You are on page 1of 1

1

Nechepso and Petosiris PLINY THE ELDER reports that Nechepso and
Petosiris together calculated the size of the
DORIAN GIESELER GREENBAUM AND
MICAH ROSS
universe (HN 2.21).
The doctrines ascribed to Nechepso and
Petosiris contain universal, natal, iatro-
Certain astrological pseudepigraphies attribute mathematical and catarchic astrology. Universal
early doctrines of ancient western astrology to techniques include the effects of eclipses,
“Nechepso” and “Petosiris.” Nechepso was sup- comets, and Sothic risings (Heph. 1.21–24).
posedly a king of Egypt; Petosiris’ relationship Natal techniques include the relationship
to him is unclear, but they are often cited between the moon’s position and the ascendant
together. No one has definitively demonstrated for conception and birth (Heph. 2.1.2), the lot
which historical figures correspond to Nechepso of fortune for determining happiness and length
or Petosiris, despite frequent attempts (e.g., of life (Vett. Val. 2.3; 3.11), and planets ruling
Neugebauer and Parker 1969; Krauss and periods of life (Heph. 2.11).
Fecht 1981). Astrological texts identify
Nechepso as “the King” (e.g., Vett. Val. Anthol- SEE ALSO: Astrology, Greece and Rome;
ogy 2.3.1; 2.29.1; 3.11.2; 3.13.6; Firm. Mathesis Astronomy, Egyptian; Firmicus Maternus,
4, 22.2). The historian MANETHO identified Iulius; Hephaistion of Thebes; Vettius Valens.
Nechepsos as a 26th dynasty king and Eisler
(1946: 216) first suggested Necho II
(610–595 BCE). REFERENCES AND SUGGESTED READINGS
Fragments of Nechepso and Petosiris’ writ-
Eisler, R. (1946) The royal art of astrology.
ings occur in Greek verse and prose (probably
London.
from mid-second century BCE). First collected Heilen, S. (forthcoming) “Some metrical
by Riess (1892), the fragments have been fragments from the manual of Nechepso and
updated by Heilen (forthcoming). Later astrol- Petosiris.” In J.-H. Abry, I. Boehm, and
ogers considered Nechepso and Petosiris W. Hübner, eds., Proceedings of the international
authoritative and used quotations ascribed to conference la poésie astrologique dans l’Antiquité,
them to lend antiquity and credibility to astro- Lyon 7–8 décembre 2007. Lyons.
logical doctrines, although these doctrines Krauss, R., and Fecht, G. (1981) “Necho II. alias
were also sometimes critiqued by astrologers Nechepso.” Göttinger Miszellen 42: 49–60.
themselves (e.g., Vett. Val. 2.3.1; 3.11; 9.2.7–8). Neugebauer, O., and Parker, R. A. (1960–9)
Nechepso and Petosiris often appear together, Egyptian astronomical texts. (1. The early decans.
2. The Ramesside star clocks. 3. Decans, planets,
but Petosiris apparently wrote a treatise called
constellations and zodiacs). Providence.
Definitions (Horia) and a letter to Nechepso, Pingree, D. (1974) “Petosiris.” In C. C. Gillispie,
whereas Nechepso authored around fourteen ed., Dictionary of scientific biography, vol. 10:
books of opaque and enigmatic verses (see 547–9. New York.
Valens’ comments at 2.3.1; 3.11.1). Valens para- Riess, E. (1892) “Nechepsonis et Petosiridis
phrases this composition in his account of fragmenta magica.” In Philologus, Suppl. 6, pt. 1.
Nechepso’s astrological vision (6. Proem). Göttingen.

The Encyclopedia of Ancient History, First Edition. Edited by Roger S. Bagnall, Kai Brodersen, Craige B. Champion, Andrew Erskine,
and Sabine R. Huebner, print pages 4722–4723.
© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Published 2013 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
DOI: 10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah21224

You might also like