Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A Bi-Monthly
A Newsletter of the Chalcedon Foundation | September
Bi-Monthly Newsletter November2018
2019
W
hile recently I noted that hair of the dog solutions
re-reading Dr. are currently the “gold standard” for
Rushdoony’s treatment (albeit fool’s gold in this
Salvation and Godly case). Opioid addiction is actually be-
Rule,1 I was stunned at ing “treated” with more opioids. This is
how often he ruled out madness. The end result is predictable
political solutions to our current prob- despite being covered up by political
lems. Political solutions merely inject misdirection and data laundering.
more poison into our culture because Does your economic system have
our problems aren’t political, they’re problems due to governmental injec-
moral. Yet we remain awash in huck- tion of funny money (fiat currency,
sters promoting one political solution debt monetization, fractional reserve
after another to “save” our nation. Far banking, etc.)? The solution is always
too many of these promoters claim to more funny money: add more sins to
be Christians, even Christian leaders, cover up the effect of earlier sins. Rob
whose rhetoric hides the fact that Peter to pay Paul only “works” until Pe-
they’re leading their disciples into the ter becomes broke. Economic problems
ditch with them. aren’t rolled back by hair of the dog solu-
It is worth our time to tease out tions: they only cause malinvestment to
these truths, to pop the hood on persist and worsen. Each new evasion
political posturing (both ancient and of responsibility worsens the impact
modern) to see it for what it truly is: of the adjustments yet to come. We
a laundry list of expedients to further consume away our own future.
man’s rebellion against His Creator, As Dr. Rushdoony said concerning
Lawgiver, Judge, King, and Savior. the proverb let us eat, drink, and be
merry, for tomorrow we die, its lesson is
ADDICTED TO HAIR OF simple.
THE DOG SOLUTIONS The economics of this proverb was an
When I wrote about our nation’s economy geared to quick consumption
addiction crisis and the moving of the without concern for the future, and
ancient landmark of sobriety to the this meant the erosion of tomorrow
lofty-sounding goal of harm reduction … It means an economy, in Roepke’s
(see my eighteen articles on Chalce- words, in which it is “a virtue to con-
don’s website concerning Massachusetts tract debts and … foolishness to save.”2
physician Punyamurtula S. Kishore), Just as opioids cannot solve opioid
M
y father often best, a waste of time and, at worst, a
used the term rejection of what was believed were the
“future-oriented” certain promises of God. The emphasis
to describe what he saw was on the present, getting as many as
as the necessary mindset possible “saved” before the rapture. That
of the believer. He be- emphasis on the present led to a neglect
lieved in working in terms of faith in the of Kingdom work that produced a
certain advance of the Kingdom of God. future in which we now find ourselves.
My father’s postmillennialism was
the eschatology behind his future-ori- PAST BOUND?
ented thinking. He saw pessimistic As bad as neglecting the future to
theology completely dominate Christi- live in the present is viewing the future
anity after the establishment of the state in terms of a return to the past. This is
of Israel in 1948. The belief that the often a problem with those who believe
imminent return of Jesus would result they are future-oriented; they seek the
in His miraculous initiation of the future by returning to the past. This
“millennial” reign paralyzed Christians’ is perhaps more debilitating than a
understanding of their responsibilities present orientation. We cannot see the
for generations, a condition from which future, so we tend to look nostalgical-
the church has still not recovered. ly at some past period and desire its
One of the most famous ministers revival. Christians tend to idealize some
of the twentieth century began a work previous time because they associate
that was notably successful and influ- it (correctly or incorrectly) with better
ential. His vision of it extended far into times. Various periods are seen as a
the future. His forward-thinking vision model: the post-Pentecost church in
was so inconsistent with his doom-and- Jerusalem, the “early church” in general,
gloom “don’t polish brass on a sinking the Reformation, later Puritanism,
ship” eschatology that something had some period of American history, agrar-
to give. A man who worked with him ian society, and so on.
told me he stopped preaching about When the first Jews returned from
eschatology. He did not repudiate his the Babylonian Captivity to rebuild
eschatology (or he would lose his finan- the temple, they quickly progressed
cial base) but he went silent on what to laying its foundation, but then a
he must have realized was a perspective sense of discouragement set in. It was
counterproductive to the success of his small, and it was not going to be the
ministry. showplace Solomon’s temple had been.
Twentieth-century Christianity was God’s message through Zerubbabel
dominated by an eschatology that saw was, “For who hath despised the day
miraculous events ending the current of small things?” (Zech. 4:10). They
age and beginning a new one. Planning could not have Solomon’s wonder back
for a future in the present age was, at again, but they did have the privilege of
YEAR-END SALE!
SAVE 30% ON ALL ORDERS
Visit our online store today
for great books and resources
to help equip you to advance
His Kingdom.
10/16/19 9:00 PM