TUTORIAL REPORT

WORK SYSTEM DESIGN AND ERGONOMIC

REACTION TIME

Group : IP - 2 Tutorial Date :

Name : Naufal Tutorial Day :
Ghaliya
Salsabil Submission Date :
Maeva A.
P.
Class : Yogyakarta,.......................................2019
Assistant :
Scoring Criteria Assistant
Report Format :
Calculation :

Analysis and
: ( )
Discussion
Conclusion and
Recommendation
TOTAL :

WORK SYSTEM DESIGN AND ERGONOMIC LABORATORY

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITAS ISLAM INDONESIA
2019
 International Program
2018/2019

CHAPTER III
REACTION TIME

3.1 Tutorial Objective

1. Student are able to understand reaction time to visual and auditory stimuli.

2. Student are able to understand short-term memory and long term memory.

3. Students are able to analyze short-term memory

4. Test the hypothesis of the difference between the reaction time of visual and
auditory stimuli in men and woman.

3.2 Tutorial Task

Perform reaction speed testing based on case studies in several ways, including
testing through vision, auditory, English word chunk, Indonesian word chunk, simple
image chunk, complex image chunk, short memory-chunk letters, visual color and
short memory- chunk number then, processing the data obtained using the SPSS
application with a method that is adapted to the case study to analyze data normality
tests and analysis and give recommendations according to the needs of existing case
studies.

3.3 Literature Review

Table 1. Literature Review

N Title Method Result Conclusion

O
1. Effects of Varying Auditory Reaction Of the 28 respondents Acyl research
Audio Frequencies Speed with
at the University of shows that the
on Reaction Time various types of
and Muscular sound frequencies, Wisconsin-Madison increased audio
Activity namely (A4) 440
who participated in frequency is not
(Mahoney,2014) . Hz, (A5) 880 Hz,
(A6) 1760 Hz, this study. Average, significant
(A7) 3520 Hz,
Participants sleep 6.9 Effects on reaction
(A8) 7040 Hz.
hours per night with a time or muscle
standard deviation of activity relative to
 International Program
2018/2019

1.16 hours and none audio tones at

Participants reported smaller
hearing problems. frequencies.
A series of two Therefore,
sample t test analyzes researchers reject
for the treatment the alternative
effect of hearing hypothesis of
frequency on researchers who
The reaction time claim that audio
produces 10 P values, enhancement
all of which have Frequency will
high significance. reduce reaction
There are 27 degrees time, and increase
of freedom for a muscle activity. In
series of two samples addition, heart rate
t-Test. in measurements
Linear regression to predict reaction
uses heart rate as the time which is seen
predictive value of in the r value
explanatory variables obtained in a small
Reaction time The range of 135. The
relationship does not
results of the data
correlate
significantly, r = . stand out are that
135.
more than 37.9%
of participants
reacted fastest to
the second
Lowest tone, 880
Hz. 31% of
participants react
the slowest to the
lowest, 440 H.
 International Program
2018/2019

This study shows

Visual Reaction The results showed that the auditory
2. Comparison Speed and Audiori that the average yield reaction speed is
between Auditory using DirectRT of the visual reaction faster than the
and Visual Simple software on a speed was 331 speed of visual
Reaction Times. laptop with 14 milliseconds and the reactions, and the
(Shelton , 2010). subjects divided auditory reaction male reaction
into 2 groups. speed was 284 speed is faster than
milliseconds. that of women for
the speed of visual
and auditory
reactions.

3. Reaction times of Reaction time In this study, athletes The reaction speed
different branch measurements and of a non-athlete is
who were involved
athletes and statistical analysis worse than the rate
correlation between with different sports of reaction of an
reaction time athlete. The
and the reaction time
parameters majority of
(Atan , 2014). of non-athletes were athletes almost
have the same
examined.
reaction speed
When the value of except in the judo
sport. This is
reaction time is
because the age of
compared between athletes is
classified as the
athletes involved in
youngest among
different sports, the athletes in other
sports.
fastest reaction value
is found in soccer
players. The auditory
reaction time value of
judokas is higher than
that of soccer players
(p <0.01); Simple
reaction times are
 International Program
2018/2019

found higher in
judokas than soccer
and track and field
Athletes (p <0.05 and
p <0.01). No
significant
differences were
found between other
sports athletes
(P> 0.05). The
reaction time of non-
athletes was found to
be higher than most
athletes (p <0.05 and
p <0.01).

3.4 Output
3.4.1 Demographic Characteristic
In this tutorial the researchers conducted a test based on case studies in several
ways, namely visual, auditory, English word chunk, Indonesian word chunk,
simple image chunk, complex chunk images, short memory-chunk letters, visual
color and short memory -chunk numbers. For visual and auditory testing data
taken using the same operator. The following is the operator's personal data:

Name : Naufal Ghaliya S

Gender : Male
Age : 20

For the next test, there are English word chunk, Indonesian word chunk, simple
image chunk, complex image chunk, short memory-chunk letters, visual color and
short memory-chunk numbers using two operators.
1. Operator 1
Name : Naufal Ghaliya S
Age : 20
Gender : Male
2. Operator 2
Name : Maeva AP
Age : 20
Gender : Female
 International Program
2018/2019

3.4.2 Data Collection

a. Visual
1. Reaction Speed Tools
Figure 1. Reaction Speed Tool Data Male Operator
male age gender visual

Tiyo Arif 21 Laki - Laki 0.37

verrel
imansyah
permana 19 Laki - Laki 35.93

Kresna
Adji S. W. 19 Laki - Laki 0.53

naufal 20 Laki - Laki 0.382

Husein 20 Laki - Laki 0.428

Ade
Desfriant
o 20 Laki - Laki 40.43
Muhamm
ad
Fauzan Al
Farisi 19 Laki - Laki 0.33
Muhamm
ad
Taufiqur
Rahman
Aziz
Tuasikal 20 Laki - Laki 0.473333

Barum G 20 Laki - Laki 0.43

Achmad
Arif 19 Laki - Laki 0.426

Alfatah 19 Laki - Laki 0.39

Fahrul
Asshiddiq
ue 20 Laki - Laki 0.474
Afdholul
Ihsan 20 Laki - Laki 0.36
Sulton nur
hakim 19 Laki - Laki 0.82
Febiyanto
W. 20 Laki - Laki 0.436552
Zain
rivaldhy 20 Laki - Laki 0.435
Navi
Antar 20 Laki - Laki 0.332

Dipta 20 Laki - Laki 0.396

Muhamm
ad Alif
Herlanda
Putra 20 Laki - Laki 0.346

Mukti 19 Laki - Laki 0.414

Muhamm
ad
Harisudin 19 Laki - Laki 0.416

Bagus 20 Laki - Laki 0.397

Ahmad 20 Laki - Laki 0.36

Muhamm
ad Panji
Domily 19 Laki - Laki 32.5
Abdul
Aziz
Aljabar 19 Laki - Laki 0.390667
Ahmad
Rizqy 20 Laki - Laki 0.386

arfi 20 Laki - Laki 0.344

Mukhama
d Nur
Iskandar 20 Laki - Laki 0.400667
Faisal
Ibrahim 20 Laki - Laki 0.48

The table above is containing the list of male operator and their reaction
time gathered from a Visual Reaction Speed test where operator tested their
reaction time by using their visual receptors and to test the visual reaction
operator needed to push the right color that shows by the machine and the
machine will record the reaction time automatically. Thus, operator repeating the
steps until 30 time to gather sufficient data.
 International Program
2018/2019

Figure 2. Visual Female Data

female age gender visual
Neneng Perempua
Satya 20 n 0.324
Alyana Perempua
nurmalita 20 n 0.3983
Farras Perempua
Rana 20 n 0.441
Perempua
Alfuah 19 n 0.54567
Feilela Perempua
Fasyicha 20 n 0.402
Cyntia Perempua
Marom 20 n 0.447
Aulia
Nanda Perempua
Pragusti 19 n 0.65
Septi Perempua
Ashari 20 n 0.416
Eryza Ayu Perempua
E 19 n 0.597
Perempua
Riska 19 n 0.47567
Perempua
Bella 19 n 0.37
Citra Perempua
Fadila W 20 n 0.5196
Putri Perempua
Amalia 20 n 0.399667
Albensa Perempua
Yunnia 20 n 0.32

Apsari
Dita Indah Perempua
Rahayu 19 n 0.49
Perempua
Resvilia 20 n 0.44
Perempua
Raissa A 19 n 0,33
Atika Perempua
Afifah 20 n 0,65
Perempua
Anindita 20 n 0,55
nandita Perempua
azzahra 20 n 0,45
Arum dwi Perempua
cahyani 20 n 0,37
Perempua
aurelia 20 n 0,34
vina Perempua
amanda 20 n 0,44
Arum Perempua
sahidina 20 n 0,457
Perempua
noviana 20 n 0,418
Perempua 0.461666
Nuzila 20 n 667
Perempua
Tiara 22 n 0.4663
Perempua
Dean 21 n 0.37
Perempua
Anin 21 n 0.36
Revi 21 pr 0.354

The table above is containing the list of female operator and their reaction
time gathered from a Visual Reaction Speed test where operator tested their
reaction time by using their visual receptors and to test the visual reaction
operator needed to push the right color that shows by the machine and the
machine will record the reaction time automatically. Thus, operator repeating the
steps until 30 time to gather sufficient data.
 International Program
2018/2019

2. Ruler Drop Test

Figure 3.Ruler Drop Test Data Operator
name age gender RDT_RI RDT_LE

Tiyo Arif 21 Laki - Laki 0.61 0.59

verrel
imansyah
permana 19 Laki - Laki 10.9 12,367

Kresna
Adji S. W. 19 Laki - Laki 9.24 11.45

naufal 20 Laki - Laki 18.3 13.43

Husein 20 Laki - Laki 0.145459 0.173591

Ade
Desfriant
o 20 Laki - Laki 13.55 12.23
Muhamm
ad
Fauzan Al
Farisi 19 Laki - Laki 1.66 1.36
Muhamm
ad
Taufiqur
Rahman
Aziz 0.186497
Tuasikal 20 Laki - Laki 122 0.177186

Barum G 20 Laki - Laki 5,083 9.75

Achmad
Arif 19 Laki - Laki 0.168 0.179

Alfatah 19 Laki - Laki 0.1719 0.1787

Fahrul
Asshiddiq
ue 20 Laki - Laki 0.17 0.198
Afdholul
Ihsan 20 Laki - Laki 0.15 0.17
Sulton nur
hakim 19 Laki - Laki 15.83 17.5
Febiyanto
W. 20 Laki - Laki 0.23073 0.18792
Zain
rivaldhy 20 Laki - Laki 9.9 12.2
Navi
Antar 20 Laki - Laki 0.116779 0.171074

Dipta 20 Laki - Laki 0.151 0.162

Muhamm
ad Alif
Herlanda
Putra 20 Laki - Laki 0.087 0.114

Mukti 19 Laki - Laki 0.168 0.181

Muhamm
ad
Harisudin 19 Laki - Laki 0.147 0.162

Bagus 20 Laki - Laki 11.06 12.46

Ahmad 20 Laki - Laki 0.19 0.18

Muhamm
ad Panji
Domily 19 Laki - Laki 0.156 0.172
Abdul
Aziz
Aljabar 19 Laki - Laki 0.172928 0.199694
Ahmad
Rizqy 20 Laki - Laki 15,533 17,467

arfi 20 Laki - Laki 0.218 0.232

Mukhama
d Nur
Iskandar 20 Laki - Laki 0.161033 0.191762
Faisal
Ibrahim 20 Laki - Laki 0.16 0.18

The table above is containing the list of male operator and their reaction
time gathered from a Drop Ruler Test where operator tested their reaction time by
measuring the distance of the starting point or 0cm and the point of operator
grabbed the ruler. Thus, operator repeating the steps until 30 time by using right
and then left hand to gather sufficient data.
 International Program
2018/2019

b. Auditory
Figure 4. Auditory Data
male age gender auditori

Tiyo Arif 21 Laki - Laki 0.23

verrel
imansyah
permana 19 Laki - Laki 236.67

Kresna
Adji S. W. 19 Laki - Laki 0.284

naufal 20 Laki - Laki 0.193

Husein 20 Laki - Laki 0.266633

Ade
Desfriant
o 20 Laki - Laki 0.236
Muhamm
ad
Fauzan Al
Farisi 19 Laki - Laki 0.23
Muhamm
ad
Taufiqur
Rahman
Aziz
Tuasikal 20 Laki - Laki 0.195067

Barum G 20 Laki - Laki 0.214

Achmad
Arif 19 Laki - Laki 0.236

Alfatah 19 Laki - Laki 0.286

Fahrul
Asshiddiq
ue 20 Laki - Laki 0.604
Afdholul
Ihsan 20 Laki - Laki 0.25
Sulton nur
hakim 19 Laki - Laki 0.267
Febiyanto
W. 20 Laki - Laki 0.187912
Zain
rivaldhy 20 Laki - Laki 213.1
Navi 0.2820666
Antar 20 Laki - Laki 67

Dipta 20 Laki - Laki 0.21

Muhamm
ad Alif
Herlanda
Putra 20 Laki - Laki 0.2

Mukti 19 Laki - Laki 0.225

Muhamm
ad
Harisudin 19 Laki - Laki 0.2085

Bagus 20 Laki - Laki 0.227

Ahmad 20 Laki - Laki 0.2

Muhamm
ad Panji
Domily 19 Laki - Laki 0.523
Abdul
Aziz
Aljabar 19 Laki - Laki 0.2204
Ahmad
Rizqy 20 Laki - Laki 0.209

arfi 20 Laki - Laki 0.198

Mukhama
d Nur
Iskandar 20 Laki - Laki 0.269
Faisal
Ibrahim 20 Laki - Laki 0.267

The table above is containing the list of male operator and their reaction
time gathered from an Auditory Reaction test where operator tested their reaction
time by using their auditory receptors and operator needed to push the button
when there is a sound and the reaction time will be shown automatically. Thus,
operator repeating the steps until 30 time to gather sufficient data.
 International Program
2018/2019

Figure 5. Auditory Female Data

female age gender audit
Neneng Perempua
Satya 20 n 8,841
Alyana Perempua
nurmalita 20 n 0.1934
Farras Perempua
Rana 20 n 0.265
Perempua
Alfuah 19 n 0.229
Feilela Perempua
Fasyicha 20 n 0.26217
Cyntia Perempua
Marom 20 n 0.281
Aulia
Nanda Perempua
Pragusti 19 n 0.2428
Septi Perempua
Ashari 20 n 0.22
Eryza Ayu Perempua
E 19 n 0.188
Perempua
Riska 19 n 0.2629
Perempua
Bella 19 n 0.276167
Citra Perempua
Fadila W 20 n 0.29936
Putri Perempua
Amalia 20 n 0.2524
Albensa Perempua
Yunnia 20 n 223.57

Apsari
Dita Indah Perempua
Rahayu 19 n 0.31
Perempua
Resvilia 20 n 263.3
Atika Perempua
Afifah 20 n 0,65
Perempua
Anindita 20 n 0,55
nandita Perempua
azzahra 20 n 0,45
Arum dwi Perempua
cahyani 20 n 0,37
Perempua
aurelia 20 n 0,34
vina Perempua
amanda 20 n 0,44
Arum Perempua
sahidina 20 n 0,457
Perempua
noviana 20 n 0,418
Perempua
Raissa A 19 n 193,933
Perempua 0.3383666
Nuzila 20 n 67
Perempua
Tiara 22 n 0.252
Perempua
Dean 21 n 0.23
Perempua
Anin 21 n 0.21
Revi 21 pr 0.354

The table above is containing the list of female operator and their reaction
time gathered from an Auditory Reaction test where operator tested their reaction
time by using their auditory receptors and operator needed to push the button
when there is a sound and the reaction time will be shown automatically. Thus,
operator repeating the steps until 30 time to gather sufficient data.
c. Word Chunk
Figure 6. Word Chunk Data
name age gend IND_WRD ENG_WRD
Ahmad Laki -
Zulfikar 20 Laki 31.25 34,375
verrel
imansyah Laki -
permana 19 Laki 31.25 21,875

Kresna Laki -
Adji S. W. 19 Laki 31.25 28,125
Laki -
Tesar 19 Laki 0.1875 0.3125
Ahmad
Afifudin
Noviantor Laki -
o 20 Laki 0.21875 0.34375
Muhamm
ad
Fauzan Al Laki -
Farisi 19 Laki 25 31.25
Laki -
Alfatah 19 Laki 31.25 34,375
Fahrul
Asshiddiq Laki -
ue 20 Laki 28,125 28,125
Afdholul Laki -
ihsan 20 Laki 28,125 25
Laki -
Sulton 19 Laki 28 25
Febiyanto Laki -
W. 20 Laki 31.25 31.25
Aldhey Laki -
wahyu p 20 Laki 31.25 28,125
Lutfiansya
hS Laki -
Hamid 19 Laki 31.25 28,125
Laki -
Dipta 20 Laki 46.87 43.75
Muhamm
ad Alif
Herlanda Laki -
Putra 20 Laki 37.5 25
Laki -
Mukti 19 Laki 28.13 31.25
Muhamm
ad Laki -
Harisudin 19 Laki 43.75 31.25
Laki -
Naufal G 20 Laki 31.25 34.37
Laki -
Ahmad 20 Laki 46,875 40,625
Muhamm
ad Panji Laki -
Domily 19 Laki 21,875 34,375
Muhamad
Gamal Laki -
Ramadan 20 Laki 34,375 46,875
Yahya Laki -
Efendi 19 Laki 28,125 28,125
Laki -
bagas 19 Laki 40,625 34,375
Mukhama
d Nur Laki -
Iskandar 20 Laki 0.344 0.406
ilham
frandinata Laki -
maizir 20 Laki 31.25 37.5
ilham
frandinata Laki -
maizir 20 Laki 31.25 37.5
ilham
frandinata Laki -
maizir 20 Laki 31.25 37.5
Fuad Laki -
Maulana 20 Laki 43.75 34.37
krisna
mu'tashim Laki -
azhar 20 Laki 21.8 25

The table above is containing the list of operator and their Short memory
result gathered from a Word Chunk test where operator tested their short memory
capability by try to read in short amount of time and re write what they read into
piece of paper. This test conducted twice, the first one is in Bahasa Indonesia and
the second one is in English.
d. Figure Chunk
Figure 7. Figure Chunk Data
name age gend SIMPLE KOMPLEX
Ahmad Laki -
Zulfikar 20 Laki 65 40
verrel
imansyah Laki -
permana 19 Laki 55 50

Kresna Laki -
Adji S. W. 19 Laki 60 60
Laki -
Tesar 19 Laki 0.5 0.25
Ahmad
Afifudin
Noviantor Laki -
o 20 Laki 0.5 0.35
Muhamm
ad
Fauzan Al Laki -
Farisi 19 Laki 40 55
Laki -
Alfatah 19 Laki 45 60
Fahrul
Asshiddiq Laki -
ue 20 Laki 50 60
Afdholul Laki -
ihsan 20 Laki 45 40
Laki -
Sulton 19 Laki 50 40
Febiyanto Laki -
W. 20 Laki 40 35
Aldhey Laki -
wahyu p 20 Laki 70 50
Lutfiansya
hS Laki -
Hamid 19 Laki 45 40
Laki -
Dipta 20 Laki 75 60
Muhamm
ad Alif
Herlanda Laki -
Putra 20 Laki 65 55
Laki -
Mukti 19 Laki 55 50
Muhamm
ad Laki -
Harisudin 19 Laki 75 50
Laki -
Naufal G 20 Laki 55 50
Laki -
Ahmad 20 Laki 60 50
Muhamm
ad Panji Laki -
Domily 19 Laki 50 40
Muhamad
Gamal Laki -
Ramadan 20 Laki 55 45
Yahya Laki -
Efendi 19 Laki 70 50
Laki -
bagas 19 Laki 55 55
Mukhama
d Nur Laki -
Iskandar 20 Laki 0.6 0.55
ilham
frandinata Laki -
maizir 20 Laki 45 50
ilham
frandinata Laki -
maizir 20 Laki 45 50
ilham
frandinata Laki -
maizir 20 Laki 45 50
Fuad Laki -
Maulana 20 Laki 20 50
krisna
mu'tashim Laki -
azhar 20 Laki 30 40

The table above is containing the list of operator and their Short memory
result gathered from a Figure Chunk test where operator tested their short
memory capability by try to retrieve the images that shows in short amount of
time and re write what they saw into piece of paper. This test conducted twice, the
first one is in Simple figure and the second one is in Complex figure.
3.4.3 Data Processing
a. Visual Reaction Time Calculation
1. Reaction Speed Tools

The researcher conducted a study of 20 -21 years old student. The researcher
measured the hand grip strength. The data is used by the DSKE Laboratory.
Before carrying out the Independent Sample T-Test, a normality test is done first
to see whether the sample used has represented the existing population.

Figure 8. Independent Sample T-Test Reaction Speed Tool

Based on the results of the independent sample t-test visual results obtained a
significance value of 0.001 which means that Ho is rejected, then there is a
difference between the reaction time between the gender of women and men.
2. Ruler Drop Test Calculation
a. Conversion of distance to time reaction on right and left hand.
Figure 9. The distance of Ruler Drop Test Right Hand

Based on the table above that shows about the right hand ruler drop test. The
average of the t or the time spontaneous that operator can grab the ruler is 0.183
second. Next is left hand test.

Figure 10.Ruler Drop Test Left Hand

Based on the data above we can see there’s no huge different between left hand
and the right hand. The average also almost same 1.1845 Second which is the left
hand much longer. This prove there’s no huge different significant because the
operator already commonly using left hand and right hand when he plays
basketball.
 b. Calculation reaction time of Right and Left hand.

In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used to

systematically determine differences. The following table shows the results of the
independent sample t-test using SPSS software:
Figure 11. Independent Sample T-Test Ruler Drop Test

The result is a significance value on all dimensions is 0.45 where less than 0, 05
then Ho is rejected, which means there is a difference in the right and left hand
responsive stimulus in men.
b. Auditory Reaction Time Calculation

In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used to

systematically determine differences. The following table shows the results of the
independent sample t-test using SPSS software:
Figure 12. Independent Sample T-Test Auditory

Judging from the table, the result is a significance value on all dimensions, namely
0.011 and 0.013 where less than 0.05, Ho is rejected, which means there are
differences in auditory averages between men and women.
c. Word Chunk Calculation
In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used. The
following table shows the results of the independent sample t-test using SPSS
software:
Figure 13. Independent Sample T-Test Word Chunk Data

Judging from the table, the result is a significance value on all dimensions <0.05
which is 0.04 so, Ho is rejected which means there is a difference in the score
between English words and Indonesian words.

d. Figure Chunk Calculation

In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used to

systematically determine differences. The following table shows the results of the
independent sample t-test using SPSS software:
Figure 14. Independent Sample T-Test Figure Chunk Calculation

Judging from the table, the result is a significance value on all dimensions <0.05
which is 0.15 so, Ho is rejected which means there is a difference in the score
between simple images and complex images..
3.5 Data Analysis
a. Visual Result Analysis
1. Reaction Speed Tools Analysis
a. Normality Test
Before calculating visual data using the independent sample t-test, the data
normality test is first performed. In carrying out the normality test, the hypothetical
forms used are first determined, namely:
H0: Data is normally distributed
H1: Data is not normally distributed
In testing the independent sample t-test the confidence level of 95% is used, so the
significance value (α) is 0.05.
If the significance value (α)> 0.05 then H0 is accepted
If the significance value (α) ≤ 0.05 then H0 is rejected
In carrying out the normality test, SPSS software is used. The following table
results from the normality test using SPSS software:
Figure 15. Normality Test Visual Data

After testing, the results are as shown above. Seen from the left side table, namely
the Kolmogorov-Smirnov section, it can be seen that all the significance values on
all dimensions> 0.05 are Ho accepted, which means that all dimensional data are
normally distributed.
b. Independent Sample T- Test
In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used. The following
table shows the results of the independent sample t-test using SPSS software:

Figure 16. Visual T-Test

The hypothesis used is:

Ho: There is no difference in the average speed of visual reactions between men
and women.
Ha: There are differences in the average speed of visual reactions between men and
women.
The independent sample t test conducted showed that there were differences in the
average time of the speed of visual reactions between men and women. So that it
can be concluded that men and women have different visual competencies.
2. Ruler Drop Test Analysis

a. Normality test

Before calculating visual data using the independent sample t-test, the data
normality test is first performed. In carrying out the normality test, the hypothetical
forms used are first determined, namely:
H0: Data is normally distributed
H1: Data is not normally distributed
In testing the independent sample t-test the confidence level of 95% is used, so the
significance value (α) is 0.05.
If the significance value (α)> 0.05 then H0 is accepted
If the significance value (α) ≤ 0.05 then H0 is rejected
In carrying out the normality test, SPSS software is used. The following table
results from the normality test using SPSS software:
Figure 17. Normality Test Ruler Drop Test

After testing, the results are as shown above. Seen from the left side table,
namely the Kolmogorov-Smirnov section, it can be seen that all the significance
values on all dimensions> 0.05 are Ho accepted, which means that all
dimensional data are normally distributed.
b. Independent sample T-Test

In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used. The following
table shows the results of the independent sample t-test using SPSS software:

Figure 18. Independent Sample T-Test Reaction Speed Tool

The hypothesis used is:

Ho: There is no difference in the average right and left hand in men.
Ha: There are differences in the average right and left hands in men.
After testing, the results are as shown above. Viewed from the table, the result is
a significance value on all dimensions <0.05, namely Ho is rejected, which
means there are differences in the right and left hand responsive stimulus in
men.

c. Auditory Result Analysis

a. Normality test
Before calculating visual data using the independent sample t-test, the data
normality test is first performed. In carrying out the normality test, the
hypothetical forms used are first determined, namely:
H0: Data is normally distributed
H1: Data is not normally distributed
In testing the independent sample t-test the confidence level of 95% is used, so
the significance value (α) is 0.05.
If the significance value (α)> 0.05 then H0 is accepted
If the significance value (α) ≤ 0.05 then H0 is rejected
In carrying out the normality test, SPSS software is used. The following table
results from the normality test using SPSS software:
 Figure 19. Auditory Normality Test

After testing, the results are as shown above. Seen from the left side table,
namely the Kolmogorov-Smirnov section, it can be seen that all the
significance values on all dimensions> 0.05 are Ho accepted, which means
that all dimensional data are normally distributed. Independent sample T-
Test.
b. Independent sample T-Test
In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used. The
following table shows the results of the independent sample t-test using
SPSS software:
Figure 20. Auditory T-test

The hypothesis used is:

Ho: There is no difference in auditory averages between men and

women.

Ha: There are differences in auditory averages between men and

women.

After testing, the results are as shown above. Viewed from the table, the
result is a significance value on all dimensions <0.05, namely Ho is
rejected, which means that there are differences in auditory averages
 between men and women.

Based on the observation sheet case study we can see male has better
reaction time than woman. A review of the literature on the influence of
gender on reaction times shows that almost every group age male
mostly take a lead or have a good reaction time than female because
males responded stimulus much faster than females (Jain,2015). The
male – female difference is due to the lag between presentation of the
stimulus and the beginning of the muscle contraction. Therefore,
PT.DSKE should hiring male employee than female employee.

d. Word Chunk Result Analysis

a. Normality test

Before calculating the word chunk data using the independent sample t-test, the
data normality test is first performed. In carrying out the normality test, the
hypothetical forms used are first determined, namely:
H0: Data is normally distributed
H1: Data is not normally distributed
In testing the independent sample t-test the confidence level of 95% is used, so the
significance value (α) is 0.05.
If the significance value (α)> 0.05 then H0 is accepted
If the significance value (α) ≤ 0.05 then H0 is rejected
In carrying out the normality test, SPSS software is used. The following table
results from the normality test using SPSS software:
Figure 21. Normality Test word chunk data
b. Independent sample T-test

In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used. The

following table shows the results of the independent sample t-test using
SPSS software:

Figure 22.Word chunk data T-test

Ho: There is no difference in score between English words and Indonesian words
Ha: There is a score difference between English words and Indonesian words
After testing, the results are as shown above. Viewed from the table, the result is a
significance value on all dimensions <0.05, namely Ho is rejected, which means
that there is a difference in the score between English words and Indonesian
words. English. So it can be concluded that the speed of the word chunk reaction
between Indonesian and English is different.
From the observation sheet study case and compare with the result we can see
there are no huge significant. Chunk word test are the test that testing the verbal
working memory may combine with phonological and conceptual units. On the
data above we can see there is no big different between Bahasa and English but
most scoring is Bahasa. Bahasa are the language that commonly used in daily life
so it must be already on the long memory and that in daily life always be used.
Therefore PT. ERGO should making application by using Bahasa than English. It
 will better if there are variance language.

e. Figure Chunk Result Analysis

a. Normality test

Before calculating the chunk data using the independent sample t-test, the data
normality test is first performed. In carrying out the normality test, the hypothetical
forms used are first determined, namely:
H0: Data is normally distributed
H1: Data is not normally distributed
In testing the independent sample t-test the confidence level of 95% is used, so the
significance value (α) is 0.05.
If the significance value (α)> 0.05 then H0 is accepted
If the significance value (α) ≤ 0.05 then H0 is rejected
In carrying out the normality test, SPSS software is used. The following table
results from the normality test using SPSS software:
Figure 23. Normality Test Figure Chunk data

After testing, the results are as shown above. Seen from the left side table,
namely the Kolmogorov-Smirnov section, it can be seen that all the significance
values on all dimensions> 0.05 are Ho which means all dimension data are
normally distributed. Using SPSS software
b. Independent Sample T-Test

In conducting the independent sample t-test, SPSS software is used. The

following table shows the results of the independent sample t-test using
SPSS software:

Figure 24. Figure Chunk Data T-Test

The hypothesis used is:

Ho: There is no difference in score between simple images and complex

images

Ha: There is a difference in scores between simple images and complex

images.

After testing, the results are as shown above. Judging from the table, the result
is a significance value on all dimensions <0.05, that is Ho is rejected, which
means that there are differences in the score between simple images and
complex images.

Based on the observation sheet case study the high score are from the simple
figure. Simultaneously, the information encoded as chunk would be stored in
long term memory and if necessary it would be rapidly transferred from long
term memory to working memory. In this case the brain more like the
simplest way to read he graph or the figure then transferred to working
memory than the figure that abstract. Therefore PT.ERGO must be using
simple icon button on their application also the icon will representative of the
menu.
3.6 Conclusion
1. Reaction Speed is the time between giving stimuli to the emergence of responses
to stimuli

2. Short-term memory is a working memory that is storing information temporarily in

a limited amount. While long-term memory is a place to store memory
permanently.

3. Individual neurons are demonstrated to show various temporary biochemical

changes that lead to responsiveness changes. Thus, the mechanics a temporary
memory as a biochemical state change are known. Exactly how these changes in a
collection of neurons would represent a memory is not known. Further, the precise
mechanisms for conversion of these temporary states

4. Based on the hypothesis test that has been done, it can be concluded that there are
differences between visual, auditory, and chunk words in men and women,
whereas in chunk images there is no difference. For the chunk letters and color
hypothesis test, there are differences in assumptions with parameters that have
been determined, while the chunk numbers do not have differences in assumptions.
The response speed of reaction to a stimulus for each person is certainly different.
Things that affect these differences include age, gender, complexity of stimulus,
fatigue, environmental factors, psychological factors, and types of stimulus.
 REFERENCES

Alan. T, Akyol. P. (2013). Reaction times of different branch athletes and correlation between
reaction time parameters
Shelton. J, Kumar. G. P. (2010). Comparison between Auditory and Visual Simple Reaction
Times.
William. T, Esposito. T, Hu. S, Mahoney. D, and Paulson. K. (2014). Effects of Varying Audio
Frequencies on Reaction Time and Muscular Activity
 ATTACHMENT

Observation Sheet

NB:
1. Each table is given the head of the table (placed above the table) and every picture is
given the image title (placed below the image).
2. Margin Top : 3 cm , left : 3,8 cm , right : 2,5 cm , bottom : 2,5 cm
3. Linespacing : 1.5 , before and after paragraph : 0
4. Paragraph : Justify