T/Ha 5,401.58 abc 5,572.13 cd
NSIC Rc514 9.9T/Ha 4,969.91 c 6133.53 bc
ANOVA Result * *
CV% 6.67 6.31
*Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

*Significant at 5%
NS-Not Significant
Table 6. presents the yield per hectare (kg) at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino. Based on the
result of the study during Wet Season cropping, NSIC Rc510 was the highest yielding entries
with a mean of 5,995.84kg/hectare and it is comparable to NSIC RC506, NSIC Rc508, NSIC
Rc442, NSIC Rc300FV and NSIC Rc512 with a mean yield of 5,988.78kg, 5,961.55kg,
5,878.58kg, 5,744.32kg, 5,401.58kg/hectare but significantly different to NSIC Rc222 check and
NSIC 514 with a mean yield of 5,154.25kg/hectare and 4,969.91kg/hectare.
For Dry Season cropping, significant differences were also observed. NSIC Rc508 is
recorded as the highest yielder with a mean yield of 7,589.87 kg/hectare and it is significantly
different among the seven varieties that includes, NSIC Rc506 (6,709.09kg/hectare), NSIC
Rc510 (6,460.42kg/hectare), NSIC Rc514 (6133.53/hectare), NSIC Rc222 check
(5,699.78kg/hectare), NSIC Rc442 (5,570.61kg/hectare), NSIC Rc512 (5,572.13kg/hectare) and
NSIC Rc300FV with a mean of 4,983.23 kg/hectare.
Graph 6: Potential Yield per Hectare and the Actual Yield per Hectare of 8 Inbred Rice
Varieties during Wet and Dry Season,2019 at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Yield per Hectare of 8 Inbred Rice Varieties during Wet and Dry Season,2019 at San
Antonio, Diffun, Quirino.
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
check
Potential Average Yield Actual Yield per Hectare (kg) Means (WS,2019)
Actual Yield per Hectare (kg) Means (DS 2019)
Graph 6. presents the potential average yield per hectare and actual yield per hectare at
San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino. Based on the graph presented, there is an increase in the yield of
six varieties during the Dry Season except for NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc300. It was recorded
that NSIC Rc510 obtain the highest yield during the Wet Season cropping while NSIC Rc508 for
the Dry Season cropping.
Preferential Analysis
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Preference data was gathered during the conduct of Wet Season field days when majority
of the entries are 85-90% mature at two experimental sites located at San Francisco, Aglipay,
Quirino and San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino. Date of field days were; October 17, 2019 for
Aglipay site and October 27, 2019 for Diffun site. Overall, the preferential analysis was
participated by 53 farmers, researchers and Agricultural Extension Workers.
The activity was done first by inviting the group of farmers in the field allowing them to
vote for their preferred varieties and list down the traits they observed for that entries. After
which, the votes are tallied and ask why they preferred the varieties receiving the most votes.
Result of Preferential Analysis with rank and reason why they choose those varieties was
detailed on Table 7. Based from the result of conducted preferential analysis, NSIC RC506 is the
most preferred varieties by farmers both at San Antonio, Diffun and San Francisco, Aglipay,
Quirino that can yield 6.1 MT/Ha. They choose these variety because it has a characteristic of
uniformity in growth, more productive tillers and produce long and more grains. Next in rank is
NSIC Rc510 with a characteristic of long panicles and more spikelets, with good standing and
can yield 5.9MT/ha. On the other hand, differ variety was chosen as the top three preferred
varieties of farmers, for San Antonio they preferred both NSIC Rc512 and NSIC RC222 check
variety while NSIC RC442 at San Francisco, Aglipay. NSIC RC222 check and NSIC Rc512 as
describe by the farmers have a good standing and produces more tillers while NSIC Rc442
produces more tillers and grains.
For Dry Season cropping, there were no preference data gathered due to the amidst of
COVID 19 pandemic.
Table 7: Average Yield per Hectare and Preference Rank during 2019 Wet Season
Cropping.
Sensory Evaluation
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Sensory Evaluation was conducted and evaluated by 15 farmers and researchers last May
21, 2020. Top three high yielding variety and top three preferred by farmers during the conduct
of field walk can be used in the evaluation, however four varieties were used in the sensory.
These varieties were NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508 and NSIC Rc510.
Based from the result of the evaluation, in terms of Aroma and Flavor NSIC Rc508 top
among the three varieties with 0.18 preference score followed by NSIC RC510 with 0.13
preference score and NSIC Rc506 with -0.15 preference score.
Likewise, for Tenderness and Moistness, NSIC Rc508 is the most accepted by almost of
all the respondents followed by NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc510 and NSIC Rc442.
Still, in terms of stickiness, NSIC Rc508 obtained the highest votes followed by NSIC
Rc506 and NSIC Rc442 while NSIC Rc510 are loose when cooked.
Overall preference based on the three traits mention showed that, NSIC Rc508 is the
most preferred by the panelist, followed by NSIC Rc510, NSIC Rc442. NSIC Rc506. NSIC
Rc506 possess a distinct characteristic such as scented, soft when eaten and sticky when cooked.
Significant Findings
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
1. Based on the data gathered and analysed, NSIC Rc506 with a yield of 6,151.49
kg/hectare; NSIC Rc510 with 489.08kg/hectare and NSIC Rc508 with a yield of
5,179.25kg/hectare performed best at Aglipay condition during Wet Season cropping.
NSIC Rc512, NSIC Rc400 FV, NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc514 for Dry Season
Cropping with a yield of 7,991.86kg/hectare, 7,376.26kg/hectare, 7,466.37kg/hectare
and 7,503.29kg/hectare.
2. For Diffun condition, varieties such as NSIC Rc510, NSIC Rc506, NSIC Rc508,
NSIC Rc442 and NSIC Rc300Fv are best grown during Wet Season cropping with a
mean yield of 5,995.84kg/hectare, 5,988.78kg/hectare, 5,961.55kg/hectare,
5,878.58kg/hectare and 5,744.32kg/hectare respectively. NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc506
and NSIC Rc510 are best grown during Dry Season cropping with a yield of
7,589.87kg/hectare, 6,709.09kg/hectare, 6,460.42kg/hectare
3. Result of Preferential Analysis showed that, NSIC Rc506 is the most preferred
varieties by farmers on both Aglipay and Diffun condition that can yield to 6.1
MT/Ha, followed by NSIC Rc510 with a yield of 5.9MT/ha. Top three preferred
varieties of farmers are NSIC Rc512 and NSIC RC222 for San Antonio while NSIC
RC442 at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino. Characteristics that farmers like much on
NSIC Rc506 are uniformity in growth, more productive tillers and can produce long
and more grains. Long panicles, more spikelet and with good standing are traits
describe on NSIC Rc510, while good standing of crop and with more tillers are
attributes found on NSIC Rc512 and NSIC 222 check variety. NSIC Rc442 on the
other hand have more productive tillers and grains.
4. For the Sensory Evaluation, Overall preference based on the three traits; Tenderness
& Moistness; Aroma & Flavor and Stickiness showed that, NSIC Rc508 is the most
preferred by the panelist of farmers and researchers, followed by NSIC Rc510 and
NSIC Rc442. NSIC Rc506 is the least preferred by the group of evaluators.
Recommendation
Those preferred varieties should be recommended for seed production or

multiplication for areas under Quirino growing condition and other similar areas.
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
COMPARISON OF MEANS FOR WET SEASON CROPPING
Table 1: Comparison of Plant Height (cm) at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino (WS 2019)
---------------------------------------------------------------
Treatment means N group
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 101.00 b
NSIC Rc400 105.17 ab
NSIC Rc442 108.33 a
NSIC Rc506 93.00 c
NSIC Rc508 89.33 c
NSIC Rc510 109.83 a
NSIC Rc512 81.00 d
NSIC Rc514 81.17 d
----------------------------------------------------------------
CV(%)= 3.78
----------------------------------------------------------------
Using DMRT to compare means, NSIC Rc510 has the highest plant height (109.83cm)
and is significantly different to the other varieties but not to NSIC Rc442 (108.33cm) and NSIC
Rc400 (105.17 cm). Lowest plant height is observed on NSIC Rc512 with 81 cm.
Table 2: Comparison of Plant Heigth (cm) at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (WS 2019)
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 103.83 bcd
NSIC Rc506 107.67 abc
NSIC Rc508 105.00 bcd
NSIC Rc510 118.17 a
NSIC Rc512 94.67 d
NSIC Rc514 96.17 cd
----------------------------------------------------------------
CV (%) = 5.79
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc510 obtained the highest plant height of 118.17cm and is significantly different
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
to other varieties except with NSIC Rc300 (109.17 cm), NSIC Rc506 (107.67) and NSIC Rc442
(114.67cm). Likewise, NSIC Rc512 was observed with the lowest mean height of 94 cm.
Table 3: Comparison of Plant Height (cm) at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino and San
Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (DS 2020)
----------------------------------------------------------
Treatment Means Means
San Antonio San Francisco
----------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 120.13 119
NSIC Rc300/400 fv 124.00 113.83
NSIC Rc442 114.27 119.67
NSIC Rc506 125.40 118.67
NSIC Rc508 119.53 116.32
NSIC Rc510 116.60 116.84
NSIC Rc512 121.00 117.79
NSIC Rc514 120.13 120.99
-----------------------------------------------------------
CV%=4.20 CV%=3.76
-----------------------------------------------------------
Table 4: Comparison of Number of Productive Tillers at San Francisco, Aglipay and San
Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (WS 2019)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(San Francisco) (San Antonio)
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 12.83 13.33

NSIC Rc400/300 13.67 12.83
NSIC Rc442 13.83 13.50
NSIC Rc506 13.67 11.67
NSIC Rc508 12.83 15.50
NSIC Rc510 11.00 13.67
NSIC Rc512 14.17 10.50
NSIC Rc514 11.67 12.67
----------------------------------------------------------------
CV(%)=12.23 CV(%)=8.2
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc512 has the greatest number of tillers among other varieties with 14.17 no. of
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
tiller for San Francisco, Aglipay while NSIC Rc508 with 15.50 no. of tiller for San
Antonio,Diffun, however result on the Anaysis of Variance shows no significant difference
among treatment means.
Table 5: Comparison of Number of Productive Tillers at San Francisco, Aglipay and San
Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (DS 2019)
----------------------------------------------------------------
(San Antonio) (San Francisco)
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 11.80 10.87
NSIC Rc300 fv 13.00 9.93
NSIC Rc442 11.07 13.33
NSIC Rc506 13.60 10.07
NSIC Rc508 15.33 10.13
NSIC Rc510 11.40 10.27
NSIC Rc512 12.73 13.60
NSIC Rc514 12.73 11.60
----------------------------------------------------------------
CV%=14.21 CV%=17.94
----------------------------------------------------------------
Table
Table 6: Comparison of Yield per hectare (kg) at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino (WS
2019)
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 4605.27 bc
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
NSIC Rc400 4501.37 bc

NSIC Rc442 4666.00 bc
NSIC Rc506 6151.49 a
NSIC Rc510 5489.08 ab
NSIC Rc512 4521.24 bc
NSIC Rc514 3827.18 c
----------------------------------------------------------------
CV (%) = 10.5
----------------------------------------------------------------
In terms of yield per hectare, NSIC RC506 have the greatest yield with 6,161.49
kilograms and it is significantly different with NSIC Rc442, NSIC Rc222, NSIC Rc400, NSIC
Rc512 and NSIC Rc514, however yield of NSIC Rc506 is comparable to NSIC Rc508 and NSIC
Rc510.
Table 7: Comparison of Yield per hectare (kg) at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (WS 2019)
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 5154.25 bc
NSIC Rc300 5744.32 ab
NSIC Rc442 5878.58 ab
NSIC Rc506 5988.78 a
NSIC Rc508 5961.55 a
NSIC Rc510 5995.84 a
NSIC Rc514 4969.91 c
----------------------------------------------------------------
CV (%) = 6.67
----------------------------------------------------------------
Pairwise mean comparison using DMRT revealed that NSIC Rc510 produced the highest
yield and it is comparable to NSIC Rc506 followed by NSIC Rc508, NSIC Rc442, NSIC RC
Rc300. The lowest yield was attained by NSIC Rc222 and NSIC Rc514.
Table 8: Comparison of Yield per hectare (kg) at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino (DS
2019)
------------------------------------------
Tel. Nos. 844-1331/1328 Fax Nos. 844-1031
------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 Check 5954.96 bc
NSIC Rc400 fv 7376.26 ab
NSIC Rc442 7466.37 ab
NSIC Rc506 5935.33 bc
NSIC Rc508 5032.75 c
NSIC Rc510 4862.91 c
NSIC Rc512 7991.86 a
NSIC Rc514 7503.29 ab
------------------------------------------
Table 9: Comparison of Yield per hectare (kg) at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino (DS 2019)
------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------
NSIC Rc222 check 5699.78 cd
NSIC Rc300 fv 4983.23 d
NSIC Rc442 5570.61 cd
NSIC Rc506 6709.09 b
NSIC Rc508 7589.87 a
NSIC Rc510 6460.42 b
NSIC Rc512 5572.13 cd
NSIC Rc514 6133.53 bc
------------------------------------------

Next-Gen Plus Participatory Performance Testing and Validation in Quirino Province

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Next-Gen Plus Participatory Performance Testing and Validation in Quirino Province

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

1. Project Title : NEXTGEN-PLUS PARTICIPATORY PERFORMANCE

A. PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTION (PVS)

4. Project Duration : January, 2019- December, 2020

5. Project Site (s)

7. R & D Agenda to be Addressed:

8. Expected Technology/Information: Appropriate Variety for specific ecosystem

9. Description of Technology/Information: Varietal Trial

10. Potential Impact of the Information/Technology: Technically, use of appropriate

11. Type of Research (Basic, Applied, Policy etc): Development research

Rice productivity is everyone’s concern to attain rice self-sufficiency. Efforts made by

Rice varieties released as of 2016 totalled to 274 varieties breakdown to 81 irrigated

by farmers are seed produced to ensure availability of seeds for farmers.

To accelerate the introduction and adoption of next-generation rice varieties with

a. To introduce and demonstrate the performance of newly released rice varieties in

The project follows the input-process-output concept as shown in Figure 1. The

*Area for the *Evaluation of the PVS *Farmers adoption on

Figure 1. Conceptual Framework

PARTICIPATORY VARIETAL SELECTIONS (PVS)

PPTV_RM is a replicated trial conducted in a farmer’s field and essentially

Research Target Sites (No.) Dry Season Wet Season

Number of Entries and Check Varieties for Quirino

Entry Breeding Maturity

Site 1: San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino

Rep. I Rep.2 Rep.3 Rep.1 Rep.2 Rep.3

Wet Season Lay-Out Dry Season Lay-out

Site 2: San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino

Rep. I Rep.II Rep.III Rep.I Rep.II Rep.III

Wet Season Lay-out Dry Season Lay-Out

Nursery Establishment and Management

Times Fertilizer Recommendation

1.0 bags/ha 0-0-60 at 1.0 bags/ha 0-0-60 at bag 0-0-60

Harvesting and Determination of Yield

Agronomic data to be collected:

OBSERVATION AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

Occurrence of Insect Pests and Diseases

Number of Days to Fifty Percent Flowering.

Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020

Registered Actual Plant Actual Plant

Registered Actual Plant Actual Plant

Registered Plant Height Actual Plant Height Means WS 2019

TABLE 3: Comparison of Number of Productive Tillers at San Francisco, Aglipay, Quirino

Actual No. of Actual No. of

TABLE 4: Comparison of Number of Productive Tillers at San Antonio, Diffun, Quirino

for Wet Season 2019 and Dry Season 2019-2020.

Actual Yield per Actual Yield per

*Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Those preferred varieties should be recommended for seed production or

COMPARISON OF MEANS FOR WET SEASON CROPPING

NSIC Rc222 check 12.83 13.33

NSIC Rc400 4501.37 bc

You might also like

Area for the Evaluation of the PVS *Farmers adoption on