HOW TO ANSWER BAR EXAM ESSAY

QUESTIONS I MPRESSIVELY
M.November 18, 2015
Sharing tips from my Criminal Law Professor Atty. Ruben C. Talampas, Jr.

HOW TO ANSWER BAR EXAM ESSAY QUESTIONS IMPRESSIVELY

By: Atty. Ruben C. Talampas, Jr.

The then Chairperson of the Committee on Bar Examinations, Madame Justice

Ameurfina Melencio-Hererra, submitted a report to the Philippine Supreme Court her
observations on the 1980 bar exams.

According to her several examinees have made very unsatisfactory showing to such
an extent that there is one who obtained a grade as low as 7% another obtained a
grade of 11%; still some others obtained grades of 12%; 16%; 17%; 18%; 19%;
20%; 21%; 24%; 25%; 26%; 27%; 31%; 34%; etc.”

She pointed out the general weakness of the bar examinees. She said: “The reason for
this high mortality rate, may be attributed to several factors among them in the
opinion of the undersigned, may be due mainly to the following: . . . inadequate
command of the English language”. 

She further emphasized: “The examinees inhabiting the lowermost rungs of the

grading scale manifested not alone an appalling lack of knowledge of the
fundamental principles involved in the examination questions but also an inability to
logically string their thoughts together compounded by an almost incredible
deficiency in language skills.”

It was less than 35 years ago but still her remarks seem to be true at present.

The following are actual questions and answers of some examinees which
demonstrate their lack of knowledge of the fundamental legal principles and
inadequate command of the English language:

Question No. 6(b) – “An accused was found guilty of double murder and was meted
out two sentences of reclusion perpetua. How would the accused serve the
sentences?”
Answer – “Both penalties must be served by the accused, and he was electrocuted
and died then it washes out the remaining sentence to served by the accused.”

Question No. 11. – “Patrolman Cruz, acting under orders of the Municipal Mayor,
Who wanted to put a stop to the frequent occurrence of robbery in Sitio Masukal,
patrolled the place. At about midnight, seeing three persons acting suspiciously in
front of an uninhabited house and entering the same, he arrested them without
warrant and took them to the municipal building where they were detained in jail for
about five hours before they were released.Patrolman Cruz was accused of arbitrary
detention. If you were the Judge, would you convict him of the crime charged?”

Answer – “No. considering his possession as peace officer by the higher authority

to patrol the place where robbery are frequent. The one responsible for this is the
Municipal Mayor who order without warrant of arrest and the act of the patrolman
are in good faith believing to be a robbery entering a house. So the proper party
liable is the Municipal Mayor.”

Question No. 17 – “AA” was the owner of a jeepney for hire. When his driver was
hospitalized, he hired “BB” as driver on a temporary basis and entrusted to him the
vehicle for transporting passengers from Quiapo to Baclaran with a compensation of
P30.00 a day. “BB” never returned the vehicle and after search the vehicle was found
in Tarnate, Cavite, about to be sold. “BB” was charged with Qualified Theft and was
convicted. Appealing the judgment of conviction, defense counsel contends that “BB”
may have committed Estafa but not Qualified Theft on the theory that the possession
of the vehicle was obtained with the consent of “AA” the owner, and therefore, there
was no illegal taking. Decide the case.”

Answer – “The defense counsel of the accused contention in untenable assuming

now that there is no illegal taking of the jeep from “AA”. The owner but “BB” a
temporary driver hired by “AA” failure to return the jeep such vehicle as now ready
to be sold by “BB” have an intent to gain is theft cases as an element.

          Our aim, of course, is not to ridicule and immortalize these Bar answers.
Our aim is to remedy, correct, and supplement the aforesaid deficiencies for
future bar takers so that they would not suffer the same fate. 

By far the most important tool that the bar candidate could equip himself with which
to tackle the examination that is inherently personal to him is command of written
English. The examinee who has a fairly good command of English, assuming that he
is prepared in all other matters, stands definitely with a much better chance of passing.
         Not all the BAR tips I will be presenting here are mine. I believe they are
the collective ideas of past bar examinees, bar topnotchers, bar lecturers and law
professors who want to share their experiences and have the desire and concern
to help future bar takers. I will try though to present these in a more
comprehensible and effective way.

A bar examinee’s answer should be a total “package”. Meaning, it contains all

the necessary ingredients. This is when the 4Ls come in: law, language, logic, and
layout. His answer should be legible and neat without the irritating erasures
observing the proper margin and space between paragraphs with correct
composition, grammar and spelling coupled of course  of the knowledge of the
law principles and its application to the given set of facts responsive to the issue
or question at hand.

The examiner will be looking and expecting for the following from your answer:

1. Proper understanding and appreciation of the facts, particularly of the

components or details that can be material in resolving the given problem;
2. Appreciation of the applicable laws that may come into play;
3. Recognition of the issues posed;
4. Resolution of the issues through the analysis and application of the law to the
given facts; and
5. Presentation and articulation of answer.

In essence, your answer should clearly indicate:

1. the relevant facts;

2. the applicable law;
3. your analysis; and
4. your conclusion.

To expound it further, a Bar examinee’s answer should clearly demonstrate:

IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROBLEM

Your answer should demonstrate your ability to identify correctly the problem(s) and
issue(s) of law presented in the question. Your answer should demonstrate your ability
to articulate and classify the problem presented, that is, to state it in a lawyer-like
fashion and to place it in its proper category or categories of doctrine.

KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW

Your answer should demonstrate your knowledge of legal principles and your ability
to repeat them accurately on the examination as they relate to the problem presented
by the question. You should state concisely the principle(s) and rule(s) governing the
issue(s) presented by the question.

APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS

Your answer should reveal your capacity to reason logically by applying the
appropriate rule or principle to the operative facts of the question as a step in reaching
your conclusion. This involves making the correct preliminary determination as to
which facts in the question are legally important and which, if any, are irrelevant.

The line of reasoning that you adopt should be clear and consistent without gaps or
digressions. This is the most important element in your answer and, therefore, carries
the most weight in the grading process.

CONCLUSION

You should address yourself to the task that the question asks you to perform. For
example, if the question calls for a specific conclusion or result, such conclusion
should clearly appear in your answer and should be stated concisely and without
equivocation.

An answer that consists entirely of mere conclusions unsupported by any statements

or discussion of the rules or reasoning upon which it is based is entitled to little credit.
Clarity and conciseness are important, but make your answer complete. Do not
volunteer irrelevant or immaterial information.

ARTICULATION 

Articulation is expressive of the following basic fundamentals: good language,

impressive presentation, logical reasoning and substantial background knowledge of
law and procedure. Impressive answers showing the candidates reasoning faculty is
what the examiners want to read in your examination notebooks.

Your answer should demonstrate your ability to analyze the facts presented by the
question, to select the material from the immaterial facts, and to discern the points
upon which the question turns. It should show your knowledge and understanding of
the pertinent principles and theories of law involved and their qualifications and
limitations. It should demonstrate your ability to apply the law to the given facts, and
to reason logically in a lawyer like manner to a sound conclusion from the given
premises.
You must also be aware that the Bar questions are not all “case or situationer
problems”. There are other types of Bar essay questions you ought to know so you
will be able to prepare and answer them properly in case you encounter one. The usual
types of Bar essay question are enumerated below:

1. Enumeration;
2. Distinction;
3. Definition;
4. Reason behind the law/concept/principle; and
5. Case Problem.

CASE PROBLEM           

This type comprises an average of 80 – 90 percent of the questions in every subject,

hence, it is imperative that you are well-versed in answering the same.

Given that you know already the law; that you know how to apply it to the set of facts;
that you write legibly enough; left you with one problem – that is how are you going
to present or articulate it in an impressive manner.

A ready outline or structure of your answer will tremendously help you to answer
faster without missing an important part. By constant practice in answering this type
of question with the outline/structure in your mind, you will be amazed how it easy
for you to start outright and tackle the question and come up with an impressive
answer.

Below is the suggested outline/structure of your answer for a “case/situationer

problem” question:

1st Paragraph –       Positive/Negative/Qualified Answer

2nd Paragraph –       Applicable Law/Jurisprudence

3rd Paragraph –       Correlation of the Law/Jurisprudence with the Facts of the Case

4th Paragraph –       Conclusion (this may be part of the 3 rd Paragraph)

Okay, you already have an outline but isn’t it boring for the examiner to read in your
answers the same words or phrase at the beginning of your paragraphs? For example
you will use these words in every answer: the contention is untenable; the law
provides; therefore. The examiner will spot this and might not be impressed to you at
all which will result to a lesser points.
You will agree that the hardest thing to do is to start. We want that the first sentences
or paragraph we will write will impress the examiner and more often we cannot find
the right words to start. Would it be easier if just like the outline you have already a
pool of words waiting to be used?

Knowing “First Liners” or introductory words will greatly help you to quickly and
smoothly string your thoughts and effectively convey your answers. The following
“first liners” or introductory words can be used interchangeably to begin every
paragraph of your outlined answer.

The following “Useful Introductory Lines” are mostly taken from the article of Atty.
Rey C. Tatad, Jr. with the same title.

ANSWERING IN THE POSITIVE

1. The petition is meritorious.

2. The contention has legal basis.
3. The case will prosper.
4. The argument is proper.
5. The provision is perfectly applicable.
6. The action is tenable.
7. The motion should be granted.
8. The Judge is correct.
9. The petition is impressed with merit.
10.Yes. It is a (i.e. patent violation) of the
11.There is merit in the petition.
12.The petitioner’s contention is sustainable.

ANSWERING IN THE NEGATIVE

1. The decision is not in accord with law and jurisprudence.

2. The decision is erroneous.
3. The contention is totally misplaced.
4. The doctrine of….. does not apply in this case.
5. The petition is not meritorious.
6. The evidence presented deserves scant consideration.
7. The contention has no legal basis.
8. The argument is bereft of merit.
9. The petition is devoid of merit.

10.Petitioner’s/Respondent’s/Complainant’s/Plaintiff’s/Defendant’s/Accused reliance
on the (i.e. doctrine of…) is inappropriate.
 11.It is a futile gesture on the part of the respondent to invoke the rule on…
12.The theory/argument has no ground to stand upon.
13.The contention has no leg with which to stand on.
14.The position of the petitioner runs counter with the doctrine of…
15.The case will not prosper.
16.The case is not tenable.
17.The act of the accused in… is of no moment.
18.The assertion lacks substance.
19.The (i.e. respondent) cannot rely on (i.e. mere alibis) to aid his cause.
20.The court cannot countenance the (i.e. inconsistent postures of the petitioner)
21.The testimony that…, cannot be given credence.
22.The evidence presented has no probative value.
23.The allegation is belied by the fact that…
24.To put it otherwise would be to render the law on _____________

useless/futile.

25.The actuations of the accused in (i.e. fleeing and hiding) negates (i.e.

innocence)

26.While it is true that _______________ is a (i.e. constitutional guaranteed right

of a person), it does not, however mean…

27.It is not correct to say that…

28.It is not proper to state that…
29.It is not accurate to conclude outright that…
30.A contrary conclusion would erode the rule that provides in part that…
31.To sustain the contention would be to render the law on ____________

nugatory.

32.It would be absurd and incongruous to sustain the argument that…

33.It is not enough that…
34.The fact that … is immaterial since…
35.The fact that … is irrelevant since…
36.In itself, mere …… is not sufficient (i.e. to warrant conviction)….
37.The petitioner cannot give any additional meaning to the clear and plain

language of the law.

 38.The Supreme Court, in several cases, has struck down the (i.e. defense of alibi)
39.The attendant circumstances of the case are contrary to the petitioner’s

assertion.

40.The evidence does not support the theory of the petitioners.

41.There is no cogent reason to disturb the ruling of the (i.e. Court of Appeals)
42.The claim for (i.e. moral damages) must necessarily fail.

ANSWER THAT REQUIRES QUALIFICATION

(But if the facts are complete in itself, do not attempt to add facts or assume anything.)

1. We must distinguish. If… (or As far as the __________ is concerned)

2. It depends. If…(or As far as the __________ is concerned)
3. The question requires a qualified answer. If…
4. I will qualify. If…
5. On the assumption that…
6. My answer must be qualified.

CITING LAW PROVISIONS

1. No less than the (i.e. 1987 Constitution) provides for the…

2. The (i.e. Rules of Court) substantially provides in part that…
3. Under the broad principles of (i.e. due process clause)…
4. Under the all-encompassing doctrine of (i.e. incontestability clause)…
5. Under the law…
6. According to the (i.e. Family Code)…
7. The law is explicit on the matter.
8. The law explicitly expresses in part that…
9. By express provision of law,…
10.By operation of law…
11.As a matter of law…
12.Worth remembering is the rule on _______________ which provides in part
that…
13.Decisive on the matter is the pertinent provision of the (i.e. Law on

Property)

14.The law prescribes certain rules on…

15.By legislative fiat…
QUOTING SUPREME COURT DECISIONS

1. The Supreme Court in one case, had the occasion to rule that…
2. In a long-line of cases decided by the Supreme Court, it has always been

(consistently) held that…

3. In a litany of cases decided by the Supreme Court,

4. In a long-string of cases decided by the highest court of the land,
5. According to several cases decided by the Supreme Court,…
6. In a series of cases decided by the Supreme Court,

* Do not use the words series, litany or long-line if there is only one

decision/jurisprudence for that topic.

7. In one case decided by the highest court of the land, it was held that
8. In one case, the Supreme Court ruled that
9. It has been said that…
10.In a recent case, the Supreme Court has laid to rest the issue of whether or
not…
11.It is well settled in this jurisdiction…
12.It is well settled in this country…
13.The Supreme Court has steadfastly adhered to the doctrine which states

that

14.In a case with similar facts, the Supreme Court ruled that…
15.In several notable Supreme Court decisions, the highest court declared that…
16.The Supreme Court has often stressed that…
17.In the landmark case of _____________, (if the case is so famous) the

Supreme Court laid down the doctrine which substantially provides that…

18.In the leading case of …

19.As enunciated by the Supreme Court in one case,…
20.The court has repeatedly ruled…
21.A case in point is a case already decided by no other than the highest court of
the land, where the Supreme Court held that…
22.There is likewise an array of cases in this jurisdiction where the Supreme Court
has consistently declared that…
23.Deeply rooted is the jurisprudence which provides that…
 24.In one case, the Supreme Court was emphatic when it ruled that….

EMPHASIZING CASE DOCTRINES / JURISPRUDENCE

1. It is hornbook doctrine in (i.e. Civil Law) that…

2. Immortal is the rule that…
3. Well settled is the rule…
4. Well entrenched is the principle that..
5. Elementary is the rule that..
6. The cardinal rule in (i.e. labor law) is that
7. It is a familiar canon in (i.e. political law) that
8. By well settled public law…
9. Basic is the rule in (i.e. Criminal Law)…
10.It is an elementary principle in…
11.It is a fundamental doctrine in…
12.Well accepted is the rule that…
13.It is axiomatic in (i.e. Civil Law) that
14.Enshrined in the 1987 Constitution is the rule that (i.e. no person shall be
deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law)
15.Consonant with the rule on…
16.It is a recognized doctrine in (i.e. Civil law) that…
17.It is a basic tenet in (i.e. Commercial Law)
18.Consistent with current jurisprudence
19.It is a legal presumption, born of wisdom and experience, that …
20.It is an oft-repeated rule that…
21.The Philippines adhere to the principle of…

REFERRING BACK TO THE CASE

(correlating the facts with the law/jurisprudence)

1. Applying the said law/doctrine in the instant case,

2. From the facts given, noteworthy is the …
3. From the facts of the case, it is readily observable that…
4. In the instant case, it may be observed that…
5. It is crystal clear from the facts presented that (i.e. the crime of treason) is
present (or was committed).
6. In the present case, it is immediately noticeable that the element of

__________ is wanting (or lacking).

7. Under the circumstances, the proper remedy would be…

 8. The case obtaining indicates a case of (i.e. B.P. 22)
9. It logically follows…
10.It goes without saying…
11.Even assuming arguendo, for the sake of argument that…
12.The situation in the case at hand…
13.The situation presented evinces a case of…
14.The facts sufficiently indicated …
15.In the given facts, it is immediately apparent that…
16.It is evident that…
17.In the same token…
18.Under the facts stated in the problem,…
19.In the case under consideration,…
20.Worth stressing is the fact that
21.Worth emphasizing is the fact that
22.The facts would reveal that…
23.A careful perusal of the facts of the case would reveal that…
24.A careful scrutiny of the actuations of the accused would reveal that…
25.A careful reading of the (i.e. Deed of Absolute Sale) would reveal that…
26.A cursory examination of the…

CONCLUDING WORDS

1. From the gamut of evidence on hand, it can be gathered/deduced that,…

2. Taken all together,…
3. Finally, …
4. Hence, …
5. Therefore, …
6. From the foregoing, it can be deduced that there is really (i.e. a violation of…)
7. From the foregoing, it is now safe to conclude that….
8. Lastly, …
9. Consequently,…
10.As a necessary consequence…
11.The logical implication is that…
12.At any rate,…
13.In view of the foregoing,…
14.As an inevitable conclusion,…
15.In the light of the circumstances,…
16.Undoubtedly,…
17.Indubitably,…
18.Clearly, the case at hand falls squarely within the purview of…
19.Verily, he/she has committed…
 20.For this/these reason/s, it is unavoidable to conclude that…
21.Based on the facts obtaining,…
22.In this light,…
23.This being the case…
24.Clearly therefore, applying the aforecited ruling in the case at hand,…
25.In light of the foregoing, it is beyond cavil (doubt) that,…
26.There is no doubt that…
27.To the unprejudiced mind, the actuations of the three, when analyzed and taken
together, leads to no other conclusion except that (i.e. conspiracy

among them existed)

28.Inescapably, therefore,…
29.All things considered,…
30.It follows therefore that…
31.As a logical result…
32.In sum,..
33.In view of the fact that…,
34.All told,…
35.Given the prevailing facts…
36.Having stated the foregoing premises,…
37.One final point,…
38.Accordingly,…

Using the outline and the “first liners” above, make a format or model of your answer
and use what you deem is applicable in a given question. You may make your own
models as many as you want but it is suggested to have at least 10 models. Here are
some examples (taken from my 2007 Bar Tips to NEU and INC Bar Examinees):

No/Yes. He can/cannot…..,

The law provides that/The Supreme Court has held in a line of cases……

In the case at bar…..

Hence.. …

X’s claim is not meritorious, hence the case should be decided against him

According to the law/The Supreme Court, in many cases, has ruled that….

Based on the facts of the case…

Therefore/Consequently… . . .

The. . . . is proper/tenable/untenable

It is a well settled rule/As provided for under the

Moreover . . ..Hence/Therefore

Under the provisions of RA/Constitution/Law/Statute. . . .

On the problem at hand..,..Consequently

On the other hand….

As such it should be ruled … …                                                         

ENUMERATION

The real secret in remembering the matters contained in an enumeration is the use of
keywords. Make your keywords on enumerations you consider important. Never leave
a blank in an enumeration! However, if you use the letters a, b, c, etc. for numbers in
the enumeration, so much the better. Ten to one, the examiner may not count his
fingers. Make the first four in the enumeration definitely good.

If you can enumerate all, write it in bulleted or numbered form to highlight the fact
that you know all of them and for more convenient-reading

purposes.

1.

2.

3.

If you cannot enumerate all, write it in paragraph form so that it would not easily be
noticeable that you missed something.

1. In capsule form, the following are the elements of the crime of _______
2. In a nutshell, the following are the elements of the crime of _________
3. The following elements are generally considered in the determination of

the presence of (i.e. employer-employee relationship)

 4. Among the (i.e. defenses/remedies) available to (i.e. Mr. X) as provided for
by/in the (i.e. Civil Code) are:

(1)…

(2)…

5. The following are the requisites for…

6. In order that a case for (i.e. B.P. 22) to prosper, the following elements must be
attendant/present:
7. To constitute (i.e. homicide), the following requisites must concur:
8. (i.e. Legal compensation) requires the concurrence of the following conditions:
9. To establish a person’s culpability under (i.e. estafa), it is indispensable

that…

DISTINCTION

When being asked to distinguish, do not state its definition. If you give its definition,
you are in effect asking the examiner to extract out the differences of the two [or
more] from your definition. Do not also give their similarities. You are asked to
differentiate and contrast, so similarities are not included. The number of distinctions
you will give must also be proportionate on the points allotted for such. If it is only
worth two points, do not give 8 distinctions. The examiner cannot give you 8 points
for that. For a two point distinction question, perhaps, three would be enough (four is
not too much).

1. The (i.e. two) may be distinguished from each other in the following

ways:

a.

b.

2. In the first, it is necessary that there be….., whereas in the second it is

sufficient that there be ….
3. In the former, … while in the latter…
4. The former requires … while the latter…
5. … on the other hand ______________ is…

DEFINITION
 1. ________________ is a comprehensive term used to describe _______.
2. _________________, in its generally accepted sense, refers to ….
3. … It is a safeguard and guarantee provided by the 1987 Constitution..
4. … It is a kind of relief granted to a ______________ by the …
5. ________________ is a branch of public law (or private law) which deals
with..
6. It pertains to…
7. It connotes a ….
8. … is a doctrine in (i.e. Civil Law) which refers to…
9. … is a principle in (i.e. Criminal Law) which states that…
10.It presupposes…
11.Its principal identifying feature is..
12.It is akin to…
13.The function of which is to…
14.The office of which is to…

REASON BEHIND THE LAW/CONCEPT/PRINCIPLE

1. The purpose of the law is…

2. The law is designed to…
3. It is intended to shield …
4. It is primarily aimed at protecting ____________ from unwarranted ____
5. The rationale behind the law is…
6. The spirit of the law is to the effect that…

ADDITIONAL TIPS ON HOW TO APPROACH BAR ESSAY QUESTION

1. Finishing is the key. Many fail the Bar exam because they don’t finish the
exam. They spend so much time on an early question that they can’t finish the
later ones. Or they work on all of the questions at once, but without finishing
some or all of them. Either way, these Bar candidates are writing too slowly,
and it costs them their ticket to a law license. Focus on one question at a time.
Don’t bother or think of another question while answering one.

2. Budget your time according to the number of questions and length of problems.
Check the point percentage allocation for each question. This will be your
guide on how much time you will spend for a question. Of course, you will
devote more minutes to questions with a big or higher percentage (i.e. 5%;
10%) than questions with a minimum point percentage (i.e. 1%; 2%).

3. Set a time schedule. It’s easy to waste time by getting carried away by a single
question or by getting stuck on a question that’s giving you trouble. Make a
 general allocation for each question and adjust the time depending on their
percentage weight. Monitor your pace so that you stay calm and will be able to
answer all questions on the exam.

4. If the question is lengthy, read first what is required at the bottom of the
question. By doing this, you will be able to determine what facts do you need
and what facts are immaterial. This will save you time from re-reading the
question. You can also start formulating your answer in mind while reading the
question, thus, it will be easier and faster for you to write your answers since
you are already guided by your earlier analysis. It will also minimize errors and
erasures.

5. Be reminded that one of your tasks while preparing for the Bar exam is to
become an expert fact pattern reader. So what do you do if you aren’t very
good at reading facts? You need to experiment with different ways to get better
at reading facts.  Practice answering past Bar questions as many as you can.
Analyze the suggested answers and take note how the answers used the facts in
the problem. Remember, you won’t get all the possible points if you don’t
understand what the Bar examiners are asking you. You must become an expert
fact reader in order to write a complete exam answer.

6. Before answering, formulate on your mind what will be placed on your first,
second and third paragraphs. Mentally apply your outline. The first paragraph
normally contains a one-sentence direct to the point answer to the question. The
second paragraph commonly contains legal basis (provision of law in point,
jurisprudence, co-relation of the jurisprudence/provision with the facts of the
case and application). Third paragraph normally contains the conclusion. When
you are already decided of your answer, write it according to your thoughts. In
this approach, you will not only be avoiding unnecessary revisions and
erasures, you will also maintain the cleanliness of your booklet. Bear in mind
that, a dirty booklet is irritating to the eyes of the person checking the same.

7. Use logic or common sense when you do not know the answer. Ask the
question, “What is the best solution or resolution for this case?” or “If I were
the examiner how do I want the question answered?” Do not just guess, make a
smart guess. Your best guide is to think what is most just and equitable since
these are the purpose any law seeks to achieve.

8. If you really have no idea on how to answer a really difficult question, or a

borderline case, or you do not know what the answer is, the use of inverted
pyramid of answering question may be helpful. This may be done by inverting
the usual answer format. Initially, present your knowledge of the law and/or
 jurisprudence, then make your smart guess. With this, you may be able to show
or convince the examiner that you know something about the issue but you
were merely incorrect in your conclusion, you may get a credit for your answer.

9. Number your answer accordingly. Don’t make the Examiner search for your
answers. Make your answer look professional. Don’t use textspeak and don’t
abbreviate. Answers which look professional, are well organized and which use
paragraphs and indenting where appropriate make the Examiner’s job easier.

10.An answer to one question in one problem requires a separate page. Answers to
sub-questions may be presented continuously in a page separated by space/s. It
is suggested, however, that even answers to sub-questions be presented on
separate page, unless your answer is very short, so that in case you want to
change any or in case you have missed a sub-question, you can still insert your
answer in the remaining spaces of the page.

11.Don’t submit your test booklet too early. There’s no prize for early finishers.
Budget and utilize all the time allocated for you to: (a) compose good answers;
(b) review your answers; and (c) write legibly.

12.Practice, practice, practice. Practice is vital to your success in the Bar exam.
You must get used answering Bar essay questions. The only way to know if
you can (or if you know the law) is to practice. Answering Bar questions
regularly will help you learn the law as well as become a better tester. There are
many sample bar exam essay questions and answers available on the internet.
You may also find the Q&A published by the UP Law Center helpful.

13.The key to success in any endeavor is preparation. Familiarity with the

structure of the essay questions and how you respond to them will go a long
way in alleviating your anxiety on test day. You job is to practice the approach
we’ve just outlined so that it becomes so automatic by exam day that you move
from one step to the other without missing a beat.

14.At least twice during your bar prep (ideally four), do a simulated Bar exam day.
Do a mock version of it. The key is to practice under conditions similar to the
actual Bar examinations. This will make you mindful of time constraints and
more comfortable when you approach the real test, the Bar exam.

15.Finally, PRAY!

The task ahead of us is not as great as the Power behind us.

May the Force be with you!!!

Related
Case Digest: Poe vs. Macapagal-Arroyo

RONALD ALLAN POE a.k.a. FERNANDO POE, JR., protestant, vs. GLORIA MACAPAGAL-

ARROYO, protestee. P.E.T. CASE No. 002. March 29, 2005 FACTS: Past midnight, in the early hours of June 24,
2004, the Congress as the representatives of the sovereign people and acting as the National Board of Canvassers, in
a near-unanimous roll-call vote, proclaimed…

In "CASE DIGESTS"
Case Digest: Malayan Insurance vs Philippine First

G.R. No. 18430, July 11, 2012         FACTS: On November 18, 1993, Wyeth procured a Marine Policy from
respondent Philippines First to secure its interest over its own products. Philippines First thereby insured Wyeth’s
nutritional, pharmaceutical and other products usual or incidental to the insured’s business while the same were
being…

In "CASE DIGESTS"
Case Digest: Manila Bankers vs Aban

G.R. No. 175666, July 29, 2013 FACTS: On July 3, 1993, Delia Sotero took out a life insurance policy from Manila
Bankers Life Insurance, designating respondent Cresencia P. Aban, her niece, as her beneficiary. Petitioner issued
the Insurance Policy, with a face value of P100,000.00, in Sotero's favor on August 30,…

In "CASE DIGESTS"