Professional Documents
Culture Documents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - In India more than 68% of its total population including bacteria, viruses, algae, change in pH and
lives in rural area. Domestic water is major problem in this accumulation of minerals accumulated gas. A design of
area, So as to solve this problem innovative design and water tanks or container should do not harm to the water.
solutions to existing problem is essential hence for that study
of Elevated Storage Reservoir (ESR) is undertaking. There Water tanks parameters include the general
are so many case studies and report on failure during and design of the tank and choice of construction materials,
post construction of ESR. The purpose of study of the ESR is linings. Reinforced concrete water tank design is based on
to design and analysis safe ESR, Where in the damage to the IS code. The design depends on the location of tank i.e,
structure and it's structural components even by natural overhead, on the ground or underground water tanks.
hazard such as earthquake can be minimized. Indian Tanks can be made of RCC or even of steel. The overhead
standard for the design of liquid retaining structures have tanks are usually elevated from the ground level using a
been revised in 2009. This revised edition Incorporated number of column and beams. On the other hand, the
limits state design method. Limit state design method for underground tanks rest below the ground level.
water retaining structure was not adopted so far as liquid
Water tanks are classified into two types based on
retaining structure should be crack free. However, This
position and shape of tanks: -Based on Location the water
edition of Indian standard adopts limit state method mainly
tanks are classified into three ways: -
considering two aspects. Firstly it limits the stresses in steel
so that concrete is not over stressed and in second aspect it Underground water tanks
limits the cracking width. This project gives in brief, The Tanks are resting on the ground
theory behind the design of liquid retaining structure Elevated or overhead water tanks
(Elevated Circular Water Tank) using Limit state method
with reference to IS 3370(2009)and Is 456:2000 Also, the water tanks are classified based on the shapes: -
Keywords- Population, Elevated service reservoir, Natural Circular tanks
hazard, limit state method, IS code Rectangular tanks
Intze tanks
1. INTRODUCTION Circular tanks with conical bottom
Square tanks
Water tanks are liquid storage containers. These
These structures plays a crucial role in storing water
containers are usually storing water for human
which can be used in various day to day activities, mostly
consumption, irrigation, fire, agricultural farming chemical
in the urban region especially in Residential apartments
manufacturing, food preparation, rainwater harvesting as
which happen to be this project.
well as many other possible solutions. Water plays a
predominant role in day to day life so water storage is The common materials used for the construction
necessary to store the water. of water tanks are concrete steel and masonry. RCC is
commonly used in construction because it is supposed to
The main objectives in design of water tanks are
be a durable material giving long maintenance free
to provide safe drinkable water after storing for a long
service.
time, optimizing cost strength, service life, and
performance during a special situation like earthquakes. The permeability of any uniform and thoroughly
The other objectives are to maintain pH of the water and to compacted concrete of given mix proportions is mainly
prevent the growth of the microorganism. Water is dependent on the water-cement ratio. The increase in
susceptible to a number of ambient negative influences,
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3851
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3852
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Table -3: Population data Let the diameter of ring beam = B2= 10 m
Sin 2 = = 0.5807
Pn = Po( )
2 = Sin-1(0.5807)
r= √ = 0.79 = 79.08 %
2= 35.50
P2021 = 4106 ×( ) = 7353.02
Cos 2 = Cos (35.50) = 0.8141
3. Incremental increase method Tan = Tan (35.50) = 0.7133
2
( )
Pn = Po + nx + Cot 2= Cot (35.50) = 1.4019
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3853
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Taking a live load of 1500 N/m2 = 1.5 KN/m2 Permissible stress in high yield strength deformed bars
(HYSD) = 150 N/mm2
Total pressure per m2 on dome =0.1 × c +L.L
Ash = = 1894 mm2
= 0.1×25000+1500
N/mm2
= = 1.3
In IS: 3370 (Part-2), Table-2, For M-30 Concrete
Therefore, 0.39 N/mm2 ˂ 8 N/mm2.......... Safe Provide ring beam of 410 mm depth and 500 mm width.
Maximum hoop stress occurs at the centre and its Therefore, Provide 8 - 2 legged stirrups.
magnitude =
Asv = 2 × × 82 = 100 mm2
= Sv = = = 180.525 mm ≈ 180 mm
Total tension tending to rupture the beam, Ash = = 2247.47 mm2 ≈ 2093 mm2 per meter height.
This spacing can be increased at the top. hoop tension at the junction. The ring beam is provided to
take up this hoop tension.
Actual Ashprovided = = 1130 mm2 on each face.
The load W transmitted through tank wall at the top of
Permitting 1.2 N/mm2 stress on composite section, conical dome consists of the following;
= 1.2 1. Load of top dome = T1 Sin = 39288 × 0.4278 = 16807
( ) 1
N/m
t = 242.51 mm
2. Load due to the ring beam B1 = 0.41 × (0.5-0.2) × 1 ×
Minimum thickness = 3H + 5 = (3×4) +5 = 17 cm 25000 = 3075 N/m
However provide t= 300 mm at bottom and taper it to 200 3. Load due to tank wall = 4* + = 25000
mm at top.
N/m
Average t = = 250 mm
4. Self load of beam B3 (1 m × 0.6 m, say ) = (1 - 0.3) × 0.6 ×
25000 = 10500 N/m
Percent distribution steel = 0.24 % of surface zone of wall
Total load, W = 55382 N/m
Therefore, Ash = = 600 mm2
Inclination of conical dome wall with vertical = 0 = 45
Area of steel on each face = 300 mm2
Sin 0 = Cos 0 = 0.7071 = ; tan 0 =1
√
Spacing of 8 mm bars = =167.7 mm ≈ 160mm
PW = W × tan 0 = 55382 × 1 = 55382 N/m
Hence provide 8 mm bars @ 160 mm c/c on both face.
PW = W × h × d3 = 9800 × 4 × 0.6 = 23520 N/m
Keep a clear cover of 25 mm. Extend the vertical bars of
outer face into the dome to take care of the continuity Hence hoop tension in the ring beam is given by
effects.
P3 = (W + PW) × = (55382 + 23520) × = 631216 N
To resist the hoop tension at 2m below top.
This to be resisted entirely by steel hoops, the area of
Ash = = 1047 mm2
which is
Spacing of 12 mm ring = = 215 mm= 210 mm Ash = = 4208 mm2
Hence, provide the rings @ 210 mm c/c in top 2 m height. No of 30 mm bars = = 5.95 ≈ 6 No
Hence, provide the rings @ 140 mm c/c in the next 1 m Stress in equivalent section = ( )
= 0.99
height. N/mm2 ˂ 1.2 N/mm2...... Safe
In the last 1 m height (3 m to 4 m) provide rings 100 mm The 8 mm distribution bars (vertical bars) provided in
c/ as found earlier. the wall @ 150 mm c/c should be taken round the above
c
ring to act as stirrups.
5.6 Design of ring beam B3
5.7 Design of conical dome
The ring beam connects the tank wall with conical dome.
The vertical load at the junction of the wall with conical a. Meridional thrust
dome. The horizontal components of the thrust causes
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3855
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Poˈ = * +
= 1.2 N/mm2
( )
=* ( )+ * +
( ) This is equal to permissible value of 1.2 N/mm2
=[ ( ) ][ ] In the Meridional direction, provide reinforcement @
=[ ][ ]
, * + - = 0.24
=[ ][ ]
Asd = 0.24 × 4466 =1072 mm2 or 536 mm2 on each face.
=[ ]
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3856
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Total weight WT = 4751259 + 540982 Self weight = 0.6 × 1.20 × 1 × 25000 = 18000 N/m
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3857
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
F = WR ( )
Where, MT = T [ ] = 53973 [ ] = 95247 N.m
At , F = 549768 × 5 (22.5 - 9.5 ) = 623692 N
Me1 = 1767 + 95247 = 97014 N.m
B.M at the point of maximum torsional moment (
) Ast1 = = = 638 mm2
= WR2 ( ( ))
No. of 25 mm bars = ≈ 2 No
At the supports,
Provide a minimum of 2 bars. Thus at the point of maximum
WR2 ( ) = Zero torsion, provide 2-25 mm bars each at top at bottom .
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3858
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
No. of 25 mm bars = 9.5 = 10 Nos. Since , shear reinforcement is necessary. The area of
cross – section Asv of the stirrups is given by
Hence provide 8 Nos of 25 mm bars in one layer and 2 bars
in the second layer. These will be provided at the top of the Asv =
section, near supports.
Where,
C. Section at Max. Sagging B.M (Mid span)
b1 = 600 – (40 × 2) – 25 = 495 mm
Mc = 323840 N.m ;Mc’ = 0
d1 = 1200 – (40 × 2) – 25 = 1095 mm
Therefore, For positive B.M steel will be to the other face
where stress in steel ( ) can be taken as 190 N/mm2. The = = 2.207
constants for M30 concrete having C = 10 N/mm2 and M = 9.33
will be Minimum transverse reinforcement is governed by
K = 0.324 ; j = 0.892, R = 1.011
* +
Ast = = 1647 mm2
= = 3.548
No. of 25 mm bars = = 3.35 Nos
Hence depth = 3.548
Hence the scheme of reinforcement will be as follows ;
Using 12 mm 4 lgd stirrups, Asv = 4 × 113 = 452 mm2
At the supports, provide 8 -25 mm bar at top layer and 2-25
mm bars in the second layer. Continue these upto the section Or, Sv = = 127.39 ≈ 128 mm
of maximum torsion (i.e. at = 9.5 = 0.166 rad ) at a
distance = 5 × 0.166 = 0.83 m or equal to L d = 52 =1300 mm However the spacing should not exceed the last of X1, and
from supports.
300 mm where
At the point, discontinue four bars while continue the
remaining four bars. Similary provide 4 bars of 25 mm at the X1 = Short dimension of stirrups = 495 + 25 +12 = 532 mm
bottom, throughout the length. These bars will take care of
Y1 = long dimension of stirrups = 1095 + 25 +12 = 1032 mm
both the max. Positive B.M as well as maximum torsional
moment.
Transverse reinforcement
Hence provide 12 mm 4 lgd stirrups @ 120 mm c/c
a. At point of max. Torsional moment ;
b. At the point of max. Shear (supports)
At the point of max. Torsion, v = 633692 N
At supports, Fo = 1079467 N
Ve = V + 1.6
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3859
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Hence shear reinforcement is necessary Outer diameter = 16.4 + 1.2 + 1.2 m gallery = 18.8 m of gallery
Therefore, Vs = Fo - Vc= 1079467-215760 = 863707 N W = 0.3 L.L + 0.11 × 2.55 D.L + 0.1 F.F / railing
The spacing of 10 mm 4 lgd stirrups having Asv = 314 mm2 W = 0.3 × 1 + 0.11 × 2.55 × 1 + 0.1 × 1
is given by
W = 0.6805 T/m2
Sv =
Moment = 0.6805 × 1.2 × × = 0.5258
This is small, hence use 12 mm 4 lgd stirrups having ;
Consider d = 120 – 30 – 5 = 85 = 0.085 m
Asv = 4 × = 452.39 mm2
Total Astrequired= = 154.096 cm2 with live load
At spacing, Sv= = 90 mm
Spacing = 1000 × = 492.981 mm
C. At the mid – span S.F is Zero. Hence provide Minimum /
nominal shear reinforcement, given by Provide 490 mm spacing 10 Nos TOR bars
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3860
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
b. Wind loads
Let the column be of 700 mm diameter
Total height of structure = 16 + 1.2 + 3 + 4 + 1.9 = 26.1 m
Weight of column per meter height = (0.7)2 × 1 × 25000 =
9620 N Refer IS 875 part-3
Clear length of each brace = 3.83 – 0.7 = 3.13 m Table no – 2 K2, category 3
Weight of each brace = 0.3 × 0.6 × 3.13 × 25000 = 14085 N Total height = 26.1 m
20 1.01
26.1 K2
30 1.06
K2 = 1.04
K3 = 1
= 0.6 × (1×1.04×1×44)2
Hence total weight of column just above each brace is Wind load at the top end of top panel =
tabulated below
Wind load are shown in diagram. The points of contraflexure
Brace GH ; W = 2158936 + 4 × 9620 = 2197416 N
O1, O2, O3 & O4 are assumed to be at the mid height of each
Brace EF ; W = 2158936 + 8 × 9620 = 2235896 N
panel. The shear forces Qw and moments Mw due to wind at
Brace CD ; W = 2158936 + 12 × 9620 = 2274376 N these planes are given below.
Bottom of column ;
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3861
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Table -6: Shear force & bending moment due to wind load N/mm2 and = 8 N/mm2 . For steel = 230 N/mm2. All
the three can be increased by 33 %
Level Qw (N) Mw (N.m)
O4 127618 + 14326 = 141944 127618 × 8.2 + 14326 × 2 =
1075119.6 When taking into account wind action.
O3 127618 + 14326 + 28652 127618 × 12.2 + 14326 × 6 +
= 170596 28652 × 2 = 1700199.6 Diameter of column = 700 mm Use 12 bars of 30 mm dia at an
O2 127618 + 14326 + 28652 127618
+ × 16.2 + 14326 × 10 + effective cover of 40 mm.
28652 28652 × 2 = 2439887.6
=199248 Asc =
O1 127618 + 14326 + 28652 127618
+ × 20.2 + 14326 × 14 +
28652 + 28652 × 10 + 28652 × 6 + 28652 × Equivalent area of column = × 7002 + (9.33-1) × 8482 =
28652 =227900 2 = 3294183.6
455500 mm 2
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3862
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
= t = 230 N/mm2
An = = 6.4×10-3
M = 9.33
Force due to earthquake Feh
K = 0.28865
Feh1 = Mass × Acceleration = 17271486 × 6.4×10-3 =
110539.4304 N J = 0.9038
The bending moment m1 in a brace is given by its maximum × b × (0.288d)2 + (9.33-1) × pbd (0.288d-0.1d)
value being governed by
P = 8.168 ×10-3
Tan ( )
% p = 0.8168 % = 0.008168
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3863
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Since the brace is subjected to both the B.M as well as twisting Ve = 160245 N
moment, we have
Me1 = M + Mr
This is less than = 0.37 N/mm2.
Where M = B.M = (M1)max = 207318
Hence transverse reinforcement is necessary.
MT = T[ ] , where T = Mt = 10331 N.m
Asv =
Let D = 700 mm
Where , b1 = 300 – (25×2) – 25 = 225 mm
Ve = V + = 105146 + 1.6 ×
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3864
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
5.13 Design of raft foundation Under the wind load, the allowable bearing capacity is
increased to
Vertical load from filled tank and columns = 2322476 × 8 =
18579808 N 196.133 × 1.33 = 260.856 kN/m2
Weight of water = 11216657 N Which is greater than the minimum soil pressure of 215.302
KN/m2. Hence the foundation raft will be designed only for
Vertical load of empty tank and columns = 7363151 N super-imposed Load.
Vmax due of wind load = 164709.18 × 8 which is less than 33 The layout of the foundation is shown
% of the super imposed load.
A ring beam of 700mm width may be provided. The foundation
164709.18 × 8 = 1367600 will be designed for an average pressure P ;
* + P= = 178138.14 N/m2
Width of foundation = = 3.316 ≈ 3.32 Provide 400 mm thick slab with effective depth of 350 mm.
Decrease the total depth of 250 mm at the edges .
Hence inner diameter = 10 – 3.32 = 6.68 m
Ast = = 2100.88 mm2
Outer diameter = 10 + 3.32 = 13.32 m
Spacing of 16 mm radial bars @ 95 mm c/c at the bottom of
Area of annular raft = ( ) = 104.30 m2
slab
Moment of inertia of slab about diametrical axis = ×(13.324 –
Area of distribution steel = = 600 mm2
6.684) = 1447.5 M2
Total load, tank empty = 7363151 + 1857980.8 = 9221131.8 N Spacing of 10 mm bars = 1000 × = 130.83 mm
Stabilizing moment = 9221131.8 × = 61412737.79 N.m Hence Provide 10 mm bars @ 130 mm c/c at the supports.
Increase this spacing to 200 mm at the edge.
Let the base of the raft be 2 m below ground level.
The design of circular beam of raft will be practically similar
Mw at base = (127618 × 24.2) + (14326 × 18) + 28652 to the circular beam B2 provided at the top of the
(14+10+6) = 4205783.6 N.m columns.
Hence the soil pressures at the edges along a diameter are Design load = = 591413.657
a. Tank full = 215302.92 N/m2 or The circular beam B2 was designed for w = 591413.657
176600.99 N
The circular beam B2 was designed for w = 549768
b. Tank empty = = Hence the B.M etc will be increased in this ratio of
107760.66N/m or 69058.737 N/m2
2
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3865
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
B.M at the point of Max. Torsion = 1767 × 1.07575 = 1900.850 Ast = = = 500 mm2
N.m
Fig -3: Raft foundation detail At supports provide 6 – 25 mm bars at bottom of section.
Continue these upto the section of maximum torsion (i.e. at
Main or longitudinal reinforcement = 9.5 = 0.116 rad) at a distance = R = 5 × 0.166 = 0.83 or
equal to Ld = = = 52 = 52 × 25 = 130 mm
a. section at point of maximum torsion
whichever is more
T = mtmax = 58061.45475 N.m
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3866
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Beyond this discontinue 2 bars, while the remaining 4 bars b. At the point of max. Shear (supports)
may be continued throughout the length.
At supports Fo = 1161237 N
Similarly provide 4 – 25 mm bars at top, throughout the
length. These bars will take care of both the maximum positive = = 1.5 N/mm2
B>M as well as Maximum torsional moment.
( )
At supports , = 0.37
Transverse reinforcement
a. At the point of maximum torsional moment Hence = 0.26 N/mm2 . Hence shear reinforcement is
necessary
V = 681695 N.m
Vc = 0.26 × 700 × 1140 = 2.7480 N
Ve = V + 1.6 = 681695 + 1.6 × = 814408 N
Vs = Fo – Vc = 1161237 – 207480 = 953757 N
This is less than = 0.22 N/mm2 hence shear reinforcement is Asv = 4 × × 122 = 452.4 mm2 is given by
necessary.
Sv = = = 124.37 mm
Asv =
Hence provide 12 mm 4 lgd stirrups @ 124 mm c/c
Where b1 = 700 – (40×2) -25 = 595 mm
C. At mid span ; At the mid span
d1 = 1200 – (40 × 2) – 25 = 1095 mm
S.F is zero hence Provide, minimum / nominal shear
=* + = 1.47 reinforcement given by
= 2.43 Sv = = 465 mm
L.L = 0.05 × T
Total = 0.15 T
=( )
=( )
= 28.55 T 20 T
Footing design
S.B.C = 20T/sq.mt
Fig –4: Loading diagram
Area of footing required = sq.mt
3. Limit state method was found to be most economical for 11. IS (Indian standard) 3370-2 (2009): Code of
design of water tank as the quantity of steel and concrete Practice Concrete structures for the storage of
needed is less as compare to working stress method. liquids, Part 2: Reinforced concrete structures
12. IS (Indian standard) 875 – Part 3Wind Loads on
4. After manual design and analysis in staad pro our Buildings and Structures -Proposed Draft &
structure is safe. Commentary
13. IS 456:2000Plain and Reinforced Concrete - Code
References of Practice
14. IS 893: 2002Indian Standard CRITERIA FOR
Research Paper EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT DESIGN OF
STRUCTURES PART 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS AND
BUILDINGS (Fifth Revision)
1. Bhandari, M. (2014). Water Tank Of Different
Shapes With Reference To IS: 3370 2009.
International Journal of Modern Engineering
Research , 1-3.
2. Gunasekaran, Y. K. (2016). Analysis And Design Of
Sump And Overhead Tank And Usage Of Sensors
In Residential Apartment In Nanganallur, Chennai.
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3869
International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 04 | Apr 2018 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
Books
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 3870