Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8
HEARING OUR CULTURE
TEACHERS THROUGH EMPATHY
155
next step is to reflect back both sets of messages without stereotyping, judg-
ing, or classifying, so that the client gets an authentic view of her or his situ-
ation. This process requires the helping professional to go beyond her or his
own feelings and thoughts. Then the therapist can sort out the information
from the client's perspective and generate accurate labels for the client's
thoughts and feelings in a way that makes sense for the client (Goldstein &
Michaels, 1985; Keefe, 1976). Finally, the therapist synthesizes all the facts
and variables into a pattern and selects an appropriate intervention strategy
based on that pattern. The most inclusive intervention strategy is that which
allows the client to define her or his ideal outcome as well as the boundaries
for achieving that outcome.
In this and the following chapter we teach you how to use internal dia-
logue as a tool for understanding a client's belief system, where it comes from,
how it works, and how it feels. We review the clinical literature on internal
dialogue and self-talk and give detailed examples of how to reflect feelings and
meanings through inclusive, culturally sensitive ways. Finally, we return to
the concept of balance in ICE first developed in chapter 3 and show you how
to help clients leverage their internalized voices to find life balance.
Professionals using ICE skills will learn to hear or imagine what clients
are feeling and thinking but not saying. Why might a client leave potentially
relevant feelings and thoughts unsaid when working with a helping profes-
sional? Perhaps the client does not like the counselor or feels uncomfortable
with the experience of being "helped" but does not wish to hurt the coun-
selor's feelings. Or, perhaps the client fears that voicing negative feelings and
thoughts will only exacerbate the issue he or she is trying to resolve. Many
times, however, clients' inner thoughts, both positive and negative, are not
rational and coherent statements, and they may be inextricably intertwined
with emotions. If expressed aloud, these thoughts and emotions may not con-
form to anyone's accustomed forms of meaning and semantic structure.
Good cognitive therapy does not reduce the client's thinking to cate-
gorized irrational belief systems but rather tries to understand why that par-
ticular client appraises events in that particular way. Cognitive therapy seeks
to understand both where the person is coming from and her or his idiosyn-
cratic way of appraising events. Sometimes the person's thoughts and emo-
tions about an event may appear irrational to the counselor but, given her or
his way of seeing the world, the response may actually be entirely rational
when seen from the client's perspective.
Once the counselor, and ultimately, the client can articulate those
thoughts and feelings that were once strictly internal, the data can be leveraged
for therapeutic change. Morin (1995) examined the characteristics of an effec-
tive internal dialogue for the mediation of self-awareness as a problem-solving
task. Self-talk served to focus attention on the task, foster constant self-
evaluation, and take the perspective of others. Morin (1993) suggested that two
social mechanisms leading to self-awareness can be reproduced by self-talk.
First, engaging in dialogues with oneself and fictitious persons permits the inter-
nalization of others' perspectives, and addressing comments to oneself about
oneself as others might do leads to the acquisition of self-information. Second,
self-observation is possible only when there is a distance between the individ-
ual and any potentially observable self-aspect as through self-talk, which con-
veys self-information through words in a continuous communication loop.
An individual's perception of another's perception of her- or himself is
called a metaperception. The symbolic interactionists (Langer & Wurf, 1997)
contend that metaperceptions are based on social feedback, going outside
the self, whereas social cognitivists say metaperceptions are formed by self-
perception, going inward. Dyadic social experience includes both a direct
view of the self and a view of the other and a view of the other's view of the
self. We not only look at ourselves but also look at others looking at ourselves.
Langer and Wurf (1997) researched the importance of verbal and nonverbal
feedback indicating both processes are important and noted,
Results indicated that the feedback and the self are both important inter-
actively: when the verbal element of the message is congruent with self-
conception nonverbal sensitivity occurs, and metaperceptions are based
on both the verbal and nonverbal components; when the verbal element
of the message is self-incongment, the evaluative implications of the
nonverbal feedback do not matter, (p. 2)
A variety of strategies are available for incorporating internal dialogue
into therapist training or direct service therapy processes as discussed in
DEBRIEFING
'Videotapes demonstrating the triad training model are available through Microtraining Associates,
Inc., 141 Walnut Street, Hanover, MA 02339, (888) 505-5576 (phone/fax).
The following brief transcript of a Black female therapist working with a Japanese
American female client provides a sample of how the procounselor and anticoun-
selor interact with the counselor and client. In the transcript, C represents the client,
T represents the therapist, P represents the procounselor, and A represents the anti-
counselor. The letter indicates the role and the number indicates the numerical order
of statements made by the person in that role.
Interview 1: Black Female Therapist
C1: Hi, my name is Noella, and I will be playing the role of the client coming in for
the first session for a presenting problem.
A2: Hi, my name is Leanne, and I will be playing the anticounselor, and my role
today will be to bring forth the negative thoughts and stereotypes that may be
found in the minds of the client and the counselor.
P3: Hi, my name is Melody, and I'll be playing the role of the procounselor. My
main job today is to provide insight into the positive thoughts and concerns for
the client and therapist.
T5: Hello, Noella, my name is Shelly, and what brings you in today?
P6: Good start.
C7: Hi, Shelly. I've been feeling really depressed and anxious lately because of
problems that my family has been giving me because of my impending move.
A8: Depressed ...
T9: Depression and anxiety, that's what you're feeling right now.
C10: Yeah, it's a heavy feeling that I have in my body and I was hoping you could
help me gain some insight into what's going on right now.
T11: Well, can you tell me a little bit more about what's going on, how you're feeling
right at this moment?
A12: You don't understand.... She's Black!
C13: Well, before we kind of get into that, I just wanted to kind of bring to light the
issue being that we're from different cultures.
P14: Good, and that's a concern.
C15: If I could maybe ... maybe you could express that issue and address that.
T16: I'm African American. What is your ethnic background?
C17: I'm Japanese American.
T18: I would imagine there are differences and similarities between our two cultures.
P19: We're both women.
C20: Yeah, I can imagine that. But you know that this is my first session, I'm a little
uneasy and a little nervous.
A21: I'm uneasy ...
P22: Build on that.
T23: Well, we'll take our time, I suppose. Can you give me a sense of your experi-
ence as the Japanese American woman?
P24: Great. Excellent. Good job.
A25: She doesn't understand ...
C26: I'm glad that you asked that question because I've been having some really
hard problems, you know, with issues of guilt and saving face, being that I'm
going to be moving away to a different town.
P27: Saving face.
C28: To a different town, and my parents have been saying to me, being the eldest
daughter, that you're a role model to your younger brother and sister, and how
could you be leaving the family, and dividing everybody up, and you're doing
this for yourself. You're being very selfish.
(continued)
REFLECTION OF FEELINGS
EXHIBIT 8.2
Rating Sheet for Scoring Emotional Content of a Story
and Emotions Felt While Telling a Story
A "10" high score indicates a great deal stronger feeling. A "1" low score indicates
very little or none of the feeling.
How strong was the feeling How strong was the feeling
Feeling at the time the event happened? at the time the story was told?
Love
Happiness
Fear
Anger
Contempt
Mirth
Surprise
Determination
Disgust
[Other]
Note. From 110 Experiences for Multicultural Learning (pp. 119-120), by P. B. Pedersen, 2004, Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association. Copyright 2004 by Paul B. Pedersen. Adapted with permission.
Several cautions are in order when using the empathy skill reflection of
feelings. For example, the counselor also has feelings in the interview that
might facilitate or get in the way of counseling. Having feelings is normal as
long as the counselor is able to monitor those feelings so that they do not dis-
tort the counseling message. It is useful for the counselor to listen and "self-
interpret" the anti and pro voices about what the counselor is saying in the
interview. The same skills used to detect client feelings can also help detect
the counselor's own feelings. Look for discrepancies, changes in topic, changes
in body language, distractions, and other danger signs. In some cultures self-
disclosure of your own feelings can be helpful as a model of risk taking, but in
other cultures it destroys your credibility completely.
In addition, Brammer (1988) recommended that counselors be partic-
ularly careful about encouraging emotional expression when
• the client has a severe emotional disorder.
• the client is under such pressure that he or she may respond
with more intensity than he or she can control.
REFLECTION OF MEANINGS
Think about an interaction you had with someone whose beliefs and
values were different from your own. How did your beliefs and values differ?
How did you discover those differences? How long did it take to discover the
differences? What did the interaction feel like (e.g., confusing, stimulating,
fun, hurtful)? Differences in beliefs and values can profoundly affect even
casual interactions, so when the element of helping enters the equation the
potential for misunderstanding may be even greater. The purpose of reflect-
ing meaning is to explore the values and beliefs underlying the interview.
Two people may experience the same event—such as an interview—but it
may have a different meaning for each of them. The search for meaning is an
important goal for most people, and even when the meaning is not explicitly
mentioned in the interview, reflecting back that implicit meaning can be a
useful skill for interviewing.
The functions of reflecting meaning are to help interviewees interpret
their feelings and actions accurately, to explore values or goals, and to under-
stand deeper aspects of an interviewee's experience. It will not be appropri-
ate to explore these deeper meanings in all interviews, but it will be important
for the interviewer to have the skill to perceive the meanings nonetheless.
Once you and your client feel confident that the feelings and meanings
being voiced are accurate interpretations of the client's internal dialogue, you
can build from simple reflection to synthesizing those reflections into possible
CONCLUSION