Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Optical-Reader 002 PDF
Optical-Reader 002 PDF
WEI CODE OF
PRoFESSIONAL EHHCS
THE ACCOUN&CY AW OF 20 0 4
in
mark
e iDf h r e sp on sib m ty to
a c c ou n tin g p m fe ssion is the * o c ep Dnd e
th e p ub lic As
p m fe s s i o m a d a b thle ac c o o nn»
a«'
₩
r e sp on sib ilityis no t
e xc lusine m p m te c t th e of t i n e i r c l i ents
r» mploym mtea+ tj b e-_i nteres t of the pali tm r st be
r h e ir p a r a m ou n t c on c e r n .
.
In tod a y%mo d e m e nviro nme n*
many ₩
e n ts of soc iay
tion m
this
;.
';. Incre asind y d e p e n d e n t for d e c ision -m a kin g o n for
:
wh ic h the y h a ve no c on ttoL
mey b im to p m fe ssion a l acco rmmls
m as s i s tanc e in as s es s i ng th e
r e lia b ility of s o m e of
Eve ry by a n a c c ou n ta n t to mmpyMpmfessinnal
it
d iftic u lt fo r th e p r ofe ssion m m a in ta in th e
. · m a k €s te ptdnion m
o vct h s
#cjmte g tity. o b je ctivity, a n d c o mp etenc e th a t it has
;' ◆
many of W Mce
m th e p ub lic
b
m Philip p ine
OFAC)is
a
In stitu te of Ce r tiEe d mlic Ac c ou « na=ns
m· Em m m fe ssional Acmwm
Eth ic s
th e IPAC Co&of
p ub l
s hould re s pe ct the
tk ₩W
A profe s d. ona l a ccotrtua nt a d u n gthe cours e . '
It is imp o ssiblr
to de m
m e ty simatio n tha t cre a tmthre us
to
c o o 6 d e nofwI n fo wdieorvlce n
s md s hould not usc
C Apmce with to ardamental
0
a c t in the
T esp ° ns ibMty to p6blic inte re s t.
.
' -mad enti ali nfo rmti o nFor e· xa mple . R he 2. re vim;
I.
dis clos e conhdcntia l
pm fe s s iona la ccouta a qtm a y Advoca cy;
if :;
,' .
_,
(ay.
inte re s itn a clie nt
mt
,
:., Financial
A profe s xiona l a ccouota ni s hould comply re le va nt m my of its
A lo ain or gda mte c to or from
a
]ne s anld tcguia tiom a nd re fia in & om pny'coriduct which (b)
might btiqg d i s c t m
to thc pm fe s s ion. '..
clim
t
(Q m·
Cm cm m m t h tp o * s iMliry of miqg t h t
c l i e m*
tin a ia
of
mb nc er tbrt
₩ b c mof clie nt in
m rdrom on
m putie *
li Ql i*
rbe p m m l=dwe m m & ot mm Pe rfi)m « d In dhp ute* widb
₩ W e nte
o f ci» c u m s m c e s
Emmp les th« inuindy
be q 1 ot ofBce r of dw c Eat-
₩. or h °w
W
a m m nbrr of dbe e ngiwm e m R am
ima tm roe nbe ot t do se mme mb«
m cxe n di» ect md signiB cam m cr thr
of thc cqgrgcm e nt
(b) of tlu e ogrgtnwut te a m hrm a m
m m
A member
(C) Fbfi« nung scnrio cs m1 tha r dire cth a fte ct immwdimc &mdy mtmm Qr M member
R
(d) t* thc s u b je c t of& C eag* gcm m
sawunco re ot prcpm Dou of m« reco lds tha t m
m
&C Std\cet mamx of m othe r e nga ge tne nt (C) A form e rp a n n e r of d« m n b e in g
I om
(e ) m the of e na m i wte m s m
₩ iom h-e d io & e ir d e s ig n or
inuplm e nta nm .
duoa m d
MM* et o f thc C
nifua m inm e m e
₩gemctM
w« the mbjcet
mountmt m p ro mo « e dim a o r I
lo the mt thu thc tm p lop w
pm fc« iotul a m um ols
c l ==m
¢ ccou«
be c*u* e
ant wiu b e de tm e d i rm a cting.
of 9 m l or p r«d vd pte s m te ti.
the p ro M
ce titr
cluding:
O
ely. 1_S=d :
',
s uen
Sdeguudr
1_S a l
fall Mo No btoa d catep der:
m pto
Ri
r.
fessjo q d m
by
*wts wodt
m e td*«, un& im ie m e o ver
ect
m
y
2. S afe in he
Exm pJe r o fcircuwume s M m a te Ms mt tiu
The tirm m tbe of& e lnua c« tc a lm a bonldS cim
include."r__..
m e m b e rs
m
* p p ro p date s a fe g u a a d s m m lnm e ot re d u c e dr« ats, o the£
da
tha n th
(·) Be ing chceitened qritb lidg¥ io s tho se tba t a re clq iwignifica nk m m* ceep nld«
-,=·':.
m m ing
S =icgmds .
#,
m prin. X
raf
a c mc da
the ou mn
emt al n t ' h : Both qua ntititive
e m tk e nvironm e nt'cooa is t
g
S a kwa rds in
i n
m Ju=litBtive ₩51?
&
i d M &-a n d c rrd m t ap p ro P tn m a
yl hould be .-¢
Firowwidca a gorud· i n h e m c n vu o m
co nsidened md a pplie d W ne cm ₩ ,
ma y imlude
s hould always
Cons ide ra tion be givm to wha t
te a s ona bhm inform e d thind pa rty ha ving kfrowlcdge o f a] 1,
t d e vm i n i o rm a t i including
m safe ₩
rds a pplie d, would
618
of tbe s e . Thr e a t8 a nd the
s iguilica nc«
ide ntifica don a ndthe a pphca tim o fsa[;
mf
bguards D c sm a me mm ot senio r a
m a na gca u«
m e lim ina te or re duce tbe tbre ats , 6 ma. to be
m pons ible £ or @ lim e
Brm'sol of
adeq mm
tha t a re c L m · tlv o f the s wm .
=Ad vi s i n g¥
mtio ning
m crs a nd
=t h o s e i hmmc e m m te lmd e n M &m a nd
e
-t h rE a tai
s d :h e e va lua tion a nd a pplica don of
Publis hd p o m asdl p ro ccd m e ncoura ge
s e nio,
a nd.Erpovrcl s t a f[ ¢o m m '
lev clswithin the fum a ny rm tm g to ,
cmplia nce m
the fwM m t a l pdnciplcs
tha tco ncern thm
* ₩m m t e a tbgna m m a y include
7-to
Eng
of ife c l i m
with go ve ₩ & lme
ce
m
cb ₩ d gove roa nct
d
Disclo sing to
a ot-
mg
Inrolvmg a nothe r m to pe rform
who o o r m e m be rs o fa n e nga ge me nt't ei i i € meo _
t of
innm ina pproptia tclF inoM " X.'outcome pe tEortn P«
o fthe =R o M rg set1 4 o t ass Lm ce te ₩
engge
'limi m<im o fa Erm 's p ° licies a nd
ln a ddition to thc a bove safeguards, profc ssiun a\
,
l i i ai w a ncha W S to thto ac c mtams inpublic pra cdce m y*
l$ n be a b le m re ly on
6 21
re a lis tic tii M 1e fo r the
Wed ag
I
₩₩
1
on
of the le nt.
pe rform a ia ce ·
IW h
me n
control p o l i c i s
nd· re plying to rwe a t=to m bm in te ndm,
* c m p b w with q m t y tho te nde r tha * b¢ fore the
to provide Wma blc accep ting
pmcdure s de s igne d m h the « xia dng
t hat
e nga ge me nt cm ta ct
a s s ura nce t h a ts pe cific e nga g« m e nts a te * ccom ta m m
b e tcqucs ttd m
W
ap p o intment s m d mr b« a cce pt
A Mc o m
h
p ro fessio nilI a ccountml in
in pt? btic pra ctice who is n th_clim lh
Pt o m o o aa ]m ua ta m t
asked t0 r« pla ct a nothe r profe s s iona l a ccomta nt in
r--'f_k\_:_to
nm
" —' y uJ wtitin& to Inida te m
e xis ting acco If thc propose d·iҰ
public p rac dor who is cm ide ring te nde ring fo t una ble m ioninuiilca tc m
thc e ti«ing mcuountw
m a rga ge m lnt cca rmdy he ld by mothe r profe s s iona l the pr o p o scd a ccom tm t s hould t ry to o b t d n
whcth« r t h m W my m,
a c c m n rainn tp u b [ kpra ctice , h o u l d de te rm 'ine
ptofe gs iona l or othe r,
fo r not a cce pting the e nga ge m e nt s u c has
iMotma do a bo« a ny pos s ible t h l m by o b «
m e a nsmch a s through m quirie s of third p atties m
circum s ta u ce s cha t tttte a re n complia nce with the thos e cha tgcd Mth gove rmmc d the che nL
fonda m e ota l p rincip lm For e xa mplq the re m a y be
to pn» miona l
thre a t a nd d u
S
a com pe te nce
if
profe s s iona l a ccounta nt in public p racdce
a =C O N F L I C T S OF WE R E S T
a cce pts tbc e ng ₩
m e nt be fore knowing a ll the A ptofe s s iona l acco unemt wbtic pta me s hould ta ke
in
pe rtine nt & cE
Appmpria tt m a y include :
rca s om ble step s to
a conflict of inte re s LFor
lc, tha tcould pm c
i mti fym um s ta nce s
a thca t m obje ctivity
«
pta cdce co ₩
tm dire ctly wi t b · m m or h a s a j o i n t
Dis cus s ing the clie nt'h a fta irs fully a nd fre e ly ve nm e or s im ila r g e m e m with a ma jot compe titor
» M thc e xis ting a ccounta nc of a clicnL A thre a t to obje ctivity ot c o n fi d m a l i t y
ona l a ccomta nt in
m a y also bc crm te d whe n a p t o fe «
Am (be cxis oog a ccounta nt to provide public pra ctice pe r for m & s e rvice s
for clie nts whos e
in dis pwte wiM
kn o w i n fo mr a don on a ny fa cts or intcrctts m in conflict ot the die m m
e mb othm in re la tion to the m a tte r or t ra m c t i o n
in
, tha in thc mcing a ccoun(a n tls
6 24
md o b m n g t b e i tmus e n to · ct i n s uc
a¥m mo e? gm
T
ha
=P }b l i cp n a i mAnm
e » · s pe ci£c
semio e) m
H
prntica inr m Me Ls oa or o rm
a ccoonum t
msp ect
o b d i n tbcit cons m to
m
d
*
p t m m · nHss m inm m a dm
mpbys ica l o fs lwh fHin
s qm ba o
m d mming); aad
conBde nm
m
ga ide h« m members o f th e e trg+g e m e n t
* m US c o fCmfirlrmini. 1;_
eMap m pa rura s o f chc lirm; md
thc ₩
timioo o f s a fcgua ndsby
(=) m s ka md lo no wledge te qm d for the typ e
of p to fessio aal s e rvic e s involvcdl
' The m'
(b) The lm lof
tra ining e xp« icnce o ftho md Mtute of
'm
p erso ns ue qs s m y e nme d in pe rforming the Tbe o ge of p o aalblc fee a ma m.
ptofe s s iom s e rdce s ;
b a s ta fo r htJw_t_:__
-_-_—— 14 8 the
(C) m tim e ne ce s my occupie d
by e a c h pe rs m
Eee.
4·
tm d p arty.
T h cdegree o f re s porls ibility tha t
thos e aiences e nta il* pcrformg AP P to p riato s a fe g u J u d s my t a m i .'
II
An advame wdttco* gte e na e nt
with the clie nt
The Mt t h «m to-the b m of rmMta tiom
pm fe s s iona la ccm m nt in Public
mctice m a y quore =fe e lowq_tha n m othe r is !
in i tc l f tlot Disdo sure to Inte nde d us e rs of the work
meifijcaJ. Ne vtrthde s s , thm m a y b e a S e w pfotme d by th« pm fe s s iona ]aCemnbU H
iMe re s t thca t m ptofe s s iona l in
m i fthe fee quote dcom
Calle cte a te d
pe te nce a nd
is m low tha t it
public p mctico a nd thc basis of tom une ra doo_
m y bo d ffi c u l to t pe rform (he
e nga ge me nt in
' q unlitycontrol p o llm atud p ro cedwe&
a ccorda nce with
a p'plica blc te cinMc. I md : Re vie w by m o bjective third pmy of thn work
pm& s s iolld st* nduds for tha t prim pe tfotm e d by the pm m ona l acco o ntam im
public
: XX d " "
p ractice
fe g u * rds which m a y be
a dopte d @ mnu Fe e or Com m is s im
=M a ki n g the clie m Rn e a re o f the te rm s o f the I nc e M cirLum s mtlces, a profe s dotta l acco untant
e nga ge me nrm4 in p uricular, the ba s is o o public pra ctice m a y re ce ive t e t e rrafcel or
whicb fees m chuge d m d w hach m t.
r
senrjces a re com m is s ion m ting m a For m m plq whe re
corne d tbe quote d fe c T he profe s s icnd a cca m m t]n public pra ctice do cs
W
.
=A5 ₩ ning
£§
not pmvido the s e rvice rc q m , a fe«
m-h
'
sp emc
a p p ro p M L m d q m e d s ma _be re ce ive d a contlnm g
m thc ta $ lr
a ji6iEGph s iooa l*cm m ta nt
in public wctice
or othe r A profe s s iond a ccommnt in public
-pra ctice nra y rmve a com m is s ion& om a third pa rty
(C.g, a s ofm m V e ndor)in com e ction with the m
Coqti#ge nt fees
ma y give m ro a s e lf-in t e re s t
of goods or s m rice s to a clie nt Acce pting a m
thre a t to re £e na l fe c ot c o m s l o n m a y gjrre ds c to s m
obje ctinity. The s gnifim ce o f s uch
m i n t e rmthre
t a ts to obje ctivity a nd pmfts s iona l
₩
tinwm
de pe nd o n facto rs inclu
com pe tm ce a nd dm c m
le , i,
om wNols s a a oud
$, ..' mmu a s
s a rm ba r pa z qa pa ds ir js Aq a tp mu 1 1 0M
mJ o 3]
Jo c p o ] o
Birwpm n
a JpJtrd S₩ p ln eq pm ptnow
Js jm q puu
( s p m ym l m aP rq JM :
:'.
m e m ds Fp 01 t m wt m
uz m m d J r Ja qroire uug uo
a qt m e q
ra m ta ird an m s m rs wa o a Jo
,
m* educed m a n accep table le ve l though the a pplica tion
mcounta nt in public p ractice in!
₩₩
ofs * Te gms ,. profe ris iona ] or re la tio--LJ__
h a n oHe r.
* be idd not*
OF mww AS S ETS
rna yb e He a te d m. 1
famay clm wm or bmin«*
=c us ro DY
O I
K
accep table s a fcgum m a y
.
T include :
=U se s uch a s s e ts
only m thc purpos e for which the y
=Vi d ra wi n g from the tm m
e nga ge m e nt
gimrPX,..
are inrendd;
W
m mm t h «the QAa
m
10 the ir clie n& e m d be inde pe nde ntof the * s e mncee lle m
S e cdm 29 0 of ¢ h¢ Code o fEthi« s ptovidm a & a rne work' rt «n» whm m raa» amce* eima'
e f the e nga ge m e nt
md to
M i d emi me m lua ting mp o nding threats to be gim m p c ri o rm—— e nd*
H:-
₩
i rd dm m I t om the thre a rs(0 indep endence \whe n tlm mce ¢ h
e pon i u o e dt» wbm np ;
t h o ·ppropri* te
safesumds ca pa ble o f
including
t&c thtws m re ducing Hp m t. t0 a n ce pta ble I fthe a s »wmne e nga ge m e ntis e xpta e d to te e m
e limimting '
the pe riod ot the a s s u c a m c e e wgtm e nt m d s_.
le 1 rel.
ownA
c
m inform e d third pe nim i muld ms ona bly conclude ms ura nce Fm thc purpos « o£
th « the k mb i n t c g t i t )\o b j e c m
ti d
vi qprofe s s iona l the p dncip le o f inde pe nde nce . *s s m nce
comp
m
rbqr« ici* m ind be e n cl* s s ia e d i n t othe e nm e ly:
e nga ge m ie ots axe
mm#a te me ut a um nm-· m (oot rcdcte d
mcm ofEthics dm notm yw the pm fe s s iona l a nd non-mdit (mtrict
6m
e
m m a im in i nm e nta l a ttimde ,
indep endence ■ M wte m e m mm the
but profe * d mtl * e c o m m u a hould Us o a void of ine ance t e m dbs m md
t h c t u a mce, i wh i d would doubt
m ia & pe ode a oa
the pmc to '
of t h c *udit glimt.
m ma ma ume e =grge Mw rbe rc
be co nsidered
indile cL
The ta bh be low m m m a riz m tho iodpe nde nce req uirements of
d
diffe rcm m m nce e me a whe the rma tm or inuna ta m Wh tho CP A's
gua ra nte e is i n i m i i a l
m thc & m m d ·wum nm
MruMnce te a m ha* a ia jiiiinwdta le W mnm
arrurancc m in-a p o m mi nuai 6 c tN
to h n u e i i c i micct
i h o trkatter d thc miwa m
₩'wM_piodw
WIT
was cia iiiy am· which the
T o do
WA
m
the boa rd of a n a s s u ra n c e
m a n m o wc
m_wl mp t
₩·
'CPA's inde pe ndm prolridd tha t
th t mm 6
ot ope tdm· m
puticir» a t, inthe management
a s s &m i m
7
I t is to. De s cribe
impra ctica ble
tba t fa mily
s ignifica nce o f tMe a ts
re la tiotmhips m a y cre a te .
In e va lua ting the
o f tbrca tscre a te dby fa m dy a nd p erso nal
signilicance
the C? A s hould com ide r the
C
ce
tm om hlps ,
o f tbe re m ns hip a nd. Tote _of the fa dily me mbe r
' 6 38
qm
6m ci*
tir· Pofo rtWb mmo twe . i tis ₩trire d
l stafwsats
otaaed
Rphe n
auditing
a*
Proria im of
Whe n ptoriding
il W
m
B emices m m assunnm dlca L
is inrpor u n [ t o m a ke a dis tinctim be twe m
m
ac
₩e ge m w least
moca cy s m ric« a&riso ry
tba t Iga d i
m l
s e rric e s m a uppm
clie nt h &e e xe cm ion of ine ma ra a ina * kg?
contra a 1due We nce a nd
adrice.
safegu5tua a re e m ploye d.
pm vjde d adeq uate
o ft h e ' wM
cm m proriding asstllajjLe
m;
=Th e 6tm doe s not a s s ume o r m a ke a ny a re not compa tibk
de cis im ; a nd
clie n ts
m s ura llce che a t 'K
P rm i s i o n
of ta xa tim s e rvice s s uch a s ta x =na ting s e rm =t t vwi n g 'k;
₩ C liaJo cq pla noing, provis ion of ta mtion opinions
m
a nd m s is ta ncem thc re s olMa n ta x dis pute s
jt ld d a t e
of
mt im₩ we WA
■ Ac tual md aamed
l i d g i o inToining
n tba m m a nua m be ot E the
thlma The
e lf-inwre s t lind Intimida don
te la tiom bip be twe e nthe CP A
anA &e r lm
₩ not M whe n
d.
S meha relatio iJy
Me
clie nvs
nm m m
pla m tbe CP A a nd the
litiptioo
m He a R OA
m a na ge m e in
in liti ₩ ionM nt
a cEe nt siruatio o
ct
bre d by a com or othe r public rnthoritv Ob w
1 r+
y
=de te rmine d bme d o n the £e s t trs judicial or
-C ld e m o lltH
g °re m m e m a gmy p ro ceedings-
,
m m mp i ta l i ty
A a ccommnt s hould ne ithe r accep t nm
p ro fessio nal
re a s ona bl
offe r gfis m e a trtta inm e m which mght
be bchrvcd. m ha re a s igmfica nt a nd imprope r
₩ nt o r with
tbm the y de d m
ina ue a ce m the ir wfe s m a ] iud
A profe s s iona l a ccotm ta nt%
a cce pta nm o f m ore tha n. a
mwa na a i o r he r inde wde nce .