Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Production of Nickel
Concentrates from Sulfide Ores
The first step in extracting nickel and cobalt from sulfide ores is crushing and
grinding. As shown in Figure 13.1, the crushed and ground ore is pumped to
flotation, where sulfide minerals are selectively extracted.
The objective of this chapter is to describe the crushing and grinding of
sulfide ores.
eccentric
gyratory
crusher
~0.2 m
vibrating screen
oversize (>0.01 m)
correct size
<0.01 m
eccentric
cone
crusher
(pebble)
to flotation
<0.02 m
correct size ~50 µm
hydrocyclones
rotating steel
ball grinding oversize > 50 µm
mill
FIGURE 14.1 Flowsheet for preparing small particles for feed to flotation from as-mined ore
pieces. Two stages of crushing and two stages of grinding are shown. The crushing is open circuit,
that is, there is no recycle loop. The two grinding circuits are closed circuit, that is, oversize
material is recycled for re-crushing or re-grinding to specified particle sizes.
Number 3 4 1
Notably, the Australian concentrator uses a jaw crusher while the Canadian concentrators use gyratory
crushers.
a
Rod mills tumble long steel rods rather than balls (Boldt & Queneau, 1967).
Separate crushing and grinding steps are necessary because it is not possible to
break ore that is as large as 0.5 m in diameter while at the same time making
particles that are approximately 50 mm in diameter that are required for optimal
flotation.
162 PART | I Extractive Metallurgy of Nickel and Cobalt
Number of mills 1 1 1
14.3.1. Blasting
Blasting entails drilling holes in mine walls or benches, filling the holes with
chemical explosive and exploding out fragments of rock. The explosions cause
cracks to propagate through the rock, releasing multiple fragments of rock. Burger
et al. (2006) reported that closer drill holes and larger explosive charges make
smaller rock fragments. This decreases subsequent crushing and grinding require-
ments, potentially decreasing cost and increasing concentrator throughput rate.
Chapter | 14 Production of Nickel Concentrates from Sulfide Ores 163
TABLE 14.3 Details of Four Ball Mill Operations That Produce Ground Ore
for Flotation of Pentlandite Concentrate
Diameter, m 0.003
Slurry density, 76 78
% solids
Number of ball 5 6 2 1
mills
Product size 70% passing 88% passing 55% passing 80% passing
150 mm 250 mm 75 mm 65 mm
FIGURE 14.2 Loss of pentlandite in tailings as a function of flotation tailing particle size
(Kerr et al., 2003). Most of the pentlandite loss is in very large and very small particles. The
graph suggests that this ore might beneficially be ground finer – to eliminate loss of nickel in
the large particle sizes. However, this might produce more very small particles and greater
overall pentlandite loss. Optimum grind size is best determined by well-controlled in-plant
experiments.
HEAD
ECCENTRIC DRIVE
Chapter | 14 Production of Nickel Concentrates from Sulfide Ores 165
14.3.2. Crushing
Primary crushing can be done in the mine. This permits easy hoisting of ore out
of underground mines. It also permits belt conveying of ore out of open pit
mines and shallow underground mines.
The crushed ore is stored in a small coarse-ore stockpile. It is transferred
from the stockpile by conveyor to the grinding mills. The stockpile permits
steady, controlled flow of ore into the concentrator.
14.3.3. Grinding
The ore from the crushing circuit is fed to the grinding circuit. The purpose of
grinding is to produce particles that are ‘liberated’, that is, small enough to
consist mostly of one mineral, for example, pentlandite, pyrrhotite or gangue
rock. The liberated particles can then be separated by flotation into two
streams:
(a) a nickel-rich concentrate consisting of pentlandite; and,
(b) a nickel-lean waste stream, consisting of pyrrhotite and gangue rock.
Grinding is done wet. The ore slurry is composed of about 70% solids and 30%
water.
The most common grinding mills are either (a) semi-autogenous and autog-
enous mills; or, (b) ball mills. A semi-autogenous mill is shown in Figure 14.4.
Semi-autogenous and autogenous mills have the advantage that they accept
a wide range of feed sizes. Ball mills have the advantage that they deliver finely
ground product to flotation.
FIGURE 14.4 Semi-autogenous grinding mill. It is a rotating barrel in which ore is broken by
ore pieces (0.2 m diameter) and steel balls (0.1–0.14 m diameter) falling on ore as they are lifted
and fall off the moving circumference of the barrel. Autogenous grinding mills are similar but
without the steel balls. The mills are fed and grind continuously. Their product is typically less
than 0.01 m diameter. Autogenous and semi-autogenous mills are up to 10 m diameter with
diameter-to-length ratios of 1.6:1–2.5:1. They rotate at about 10 rpm and grind 2000–15 000
tonnes of ore per day. Source: Drawing courtesy W. G. Davenport.
The principal parameter for the control of particle size is the water content
of the incoming slurry, which is approximately 50% H2O. An increase in water
content gives less-hindered movement of particles and allows a greater fraction
of input particles to reach the wall and pass through the apex. As a result, the
fraction of particles that are being recycled to re-grinding increases with
increasing water content and ultimately results in a more finely ground product.
Feed
pulp
VORTEX FINDER
APEX VALVE
Coarse
fraction
sized (Outotec, 2010); and, (ii) optimize grinding rate and energy consumption
while maintaining this size.
A typical control system is shown in Figure 14.6. There are two main
control loops. The first is the control of the particle size and the second is the
control of the feed rate to the ball mill.
50 µm particles
to flotation
particle size
HO HO control loop
S
W W
crushed flotation feed
ore
hydrocyclones
bin O
cyclone
autogeneous feed
grinding mill
L hydrocyclone variable
mass flow control loop sump speed pump
FIGURE 14.6 Control system for grinding mill circuit. The objective is to produce correct-size
ore particles for optimal pentlandite flotation. The circled symbols refer to the sensing devices in
Table 14.4. A circuit usually consists of an autogenous or semi-autogenous grinding mill,
a hydrocyclone feed sump, a hydrocyclone ‘cluster’ (about six cyclones) and two ball mills.
A similar flowsheet is described by Outotec (2010).
If, for example, slurry level sensor (L) detects that the slurry level is rising
(due to tougher1 ore and hence more hydrocyclone recycle), it automatically
slows the ore feed conveyor. This decreases flow rates throughout the plant and
gives the ball mill enough time to adequately grind its input ore particles.
If, the level in the sump falls, the control system automatically increases
feed rate of ore until the sump level is maintained at its set point.
1. The resistance of an ore to grinding is usually represented by the Bond Work Index, measured in
kilojoules per tonne of ore. High-index ore is difficult to grind: lower index ore is easier to grind.
The definition, measurement and use of Bond Work Index are given by Wills and Napier-Munn
(2008).
Chapter | 14 Production of Nickel Concentrates from Sulfide Ores 169
TABLE 14.4 Sensing and Control Devices for the Grinding Control Circuit
Shown in Figure 14.6
Use in
Sensing Symbol in automatic
instruments Figure 14.6 Purpose Type of device control system
Ore input rate O Senses feed rate of Load cells, Controls ore feed
weightometer ore into grinding conveyor speed rate
circuit
14.6. SUMMARY
Pentlandite [(Ni,Fe)9S8] ore is the largest source of nickel as sulfide in the
world.
170 PART | I Extractive Metallurgy of Nickel and Cobalt
REFERENCES
Boldt, J. R., & Queneau, P. (1967). The winning of nickel. Longmans.
Burger, B., McCaffery, K., McGaffin, I., et al. (2006). Batu Hijau model for throughput forecast,
mining and milling optimization and expansion studies. In S. K. Kawatra (Ed.), Advances in
comminution (pp. 461–479). SME.
Charland, A., Kormos, L., Whittaker, P., et al. (2006). A case study for integrated use of automated
mineralogy in plant optimization: the Falconbridge Montcalm concentrator. In Paper pre-
sented to the Automated Mineralogy Conference; Brisbane: July 17–18, 2006.
Kerr, A., Bouchard, A., Truskoski, J., et al. (2003). The “Mill Redesign Project” at Inco’s Clar-
abelle Mill. CIM Bulletin, 96, 58–66.
Krebs. (2010). Hydrocyclones [Company brochure].
Outotec. (2010). Grinding control solutions [Company brochure].
Wills, B. A., & Napier-Munn, T. J. (2008). Wills’ mineral processing technology (7th ed.).
Elsevier.
SUGGESTED READING
Damjanovic, B., & Goode, J. R. (Eds.), (2000), Canadian milling pratice, Special Vol. 10. CIM.
Fuerstenau, M. C., Jameson, G., & Yoon, R.-H. (Eds.), (2006). Froth flotation, A century of
innovation. SME.
Kawatra, S. K. (Ed.), (2006). Advances in comminution. SME.
Kerr, A. (2002). An overview of recent developments in flotation technology and plant practice for
nickel ores. In A. L. Mular, D. N. Halbe & D. J. Barratt (Eds.), Mineral processing, plant
design, practice and control proceedings, Vol. 1 (pp. 1142–1158). SME.
Malhotra, D., Taylor, P., Spiller, E., & LeVier, M. (Eds.), (2009). Recent advances in mineral
processing plant design. SME.