The six speakers in an Australasian Parliamentary debate each have
different roles to play and adjudicators should take account of how well a speaker fulfill his/her obligations.
The FIRST speakers establish the fundamentals of their team’s cases.
Affirmative Team Negative Team
First affirmative’s duties First negative’s duties Ddefines the motion of the Pprovide a response to the
debate definition (accepts or
challenges the definition) st Ppresents the affirmative’s Rrebuts 1 affirmative,
theme line delivers a part of the
negative’s substantive case Ooutlines the affirmative’s Ppresents the negative’s
team split theme line
Ddelivers substantial Ooutlines the negative’s
arguments (1st affirmative team split
part of the split) Pprovides a brief Ddelivers substantial summary/recap of the arguments (1st negative’s speech part of the split) Pprovides a brief summary/recap of the speech
The SECOND speakers deal with the talk of the substantive argument.
Affirmative Team Negative Team
Second affirmative’s duties Second negative’s duties st st Rrebuts the 1 negative Rrebuts the 1 affirmative
major arguments major arguments
Bbriefly restates in general Bbriefly restates in general
terms the affirmative team’s terms the negative team’s
case case Ddelivers substantial Ddelivers substantial
part of the split). Most of part of the split) the 2nd affirmative’s time should be spent dealing with new substantial materials/arguments Pprovides a brief summary
Pprovides a brief summary
The THIRD speakers’ main duty is to rebut the opponent case.
Affirmative Team Negative Team
Third affirmative’s duties Third negative’s duties Rrebuts the points raised by Rrebuts the points raised by
the first two negative all three affirmative
speakers. The 3rd affirmative speakers is mainly entrusted with the Rrebuilds team’s case
responding to the arguments (briefly reiterate theme line
of the negative that were and first two speakers’ not previously dealt with by arguments) the first two affirmative Iidentifies the points of speakers. 3rd affirmative may contention/the clash of the also reinforce rebuttal that debate have already been stated by Ssummarizes the issues of the teammates the debate Rrebuilds team’s case Ssummarizes the issues of the debate
The REPLY speakers give a recap of the debate and convincing biased adjudication