Professional Documents
Culture Documents
"...aus dem Schiffbruch des irdischen Lebens": The Literature of Karoline von Günderrode
and Early German Romantic and Idealist Philosophy
Author(s): Steven D. Martinson
Source: German Studies Review, Vol. 28, No. 2 (May, 2005), pp. 303-326
Published by: The Johns Hopkins University Press on behalf of the German Studies
Association
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30038151
Accessed: 14-01-2020 03:31 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
German Studies Association, The Johns Hopkins University Press are collaborating with
JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to German Studies Review
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
"...aus dem Schiffbruch des irdischen Lebens":
The Literature of Karoline von Giinderrode
and Early German Romantic and
Idealist Philosophy
Steven D. Martinson
The University of Arizona
Abstract: Due, in large part, to her unfortunate suicide, Karoline von G0nderrode (1775-1806)
has been portrayed as a victim of her times. By appreciating the quality and uniqueness
of her contributions to German culture, a much different view of the writer emerges. Her
Studienbuch constitutes a running dialogue with some of the most influential theoreticians
of her time. She created an impressive body of literature, which shows her mastery of
language, form, and action. It is especially in the area of mythology that she excels. Her
suicide should be interpreted in her own terms. For G0nderrode, death meant new life.
The romantic writer Karoline von Giinderrode (1775-1806) was especially well
read.1 She pursued many different fields of inquiry, such as philosophy; East Asian,
ancient Greek, and Nordic mythology; the history of religion, physiognomy, clas-
sical languages, in particular, Latin, metrics, and chemistry, all of which enriched
the quality of her lyrical, prose, and dramatic works. The Brentanos-Clemens
Gunda, and Bettina, the latter of whom wrote Die Giinderrode (1840), are among
the romantics with whom she associated.
The present undertaking constitutes a first attempt to illuminate the crosscur-
rents of the literature of Karoline von Gtinderrode and early romantic and idealist
philosophy, while remaining sensitive to the aesthetic quality of her works and
the turmoil of her inner world. Rather than redraw the picture of Gtinderrode as a
victim of her times or as a self-sacrifice,2 we seek to disclose the positive, produc-
tive side of Gtinderrode's contributions to German culture.3 The study concludes
with a detailed analysis and reevaluation of Gtinderrode's suicide in the light of
her many original writings.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
304 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 305
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
306 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 307
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
308 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 309
E. For Schleiermacher,
noch praktisch, wie die
Anschauung und Gefiih
his uniqueown
perspect
termining its limits and
Giinderrode's work, as t
Endliche gleichsam aus
Endliche Un zugleich ein
seiner Grtinzen" (II: 28
that true religion has ne
one's own religion, that
Giinderrode also embra
tionen des Geistes" are
Divinity (die Gittlichkei
Geist. Only self-observ
Dasein der Freiheit," wh
to the critical idea that t
holds that humanity (M
Hauch des Lebens hin u
was struck by this idea,
articulated.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
310 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 311
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
312 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 313
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
314 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 315
Giinderrode's reception
Frankfurt historian Johan
of Friedrich and Charlotte
to "Ueberspannung, eine
von La Roche, too, blamed
ism. Writing to Christoph
manche Opfer dem Charo
to ancient Greek mytholo
over the river into the Hades of the underworld.
The fact is, however, that Karoline von Giinderrode could not separate her
vocation as a poet-writer from her social life. For her, Fichte's moral imperative
regarding one's "Bestimmung, sittlich zu handeln" did not mean the passive ac-
ceptance of the status quo. Rather, it presupposed change, which, at times, meant
resistance and non-acceptance. In the end, Giinderrode believed that the divide
between theory and practice, the intellectual and the practical, could be overcome
only in death, which meant new life.
Almost all scholars agree that Giinderrode's decision to commit suicide can-
not be adequately explained on the basis of biographical information alone. The
intricate fabric of her collected writings contains clues as to the reasons for and
significance of her suicide, an analysis of which follows.
Hannelore Schlaffer claims that Giinderrode died for an idea, that is, as the result
of the search for cultural recognition, the highest accomplishment of which was
death. Karl-Heinz Bohrer's lengthy examination of the contours of Giinderrode's
suicide, in Der romantische Brief, is based exclusively on various exchanges of
letters, thus leaving out of consideration a large part of her work that is essential
for an understanding of her life and death. Finally, Markus Hille has advanced
the idea that Giinderrode suffered from the kind of split consciousness the author
depicts in her representation of Mohammed.
In the opening monologue of Mahomed, der Prophet von Mekka (published
1805),44 Giinderrode assigned the following words to her dramatic hero: "Zwei-
faches Leben floI3 aus diesem Gestirn aufmich herab, und ein Sinnbild war es mir
meines doppelten Lebens, das mich theilweise an die Erde und die Geschlifte der
Welt kniipft, und mich theilweise zu dem Ueberirdischen und zu seltsamen Offen-
barungen fiihrt" (I:111). Although there would seem to be some affinity between
Ginderrode's Mohammed and Goethe's Faust (that is, the Faust-fragment of 1790),
Mohammed's double life actually coincides with the idealist philosophies of Fichte
and Schelling. According to Schelling, for example, and as Giinderrode noted in her
Studienbuch, all things have a double existence (ein doppeltes Dasein), a limited
individual nature and an unlimited universal one (II: 368). When taken together,
they participate in the infinite. Quoting Schelling, Giinderrode writes: "Dies dop-
pelte Dasein ist das Prinzip aller Wesen so sind alle Kdrper und Materien der Erde
jedes fuir sich ein indiwiduelles Dasein und auch zugleich ein universelleres in dem
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
316 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 317
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
318 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 319
Conclusion
For a time, Giinderrode could not answer the question that Fichte posed
very end of the first book of Die Bestimmung des Menschen: "Welche Mach
mich von dir, welche Macht kann mich von mir selbst retten?" (BM 43) Wh
the course of writing Hildgund, however, Giinderrode would answer the qu
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
320 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 321
1 This article is a greatly expanded version of a paper presented on June 12, 2004 at George
Mason University as part of the conference, "Literature and Philosophy: After Kant." It is
intended as a tribute to the work of Karoline von Giinderrode in commemoration of the
bicentennial of her death in 2006.
2 Wolf 1979.
3Although she is included in the bio-bibliography, the Romantik-Handbuch edited by Helmut
Schanze (Tiibingen: Kraner, 1994) contains only fleeting reference to Giinderrode, who is
seen mostly through the lens of an earlier contribution by Karl Heinz Bohrer (50-51, 70,
531). As complete and exhaustive as it seems to be, the handbook contains no separate
chapter on women writers of the time.
4 McGowan, 6.
5 In her lengthy, highly informative study, Licherperceives the writer as a"politische Dichterin"
(1996, 12). Dormann disagrees. She sees in Giinderrode's work neither Erlebnisdichtung or
the product ofa weibliche Asthetiknor political commentary or a new mythos, but rather what
she understands to be the spirit of early romanticism, namely "'freie Ideenkunst'" (13).
6 Selbig proceeds too quickly when she asserts that simply by having read the work of many
writers, Giinderrode created "ein komplexes Werk eigener Prfigung," "denn Karoline von
Giinderrode gestaltete in Unabhlingigkeit von den Urbildern" (303). Lithi shares Selbig's
opinion (70).
7 Weilenborn, Die Briefe der Karoline von Giinderrode, 77. Hereafter, references to this
edition of Giinderrode's letters appear as Weilenborn followed by the page number.
8 McGowan, 76.
9 In her time, feeling (Gefiihl) was conceived as a "denkende Empfindung der durch den
Verstand gefilterten Seele" (Selbig 302).
10 For feminist readings of Giinderrode's work, see Kord, Kastinger-Riley, Treber, and
Helfer. See Licher (1996) for a critique of the ideological-critical rigorism of some feminist
readings of Giinderrode and the past (37-38 and 42-43).
"A fine example of this is G6lz' study. Following an exhaustive analysis of Novalis' "Das
Lied der Toten," Golz concludes that "A striking feature of Giinderrode's selection as it
relates to the 'double' poem by Novalis is that none of the stanzas she selects are among
those highlighted by Novalis' centering and recentering activities or by their structural role
in his poem (e.g., the frame)" (103). However, when Ginderrode made changes to the text
she did not add to the linguistic register of Novalis' poem. Rather, she used lexical items
from other parts of Novalis' text (103).
12 Scholars have debated the potential problem of Giinderrode's reliance on or adherence
to masculine philosophical discourse. Our attention is directed to the significance of her
selection of portions of some of the most influential male writers of her time, her divergence
from their work, and where her originality lies.
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
322 German Studies Review 28/2 (2005)
22 Ltithi sees that "das Sich-Mitteilen" is, for her, "ein tiefes Bediirfnis...in ihrer Produktion
ist sie ganz eigenstiindig und authentisch" (76).
23 Kord explores "die Abhtingigkeit des Weibes" in Giinderrode's dramas, which was indica-
tive of the social restrictions that were imposed on women in her time.
24 Quoted in F WJ. Schelling, 88.
25 IPNrefers to Schelling's Ideen zu einer Philosophie der Natur and PK to his Philosophie
der Kunst. They are followed by page numbers in the Schrdder edition of Schellings Werke.
Here: IPN 93.
26 The topic of Gtinderrode and science awaits future investigation.
27 As noted by Herder. All further references are to the Suphan edition by volume and pa
number. Here: 16: 68.
28 "Das Durchqueren der 'Schltinde der Nacht' deutet die Riickkehr zum Ursprung im Scho3
der Natur an, meint aber auch den Blick in dessen (also des Absoluten) Spiegel, die Tiefen
des eigenen Selbst (Seele)" (Lucher 1996, 142).
29 One forceful example of this view is found in Berwald's dissertation. "Throughout her
work, Giinderrode depicts all efforts of the isolated subject to merge with a motherly gaze and
to lose itself in imagined icons of oneness as futile attempts to escape alienation" (iii).
30 Quoted by Kastinger-Riley, 94; Preitz (1964), 175.
31 The metaphor was also employed by idealist philosophers such as Schelling. In his
System des Transzendentalen Idealismus, for example, Schelling argues that philosophy
and all the sciences that proceed from it were born of, and nurtured by poetry, like "ebenso
viel einzelne Strime in den allgemeinen Ocean der Poesie zuriickfliel3en, von welchem sie
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 323
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
324 German Studies Review 29/1 (2006)
Works Consulted
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Steven D. Martinson 325
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
326 German Studies Review 29/1 (2006)
This content downloaded from 132.248.9.8 on Tue, 14 Jan 2020 03:31:38 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms