You are on page 1of 5

Current Eye Research Growth factors in amniotic membrane 173

0271-3683/00/2003-0173 $15.00
2000, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 173–177 © Swets & Zeitlinger

Growth factor mRNA and protein in preserved human amniotic


membrane

Noriko Koizumi, Tsutomu Inatomi, Chie Sotozono, Nigel J. Fullwood, Andrew J. Quantock and Shigeru Kinoshita

Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan; the Division of Biology (NJF),
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK; and the Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences (AJQ), Cardiff University,
Cardiff, UK
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14

Abstract
Purpose. To investigate the expression of growth factor Keywords: growth factor; amniotic membrane; cornea;
mRNA and the level of growth factor protein in preserved ELISA; RT-PCR
human amniotic membrane (AM).
Methods. RT-PCR was used to examine the expression of
Human amniotic membrane (AM) has been used in a vari-
mRNA for eight growth factors (EGF, TGF-α, KGF, HGF,
ety of surgical procedures to promote epithelialization and
bFGF, TGF-β1, -β2, -β3) and two growth factor receptors
prevent tissue adhesion.1 The first reported application of AM
(KGFR and HGFR) in human AM preserved at –80°C for
in ophthalmic surgery was in 1940 when De Rötth used live
For personal use only.

one month. In addition, ELISAs were used to measure the


fetal membrane containing both amnion and chorion to re-
protein concentrations of seven growth factors (EGF, TGF-
pair a symblepharon; the procedure, however, met with only
α, KGF, HGF, bFGF, TGF-β1, -β2) in preserved human
limited success.2 More recently, Kim and Tseng have shown
corneas and in AM both with and without amniotic epithe-
that, when used to treat experimental ocular surface injuries
lium.
in rabbits, AM transplantation is successful in maintaining
Results. RT-PCR revealed that human AM expresses mRNA corneal clarity 40% of the time.3 Moreover, in the last few
for EGF, TGF-α, KGF, HGF, bFGF, TGF-β1, -β2, -β3, KGFR years Tsubota, Tseng, Tsai and their co-workers have dem-
and HGFR, while ELISAs showed that it contains EGF, TGF- onstrated the beneficial effects of AM transplantation when
α, KGF, HGF, bFGF, TGF-β1, -β2. AM without amniotic performed in conjunction with limbal grafting.4–8
epithelium also contains all seven growth factors examined, The precise reason why a graft of AM aids healing after
however, in this tissue the protein levels of EGF, KGF, HGF ocular surface reconstructive surgery remains unclear, how-
and bFGF were found to be significantly lower than in na- ever, it is possible that AM contains factors that promote
tive AM. normal epithelialization. For example, one can envisage situ-
ations where the AM’s basement membrane might provide
Conclusions. Preserved human AM expresses mRNAs for a
a substrate that facilitates easy epithelial migration. We know
number of growth factors and contains several growth fac-
that, like cornea, the basement membrane of AM contains
tor proteins that might benefit epithelialization after AM
collagen types IV and V and laminin,9–10 however, its com-
transplantation. High levels of EGF, KGF, HGF and bFGF
position does seem to more closely resemble the basement
in AM with amniotic epithelium as compared to AM with-
membrane of conjunctiva than that of cornea. 11 Another
out amniotic epithelium suggest an epithelial origin for these
mechanism by which AM transplantation might affect ocular
growth factors. We feel that EGF, KGF and HGF in par-
surface reepithelialization is via the action of growth fac-
ticular might play important roles in ocular surface wound
tors. Some researchers have started to investigate this pos-
healing after AM transplantation.
sibility,12–13 but as yet the identities and relative levels of
growth factors in AM have not been ascertained. To help
Correspondence: Noriko Koizumi MD, Department of Ophthalmol- remedy this, we used RT-PCR to determine the expression
ogy, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi- in preserved AM of mRNA for several different growth fac-
hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-0841, Japan, Tel: 81-75-251-5578, tors. We also used ELISAs to measure the concentrations
Fax: 81-75-251-5663, E-mail: nkoizumi@eye.ophth.kpu-m.ac.jp of a number of growth factor proteins in AM. Furthermore,

Received on June 28, 1999; revised and accepted on October 22, 1999

99111.p65 173 2/1/00, 1:04 PM


174 N. Koizumi et al.

Figure 1. Ethidium-bromide-stained gel of RT-PCR products for eight growth factors (epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth
factor-α (TGF-α), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and the transforming
growth factors (TGF)-β1, -β2, and -β3) and two growth factor receptors (KGF receptor (KGFR) and HGF receptor (HGFR)) in preserved
human amniotic membrane.
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14

to examine whether growth factors were contained more in data clearly demonstrate that AM preserved with its epithe-
the amniotic epithelial cells or the membrane itself, we meas- lial cells intact has the potential to produce a wide range of
ured the growth factor concentrations in AM from which the growth factors.
epithelial cells had been removed. For reference, we also Next, we wanted to know whether the growth factor pro-
measured the growth factors in preserved human cornea, teins themselves were present in AM. To this end, we used
although we are aware of the difficulty in directly compar- ELISAs to quantify seven of the growth factors (EGF, TGF-
ing the concentrations of growth factors extracted from two α, HGF, KGF, bFGF, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2) whose mRNA
For personal use only.

different tissues. we found in preserved AM. To further investigate the pos-


With proper informed consent, human AM (n = 13) was sible source of these growth factors, we also studied AM
obtained at the time of Cesarean section. Under sterile condi- from which the epithelium had been removed by incubation
tions it was washed three times in phosphate buffered saline for two hours in 0.02% EDTA (37°C) followed by physical
(PBS) containing antibiotics (0.005% ofloxacin), once in 50% removal with a cell scraper (Nunc A/S, Roskilde, Denmark).
glycerol / DMEM and then stored at –80°C in 50% glycerol For comparison we also assayed the seven growth factors
/ DMEM. One month later, total RNA was extracted by the in seven human corneas (Rocky Mountain Eye Bank, Den-
use of TRIZOL (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), after ver, CO) that had been preserved at –80°C in Optizol GS
which it was subjected to reverse-transcription following a (Chiron, Claremont, CA). For the ELISAs, tissue samples
previously described method.14 Oligonucleotide primers for were frozen in liquid nitrogen, then smashed and homog-
epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor- enized in 1.6 ml of PBS. Growth factor levels were mea-
α (TGF-α), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), KGF receptor sured using commercially available ELISA systems (EGF,
(KGFR), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), HGF receptor TGF-β1, TGF-β2, KGF, HGF, bFGF, R&D System, Min-
(HGFR) , basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and the neapolis, MN; TGF-α Oncogene Research Products, Cam-
transforming growth factors (TGF)-β1, -β2, and -β3 were bridge, MA).
synthesized as described previously.14–18 All ten primer pairs The concentrations of the growth factors in AM with and
were designed to include at least one intron so as to exclude without epithelial cells and in cornea are given in Table 1.
PCR products amplified from residual genomic DNA. Am- As we can see, AM contains all seven growth factors whose
plification (35 cycles consisting of 1 min at 94°C for dena- mRNAs were detected by RT-PCR. We also note that in our
turation, 1 min at 60°C for annealing, and 1 min at 72°C for experiments the levels of EGF, HGF, and KGF are higher
extension) was performed with a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin- in AM with amniotic epithelium than in cornea (Fig. 2),
Elmer Cetus, Norwalk, CT), and the reaction mixture (7 µl) however, we should interpret this with caution because of
was electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel with a primer the possibility of extraction differences in different tissues.
set for β-actin used to confirm RNA isolation and cDNA Potentially, the most important result of this set of experi-
synthesis.19 RNAs isolated from SV40 large T antigen-trans- ments is the finding of significantly higher levels of EGF,
fected human corneal epithelial cells (HCE)20 and mouse 3T3 KGF, HGF and bFGF in AM containing amniotic epithe-
fibroblast cells (3T3)21 were used as positive controls. The lium when compared to acellular AM.
RT-PCR detected mRNA for all eight growth factors exam- The fact that three mitogenic growth factors – EGF, HGF
ined in this experiment (EGF, TGF-α, KGF, KGFR, HGF, and KGF – were found predominantly in amniotic epithe-
HGFR, bFGF, TGF-β1, TGF-β2 and TGF-β3; Fig. 1). In lium (Fig. 2) is of considerable interest with regard to the
contrast, none of the negative controls were amplified. These possible mode of action of AM transplantation. EGF is sup-

99111.p65 174 2/1/00, 1:04 PM


Growth factors in amniotic membrane 175

Table 1. Concentrations of 7 growth factors’ protein measured by ELISA (pg/mg,


w/w)

AM with cells AM without cells Cornea


(n = 13) (n = 13) (n = 9)

EGF 1.0 ± 0.6*‡ 0.1 ± 0.0* 0.1 ± 0.1‡


TGFα 0.7 ± 0.6 0.9 ± 1.0 1.3 ± 0.0
KGF 4.6 ± 2.8*‡ 2.7 ± 0.4* 2.0 ± 1.3‡
HGF 44.7 ± 33.7*‡ 5.3 ± 1.1* 9.4 ± 1.7‡
bFGF 5.6 ± 4.0*‡ 0.5 ± 0.6* 10.5 ± 3.8‡
TGFβ1 0.7 ± 0.0 0.6 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1
TGFβ2 0.7 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 1.3 ± 0.4

* P < .05 for difference between AM with cells and AM without cells (Tukey’s HSD
test).

P < .05 for difference between AM with cells and cornea (Tukey’s HSD test).
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14

however, we think it likely that HGF is potentially the stron-


gest effector of corneal wound healing produced by amni-
otic epithelial cells (Table 1).
In contrast to the epithelially derived growth factors bFGF,
EGF, KGF, and HGF, the TGF-βs in these experiments were
found at almost the same levels in cellular AM, acellular AM
and cornea (Table 1). TGF-βs are known to increase syn-
thesis of protease inhibitors, up-regulate cell adhesion mol-
ecules, and suppress the synthesis of matrix-degrading pro-
For personal use only.

tease, with the result that TGF-βs stimulate the synthesis and
deposition of extracellular matrix proteins.34–35 As such, TGF-
βs are considered to be the most influential growth factors
in the control of fibroblast activity during wound healing,
Figure 2. Comparison of the levels of growth factors in amni- and TGF-βs which are detected in cornea and tears18,36 are
otic membrane with the levels in preserved cornea. The height of thought to play important roles in ocular surface homeosta-
each bar represent the growth factor protein levels in amniotic sis. We cannot offer any information about the direct effect
membrane as a ratio of the growth factor levels in corneas. Sig- of TGF-βs released by AM on ocular surface reconstruction
nificantly high levels of EGF, KGF and HGF were detected in based solely on our results, however, it is noteworthy that
amniotic membrane containing epithelium compared to preserved
Tseng and colleagues recently reported that TGF-β expres-
cornea.
sion by corneal fibroblasts cultivated on AM is suppressed
in vitro.13 It might be the case, then, that the reduction of
plied by the corneal epithelium and lacrimal gland,22–26 and fibroblast overgrowth after AM transplantation depends more
is one of the most effective mitogens for corneal epithelial on the suppression of TGF-β expression by corneal fibro-
cell growth. In view of this, we speculate that the high ex- blasts than on the direct effect of TGF-β released by AM.
pression of EGF in amniotic epithelium could be one of the Importantly, we found higher levels of certain growth fac-
major reasons why the AM promotes ocular surface wound tors (e.g. EGF, KGF, HGF and bFGF) in amniotic epithe-
healing after AM transplantation. Interestingly, our data also lium than in amniotic stroma, suggesting that the amniotic
show that, along with EGF, the amniotic epithelium produces epithelium and amniotic stroma might have different influ-
KGF and HGF, growth factors which are commonly produced ences on corneal re-epithelialization, and thus contribute
by mesenchymal cells such as corneal stromal fibroblasts. differently to the success of ocular surface reconstruction.
On the corneal surface, these growth factors and their re- In view of this, we might be able to develop surgical proce-
ceptors in the corneal epithelium influence corneal wound dures that allow us to select a particular portion of the AM
healing through the paracrine system.14, 27–33 It seems rea- for use in an individual patient depending on the nature of
sonable, therefore, to assume that after AM transplantation, the injury and the specific aim of the surgery.
corneal epithelial growth might be accelerated by KGF and
HGF produced by the amniotic epithelium. It is worth not-
ing that, as reported by Honma and associates, the growth-
Acknowledgments
promoting effect of EGF on corneal epithelial cells is about Supported by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare
ten times stronger than the effects of KGF and HGF at the and the Japanese Ministry of Education (10470365), the Kyoto
same concentrations.33 Judging from the results presented here, Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, the In-

99111.p65 175 2/1/00, 1:04 PM


176 N. Koizumi et al.

tramural Research Fund of the Kyoto Prefectural University specimens of human cornea and conjunctiva. Jpn J Oph-
of Medicine, and by a UK/Japan Joint Project grant from thalmol. 1994;38:353–359.
the Royal Society (London). 15. Wilson SE, Lloyd SA. Epidermal growth factor and its
receptor, basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming
growth factor beta-1, and interleukin-1 alpha messenger
References RNA production in human corneal endothelial cells. Invest
1. Trelford JD, Trelford-Sauder M. The amnion in surgery, Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2747–2756.
past and present. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:833– 16. Humphreys-Beher MG, Macauley SP, Chegini N et al.
845. Characterization of the synthesis and secretion of trans-
2. de Rötth A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with forming growth factor-a from salivary glands and saliva.
fetal membranes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1940;23:522–525. Endocrinology 1994;134:963–970.
3. Kim JC, Tseng SCG. Transplantation of preserved hu- 17. Wilson SE, Walker JW, Chwang EL et al. Hepatocyte
man amniotic membrane for surface reconstruction in se- growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor, their recep-
verely damaged rabbit corneas. Cornea 1995;14:473–484. tors, fibroblast growth factor receptor-2, and the cells
4. Tsubota K, Satake Y, Ohyama M et al. Surgical recon- of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2544–
struction of the ocular surface in advanced ocular cica- 2561.
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14

tricial pemphigoid and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am 18. Nishida K, Sotozono C, Adachi W et al. Transforming
J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:38–52. growth factor-β1, -β2 and -β3 mRNA expression in
5. Lee SH, Tseng SCG. Amniotic membrane transplanta- human cornea. Curr Eye Res. 1995;14:235–241.
tion for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration. Am 19. Albino AP, Davis BM, Nanus DM. Induction of growth
J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:303–312. factor RNA expression in human malignant melanoma:
6. Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G et al. Comparison markers of transformation. Cancer Res. 1991;51:4815–
of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and 4820.
primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 20. Araki-Sasaki K, Ohashi Y, Sasabe T et al. An SV40-
1997;104:974–985. immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line and its
For personal use only.

7. Shimazaki J, Yang HY, Tsubota K. Amniotic membrane characterization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:614–
transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction in pa- 621.
tients with chemical and thermal burns. Ophthalmology 21. Rheinwald JG, Green H.Serial cultivation of strains of
1997;104:2068–2076. human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of kera-
8. Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K. Transplantation tinizing colonies from single cells. Cell 1975;6:331–344.
of amniotic membrane and limbal autograft for patients 22. Kitazawa T, Kinoshita S, Fujita K et al. The mechanism
with recurrent pterygium associated with symblepharon. of accelerated corneal epithelial healing by human epi-
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:235–240. dermal growth factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
9. van Herendael BJ, Oberti C, Brosens I. Microanatomy 1990;31:1773–1778.
of the human amniotic membranes. A light microscopic, 23. Wilson SE, Lloyd SA, Kennedy RH. Epidermal growth
transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. factor messenger RNA production in human lacrimal
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131:872–880. gland. Cornea 1991;10:519–524.
10. Modesti A, Scarpa S, D’Orazi G et al. Localization of 24. Kinoshita S. Clinical application of epidermal growth
type IV and V collagens in the stroma of human am- factor in ocular surface disorders. J Dermatol. 1992;19:
nion. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;296:459–463. 680–683.
11. Fukuda K, Chikama T, Nakamura M et al. Differential 25. Wilson SE, He YG, Lloyd SA. EGF, EGF receptor, ba-
distribution of subchains of the basement membrane sic FGF, TGF beta-1, and IL-1 alpha mRNA in human
components Type IV collagen and laminin among the corneal epithelial cells and stromal fibroblasts. Invest
amniotic membrane, cornea, and conjunctiva. Cornea Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:1756–1765.
1999;18:73–79. 26. Watanabe H, Ohashi Y, Kinoshita S et al. Distribution
12. Sato H, Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N et al. Role of growth of epidermal growth factor in rat ocular and periocular
factors for ocular surface reconstruction after amniotic tissues. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231:
membrane transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 228–232.
1998;39(suppl1989):S428. 27. Wilson SE, He YG, Weng J et al. Effect of epidermal
13. Tseng SCG, Li DQ, Ma X. Suppression of transform- growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and keratinocyte
ing growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type growth factor, on proliferation, motility and differentia-
II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human tion of human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res.1994;
corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane 59:665–678.
matrix. J Cell Physiol. 1999;179:325–335. 28. Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Kita M et al. Paracrine role
14. Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Kita M et al. Expression of of keratinocyte growth factor in rabbit corneal epithe-
keratinocyte growth factor mRNA in ex vivo and in vitro lial cell growth. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59:385–392.
29. Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Nakamura M et al. Keratinocyte

99111.p65 176 2/1/00, 1:04 PM


Growth factors in amniotic membrane 177

growth factor accelerates corneal epithelial wound healing


in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:1524–1529.
30. Li Q, Weng J, Mohan RR et al. Hepatocyte growth fac-
tor and hepatocyte growth factor receptor in the lacri-
mal gland, tears, and cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
1996;37:727–739.
31. Li DQ, Tseng SCG. Differential regulation of keratinocyte
growth factor and hepatocyte growth factor / scatter factor
by different cytokines in human corneal and limbal fi-
broblasts. J Cell Physiol. 1997;172:361–372.
32. Weng J, Mohan RR, Li Q et al. IL-1 Upregulates
keratinocyte growth factor and hepatocyte growth fac-
tor mRNA and protein production by cultured stromal
fibroblast cells: Interleukin-1β expression in the cornea.
Cornea.1997;16:465–471.
33. Honma Y, Nishida K, Sotozono C et al. Effect of trans-
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14

forming growth factor-β1 and -β2 on in vitro rabbit


corneal epithelial cell proliferation promoted by epider-
mal growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor, or hepa-
tocyte growth factor. Exp Eye Res. 1997;65:391–396.
34. Nathan C, Sporn M. Cytokines in context. J Cell Biol.
1991;113:981–986.
35. Sporn MB, Roberts AB, Wakersfeld IM et al. Some recent
advances in the chemistry and biology of transforming
growth factor-β. J. Cell Biol. 1987;105:1039–1045.
For personal use only.

36. Kokawa N, Sotozono C, Nishida K et al. High total TGF-


β2 levels in normal human tears. Curr Eye Res. 1996;
15:341–343.

99111.p65 177 2/1/00, 1:04 PM

You might also like