SOM KeithBoswell2 PDF

HIGH RISE DESIGN WORKSHOP
C. KEITH BOSWELL
TECHNICAL DESIGN PARTNER
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL
SAN FRANCISCO CALIFORNIA
GPD HELSINKI
HELSINKI FINLAND
27 JULY 2017
Finnish Architects Forum- 350 Mission Street 75 Howard Street
Example Works
1) Holistic Design – Balanced
2) High Rise-Definition
US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses
Office / Residential / Civic / others
4) High Rise Design is inside to out

Core elements
Lease spans / Floor Uses
Floor to Floor Heights
Stuff in Plenum
5) Exterior enclosure
Performance Criteria
6) Public spaces
Engagement in the Urban Fabric
7) Longevity
GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP
Finnish Architects Forum- Poly International Plaza Los Angeles Federal Courthouse
Topics for discussion
US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses

Core elements
Stuff in Plenum
6) Public spaces
7) Longevity

Finnish Architects Forum-
US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses

Core elements
visual
Stuff in Plenum
performance
6) Public spaces
7) Longevity

US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses

Core elements
performance
Stuff in Plenum
visual
6) Public spaces
7) Longevity

HIGH RISE DESIGN
1) Holistic Design - Balanced
US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses

Core elements
visual
Stuff in Plenum
performance
visual
performance
6) Public spaces
7) Longevity

HIGH RISE DESIGN
US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses

Core elements
Stuff in Plenum
visual
performance
6) Public spaces
7) Longevity

HIGH RISE DESIGN
US/ASIA/EUROPE
3) Building Uses

Core elements
Stuff in Plenum
visual
performance
6) Public spaces
7) Longevity

HIGH RISE DESIGN
1) Holistic Design - Balanced HOLISTIC BALANCED DESIGN

Design is more than visual appearance. Holistic–or complete - design
US/ASIA/EUROPE consists of equal parts visual composition and performance. This
3) Building Uses
integration of composition and performance is achieved through a
Office / Residential / Civic / others collaborative, sometimes elusive, and always iterative process.
Core elements High performance design is the application and careful balance of
Floor to Floor Heights performance principles and the art of composition. It is the integration
Stuff in Plenum
of physics and the science of materials. It requires a basic understanding
5) Exterior enclosure of building and construction sequencing. It is in this intersection of
science, art, materials, and construction where design and technology,
6) Public spaces art, and science become architecture. Beauty is more than skin deep.
7) Longevity

HIGH RISE DESIGN
Enclosure Topics for discussion
1) Exterior enclosure - Visual Criteria

2) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria – all jobs
A) System Structure
B) Building Structure
C) Air Infiltration
D) Water Management
E) Thermal
F) Daylight
G) Fire Resistance
3) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria – select jobs

A) Seismic
B) Acoustics
C) Higher Pressures
D) Security

HIGH RISE DESIGN
Finnish Architects Forum- SOM High Rise
1970 1974 1999 2009 2010 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012
约翰•汉考克中心威利斯大厦(原西尔斯大厦) 金茂大厦特朗普国际酒店大厦哈利法塔紫峰大厦中国国际贸易中心阿尔•哈姆拉大厦天津环球金融中心珠江城大厦
JOHN HANCOCK CENTER WILLIS TOWER JIN MAO TOWER TRUMP INTERNATIONAL BURJ KHALIFA ZIFENG TOWER CHINA WORLD AL HAMRA TOWER TIANJIN PEARL RIVER
(FORMERLY SEARS TOWER) HOTEL & TOWER TRADE CENTER GLOBAL FINANCIAL CENTER TOWER
芝加哥 Chicago 芝加哥 Chicago 上海 Shanghai 芝加哥 Chicago 迪拜 Dubai 南京 Nanjing 北京 Beijing 科威特 Kuwait 天津 Tianjin 广州 Guangzhou
344 米 M 442 米 M 421 米 M 423 米 M 828 米 M 450 米 M 330 米 M 413 米 M 337 米 M 310 米 M
2013 2014 2015 2015 2016 2016 2017 2017 2018 2020
GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017 卡延塔世界贸易中心1号大厦白玉兰广场南昌绿地紫峰大厦天津周大福金融中心釜山乐天世界大厦绿地集团苏州吴江中心深业贵州文化广场滨河印尼国家石油和天
CAYAN TOWER ONE WORLD WHITE JIANGXI NANCHANG TIANJIN CTF FINANCE BUSAN LOTTE GREENLAND GROUP SHUM YIP GUIZHOU CULTURE PLAZA 然气开采公司能源大厦
SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP TRADE CENTER MAGNOLIA PLAZA GREENLAND ZIFENG TOWER CENTRE TOWN TOWER SUZHOU CENTER RIVERFRONT PERTAMINA ENERGY TOWER
迪拜 Dubai 纽约 New York 上海 Shanghai 南昌 Nanchang 天津 Tianjin 釜山 Busan 吴江 Wujiang 深圳 Shenzhen 贵阳 Guiyang 雅加达 Jakarta
307 米 M 541 米 M 320 米 M 268 米 M 530 米 M 510 米 M 341 米 M 389 米 M 540 米 M 523 米 M
HIGH RISE DESIGN
Finnish Architects Forum- SOM High Rise Asia
SOM在中国项目 –著名的超高塔楼
SOM PROJECTS IN CHINA – WELL-KNOWN LANDMARK TOWERS

High Rise
1) Define high rise-US/ASIA/EUROPE
A. United States: INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC SECTION 403) Every building of ANY
TYPE of construction or occupancy having floors used for human occupancy located more
than 75’’-0” (22.86 meters) above the lowest floor level having building access ( grade)
B. China: GBT 50045 95: High-rise buildings shall be classified according to their use, fire hazard
and the difficulty in dispersal and rescue. A commercial building with an occupied floor more
than 24 meters above the lowest grade. Residential 10 floors (type II) or 19 floors (type I) or
more above grade.
C. United Kingdom: FIRE REGULATIONS (Part B of the Building Regulations) define ‘tall buildings’
as “buildings with a floor at 18m or more above fire & rescue service vehicle access level”:
Essentially this marks the shift from buildings where firefighting is from outside (with
portable ladders and hoses) to those where firefighting is from inside (with firefighting lifts
and stairs, dry or wet risers etc.). London used to have additional fire precautions (LDSA
‘Section 20’) starting for buildings “with a storey or part of a storey at a greater height than
30m [from street level]” which increased the requirements regarding smoke extract, fire
control centres and high fire risk areas. This code is now withdrawn, but still used as a
starting point for fire engineering discussions.
D. In Switzerland ‘batiment élevé’ is defined in the AEAI/VKF Fire Codes 1007-03 as one “where
the upper level is more than 22m above the adjacent ground level used by firefighters, or
more than 25m to the cornice line” (my translation).
E. in Moscow the fire code had special provisions for buildings of more than 50m height (from
Ground Level) and also a true ‘high-rise’ code for buildings of more than 75m height. At first
we were mystified how the Moscow code assumed firefighting from outside up to 75m high,
but a quick google demonstrated that they have some huge fire trucks in Moscow!
Moral of story---
Fire fighter access and requirements for life safety set out specific design
requirements for high rise buildings

Moral of story---
Fire fighter access and requirements for life safety set out specific design
requirements for high rise buildings

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
Owner:: Kilroy Realty Corporation
Project Phase: Recently Completed
SOM Project Team:

Craig Hartman Keith Boswell
Steve Sobel Michael Fukutome
Eric Cole Michael Temple
Consultant Team:
Structure - SOM
M/E/P/FP - WSP
Landscape - Tom Leader
Elevators - Edgett Williams
Enclosure Systems:
Tower: Custom Unitized curtainwall
Lobby: Unitized curtain wall on
suspended steel
Performance principles:
Tower: Pressure Equalized Rain Screen
Lobby: Barrier
Timeline: 2008-2016

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
GPD FINLAND JUNE 28 – 30 2017

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

1) Tower-Texture
2) Tower-Daylight deep into office spaces
3) Lobby-Maximum transparency
4) Lobby-Connect inside to public
A) System Structure
C) Air Infiltration
D) Water Management
E) Thermal
F) Daylight
G) Fire Resistance

A) Seismic
B) Acoustics
C) Higher Pressures
D) Security

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

1) Tower-Texture
2) Tower-Daylight deep into office spaces
3) Lobby-Maximum transparency
4) Lobby-Connect inside to public
A) System Structure
C) Air Infiltration
D) Water Management
E) Thermal
F) Daylight
G) Fire Resistance

A) Seismic
B) Acoustics
C) Higher Pressures
D) Security

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
11’-0” CLEAR
10’-4” CLEAR (with exposed ceiling)
(with exposed ceiling)

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

350 MISSION STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
Owner:: Paramount Group Inc.
Project Phase: Construction Documents
SOM Project Team:

Steve Sobel Mark Schwettmann
John Kuchen Lisa Follman
Consultant Team:
Structure - SOM
M/E/P/FP - Meyers Plus
Enclosure Systems:
Lobby: Unitized curtain wall on
suspended steel
Lobby: Barrier
Timeline: May 2008-Present

75 howard
75 HOWARD STREET SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
STEUART STREET
RINCON
CENTER
HOWARD STREET
SF DPW
PARCEL
201 75 HOWARD
SPEAR
SPEAR STREET
GAP BUILDING

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
stacked gardens
tall buildings usually zoning limits the volume the opportunity of the tower 75 Howard creates a series these horizontal and vertical
start with an efficient in sometimes is the multiplication of the of constructed grounds, voids naturally divide the
volume unfortunate ways ground plane capturing outdoor space building into groups of units

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
Form
200’ ILLUSTRATIVE
MASSING
PRIMARY FORM + TERRACE SLOTS + BALCONY SLOTS + ARTICULATED FORM = 75 HOWARD

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
Massing Comparison Volume Analysis

The proposed project has less volume than either 100% bulk compliant The bulk exceptions requested for the upper tower are significantly less than
envelope the area removed from the lower tower and base.
200’ ILLUSTRATIVE 220’ ILLUSTRATIVE 220’ DESIGN 200’ ILLUSTRATIVE 220’ ILLUSTRATIVE 220’ DESIGN
MASSING MASSING 292,864 SF MASSING MASSING 292,864 SF
316,013 SF 330,393 SF 316,013 SF 330,393 SF
11,888 SF 10,322 SF 12,787 SF 11,888 SF 10,322 SF 12,787 SF

16,065 SF 16,065 SF 14,295 SF 16,065 SF 16,065 SF 14,295 SF
20,904
GPD FINLAND SF
HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017 20,904 SF 16,964 SF 20,904 SF 20,904 SF 16,964 SF
TOP OF BUILDING
75 HOWARD STREET Due to the low total height, a large single setback at 160’ does
SAN FRANCISCO, not contribute to slenderness; rather it emphasizes the broad
CALIFORNIA horizontality of the base.
ADDITIONAL SETBACKS
The top two floors of 75 Howard and the integrated roof screen
Compliance set back further from the north to add visual interest to the
termination of the building.
INTEREST AT SKYLINE
Rather than a set-back top which recedes from the skyline, the
lightweight and highly transparent extension of the upper tower
creates more interest at the sky, with a balance of transparency to the
sky and sun and the vertical extension of the building form. The
transition of the recessed vertical balcony to a complete slot creates a
distinct figure at the sky.
SLENDERNESS
Alternating vertical lines use setbacks to
emphasize slenderness
STACKED MASSING
Horizontal terraces break up the mass, creating a
more slender form.
PEDESTRIAN SCALE
A reduced podium height relates to pedestrian scale and
contributes to vertical reading of stacked trays.
Compared to the 220’ bulk envelope, the proposed project

uses more proportionally balanced compositions of vertical
and horizontal relief to achieve a better design. The intentions
220’ ILLUSTRATIVE MASSING 75 HOWARD (220’) of both Sections 272 and 263.9 are fulfilled and the overall
volume is smaller than the fully bulk-compliant 220’ version by
11.5%.
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO, 220’-0” max top of roof
CALIFORNIA
10’-6” typical floor to floor

11’-8” terrace floor
68’-0” top of podium
14’-2” second floor

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
Level 8

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
Level 11
(terrace)
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

1) Tower-Proportion
2) Tower-Extent of vision glass
A) System Structure
C) Air Infiltration
D) Water Management
E) Thermal
F) Daylight
G) Fire Resistance

A) Seismic
B) Acoustics
C) Higher Pressures
D) Security

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
10’-6” to 11’-2”
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

p 7/10/ 75 Howard
3/8” + 3/8” lam. glass
½” airspace
¼” glass
¼” + ¼” lam. Glass
1” airspace
¼” glass
curtain wall profile mockup (1 of 3)
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
75 HOWARD STREET
SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA

POLY DAWANGJING
BEIJING, CHINA
Owner:: Poly Real Estate Group
SOM Project Team:

Keith Boswell Leo Chow
Larry Chien Francesca Oliveira
Angela Wu Brian Cook
Chris Talbot
Consultant Team:
Structure - SOM
M/E/P/FP - WSP
Landscape - SWA
Systems:
Tower
Inner Wall: Custom Unitized curtainwall
Outer Wall: Custom Unitized curtainwall
with operable vents
Lobby: Suspended stainless steel cables
with laminated / tempered glass
Lobby: Barrier
Timeline: September 2011-May 2016

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China
11.5 meters
37’-9”
9.5 meters
31’-2”
POLY DAWANGJING
BEIJING, CHINA

1) Iconic image on skyline
2) Express the structure
A) System Structure
C) Air Infiltration
D) Water Management
E) Thermal
F) Daylight
G) Fire Resistance

A) Seismic
B) Acoustics
C) Higher Pressures
D) Security

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China
幕墙设计概括
SUMMARY OF FAÇADE APPROACH外层：单层玻璃
内层：低反射双层玻璃
OUTER SKIN: SINGLE GLAZING
INNER SKIN: LOW-E DOUBLE GLAZING从各层溢流空
气到中庭，并从顶部排出
SPILL AIR VENTING TO THE ATRIUM AT EACH FLOOR –
EXHAUSTED AT TOP自动反射百叶窗位于双层
幕墙的中间
AUTOMATED, REFLECTIVE BLIND
LOCATED IN THE INTERSTITIAL SPACE 整体传热
OF THE DOUBLE SKIN FAÇADE 玻璃概括
Glass Summary 遮阳系数系数
SHGC U-VALUE
美国标准ASHRAE的基准 0.25 3.4
ASHRAE Baseline
内层:低反射
性 0.29 2.7
玻璃
Inner Skin: Low-e
外层: 单层玻
璃 0.82 5.8
Outer Skin: Single
综合: (大约)
Combined 0.24 1.8
GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017 (Approximate)
POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

POLY DAWANGJING
Beijing, China

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
Owner:: GSA
SOM Project Team:

Michael Mann Paul Danna
Jose Palacios Steve Zimmerman
Garth Ramsey Josh Kenin
Consultant Team:
Structure - SOM
M/E/P/FP - Syska and Hennessy
Enclosure Systems:
Lobby: Unitized storefront
Lobby: Pressure Equalized Rain Screen
Timeline: May 2013-July 2017

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

1) Transparency of Judicial Process
2) Civic
2) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria
A) System Structure
C) Air Infiltration
D) Water Management
E) Thermal
F) Daylight
G) Fire Resistance
3) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria

A) Seismic
B) Acoustics
C) Higher Pressures
D) Security

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017 SITE PLAN

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017 SITE PLAN

SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL LLP TYPICAL FLOOR
LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
NORTH

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
TRANSVERSE
NORTH

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE
LONGITUDINAL
TRANSVERSE
NORTH

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

LOS ANGELES
FEDERAL COURTHOUSE

“Treat each and every project as if it the last one you
will ever do. The project should achieve the highest
level of craft possible, utilize innovative and
appropriate technology and reflect how you want to
be remembered”
C. Keith Boswell

SOM KeithBoswell2 PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

SOM KeithBoswell2 PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

HIGH RISE DESIGN WORKSHOP

1) Holistic Design – Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design – Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design – Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design – Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design - Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design - Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design - Balanced

4) High Rise Design is inside to out

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Holistic Design - Balanced HOLISTIC BALANCED DESIGN

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Exterior enclosure - Visual Criteria

3) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria – select jobs

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

Project Phase: Recently Completed

SOM Project Team:

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND JUNE 28 – 30 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Exterior enclosure - Visual Criteria

3) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria – select jobs

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

1) Exterior enclosure - Visual Criteria

3) Exterior enclosure – Performance Criteria – select jobs

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

GPD FINLAND HELSINKI JUNE 27 2017

Project Phase: Construction Documents

SOM Project Team: