Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(2016)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1240113
Walter Leal Filho1*, Merit Mandel2 , Abul Quasem Al-Amin3, Alexander Feher4, Charbel José
Chiappetta Jabbour5
1.School of Science and the Environment, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street,
Manchester, M1 5GD, United Kingdom; *Corresponding author
E-mail: w.leal@mmu.ac.uk
Abstract
The agriculture sector is the principal source of income for around 20% of the EU-26 population,
which live in predominantly rural regions that would be devastated without its contribution.
Moreover, the combined agricultural and food sector forms an important part of the EU economy,
accounting for 15 million jobs (8.3% of total employment) and 4.4% of GDP ((Europedia 2016).
The 12 million active farmers across Europe today, have an average farm size of about 15 hectares,
and are expected to meet the needs of 500 million Europeans. In addition, they are also expected to
promote a sustainable and balanced development of their land, also in areas where production
conditions are difficult. Yet, despite the relevance of the sector, the use of land for agriculture
purposes is not very sustainable. Among other issues, there is a serious problem in respect of the
abandonment of agricultural land. Based on the perceived need for research on this topic, the aim of
this paper is to examine the causes and consequences of agricultural land abandonment, outlining its
social, economic and environmental impacts, as well as the implications for territorial integration.
1
Keywords: agricultural land use, land abandonment, land losses, farmers, Europe
2
1. Introduction
The sustainable use of land is a matter of primary concern to any country in the world.
Indeed, sustainable land use is mentioned across many of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs) .In particular, Goal 15 (Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse
land degradation, halt biodiversity loss) clearly states that there is a pressing need to fight
deforestation and desertification, which not only pose major challenges to sustainable
development,but also negatively affects the lives and livelihoods of millions of people in the fight
against poverty. But one major threat to sustainable land use, is the issue of land abandonment.
Therefore, apart from describing the problem and its scope, the paper also suggests some
sustainability measures which may be adopted in order to ameliorate the problem.
Land abandonment is a term commonly used to describe uncultivated land ('Land used for
agricultural purposes until recent times but not currently cultivated, with a noticeable cover of
shrubs'), as abandoned land ('Land not subject to any cultivation practice (including conservation
agriculture), nor intended for grazing'), neglected land (when they pose a threat to neighbour
owners) (Rico 2011). Land abandonment is one possible outcome of a process of marginalisation
driven by a combination of social, economic, political and environmental factors, by which certain
areas of farmland cease to be viable under existing land use and socio-economic structures
(Keenleyside and Tucker 2010).
Land abandonment often is a complex and gradual process, starting with a progressive
marginalisation (i.e. withdrawal of land management) that leads initially to a reduction in farming
intensity (e.g. lower stocking rates, withdrawal of grazing from the margins and infrequent
cultivations) (Keenleyside and Tucker 2010). Farmland abandonment is a widespread land-use
change in temperate regions, due to increasing yields on productive lands, conservation policies, and
the increasing imports of agricultural products from other regions (Estelet al. 2015).Farmland
abandonment (FLA) can be defined as the cessation of agricultural activities on a given surface of
land and not taken by another activity (such as urbanisation or afforestation) (Pointereauet al. 2008).
The research importance of the topic can be assessed if one considers that, over last decades, large
agricultural areas were abandoned worldwide, and relatively little research has focused on it.
Agricultural or farmland abandonment is the process starting with withdrawal of agricultural
management that leads initially to a reduction in farming intensity,and is followed by a progression
of natural succession processes (Keenleyside and Tucker 2010a). However, it should be also noted
that the literature provides more than one definition of the term, depending on the type of an used
approach: administrative, social, ecological landscape or agronomic (Pointereau et al. 2008). For
example, Joint Research Centre(JRC) defines farmland abandonment as‘a significant decrease in
management which leads to undesirable changes in ecosystem services’(Keenleyside and Tucker
2010a).
3
Land abandonment is a serious problem in Africa, with serious climate implications (Tesfaye, Seifu
2016). In Europe, the problem is considered as one of the major environmental threats to territorial
cohesion (Zakkak et al. 2015), since substantial areas have been affected by agricultural
abandonment (Pointereau et al. 2008) The situation varies from a region to a region due to
economic, social and demographic situation, natural conditions and historical development.
Particularly, the problem is prominent in south-eastern Europe(Zakkak et al. 2015). During the
1990s millions of hectares of farmland (e.g. 15-20% of cropland in Slovakia, Poland and Ukraine)
were abandoned as a result of the transition process (Keenleyside and Tucker 2010a, van Dijk et al.
2004). Between years 2001 and 2012, up to 7.6 Mha of agricultural land was abandoned, in Eastern
Europe, Southern Scandinavia, and Europe's mountain regions (Estel et al. 2015). The analysis of
the 2004-06 Rural Development Programmes has shown that as a result of poor soils and
unfavourable economic conditions 17.6% of the agricultural land was abandoned in Poland, 10.1%,
in Estonia, 21.1% in Latvia and 10.3% in Lithuania (van Dijk et al. 2004).
A wide range of studies introduces different drivers, causes, indices of farmland abandonment.
Mostly are the result of environmental and socio-economic changes (Cramer et al. 2008).The
following drivers are often named as the most common:
The causes of agricultural land abandonment in Europe are manifold, depending on the area and the
period under consideration (Pointereau et al. 2008, Terres et al. 2015).JRC classified the recurrent
determinants of farmland abandonment in EU into three blocks(Terres et al. 2013):
4
1. Poor environmental / biophysical suitability for agricultural activity;
2. Low farm stability and viability ;
3. Negative drivers from regional context.
In addition to the aforementioned general key drivers, experts have pointed out such causes as share
of subsidies from the Common Agricilture Policy (CAP) in the income, low investments on the
farm, age of a farm holder, lower farmer qualification, and weak land market (Terres et al.
2013).Pointereau et al. (2008) also talk about historical factors e.g. transition to free market
economies with a breakdown of the gricultural economy during the 1990-2004 period inEastern
European countries, national and EU policies e.g. problems in renewing agri-environment contracts
after 5 years duration, new CAP sanitary requirements from in eastern European countries since
2004, and decoupling of direct payments from a product (Pointereau et al. 2008). Basically, these
analyses point to ways in which the application of policies for economic purposes may have
(unintended) impacts upon marginal areas because of their particular socio-economic and
environmental characteristics, which reduce the viability of farming or otherwise commercially
managing these areas, leading to their abandonment.
The consequences of farmland abandonment are very diverse across the EU, and have serious
implications for biodiversity and ecosystem function (Munroe et al. 2013). However, it is important
to note that at the same time they can be considered as potentially negative or positive(Eurostat
2013).
Positive
Among the benefits of land abandonment, the following elements have been identified:
Negative
5
In many other circumstances abandonment may be damaging. Among the negative
implicationslinked to the abandonment of agricultural land,the following may be mentioned:
Unfortunately, such issues are seldom tackled in the curriculum (Dmochowski, Garofalo, Fisher,
Greene, Gambogi 2016), hence good opportunties for the training of students are being missed.
Figure 1 here
The authors identified 36 case studies from the selected publications. Case study areas varied from
13 km2 to 10 million km2, with median of 255 km2 . 74 % of the studies were published after 2010.
The timespan of the case studies was 1782 to 2012. The median start year of case study periods is
1988 and the median end year is 2007. Most of the studies (19) were long period studies –
abandonment was measured more than 10 years back in time. The study period ranged from 1 to 224
6
years, with an average of 29 years. Abandonment rates varied from 44.56 ha to 46.1 Mha, or 1.5
%to 45 % of the agricultural land area within the territory.
When looking at the causes or drivers of agricultural land abandonment, socio-economic and
ecological drivers are dominant in the selected studies (Table 1). Division of the abandonment
drivers is synthesised based on (Rey Benayas et al. 2007)and (Pointereau et al. 2008). Only one-
fourth of the studies mentioned policy-driven factors. A Latvian case study (Abolina and Luzadis
2015) highlighted that socio-economic drivers have greater effect upon land abandonment than
environmental or biophysical factors. A similar conclusion is supported by a study (Gellrich and
Zimmermann 2007) in Swiss mountain areas where land abandonment is driven by migration and
income decline from agriculture. In a Slovakian case study (Pazúr et al. 2014) ecological factors
(e.g. soil quality, higher slopes, accessibility) were important for determining the location and extent
of land abandonment, but these acted in combination with socio-economic changes. In essence,
because abandonment signifies a change in land use, it generally links to changes in wider
circumstances which are more often socio-economic or anthropogenic in nature than purely the
result of biophysical change. Often, these changes can be linked to policies.(Prishchepov et al. 2013)
and (Corbelle-Rico et al. 2015) both concluded the importance of policies in relation to land
abandonment and future land use.
Table 1 here
Drawing out the possible consequences of agricultural land abandonment seems to have faded into
the background as a focus in selected studies. One reason may be the lack of data and methodology
for how to assess or attribute the possible consequences of the land abandonment. According to the
Zaragozí et al. (2012) and (Rey Benayas 2007) land abandonment may have positive or negative
effectsupon future land use. Findings of possible consequences from the selected literature (Table 2)
coincide with those mentioned in section 2‘Implication of land abandonment’. Depending on the
study site, the positive or negative effects of the consequence may vary. For example, agricultural
land abandonment may have positive effectsupon soil erosion in hilly areas (Bakker et al. 2008) and
negative effects on dry regions (Rey Benayas 2007). In selected studies, environmental
consequences (e.g. biodiversity loss, revegetation, soil erosion and wildfire risks) are more recorded
than socio-economic ones (e.g. rural depopulation, changes in local economy, renewable energy
potential). According to (Milenov et al. 2014) agricultural land abandonment may have a snowball
effect on the local economy through structural changes and decreasing demand for labour skills
leading to further land abandonment. Income reduction from agriculture (Kanianska et al. 2014)
may lead to outmigration (Baumann et al. 2011) from the rural areas unbalancing rural communities
and thus stimulating further decline.
Table 2 here
7
Another aspect of the agricultural land abandonment studies is the location of the case study sites.
At first sight, it may seem that it is a well studied topic. While looking little bit deeper, it appears
that several publications are based on the same study areas with different perspectives (e.g.
Corbelle-Rico et al. 2012, Corbelle-Rico et al. 2015, Gellrich and Zimmermann 2007, Gellrich et al.
2007). The limited location aspect is emphasised by (Hatna and Bakker 2011) as most studies are
based on small areas, biased towards marginal areas. Selected study sites are located in areas where
land abandonment is estimated to occur – European mountain areas, areas with poor soils and harsh
climate (Keenleyside and Tucker 2010b). (Łowicki 2008) was one the few finding that
abandonment of agricultural areas took place in the vicinity of large cities, where a whole range of
different drivers are in play. The proximity of the city sets a pressure for land use change, setting it
aside for speculative development purposes (Vanwambeke et al. 2012), as agricultural land becomes
attractive to real estate developers (Lieskovsky et al. 2013). This is an aspect meriting further
consideration in future abandonment studies.
As discussed above, the consequences of land abandonment and their significant impact on various
fields attractconsiderable attention from policy makers at national and EU level (Eurostat, 2013).The
main discussion point regarding the measures addressing the problem is the environmental trade-off
between its negative or positive implications. Therefore, it is not always an EU priority to bring
abandoned land back into production(van Dijk et al. 2004).
There is a diversity of drivers of agricultural abandonment, which are closed related to pathways of
land use change. Some of them are: relationship to fire, damages to landscape management and
influences to biodiversity. In addition, a diversity of policies have been playing a role in reducing
the portions of land are being abandoned.
For instance, the common agricultural policy (CAP) includes environmental requirements attached
to the necessary management of agricultural land and offers two main instruments to avoid land
abandonment (decoupled direct payments and compensatory payments in Areas of Natural
Constraints). The first contributes to stabilizing and enhancing farm income, whereas the second
helps maintain farming activity in areas which, due to adverse natural conditions, are less
profitable(Eurostat, 2013).In addition cross-compliance measures applied to direct
paymentsrequire landowners to maintain agricultural land in ‘good agricultural and environmental
condition’ and thus reduce the risks of complete abandonment (Keenleyside and Tucker
2010a).Therefore, many experts anticipate a higher level of land abandonment as a result of reduced
levels of CAP support for extensive farming (Terres et al. 2013).
To supportareas that are designated as High Nature Value (HNV) farmland i.e. to ensure
preservation of their biodiversity value, restoration activities, including removal of unwanted
vegetation, need to be undertaken (van Dijk et al. 2004).There are also a number of EU policies that
8
support the management of abandoned land for the benefit of biodiversity, e.g. theHabitats and Birds
Directives and the Biodiversity Plan for Agriculture (van Dijk et al. 2004). Another alternative
approach to the management of such land is rewilding. Navarro and Pereira (2012) argue that it
should be recognized by policy-makers as one of the possible land management options in Europe,
particularly on marginal areas. The approach covers change in ecosystems and aims at restoring
ecological dynamics. The important point is that rewilding does not target to conserve species
occurrences, but to allow natural processes to regain dominance in landscapes (Pereira and Navarro
2015).
It should be noted that some measures focused on agro-environmental services and forest
regeneration e.g. payments for environmental service(s) (PES) systems, may actually subsidise and
accelerate the abandonment of marginal agricultural areas (Sierra and Russman 2006, Wunder et al.,
2005).
5. Conclusions
Land abandonment is a major barrier to sustainable development efforts in rural areas for three main
reasons: uncultivated land allows the uncontrolled growth of shrubs and many undesired plants,
instead of organised biodiversity planning, it makes the land more vulnerable to fire, and in some
occasions, to soil erosion. Land abandonment also means possible losses of income to people living
in such areas.
As outlined in this paper, land abandonment is a dynamic process driven by many factors including
time span, region, and historical development(Keenleyside and Tucker 2010a). According to
projections, there is likely to be significant levels of farmland abandonment in Europe over the next
20 - 30 years (Terres et al. 2013).However, these projections may be unsafe as they do not fully rely
upon scientific evidence, which demonstrates potential issues of bias due to repeat sampling and an
under-representation of non-marginal areas.
As this paper has shown, land abandonment can pose a major threat to sustainable land use in
particular and to the sustainable development of rural areas as a whole. It therefore needs to be
addressed, as a matter of urgency, so that its consequences in the medium and long-term may be
avoided.
Furthermore, the measures most suitable for addressing the phenomenon are strongly dependent on
government choice, whether to support the positive environmental implications or to tackle the
negative consequences.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge Janet Dwyerfor her comments to an early draft of this paper.
9
References
Abolina, E., Luzadis, V.A., 2015. Land Use Policy Abandoned agricultural land and its potential for
short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Land use policy 49, 435–445.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.022
Abolina, E., Volk, T.A., Lazdina, D., 2015. GIS based agricultural land availability assessment for
the establishment of short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Biomass and Bioenergy 72, 263–
272. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.026Abolina, E., Luzadis, V.A., 2015. Land Use Policy
Abandoned agricultural land and its potential for short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Land
use policy 49, 435–445. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.022
Abolina, E., Volk, T.A., Lazdina, D., 2015. GIS based agricultural land availability assessment for
the establishment of short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Biomass and Bioenergy 72, 263–
272. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.026
Aide, T.M., Grau, H.R., 2004. Globalization, Migration, and Latin American Ecosystems. Science
(80-. ). 305, 1915–1916.
Bakker, M.M., Govers, G., van Doorn, A., Quetier, F., Chouvardas, D., Rounsevell, M., 2008. The
response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: The
importance of landscape pattern. Geomorphology 98, 213–226.
doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.027
Bakker, M.M., van Doorn, A.M., 2009. Farmer-specific relationships between land use change and
landscape factors: Introducing agents in empirical land use modelling. Land use policy 26,
809–817. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.010
Baumann, M., Kuemmerle, T., Elbakidze, M., Ozdogan, M., Radeloff, V.C., Keuler, N.S.,
Prishchepov, A. V., Kruhlov, I., Hostert, P., 2011. Patterns and drivers of post-socialist
farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land use policy 28, 552–562.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003
Beilin, R., Lindborg, R., Stenseke, M., Pereira, H.M., Llausàs, A., Slätmo, E., Cerqueira, Y.,
Navarro, L., Rodrigues, P., Reichelt, N., Munro, N., Queiroz, C., 2014. Analysing how drivers
of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies
from Scandinavia, Iberia and Oceania. Land use policy 36, 60–72.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.003
Cocca, G., Sturaro, E., Gallo, L., Ramanzin, M., 2012. Is the abandonment of traditional livestock
farming systems the main driver of mountain landscape change in Alpine areas? Land use
policy 29, 878–886. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.005
Corbelle-Rico, E., Butsic, V., Enríquez-García, M.J., Radeloff, V.C., 2015. Technology or policy?
Drivers of land cover change in northwestern Spain before and after the accession to European
Economic Community. Land use policy 45, 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.004
Corbelle-Rico, E., Crecente-Maseda, R., Santé-Riveira, I., 2012. Multi-scale assessment and spatial
modelling of agricultural land abandonment in a European peripheral region: Galicia (Spain),
1956-2004. Land use policy 29, 493–501. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.008
10
Cramer, V., Hobbs, R., Standish, R., 2008. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and
ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 104–112. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005
Dmochowski, J.E., Garofalo, D., Fisher, S. Greene, A., Gambogi, D. 2016. Integrating sustainability
across the university curriculum. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17
(5), pp.652-670.
Estel, S., Kuemmerle, T., Alcántara, C., Levers, C., Prishchepov, A., Hostert, P., 2015. Mapping
farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series.
Remote Sens. Environ. 163, 312–325. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.028
11
Lieskovsky, J., Kanka, R., Bezak, P., Stefunkova, D., Petrovic, F., Dobrovodska, M., 2013. Driving
forces behind vineyard abandonment in Slovakia following the move to a market-oriented
economy. Land use policy 32, 356–365. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.010
Łowicki, D., 2008. Land use changes in Poland during transformation. Case study of Wielkopolska
region. Landsc. Urban Plan. 87, 279–288. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.010
Milenov, P., Vassilev, V., Vassileva, A., Radkov, R., Samoungi, V., Dimitrov, Z., Vichev, N., 2014.
Monitoring of the risk of farmland abandonment as an efficient tool to assess the environmental
and socio-economic impact of the Common Agriculture Policy. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.
32, 218–227. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2014.03.013
Moreira, F., Russo, D., 2007. Modelling the impact of agricultural abandonment and wildfires on
vertebrate diversity in Mediterranean Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 22, 1461–1476.
Mottet, A., Ladet, S., Coqué, N., Gibon, A., 2006. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in
mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 296–310.
doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.017
Munroe, D.K., van Berkel, D.B., Verburg, P.H., Olson, J.L., 2013. Alternative trajectories of land
abandonment: Causes, consequences and research challenges. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5,
471–476. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.010
Navarro, L.M., Pereira, H.M., 2012. Rewilding Abandoned Landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15,
900–912. doi:10.1007/s10021-012-9558-7
Pazúr, R., Lieskovský, J., Feranec, J., Oťaheľ, J., 2014. Spatial determinants of abandonment of
large-scale arable lands and managed grasslands in Slovakia during the periods of post-socialist
transition and European Union accession. Appl. Geogr. 54, 118–128.
doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.07.014
Pereira, H., Navarro, L., 2015. Preface, in: Pereira, H.M., Navarro, L.M. (Eds.), Rewilding
European Landscapes. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, pp. v–x.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3
Pointereau, P., Coulon, F., Girard, P., Lambotte, M., Stuczynski, T., Sánchez Ortega, V., Del Rio,
A., 2008. Analysis of the Driving Forces behind Farmland Abandonment and the Extent and
Location of Agricultural Areas that are Actually Abandoned or are in Risk to be Abandoned.
Prishchepov, A. a., Müller, D., Dubinin, M., Baumann, M., Radeloff, V.C., 2013. Determinants of
agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia. Land use policy 30, 873–884.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.011
Rey Benayas, J., 2007. Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences.
CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20072057
Rey Benayas, J.M., Martins, A., Nicolau, J.M., Schulz, J.J., 2007. Abandonment of agricultural
land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat.
Resour. 2. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20072057
Sierra, R., Russman, E., 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest
conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 59, 131–141.
12
doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.010
Zakkak, S., Radovic, A., Nikolov, S.C., Shumka, S., Kakalis, L., Kati, V., 2015. Assessing the effect
of agricultural land abandonment on bird communities in southern-eastern Europe. J. Environ.
Manage. 164, 171–179. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.005
Zaragozí, B., Rabasa, A., Rodríguez-Sala, J.J., Navarro, J.T., Belda, A., Ramón, A., 2012.
Modelling farmland abandonment: A study combining GIS and data mining techniques. Agric.
Ecosyst. Environ. 155, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.03.019
Terres, J.-M., Nisini, L., Anguiano, E., 2013. Assessing the risk of farmland abandonment in the
EU. doi:10.2788/81337
Terres, J.-M., Scacchiafichi, L.N., Wania, A., Ambar, M., Anguiano, E., Buckwell, A., Coppola, A.,
Gocht, A., Källström, H.N., Pointereau, P., Strijker, D., Visek, L., Vranken, L., Zobena, A.,
2015. Farmland abandonment in Europe: Identification of drivers and indicators, and
development of a composite indicator of risk. Land use policy 49, 20–34.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.009
van der Sluis, T., Pedroli, B., Kristensen, S.B.P., Lavinia Cosor, G., Pavlis, E., 2015. Changing land
use intensity in Europe – Recent processes in selected case studies. Land use policy.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.005
van Dijk, G., Zdanowicz, A., Blokzijl, R., 2004. Land abandonment, biodiversity and the CAP,
Land abandonment and biodiversity, in relation to the 1st and 2nd pillars of the e u ’s Common
Agricultural Policy; outcome of an international seminar in Sigulda, Latvia, 7-8 October, 2004.
Utrecht, Netherlands.
Vanwambeke, S.O., Meyfroidt, P., Nikodemus, O., 2012. From USSR to EU: 20 years of rural
landscape changes in Vidzeme, Latvia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105, 241–249.
doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.009
Wunder, S., The Dung, B., Ibarra, E., 2005. Payment is good, control is better: Why payments for
environmental services in vietnam have so far remained incipient, Cifor.Org. Bogor Barat,
Indonesia.
Abolina, E., Luzadis, V.A., 2015. Land Use Policy Abandoned agricultural land and its potential for
short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Land use policy 49, 435–445.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.08.022
Abolina, E., Volk, T.A., Lazdina, D., 2015. GIS based agricultural land availability assessment for
the establishment of short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Biomass and Bioenergy 72, 263–
272. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.10.026
Aide, T.M., Grau, H.R., 2004. Globalization, Migration, and Latin American Ecosystems. Science
(80-. ). 305, 1915–1916.
Bakker, M.M., Govers, G., van Doorn, A., Quetier, F., Chouvardas, D., Rounsevell, M., 2008. The
response of soil erosion and sediment export to land-use change in four areas of Europe: The
importance of landscape pattern. Geomorphology 98, 213–226.
13
doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.027
Bakker, M.M., van Doorn, A.M., 2009. Farmer-specific relationships between land use change and
landscape factors: Introducing agents in empirical land use modelling. Land use policy 26,
809–817. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.10.010
Baumann, M., Kuemmerle, T., Elbakidze, M., Ozdogan, M., Radeloff, V.C., Keuler, N.S.,
Prishchepov, A. V., Kruhlov, I., Hostert, P., 2011. Patterns and drivers of post-socialist
farmland abandonment in Western Ukraine. Land use policy 28, 552–562.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.003
Beilin, R., Lindborg, R., Stenseke, M., Pereira, H.M., Llausàs, A., Slätmo, E., Cerqueira, Y.,
Navarro, L., Rodrigues, P., Reichelt, N., Munro, N., Queiroz, C., 2014. Analysing how drivers
of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies
from Scandinavia, Iberia and Oceania. Land use policy 36, 60–72.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.003
Cocca, G., Sturaro, E., Gallo, L., Ramanzin, M., 2012. Is the abandonment of traditional livestock
farming systems the main driver of mountain landscape change in Alpine areas? Land use
policy 29, 878–886. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.005
Corbelle-Rico, E., Butsic, V., Enríquez-García, M.J., Radeloff, V.C., 2015. Technology or policy?
Drivers of land cover change in northwestern Spain before and after the accession to European
Economic Community. Land use policy 45, 18–25. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.01.004
Corbelle-Rico, E., Crecente-Maseda, R., Santé-Riveira, I., 2012. Multi-scale assessment and spatial
modelling of agricultural land abandonment in a European peripheral region: Galicia (Spain),
1956-2004. Land use policy 29, 493–501. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.08.008
Cramer, V., Hobbs, R., Standish, R., 2008. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and
ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 104–112. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.005
Estel, S., Kuemmerle, T., Alcántara, C., Levers, C., Prishchepov, A., Hostert, P., 2015. Mapping
farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series.
Remote Sens. Environ. 163, 312–325. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.028
Kosmas, C., Kairis, O., Karavitis, C., Acikalin, S., Alcalá, M., Alfama, P., Atlhopheng, J., Barrera,
J., Belgacem, a., Solé-Benet, a., Brito, J., Chaker, M., Chanda, R., Darkoh, M., Ermolaeva, O.,
Fassouli, V., Fernandez, F., Gokceoglu, C., Gonzalez, D., Gungor, H., Hessel, R., Khatteli, H.,
Khitrov, N., Kounalaki, a., Laouina, a., Magole, L., Medina, L., Mendoza, M., Mulale, K.,
Ocakoglu, F., Ouessar, M., Ovalle, C., Perez, C., Perkins, J., Pozo, a., Prat, C., Ramos, a.,
Ramos, J., Riquelme, J., Ritsema, C., Romanenkov, V., Sebego, R., Sghaier, M., Silva, N.,
Sizemskaya, M., Sonmez, H., Taamallah, H., Tezcan, L., de Vente, J., Zagal, E., Zeiliguer, a.,
Salvati, L., 2014. An exploratory analysis of land abandonment drivers in areas prone to
desertification. Catena. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2014.02.006
Lieskovsky, J., Kanka, R., Bezak, P., Stefunkova, D., Petrovic, F., Dobrovodska, M., 2013. Driving
forces behind vineyard abandonment in Slovakia following the move to a market-oriented
economy. Land use policy 32, 356–365. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.11.010
Łowicki, D., 2008. Land use changes in Poland during transformation. Case study of Wielkopolska
region. Landsc. Urban Plan. 87, 279–288. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.010
Milenov, P., Vassilev, V., Vassileva, A., Radkov, R., Samoungi, V., Dimitrov, Z., Vichev, N., 2014.
Monitoring of the risk of farmland abandonment as an efficient tool to assess the environmental
and socio-economic impact of the Common Agriculture Policy. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf.
32, 218–227. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2014.03.013
Moreira, F., Russo, D., 2007. Modelling the impact of agricultural abandonment and wildfires on
vertebrate diversity in Mediterranean Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 22, 1461–1476.
Mottet, A., Ladet, S., Coqué, N., Gibon, A., 2006. Agricultural land-use change and its drivers in
mountain landscapes: A case study in the Pyrenees. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114, 296–310.
doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.017
Munroe, D.K., van Berkel, D.B., Verburg, P.H., Olson, J.L., 2013. Alternative trajectories of land
abandonment: Causes, consequences and research challenges. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 5,
471–476. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.010
Navarro, L.M., Pereira, H.M., 2012. Rewilding Abandoned Landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems 15,
900–912. doi:10.1007/s10021-012-9558-7
Pazúr, R., Lieskovský, J., Feranec, J., Oťaheľ, J., 2014. Spatial determinants of abandonment of
large-scale arable lands and managed grasslands in Slovakia during the periods of post-socialist
transition and European Union accession. Appl. Geogr. 54, 118–128.
doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.07.014
Pereira, H., Navarro, L., 2015. Preface, in: Pereira, H.M., Navarro, L.M. (Eds.), Rewilding
European Landscapes. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London, pp. v–x.
doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3
Pointereau, P., Coulon, F., Girard, P., Lambotte, M., Stuczynski, T., Sánchez Ortega, V., Del Rio,
15
A., 2008. Analysis of the Driving Forces behind Farmland Abandonment and the Extent and
Location of Agricultural Areas that are Actually Abandoned or are in Risk to be Abandoned.
Prishchepov, A. a., Müller, D., Dubinin, M., Baumann, M., Radeloff, V.C., 2013. Determinants of
agricultural land abandonment in post-Soviet European Russia. Land use policy 30, 873–884.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.06.011
Rey Benayas, J., 2007. Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences.
CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour. 2. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20072057
Rey Benayas, J.M., Martins, A., Nicolau, J.M., Schulz, J.J., 2007. Abandonment of agricultural
land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat.
Resour. 2. doi:10.1079/PAVSNNR20072057
Sierra, R., Russman, E., 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest
conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 59, 131–141.
doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.010
Terres, J.-M., Nisini, L., Anguiano, E., 2013. Assessing the risk of farmland abandonment in the
EU. doi:10.2788/81337
Terres, J.-M., Scacchiafichi, L.N., Wania, A., Ambar, M., Anguiano, E., Buckwell, A., Coppola, A.,
Gocht, A., Källström, H.N., Pointereau, P., Strijker, D., Visek, L., Vranken, L., Zobena, A.,
2015. Farmland abandonment in Europe: Identification of drivers and indicators, and
development of a composite indicator of risk. Land use policy 49, 20–34.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.009
Tesfaye, W., Seifu, L. 2016. Climate change perception and choice of adaptation strategies:
Empirical evidence from smallholder farmers in east Ethiopia. International Journal of Climate
Change Strategies and Management, 8 (2), pp.253 - 270.
van der Sluis, T., Pedroli, B., Kristensen, S.B.P., Lavinia Cosor, G., Pavlis, E., 2015. Changing land
use intensity in Europe – Recent processes in selected case studies. Land use policy.
doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.12.005
van Dijk, G., Zdanowicz, A., Blokzijl, R., 2004. Land abandonment, biodiversity and the CAP,
Land abandonment and biodiversity, in relation to the 1st and 2nd pillars of the e u ’s Common
Agricultural Policy; outcome of an international seminar in Sigulda, Latvia, 7-8 October, 2004.
Utrecht, Netherlands.
Vanwambeke, S.O., Meyfroidt, P., Nikodemus, O., 2012. From USSR to EU: 20 years of rural
landscape changes in Vidzeme, Latvia. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105, 241–249.
doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.009
Wunder, S., The Dung, B., Ibarra, E., 2005. Payment is good, control is better: Why payments for
environmental services in vietnam have so far remained incipient, Cifor.Org. Bogor Barat,
Indonesia.
16
Zakkak, S., Radovic, A., Nikolov, S.C., Shumka, S., Kakalis, L., Kati, V., 2015. Assessing the
effect of agricultural land abandonment on bird communities in southern-eastern Europe. J.
Environ. Manage. 164, 171–179. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.005
Zaragozí, B., Rabasa, A., Rodríguez-Sala, J.J., Navarro, J.T., Belda, A., Ramón, A., 2012.
Modelling farmland abandonment: A study combining GIS and data mining techniques. Agric.
Ecosyst. Environ. 155, 124–132. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.03.019
17
Table 1. General summary of the identified agricultural land abandonment drivers by their location
according to the literature review
economic and financial constraints (e.g. Latvia; Slovakia; (Abolina and Luzadis, 2015);(Łowicki,
economic activity of residents; the Swiss mountains; 2008);(Lieskovsky et al., 2013); (Gellrich et
financial inability of farmers; relative temperate European al., 2007); (Prishchepov et al., 2013)
decline of the agricultural income; Russia
withdrawal of agricultural subsidies)
Accessibility (e.g. remoteness, distance France; Portugal; (Pazúr et al., 2014); (Beilin et al., 2014);
from roads, proximity to forest and shrubs, Sweden; Spain; Latvia; (Corbelle-Rico et al., 2012); (Bakker and
distance from river, vicinity of large cities) Slovakia; van Doorn, 2009); (Estel et al., 2015);
Poland; Italy; Greece; (Mottet et al., 2006); (Łowicki, 2008);
temperate European (Vanwambeke et al., 2012); (Prishchepov et
Russia al., 2013)
Ecological
soil properties (e.g. soil quality, less fertile Portugal; Greece; (Pazúr et al., 2014); (Abolina and Luzadis,
soil) Mediterranean region, 2015); (Abolina et al., 2015)(Bakker et al.,
rainfall seasonality; Eastern Europe; Latvia; 2008); (Gellrich et al., 2007); (Kosmas et al.,
vegetation properties (e.g. fraction of Spain; Slovakia; 2014); (Baumann et al., 2011); (Milenov et
brown vegetation cover, vegetation index) Ukraine; Bulgaria; al., 2014); (Zaragozí et al., 2012)
Swiss mountains
high/steep slopes; Slovakia; Spain; Italy; (Pazúr et al., 2014); (Corbelle-Rico et al.,
Portugal; Ukraine 2012); (Bakker and van Doorn, 2009);
(Bakker et al., 2008); (Cocca et al., 2012);
(Baumann et al., 2011)
Political
18
policy obstacles(e.g. political actions, Mediterranean region, (Corbelle-Rico et al., 2015); (Abolina and
absence clear government policies) Eastern Europe; Latvia; Luzadis, 2015); (Kosmas et al., 2014);
land-use policy (restitution of private Spain
property); Slovakia (Kanianska et al., 2014)
establishment of 'new wilderness areas' Swiss mountains (Gellrich and Zimmermann, 2007)
19
Table 2. Summary of possible consequences of agricultural land abandonment
20
Figure 1. Location of case study areas. Large and medium scale studies are marked in the centre of
this area
21