Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Growth Factor mRNA and Protein in Preserved Human Amniotic Membrane
Growth Factor mRNA and Protein in Preserved Human Amniotic Membrane
0271-3683/00/2003-0173 $15.00
2000, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 173–177 © Swets & Zeitlinger
Noriko Koizumi, Tsutomu Inatomi, Chie Sotozono, Nigel J. Fullwood, Andrew J. Quantock and Shigeru Kinoshita
Department of Ophthalmology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Japan; the Division of Biology (NJF),
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK; and the Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences (AJQ), Cardiff University,
Cardiff, UK
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate the expression of growth factor Keywords: growth factor; amniotic membrane; cornea;
mRNA and the level of growth factor protein in preserved ELISA; RT-PCR
human amniotic membrane (AM).
Methods. RT-PCR was used to examine the expression of
Human amniotic membrane (AM) has been used in a vari-
mRNA for eight growth factors (EGF, TGF-α, KGF, HGF,
ety of surgical procedures to promote epithelialization and
bFGF, TGF-β1, -β2, -β3) and two growth factor receptors
prevent tissue adhesion.1 The first reported application of AM
(KGFR and HGFR) in human AM preserved at –80°C for
in ophthalmic surgery was in 1940 when De Rötth used live
For personal use only.
Received on June 28, 1999; revised and accepted on October 22, 1999
Figure 1. Ethidium-bromide-stained gel of RT-PCR products for eight growth factors (epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth
factor-α (TGF-α), keratinocyte growth factor (KGF), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and the transforming
growth factors (TGF)-β1, -β2, and -β3) and two growth factor receptors (KGF receptor (KGFR) and HGF receptor (HGFR)) in preserved
human amniotic membrane.
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14
to examine whether growth factors were contained more in data clearly demonstrate that AM preserved with its epithe-
the amniotic epithelial cells or the membrane itself, we meas- lial cells intact has the potential to produce a wide range of
ured the growth factor concentrations in AM from which the growth factors.
epithelial cells had been removed. For reference, we also Next, we wanted to know whether the growth factor pro-
measured the growth factors in preserved human cornea, teins themselves were present in AM. To this end, we used
although we are aware of the difficulty in directly compar- ELISAs to quantify seven of the growth factors (EGF, TGF-
ing the concentrations of growth factors extracted from two α, HGF, KGF, bFGF, TGF-β1 and TGF-β2) whose mRNA
For personal use only.
* P < .05 for difference between AM with cells and AM without cells (Tukey’s HSD
test).
‡
P < .05 for difference between AM with cells and cornea (Tukey’s HSD test).
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14
tease, with the result that TGF-βs stimulate the synthesis and
deposition of extracellular matrix proteins.34–35 As such, TGF-
βs are considered to be the most influential growth factors
in the control of fibroblast activity during wound healing,
Figure 2. Comparison of the levels of growth factors in amni- and TGF-βs which are detected in cornea and tears18,36 are
otic membrane with the levels in preserved cornea. The height of thought to play important roles in ocular surface homeosta-
each bar represent the growth factor protein levels in amniotic sis. We cannot offer any information about the direct effect
membrane as a ratio of the growth factor levels in corneas. Sig- of TGF-βs released by AM on ocular surface reconstruction
nificantly high levels of EGF, KGF and HGF were detected in based solely on our results, however, it is noteworthy that
amniotic membrane containing epithelium compared to preserved
Tseng and colleagues recently reported that TGF-β expres-
cornea.
sion by corneal fibroblasts cultivated on AM is suppressed
in vitro.13 It might be the case, then, that the reduction of
plied by the corneal epithelium and lacrimal gland,22–26 and fibroblast overgrowth after AM transplantation depends more
is one of the most effective mitogens for corneal epithelial on the suppression of TGF-β expression by corneal fibro-
cell growth. In view of this, we speculate that the high ex- blasts than on the direct effect of TGF-β released by AM.
pression of EGF in amniotic epithelium could be one of the Importantly, we found higher levels of certain growth fac-
major reasons why the AM promotes ocular surface wound tors (e.g. EGF, KGF, HGF and bFGF) in amniotic epithe-
healing after AM transplantation. Interestingly, our data also lium than in amniotic stroma, suggesting that the amniotic
show that, along with EGF, the amniotic epithelium produces epithelium and amniotic stroma might have different influ-
KGF and HGF, growth factors which are commonly produced ences on corneal re-epithelialization, and thus contribute
by mesenchymal cells such as corneal stromal fibroblasts. differently to the success of ocular surface reconstruction.
On the corneal surface, these growth factors and their re- In view of this, we might be able to develop surgical proce-
ceptors in the corneal epithelium influence corneal wound dures that allow us to select a particular portion of the AM
healing through the paracrine system.14, 27–33 It seems rea- for use in an individual patient depending on the nature of
sonable, therefore, to assume that after AM transplantation, the injury and the specific aim of the surgery.
corneal epithelial growth might be accelerated by KGF and
HGF produced by the amniotic epithelium. It is worth not-
ing that, as reported by Honma and associates, the growth-
Acknowledgments
promoting effect of EGF on corneal epithelial cells is about Supported by the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare
ten times stronger than the effects of KGF and HGF at the and the Japanese Ministry of Education (10470365), the Kyoto
same concentrations.33 Judging from the results presented here, Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, the In-
tramural Research Fund of the Kyoto Prefectural University specimens of human cornea and conjunctiva. Jpn J Oph-
of Medicine, and by a UK/Japan Joint Project grant from thalmol. 1994;38:353–359.
the Royal Society (London). 15. Wilson SE, Lloyd SA. Epidermal growth factor and its
receptor, basic fibroblast growth factor, transforming
growth factor beta-1, and interleukin-1 alpha messenger
References RNA production in human corneal endothelial cells. Invest
1. Trelford JD, Trelford-Sauder M. The amnion in surgery, Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991;32:2747–2756.
past and present. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979;134:833– 16. Humphreys-Beher MG, Macauley SP, Chegini N et al.
845. Characterization of the synthesis and secretion of trans-
2. de Rötth A. Plastic repair of conjunctival defects with forming growth factor-a from salivary glands and saliva.
fetal membranes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1940;23:522–525. Endocrinology 1994;134:963–970.
3. Kim JC, Tseng SCG. Transplantation of preserved hu- 17. Wilson SE, Walker JW, Chwang EL et al. Hepatocyte
man amniotic membrane for surface reconstruction in se- growth factor, keratinocyte growth factor, their recep-
verely damaged rabbit corneas. Cornea 1995;14:473–484. tors, fibroblast growth factor receptor-2, and the cells
4. Tsubota K, Satake Y, Ohyama M et al. Surgical recon- of the cornea. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:2544–
struction of the ocular surface in advanced ocular cica- 2561.
Curr Eye Res Downloaded from informahealthcare.com by Deakin University on 10/12/14
tricial pemphigoid and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Am 18. Nishida K, Sotozono C, Adachi W et al. Transforming
J Ophthalmol. 1996;122:38–52. growth factor-β1, -β2 and -β3 mRNA expression in
5. Lee SH, Tseng SCG. Amniotic membrane transplanta- human cornea. Curr Eye Res. 1995;14:235–241.
tion for persistent epithelial defects with ulceration. Am 19. Albino AP, Davis BM, Nanus DM. Induction of growth
J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:303–312. factor RNA expression in human malignant melanoma:
6. Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G et al. Comparison markers of transformation. Cancer Res. 1991;51:4815–
of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and 4820.
primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology 20. Araki-Sasaki K, Ohashi Y, Sasabe T et al. An SV40-
1997;104:974–985. immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line and its
For personal use only.
7. Shimazaki J, Yang HY, Tsubota K. Amniotic membrane characterization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:614–
transplantation for ocular surface reconstruction in pa- 621.
tients with chemical and thermal burns. Ophthalmology 21. Rheinwald JG, Green H.Serial cultivation of strains of
1997;104:2068–2076. human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of kera-
8. Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N, Tsubota K. Transplantation tinizing colonies from single cells. Cell 1975;6:331–344.
of amniotic membrane and limbal autograft for patients 22. Kitazawa T, Kinoshita S, Fujita K et al. The mechanism
with recurrent pterygium associated with symblepharon. of accelerated corneal epithelial healing by human epi-
Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82:235–240. dermal growth factor. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
9. van Herendael BJ, Oberti C, Brosens I. Microanatomy 1990;31:1773–1778.
of the human amniotic membranes. A light microscopic, 23. Wilson SE, Lloyd SA, Kennedy RH. Epidermal growth
transmission, and scanning electron microscopic study. factor messenger RNA production in human lacrimal
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;131:872–880. gland. Cornea 1991;10:519–524.
10. Modesti A, Scarpa S, D’Orazi G et al. Localization of 24. Kinoshita S. Clinical application of epidermal growth
type IV and V collagens in the stroma of human am- factor in ocular surface disorders. J Dermatol. 1992;19:
nion. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1989;296:459–463. 680–683.
11. Fukuda K, Chikama T, Nakamura M et al. Differential 25. Wilson SE, He YG, Lloyd SA. EGF, EGF receptor, ba-
distribution of subchains of the basement membrane sic FGF, TGF beta-1, and IL-1 alpha mRNA in human
components Type IV collagen and laminin among the corneal epithelial cells and stromal fibroblasts. Invest
amniotic membrane, cornea, and conjunctiva. Cornea Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:1756–1765.
1999;18:73–79. 26. Watanabe H, Ohashi Y, Kinoshita S et al. Distribution
12. Sato H, Shimazaki J, Shinozaki N et al. Role of growth of epidermal growth factor in rat ocular and periocular
factors for ocular surface reconstruction after amniotic tissues. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993;231:
membrane transplantation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 228–232.
1998;39(suppl1989):S428. 27. Wilson SE, He YG, Weng J et al. Effect of epidermal
13. Tseng SCG, Li DQ, Ma X. Suppression of transform- growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor, and keratinocyte
ing growth factor-beta isoforms, TGF-beta receptor type growth factor, on proliferation, motility and differentia-
II, and myofibroblast differentiation in cultured human tion of human corneal epithelial cells. Exp Eye Res.1994;
corneal and limbal fibroblasts by amniotic membrane 59:665–678.
matrix. J Cell Physiol. 1999;179:325–335. 28. Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Kita M et al. Paracrine role
14. Sotozono C, Kinoshita S, Kita M et al. Expression of of keratinocyte growth factor in rabbit corneal epithe-
keratinocyte growth factor mRNA in ex vivo and in vitro lial cell growth. Exp Eye Res. 1994;59:385–392.
29. Sotozono C, Inatomi T, Nakamura M et al. Keratinocyte