Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enforcement
International
Economic & Risk Analysis
Careers
Home > Standards > Archived Standards and Guidance > Pre-Reorganized Auditing Standards and
Interpretations > Auditing Standard No. 15
AS No. 1: References in
Auditors’ Reports to the
Standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board
AS No. 6: Evaluating
Consistency of Financial
Statements
The following auditing standard is not the current version and does not reflect any
amendments effective on or after December 31, 2016. The current version of the
auditing standards can be found here.
Introduction
1. This standard explains what constitutes audit evidence and establishes
requirements regarding designing and performing audit procedures to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence.
2. Audit evidence is all the information, whether obtained from audit procedures or
other sources, that is used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusions on which the
auditor's opinion is based. Audit evidence consists of both information that supports and
corroborates management's assertions regarding the financial statements or internal
control over financial reporting and information that contradicts such assertions.
Objective
3. The objective of the auditor is to plan and perform the audit to obtain appropriate
audit evidence that is sufficient to support the opinion expressed in the auditor's report. 1/
Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence
4. The auditor must plan and perform audit procedures to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence to provide a reasonable basis for his or her opinion.
5. Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of audit evidence. The quantity of audit
evidence needed is affected by the following:
Risk of material misstatement (in the audit of financial statements) or the risk associated with the
control (in the audit of internal control over financial reporting). As the risk increases, the
amount of evidence that the auditor should obtain also increases. For example,
ordinarily more evidence is needed to respond to significant risks.2/
Quality of the audit evidence obtained. As the quality of the evidence increases, the need
for additional corroborating evidence decreases. Obtaining more of the same type of
audit evidence, however, cannot compensate for the poor quality of that evidence.
6. Appropriateness is the measure of the quality of audit evidence, i.e., its relevance
and reliability. To be appropriate, audit evidence must be both relevant and reliable in
providing support for the conclusions on which the auditor's opinion is based.
Relevance and R