Chapter 4

Interpretation and Analysis of Data

Table 1

Distribution of Age’s Respondents

List of respondents Actual number Frequency Percentage

(by Age)
14 15 15 50
15 10 10 33.3
16 5 5 16.7
Total 30 30 100

Table 1 shows the Distribution of Age’s Respondents. From age 14, the actual number is

15, frequency of 15 and percentage of 50. From age 15, the actual number is 10, frequency of 10

and percentage of 33.3. From age 16, the actual number is 5, frequency of 5 and percentage of

16.7.

Table 2

Distribution of Gender’s Respondents

 Gender
Male Female
12 18

Table 2 shows the Distribution of Gender’s Respondents. There are 12 males and 18

females. Because females are more observant in our environment especially the segregation of

plastics and usually fond of the orderliness of the environment than males.

Table 3

Distribution of Year Level’s Respondents

List of Respondents

(by year level)

K7 5
K8 5
K9 15
K10 5

Table 3 shows the Distribution of Year Level’s Respondents. From K7 to K10. From k7,

there are 5 respondents. From K8, there are 5 respondents. From K9, there are 15 respondents.

From K10, there are 5 respondents.

Table 4

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Not Aware

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Soil Not Aware Percentage Ranking

pollution
Plastics are harmful to plant growth? 3 10% 1
 Can you use plastics or any kind of solid 0 0% 2

waste as a decoration?
Soil pollution is dangerous? 3 10% 1
Soil pollution can affect our health? 0 2

0%
Soil pollution can be prevented? 3 10% 1

Table 4 shows that the respondents are not aware in Segregation of plastics in St.

Augustine’s School. That’s why they are not aware what’s happening to their surroundings.

Table 5

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Somewhat Aware

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Somewhat Aware Percentage Ranking

Soil pollution
Plastics are harmful to plant 11 37% 3

growth?
Can you use plastics or any kind of 15 50% 1

solid waste as a decoration?

Soil pollution is dangerous? 8 27% 5
Soil pollution can affect our health? 10 33% 4
 Soil pollution can be prevented? 12 40% 2

Table 5 shows that the respondents are somewhat aware of Segregation of plastics in St.

Augustine’s School because they know the possibilities of what might happen if this continues.

Table 6

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Very Aware

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Very Aware Percentage Ranking

Soil pollution
Plastics are harmful to plant 18 60% 2

growth?
Can you use plastics or any kind of 15 50% 3

solid waste as a decoration?

Soil pollution is dangerous? 18 60% 2
Soil pollution can affect our health? 20

67% 1
Soil pollution can be prevented? 15 50% 3
Table 6 shows that the respondents are very aware in Segregation of plastic to prevent Soil in St.

Augustine’s School because if ever the soil would be polluted, the will be no chances of

plantation of foods to support the human livings and animals.

Table 7

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Strongly Agree

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Soil pollution Strongly Agree Percentage Ranking

Plastic is eco-friendly? 2 7% 7
Do plastics can make up a large part of the 4 13% 5

municipal waste?
Plastics good for the environment? 1 3% 8
Plastics as an alternative energy source? 0 0% 9
Manila has a worst case of Soil pollution? 5 17% 4
Soil pollution can be prevented? 5 17% 4
Soil pollution can give rise to mutated 3 10% 6

agricultural goods and products?

Soil pollution can contribute to the need of 2 7% 7

pharmaceutical modifications of drugs due to the

formation of mutated microorganism causing

disease?
Making recyclable plastics or bio- plastics can 16 53% 2
 save mother earth?
Government leader should be more focused on 20 67% 1

the environment?
People lived along the polluted soil should 8 27% 3

evacuate?

Table 7 shows that the respondents are strongly agree in Segregation of plastics because

plastics can make up a large part of the municipal waste and might pollute the soil.
 Table 8

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Agree

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Soil pollution Agree Percentage Ranking

1. Plastic is eco-friendly? 0 0% 10
2. Do plastics can make up a large part of the 11 37% 2

municipal waste?
3. Plastics good for the environment? 1 3% 9
4. Plastics as an alternative energy source? 3 10% 8
5. Manila has a worst case of Soil pollution? 8 27% 4
6. 6. Soil pollution can be prevented? 15 50% 1
7. Soil pollution can give rise to mutated 6 20% 6

agricultural goods and products?

8. Soil pollution can contribute to the need of 5 17% 5

pharmaceutical modifications of drugs due

to the formation of mutated

microorganism causing disease?

9. Making recyclable plastics or bio- plastics 9 30% 3

can save mother earth?

10. Government leader should be more 4 13% 7

focused on the environment?

11. People lived along the polluted soil should 8 27% 4

evacuate?
Table 8 shows that the respondents are agree in Segregation of plastics because soil pollution can

be prevented.
 Table 9

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Moderately Agree

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Soil pollution Moderately Agree Percentage Ranking

Plastic is eco-friendly? 6 20% 6
Do plastics can make up a large part of the 10 33% 4

municipal waste?
 Plastics good for the environment? 3 10% 9
Plastics as an alternative energy source? 19 63% 7
Manila has a worst case of Soil pollution? 10 33% 4
Soil pollution can be prevented? 4 13% 8
Soil pollution can give rise to mutated 14 47% 3

agricultural goods and products?

Soil pollution can contribute to the need of 15 50% 2

pharmaceutical modifications of drugs due to

the formation of mutated microorganism

causing disease?
Making recyclable plastics or bio- plastics can 5 17% 7

save mother earth?

Government leader should be more focused on 5 17% 7

the environment?
1. People lived along the polluted soil 7 23% 5

should evacuate?

Table 9 shows that the respondents are moderately agree in Segregation of plastics

because plastics might cause mutated microorganism causing diseases.

 Table 10

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Disagree

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Soil pollution Disagree Percentage Ranking

Plastic is eco-friendly? 8 27% 1
Do plastics can make up a large part of the 3 10% 3

municipal waste?
Plastics good for the environment? 8 27% 1
Plastics as an alternative energy source? 2 7% 4
Manila has a worst case of Soil pollution? 3 10% 3
Soil pollution can be prevented? 3 10% 3
Soil pollution can give rise to mutated agricultural 4 13% 2

goods and products?

Soil pollution can contribute to the need of 4 13% 2

pharmaceutical modifications of drugs due to the

formation of mutated microorganism causing

 disease?
Making recyclable plastics or bio- plastics can save 0 0% 6

mother earth?
1. Government leader should be more focused 1 3% 5

on the environment?
2. People lived along the polluted soil should 1 3% 5

evacuate?

Table 10 shows that the respondents are disagree in Segregation of plastics because

plastics are not eco-friendly and not good for the environment.
 Table 11

Distribution of Respondents According to The Result of Strongly Disagree

Segregation of Plastics to prevent Soil pollution Strongly Percentage Ranking

Disagree
Plastic is eco-friendly? 14 47% 1
Do plastics can make up a large part of the municipal 3 10% 4

waste?
Plastics good for the environment? 14 47% 1
Plastics as an alternative energy source? 6 20% 2
Manila has a worst case of Soil pollution? 3 10% 4
Soil pollution can be prevented? 2 7% 5
Soil pollution can give rise to mutated agricultural goods 3 10% 4

and products?
Soil pollution can contribute to the need of 4 13% 3

pharmaceutical modifications of drugs due to the

formation of mutated microorganism causing disease?

Making recyclable plastics or bio- plastics can save 0 0% 7

mother earth?
Government leader should be more focused on the 0 0% 7

environment?
People lived along the polluted soil should evacuate? 1 3% 6
 Table 11 shows that the respondents are strongly disagree in Segregation of plastics

because it its truly that plastics are not eco-friendly and plastics are not good for the environment

which can give rise to mutated agricultural goods and products.