Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract. Different larval densities have revealed that growth is directly proportional to their
numbers in their rearing jars. While developmentaltime for pupal stage have inverse relationship
with larval population density of both sexes. Survival percentage of the larval and pupal stages
were unchanged by the increase of larval population density. Larval population density had no
effecton adult sex ratios. Puparial and adult weights responded inverselywith the density for both
sexes.Adult weight of males was less than those of females.
Vl
Larval densities (n) Larva Pupa Total r'
Ol
:::.
:;:: :;!
~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ o+~ ~
""d
":-< 0
20 7.4±0.27 7.2±0.17 14.0±0.00 14.2±0.09 21.4±0.27 21.4±0.23 21.4±0.17 "d
ttl
E..
~ ..•.
Ol
Vl 40 7.2±O.09 7.5±0.19 14.0±0.00 14.4±0.17 21.2±0.09 21.9±025 21.6±0.16 •.....
p. 60 14.5±0.11 21.6±O.22
0
::s
7.2±0.18 7.4±0.11 14.5±0.14 22.0±0.09 21.8±0.11
0
ro
~ 80 7.7±0.19 7.2±0.10 14.5±0.08 14.4±O.07 22.1±0.21 21.6±O13
::s
.;0 21.8±0.12 •.....
Vl
Overall
Mean±SE
Table 3. Weights of pupal and adult stages (Mean±SE) of W. II11ba at different larval densities.
Larvae/jar (n) Pupal wt. (mg) Adult wt. (mg) Total biomass
/jar (g)
d'+<j' d' <j' d'+<j'
59.7 and 59.0% of the total developmental with population density, (r=0.06, p>0.05)
time (combined sexes) for eight different for pupae and (r=0.05, p>0.05) for total
population densities (20, 40, 60, 80, 100, survivaL
120, 180, and 200 larvae per jar/15 g The percentage of pupation (Table 2)
ground beef), respectively. The percentage showed in general a similar trend as that
duration of total developmental time for of the larval survival mentioned above.
larvae was increased (r=0.94, p<O.Ol)and This may show that once the larvae reach
for pupae was decreased (r=-0.93, p<O.Ol) their maturity, the rate of pupation is not
with increasing larval population. affected. Data presented in Table (2)
Larval and pupal survival. Data obta- showed clearly that larvae which
ined in the present study revealed that successfully survive produced pupae.
larval survival of eight larval densities Such data are in agreement with those of
(Table 2) ranged between 86.1% and 97%. AI-Misned et al. (1999).They found that no
This result did not reflect any decisive significant correlation between larval food
effect of larval densities on the percentage
weights and pupal and total survival
of larval survival. Statistical analysis of
percentage of B. crnentata, which was
data in Table (2) revealed that no signi-
observed by Wells and Greenberg (1992a),
ficant correlation was found between all
who found that the survivorship from egg
eight tested levels of larval densities and
larval survival percentage (r=-0.25, p> to adult according to egg density for C.
0.05). Findings of the present study are in rufifacies and Cochliomyia macellaria in pure
agreement with those of AI- Misned et al. culture revealed no significant effect of
(1999) and AI-Misned (2002). They found density. Also the present findings here are
that no significant correlation between in general agreement and somehow
larval food weights and larval survival coincident with those of Kelany et al.
percentage of B. crnentata and P. rnficornis, (1989).They found that all tested density
respectively. levels of Parasarcophaga argyrostoma and C.
The percentage of pupal and total albiceps showed no effect on the pupation
survival were not significantly correlated percentages, and they also added that once
the larvae reach the pupal stage, the rate of The mean adult weights of males were
emergence is not strongly affected. smaller than those of females.
Sex ratio. Data obtained in the present From the results obtained in the
study were examined for any possible present study, it is clear that the most
relations between larval density and sex favourable larval density ranged between
ratio. No significant correlation was 20 and 60 larvae per 15 g ground beef
detected (r=-0.25, p>0.05) (Table 2). This where the resulting weight of the
finding was similar to that observed in combined sex were between 44-53 mg.
house flies (Boggild and Keiding, 1958; Such data are in agreement in general with
Sullivan and Sokal, 1963)/ blowfly that found in B.cruentata (AI- Misned et al.,
Calliphora erythrocephaIa (Shahein, 1986) 1999)/ P. ruficornis (AI- Misned, 2002)/ P.
and fleshfly P. ruftcornis (AI-Misned/2002). argyrostoma and C. aIbiceps (Kelany et aI.,
Pupal and adult weights. Data obta- 1989)/ house flies (Sullivan and Sokal,
ined showed generally that the increasing 1963) and C. megacephala and C. rufifacies
larval population density resulted in a (Goodbrod and Goff, 1990).
decrease of pupal and adult weights (Table The results obtained in this study
3). The correlation between the level of could be correlated with wild flies where
crowding and the pupal weight was signi- the increase of weight of individual may
ficant (r=-0.99, p<O.OOl).Such data are in reflect the decrease of population density
agreement with those of AI- Misned et aI. Total biomass. The total biomass per
(1999)/and AI-Misned (2002).They found jar obtained in the present study was
that decrease in larval food weight of B. significantly correlated with population
cruentata and P. ruficornis resulted in a density (r=0.88, p<O.Ol) (Table 3). The
decrease of pupal weight. Also Kelany et increase in total biomass of flies is not a
al. (1989)found that an increase in larval crowding or food shortage effect . Those
density of P. argtjrostoma lead to the same cultures with more larvae will produce a
result. They added also that distinguish larger biomass of adults unless the adults
differences were found between the mean are drastically reduced in size. As
weights of the control pupae of C. albiceps indicated in Table 3/ the weight of flies
(10 larvae/50g fish) and the maximum was slightly decreased. Survival percen-
density of 100 larvae/50 g fish. The tage of the larval and pupal stages were
present data was also in agreement with not affected by the increase of larval
those of Zaher and Moussa (1961). They density. This will produce a large biomass
reported that the population density has a of adults with increasing larval density.
great influence of the weight of the pupae AI-Misned et al. (1999) found in B.
when the larval food is limited. Similar cruentata a positive correlation between the
results were also found in house flies total biomass per beaker and larval food
(Kitaok, 1957; Haupt and Busvine, 1968) weights. Similar results were reported in
and calliphorid flies (Shahein, 1986; P. ruficornis by AI-Misned (2002).
Goodbrod and Goff, 1990;Omar, 1992). Concerning W nuba examined in the
The mean adult weights were present study it has been concluded the
significantly decreased with increasing larval developmental time was increased,
population density (r=-0.99, p<O.OOl)for the pupal developmental time was decr-
both sexes. Moreover, there was a signi- eased. At the same time, decrease in pupal
ficant differences (p<O.OOl)between adult and adult weights in response to larval
weights of both sexes at all larval densities. population density was also detected,
while the survival percentage of the larval Amoudi, M. A 1993b. Effect of temperature on the
developmental stages of Wohlfahrtia nuba (Diptera:
and pupal stages was not affected. in
Sarcophagidae). J. Egypt. Soc. Para-sito!., 23 (3): 697-
contrast, Collins (1980) found that all 705.
individuals of shore fly Ephydra cinerea Amoudi, M. A, Diab, F. M. and Abou- Fannah, S. S. M.
surveyed were responded to larval food 1993. Effects of larval population density on the life
limitation by sacrificing adult body size, cycle parameters in Zaprionus indiana Gupta
(Diptera: Drosophilidae). Pakistan J. Zool., 25 (1) : 37-
fecundity, and developmental time.In 40.
Drosophila, the crowding usually results in Andrewartha, H.G. and Birch, L. C. 1954. "The distribution
size reduction, increased development and abundance of animals". Univ. Chicago Press,
time and reduced fecundity is well known Chicago.
Annan, M. E. 1952. Crowding and temperature effects on
(Pearl, 1926; Miner et al., 1927; Robertson, the duration of development of Drosophila offinis and
1936; Annan, 1952; Birch, 1955; Grucci, Drosophila pseudoobscura. Drosophila Int. Servo 26: 90.
1955; Lints, 1963; Robertson, 1963). Birch, L. C. 1957 The meanings of competition. Am. Nat.,
Andrewartha and Birch (1959) and Odum 91: 5-18
Boggild, O. and Keiding, J. 1958. Competition in house fly
(1959)reported the well- known ecological larvae. Experiments involving a DDT- resistant and a
fact that overcrowding of organisms susceptible strain. Gikos, 9: 1-25.
produces adverse effects on their survival, Buttiker, A, Attiah, M. D. and Pont, A C. 1979. Insects of
rate of development and population Saudi Arabia Diptera: Synanthropic flies. Faulla of
Saudi Arabia, 1: 352-367.
growth. Collins, N. C. 1980. Developmental responses to food
limitation as indicators of environmental conditions
Acknowledgments for Ephydra cinerea Jones (Diptera). Ecology, 61: 650-
661.
I express my great appreciation to Mr. Denno, R. F. and Cothran, W. R. 1976. Competitive
Salah Salem M. Abou-Fannah for interactions and ecological strategies of sarcophagid
and calliphorid flies inhabiting rabbit carrion. Ann.
technical assistance.
Entom. Soc Am., 69: 109-113.
Edwards, A L. 1985. "Multiple regression and the analysis of
variance and covariance". Freeman. New York.
El- Boulaqui, H. A, Amin, F. M. A, Bassiouny, G. A and
Al-Misned, F. A M. 2000. Developmental time, mortality El- Rifaie, S. A 1983. Human aural myiasis in Cairo. J.
and weight of the immature fleshfly Bercaea cruentata Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 13 (2): 547 - 550.
(Diptera: Sarcophagidae) larvae exposed to mercury. Fuller, M. E. 1934. The insect inhabitants of carrion: a study
Agric. Sci., 5 (2): 63-67. in animal ecology.Aust. Coune. Sci, Ind. Res. Bull., 82:
Al-Misned, F. A M. 2002. Effect of the amount of food 4-63.
given to the larvae on the life cycle of Parasarcophaga Goodbrod, J. R. and Goff, M. L. 1990. Effects of larval
(Liopygia) ruficomis (F.). J. EgJJpt. Soc. Parasito!., 32(1): population density on rates of development and
179-190. interactions between two species of Chrysomya
Al-Misned, F. AM., Amoudi, M. A and Abou- Fannah, S. (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in laboratory culture. J. Med.
S. M. 2001. First record of Sarcophaga (Liosarcophaga) Entomol., 27 (3): 338-343.
dux Thomson, 1868 (Diptera: Sarcophagidae) from Grucci. T. M. 1955. "The effects of crowding on the mean
Saudi Arabia. Pakistan J. Zool., 33 (4): 313-315. percen tage survival of certain karyotypes of Drosophila
Al-Misned, F. AM., Kelany, 1. M. and Abou- Fannah, S. S. persimilis". M. S. thesis, University of pittsburgh.
M. 1999. Effect of larval food weight as a limiting Haupt, A and Busvine, J. R. 1968. The effect of
factor on some biological aspects of Bercaea cruelltata overcrowding on the size of house flies. Trans. R.
(Meigen) ( Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Anllals Agrie. Sci. Entomol. Soc. London, 120: 297-311.
Moshtohor., 37 (1): 721- 730. Holdaway, F. G. 1930. Field populations and natural
Amoudi, M. A 1993a. New records of some of sarcophagid control of Lucilia sericata. Nature (Lond.) 126: 648-649.
fly with distribution of all known flesh flies (Diptera: lkeshoji, T. 1965. The influence of larval breeding
Sarcophagidae) of Saudi Arabia. f. Egypt. Soc. conditions on fecundity of Culex pipiens fatigans
Parasitol., 23 (1): 297-304.
Wied. World Health Organ. Vector Control 135, 65. growth rate of larvae. J. Egypt. Soc. Parasitol., 22 (2):
21. 521-531.
Ikeshoji, T. and Mulla, M. S. 1970a. Overcrowding factors Pearl, R 1926. "The biology of population growth". Knopf,
of mosquito larvae. J. Econ. Entomol., 63 (1): 90-96. New York. 316 P.
Ikeshoji, T. and Mulla, M. S. 1970b. Overcrowding factors Ping-Man, S. O. and Dudgean, D. 1989. Variation in the
of mosquito larvae. 2- Growth and bacteriostatic life-history parameters of Hemipyrellia ligurriens
effects of the overcrowding factors of mosquito (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in response to larval
larvae. J. Econ. Entomol., 63(6): 1737-1743. competition for food. Ecol. Entomol., 14: 109-116.
Kamal, A. S. 1958. Comparative study of thirteen species of Robertson, C. W . 1936. Metamorphosis of Drosophila
sarcosaprophagous Calliphoridae and melanogaster including an accurately timed account
Sarcophagidae (Diptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 51: of the principal morphological changes. J. Morphol.,
261-271. 59: 351-399.
Kelany, I. M., Khalil, S. I. Y. and Abdel-Galil, F. A. 1989. Robertson, F. W. 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in
Larval competition and its biological effects on two Drosophila. 6. The genetic correlation between the
different fly species Parasarcophaga argyrostoma and duration of larval period and body size in relation to
ChnJsomyia albiceps (Diptera: Sarcophagidae & larval diet. Genet. Res. Cambridge 4: 74-92.
Calliphoridae). J. Agric. Res. Center Ministry of Agric. Roubaud, E. 1914. Les producteurs de myiases et agents
Dokki, Egypt. similaires chez 1, homme et les anirnaux. In Bouet, G.
Khedre, A. M. 1998. Oogenesis and expression of autogeny et Roubaud, E. Etudes sur la Faune Parasitaire de 1,
in relation to larval diet and population density of Afrique Occidentale Francaise. Fasc. 1. Paris.
Wohlfahrtia nuba (Wied.) (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). J. Salem, H. H. 1938. A complete revision of the species of the
Egypt. Ger. Soc. Zool., 25(E): 159-177. genus Wohlfahrtia B. and B. Diptera, Larvaevoridac,
Kitaok, S. 1957. Effects of population density and its phase Metopiidae. Publ. Fac. Med. Egypt, Univ., 13 (IV): 90-
99.
change on the development of the housefly. Jap. J.
Salt, G. 1932. The natural control of the sheep blowfly
San it. Zool., 8: 192.
Lueilia sericata Meigen. Bull. Entomol. Res., 23: 235-245.
Kneidel, K. A. 1984. Competition and disturbance in
Scheiring, J. F., Davis, D. G., Ranasinghe, A. and Teare, C.
communities of carrion-breeding Diptera. J. Anim.
A. 1984. Effects of larval crowding on life history
Ecol., 53: 849-865.
parameters in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen
Knipling, E. F. 1937. The biology of Sarcophaga cistudinis
(Diptera: Drosophilidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 77:
Aldrich (Diptera), a species of Sarcophagidae
329-332.
parasitic on turtle and tortoises. Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash.,
Shahein, A. 1986. Effect of intraspecific competition
39: 91-101.
between larvae of Calliphora erythrocephala (Meig.) (
Lewis, D. J. 1955. Calliphoridae of medical interest in the
Calliphoridae: Diptera). Beitrage Zur Entomol., 36 (2):
Sudan (Diptera). Bull. Soc. Ent. Egypt, 39: 275-296.
233-235.
Lints, F. A. 1963. Size in relation to development time and
Singh, R B. 1940. Prolongation of the larval life of
egg density in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature
Drosophila melanogaster. Drosophila In! Serv., 13: 75.
(London) 197: 1128-1130. Sullivan, R L. and Sokal, R R 1963. The effects of larval
Martinez- Beringola, M. L. 1966. Influence de al densidad density on several strains of the house fly. Ecology,
de poblacion larvaria en la duracion del desarrollo 44: 120-130.
de Ceratitis capitata Wied, II. Bioi. R. Soc. Esp. Hist. Terzian, L. and Stahler, N. 1949. The effect of larval
Nat. Secc. Bioi., 64: 351-360. population density on some laboratory
Miner, J. R, Parker, S. L. and Pearl, R 1927. Experimental characteristics of Anopheles quadrimaculatus Say. J.
studies on the duration of life. XI. Density of Parasitol., 35: 487-489.
population and life duration in Drosophila. Am. Nat., Ullyet, G. C. 1950. Competition for food and allied
61: 289. phenomena in sheep blowfly populations. Phil.
Morsy, T. A. and Soliman, M. S. 1976. Traumatic myiasis in Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. B. 234: 77-174.
man due to Wohlfahrtia magnifica. J. Egypt. Soc. Wells, J. D. and Greenberg, B. 1992a. Laboratory
Parasitol., 6: 19-22. interaction between introduced ChnJsomya mfifaeies
Nair, K. R 1968. Two sarcophagid parasites of and native Cochliomyia macellaria (Diptera:
phytophagous terrestrial snails in Mysore State, Calliphoridae). Environ. Entomol., 21 (3): 640-645.
India. Tech. Bull. Commonw. Inst. Bioi. Control., 10: Wells, J. D. and Greenberg, B. 1992b. Interaction between
113-127. ChnJsomya nlfifacies and Cochliomyia macellaria
Odum, E. P. 1959. An outline of the dynamics of (Diptera: Calliphoridae): The possible consequences
populations. Aust. J. Zool., 2: 9-65. of an invasion. Bull. Entomol. Res., 82:133-137.
Omar, A. H. 1992. Effect of larval population density on Zaher, M. A. and Moussa, M. A. 1961. Effects of population
dynamics of growth in ChnJsomya albiceps density on Prodenia litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
(Wiedemann), effect of feeding behaviour and Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 54 (2): 145-149.
~l:j :>lp. O.JJj ~ ~\:i.»U ~j.1aJ\ ~~\ ~b
4~\4~~.J 6A ~\ "':-ll:j tuw ~ll1\ Wolfahrfia nuba (Wiedemann)