Organization Creative Climate

Advanced Topics in Business and Organization

LA21

Ayu Anjarwati 2201744784

Angga Oktaviansa 2201762250
Christine Ongky 2201758644
Nicander Steven Fu 2201768140
Sherly 2201810584
Caitlin Christabel 2201746101
Livionita C 2201748896
Steaven Calvino 2201756595
Aldous Billezra Bang 2201749545

Okta Prihatma Bayu Putra

2019/2020
 Based on the model of creativity and innovation proposed by Amabile (1988),
organizational motivation, resources, and management practices constitute the work
environment for individuals and teams working within the organization. These components of
the work atmosphere can impact individuals 'and teams' ability and innovation. in keeping
with Schneider (1990), structure artistic climate consists of a group of specific practices and
procedures and consistent reward mechanisms, that is the first driver of product innovation.
The presence of distinctive processes and procedures and associated incentive systems
produces and enhances structure innovative atmosphere. structure artistic climate usually
consists of 10 dimensions: challenge, freedom, plan support, trust / openness, dynamism /
liveliness, playfulness / humor, debates, conflicts, risk-taking, and plan time.

The dimensions of Creative Climate

The Creative Climate Questionnaire was developed by Göran Ekvall :

1. Challenge: It means that members of the organization are affectionately interested in the
aims and activities of the company. When people feel happiness and experience
meaningfulness in their work, a high Challenge environment is present, and then they put a
lot of energy into the work.

2. Freedom: Denotes organisation's behavioral independence. In a climate of high freedom

people freely make contacts, exchange information, initiate and make decisions. The
alternative is an area of rules and passivity. 

3. Idea Time: The amount of time company leaders will and must use to create new ideas.
Possibilities for exploring and sharing ideas and fresh impulses that were not planned and
prepared in advance occur in a high Idea Time situation.

4. Idea Support: Describes how the organisation's new ideas are handled. Bosses and
colleagues are attentive and cooperative in a friendly atmosphere, people listen to each other's
ideas, the climate is constructive and optimistic. 

5. Openness: The freedom of feeling in relationships. Everybody in the company dares to

bring forth new ideas and thoughts in a high Openness setting. Initiatives should be taken in
the event of disappointment, without fear of reprisal and mockery. The contact style is
straightforward. 

6. Dynamism: The eventfulness of organizational life. New things happen all the time in a
high dynamic environment and ways of thinking change frequently. There is a "psychological
turbulence" that features "full speed" and "breakneck." 

7. Playfulness / Humour: The show of spontaneity and ease. In a high Playfullness setting is
present a relaxed atmosphere of jokes and laughter. 

8. Debates: The occurrence of confrontations and interactions between various perspectives,

beliefs , perceptions and knowledge. Many voices are heard in a debating group, and people
are keen to bring forth their proposals and challenge the status quo.

9. Conflicts: The absence of mental and personal problems within the company (as opposed
to disagreements between ideas). People dislike each other when there are many conflicts
(and the measure is actually low) and the climate is characterized by "warfare," plots and
traps being their usual elements. 

10. Risk Taking: The perception of organizational ambiguity. A high score means decisions
are fast and prompt, giving rise to possibilities and preferring practical innovation to thorough
examination and review.

Creative climate attributes :

1. Work Characteristics
According to Amabile (1998), matching individuals with the correct assignments is
one among the foremost effective ways that to extend creative thinking. this suggests that
folks ought to use their experience and creative-thinking skills in their work, that successively
can increase their intrinsic motivation towards the task.

2. Management Support
Management support could be a broad class and involves all activities conducted by
managers that influence structure creative thinking. though abundant of what goes on in a
company might be argued to stem from management choices, this class completely contains
attributes that area unit the direct responsibility of managers likewise as social control
behavior.

3. Fellow worker Support

Co-worker support is that the temperament of fellow workers to get together and
facilitate one another rather than making a climate of secrecy. In their analysis concerning
however the work context have an effect on creative thinking, author and Oldham (1997)
stress the importance of stimulating coworkers. Such co-workers create each other feel a lot
of excited concerning their work and don't distract one another from it.

4. Safety
Safety contains the attributes necessary for organization members to feel safe once
expressing their concepts. Trust/openness is another of Ekvall’s (1996) climate dimensions
and refers to an identical thought. He mentions the emotional safety that staff have to be
compelled to expertise so as to totally categorical themselves. individuals mustn't be mocked
thanks to their concepts and this needs an excellent level of trust among staff, he continues.

5. Resources
Resources discuss with the desired time and cash to nourish creative thinking.
Williams (2001) states that experiments ought to be allowed and supported by enough
resources to boost artistic results. once it involves the time side, totally different researchers
address it otherwise. Amabile (1998) argues that allocating a correct quantity of your time for
creative thinking could be a sophisticated task since a too tight schedule or not possible
deadlines will have AN inhibiting impact on creative thinking, whereas cheap time pressure
nourishes artistic concepts by generating a way of challenge.

6. Diversity
In Amabile’s (1998) climate scale work-group options, she lifts forth the importance
of diversity in views and backgrounds as a very important conducive attribute to creative
thinking. helpful and exciting things typically emerge once individuals with totally different
intellects and ways that of operating move.
7. Dynamism/Risk-taking
Dynamism/Risk-taking contains attributes that discuss with a climate that may be
known as dynamic and risk-taking, that successively urges creative thinking.
Dynamism/liveliness is one among Ekvall’s (1996) dimensions of an ingenious climate. He
describes that this dimension refers to a scenario within which there's invariably one thing
new happening at intervals the organization. The atmosphere provides a way of urgency and
speed, eventfulness and excitement. This stands opposite to the slow atmosphere that
functions habitually.

8. Structure Systems and Processes

Establishing social networks may be the simplest way of sharing heterogeneous data
and views, that successively will increase creative thinking (George, 2007). To any nourish
artistic behavior, Williams (2001) determine the importance of building a system to properly
appraise employees’ artistic performance.

The outcomes of organizational creativity should be new and useful, i.e. be valuable to the
organization (Amabile, 1998; George, 2007; Isaksen and Ekvall, 2010; Cummings, 1965).

Playfulness/Humour is regarded as the spontaneity and ease that is displayed among

employees in the firm. Such organizations maintain a relaxed atmosphere with jokes and
laughter (Ekvall et al., 1983).Isaksen et al (1998) intercalary that associate easygoing and
light-hearted atmosphere would produce a fun geographic point. during this kind of work
atmosphere, staff can feel relax, and their capability to suppose will increase, resulting in
larger plan generation for development and improvement.

Challenge refers to the emotional involvement of the employees of the firm in its
operations and goals (Ekvall et al., 1983).When employees experience joy and
meaningfulness in their job, they tend to become more energetic in their work.

Based on Ekvall et al. (1983), idea support is regarded as the way in which new ideas
are treated. When new ideas are well received by superiors and peers in an organization,
employees are likely to judge their organization as supportive. Freedom is conceptualized
because the independence in behaviour exerted by the workers during a firm (Ekvall et al.,
1983). during a climate characterized by freedom, staff build contacts, share info, measure
various, and build choices for problem-solving (Ekvall et al., 1983).

Conflict is defined as the presence of personal and emotional tensions, where, in a

firm with a high level of conflict, employees dislike each other, and that the climate can be
liken to a war (Ekvall et al., 1983)

Playfulness proves an essential aspect of creative organizational climate [ CITATION

Ekv96 \l 1033 ], and it encourages a creative work environment.
 Playful methods of representational modeling to promote collaborative ideation in
heterogeneous interdisciplinary groups were published. In the two case studies reported,
workshop participants played and tinkered with art supplies and plastic building blocks to
generate visualizations in the early stages of an innovation process (Schulz et al. 2015).

The importance of structure climate factors for creativeness has been well established
widely cited innovation team climate theory consists of four factors that promote team
creativity: vision (group members communicate and contribute to clearly defined goals);
participatory protection (a non-judgmental atmosphere in which group members engage in
decision-making and are free to suggest new ideas without fear of being criticized), Task
orientation (a general commitment to performance among community members that stresses
transparency and continuous improvement of procedures); and innovation support (an
intention and active support of creative behavior organization).

Play cues (including playful props or childish sweets) are encouraging people to play;
they are clearly signalling that play is permitted. Self-adhesive moustaches for each
participant (along with an envelope containing instructions for applying them); instructions
for playing a "silly meeting game" in which participants throw their hands while yelling "life
is great" when they encounter other participants touching their faces during the meeting.

There is a discussion in this region involving the difference between tradition and
climate that is worth bringing up for the sake of clarity. According to Martin (2002), lifestyle
refers to underlying assumptions, beliefs and values, and studying tradition requires deep
investigation in a huge vary of human affairs within the organization. lsaksen et al. (2001)
country that climate is observable whereas, according to Schneider et al. (1996), subculture is
deeper, extra lasting and much less observable. As a result, according to Schneider (2000)
mentioned in lsaksen and Ekval1 (2010), considering climate is observable via interactions
and behaviors, it is considered as a much less abstract thinking compared to culture. In his
study of the difference between organizational climate and culture, although concurs that
local weather is rooted in the organizational values, he provides to the previous factors that
climate research are extra involved with the have an effect on that agency social structures
have on members of the agency where as lifestyle research are greater interested in the
evolvement of these social structures at some point of time. According to him, the climate-
related dimensions are extra controllable and consciously perceivable by using organizational
members.

As Schneider (1987) expresses, whilst climate addresses how businesses operate and
what are valued and anticipated in the organization, way of life is about the reasons why
positive performances are predicted and supported. Further, lifestyle is the values that
pressure the enterprise to feature in the certain way (ibid). After reviewing the literature,
states every other difference between culture and climate. According to him, way of life can
be approached from outdoor the context and as a crew understanding, whilst climate is the
feeling that humans get from inner the environment. The subjective approach to the local
weather is also adopted by using Amabile et al. (1996), where they intend to check
individual's grasp of the work surroundings by using the KEYS local weather assessing tool.
However, Ekval1 (1996) believes that even though person appreciation is the groundwork of
the organizational climate, the climate is an goal aggregation of the shared perceptions of
individuals. According to him, the absolute measure of climate dimensions can be assessed
regardless of individual's perception. He adopts this viewpoint in his climate assessing tool,
CCQ as well.
 A variety of organizational climate elements have been highlighted in the
abovementioned descriptions by using unique researchers. The local weather definition
adopted in this document carries those highlighted areas, and is: The organizational climate is
the behavioral manifestation of underlying values, beliefs and assumptions of the members of
an organization. The climate is perceived through individuals through organization
procedures and practices which provide an aggregated concept of how to characteristic in the
agency and what the organizational dreams and objectives are. During further phases, the
definition of organizational climate that is adopted in this research, as well as the big
difference between climate and culture, pave the way to consider climate-related attributes in
the concept as properly as empirical studies, and rule out the attributes that do now not make
a contribution to organizational climate.
 REFERENCES

Amabile, T.M. (1998), “How to kill creativity”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76
No. 5, pp. 77-87. Ekvall, G., Arvonen, J. and Waldenstorm, L.I. (1983).
Creative organizational cimate. Construction and validation of a measuring
instrument. Faradet, Report 2 the Swedish Council for Management and Work
Life Issues: Stockholm.
B., Brief, A. P. & Guzzo, R. A. 1996. Creating a climate and culture for
sustainable organizational change.
D’Andrea, M. (2013). Review of Creative Intelligence by Bruce
Nussbaum . Creativity Research
Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843919
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J. and Ekvall, G. (1998). Perception of the Best and Worst
Climates for Creativity: Preliminary Validation Evidence for the Situational
Outlook Questionnaire. Monograph #305. Buffalo: Creative Problem Solving
Group.                 
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European
Journal of Work and Organizational
Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845
Ekvall, G. 1996. Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation. European
Journal of
Work & Organizational Psychology, 5, 105.
George, J. M. 2007. Creativity in Organizations. The Academy of Management
Annals.
London: Routledge.
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-Level Predictors of
Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades
of Research. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
J. 2002. Organizational Culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications, Inc.
S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G. & Britz, A. 2001. 
Perceptions of the Best and Worst C[imates for Creativity: Pre]iminary Va]idation
Evidence for the Situationa] Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal
 
Oldham, G. R. & Cummings, A. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and
contextual factors
at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607.
 
Patrik Axelsson, N. S. (2011). A Framework to Assess Organizational Creative.
Master of Science 
Thesis in the Master Degree Program, Quality and Operations, 9-18.
 
Schneider, B., Ed. (1990). Organizational Climate and Culture. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Amabile, t. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In
Research in Organizational Behaviour (Vol. 10 pp. 169-211). Edited by Barry M.
Staw and L. L. Cummings. Greenwich, Conn. J.A.I. Press.
 
Schulz, K. P., Geithner, S., Woelfel, C., & Krzywinski, J. (2015). Toolkit-based
modelling and serious play as means to foster creativity in innovation
processes. Creativity and Innovation
Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12113
West, S., Hoff, E., & Carlsson, I. (2016). Play and Productivity: Enhancing the
Creative Climate at Workplace Meetings with Play Cues. American Journal of
Play.
Williams, S. 2001. Increasing employees' creativity by training their managers.
Industrial and Commercial Training, 33, 63.
Schneider, B., Brief, A. P. & Guzzo, R. A. 1996. Creating a climate and culture for sustainable
organizational change.
Martin, J. 2002. Organizational Culture: Mapping the terrain. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
lsaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G. & Britz, A. 2001. Perceptions of the Best and Worst C[imates for
Creativity: Pre]iminary Va]idation Evidence for the Situationa] Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity
Research Journal