Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Esa K Renko*
Laboratory of Environmental Engineering, Helsinki University of Technology, PO Box 5300, FIN-02015 HUT, Finland
Abstract
This study suggests a hypothesis for determining and a model for computing suspended solids behaviour during batch settling
aimed at better understanding of the settling process and more accurate and convenient determination of solids profiles. The
approach is built on the graphical approach of Work and Kohler taking into account the effect of scale (i.e. initial height of
suspension) on the settling of the surface of suspension. It is shown that the proposed approach includes the same information as
the traditional Kynch theory of sedimentation. The proposed model, derived from the hypothesis and a model for a batch settling
curve, introduces a mathematical tool for determining the solids layers and it also eliminates the disadvantage of the Kynch theory
which only offers a graphical procedure for the determination. The applicability of the model was tested with calcium carbonate
(CaCO3) suspension. The experimental study proves that the model can be successfully utilised in computing the behaviour of
calcium carbonate during a batch settling test.
Particles settle independently when solids concentration of sus- The Kynch (1952) theory of sedimentation is derived from a
pension is low and the particles are at a considerable distance continuity equation ignoring the details of forces on the particles.
from each other. This type of particle settling is referred to as The basic assumption of the theory is that at any point in the
clarification and can be accurately explained by Stoke’s law. As suspension the settling velocity of a particle depends only on the
a particle settles independently from others, only the character- local concentration of the suspension. Other essential assump-
istics of the particle and the properties of the fluid affect the tions of the theory are that the wall effect is ignored and the
settling velocity of the particle. particles are of the same size and shape.
Settling is different when the concentration of solids is high The important contribution of the theory is that it shows that
and the distance between particles is so small that the particles the solids concentration layers travel upwards at a uniform
come into contact with one another. In such a case, Stoke’s law velocity and that such velocities are constant for each concentra-
tion. A typical settling curve with lines of constant concentration
is shown in Fig. 1. Lines parallel to the line Oh(t1) show constant
* Present address: Soil and Water Ltd., Itälahdenkatu 2, FIN-00210
Helsinki, Finland concentrations, representing the initial concentration of the sus-
( 358-9-682 661; fax 358-9-682 6600; e-mail: renko@fpt.vn pension. As the solids settle to the bottom there is an extremely
Received 22 August 1997; accepted in revised form 22 May 1998 rapid increase of concentration from the initial to the maximum
h0 Oh(t1) Oh(t2)
= =
H0 H0 OH(T1) OH(T2)
height
height
h(t 1)
h(t1)
h(t 2) H(T1)
h(t2)
H(T2)
O time
O T1 t 1 T2 t2
Figure 1 time
Settling of suspension surface with the lines of constant
concentration (Kynch, 1952) Figure 3
The effect of the initial height on settling curve
(Work and Kohler, 1940)
h0
height (m)
H0 h(t) computed
X(t,h)
height
0.5
H(t)
X0
0
X(t,H)
0 1 2 3 4
O t time (h)
time
Figure 5
Figure 4 Measured and computed (by Eq. (2)) settling curves
Graphical interpretation of the proposed approach of CaCO3
The model and consequently, the model for the concentration profile can be
written as:
If at time t the difference between the starting heights of X0
two curves (drawn according to the Work and Kohler (1940) X(t, h) =
approach) h0-H0 = ∂h0 is small, the expression for the proposed CX0 CX0 tα
+ (1 - ) (1 + ) e-tα/(X h ) (3) 0 0
approach reduces to:
α α X0h0
X0
X(t, h) =
∂h(t, h0) or equivalently as:
∂h0 X0h0
where: X(t, h) =
α (4)
X(t, h) is solids concentration at time t and height h h(t, h0) - (C - h(t, h0)) t
h(t, h0) is the difference between the drawn curves at time t. X0h0
At certain times the concentration profile depends only on the If h0 is kept constant during computation (or in simple words if the
initial solids concentration (X0) which is a constant and the partial solids concentration in the water-to-solids interface is computed)
derivative of a function h(t, h0), i.e. ∂h(t, h0)/∂h0. Thus, modelling it can be seen that a model for the Kynch (1952) graphical
of the concentration profile turns out to be modelling of the approach is written (see Appendix II).
settling curve where the effect of the initial height on the curve is
taken into account according to the Work and Kohler (1940) Experimental study
approach.
Here, the model for the batch settling curve proposed by Data collection
Renko (1996) is used for further modelling while any model
describing accurately the settling curve and agreeing with the The settling experiments to test the applicability of the model
Work and Kohler’s (1940) findings can be utilised. were conducted in a graduated cylinder with a total height of
The model for the batch settling curve can be written as: 1.5 m. The diameter of the cylinder was 0.2 m and it was equipped
with seven sampling ports with the diameter of 12.5 mm at
CX0h0 CX0h0
h(t, h0) = + (h0 - )e-tα/(X h )
0 0
(2) heights 0.075, 0.15, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, and 1.25 m (from the
α α bottom) for measuring the solids profile.
where: The suspension examined was a CaCO3 suspension which
t is time (h) was prepared by mixing the known quantity of CaCO3 with tap
h (t, h0) is the height of the settling curve at time t (m) water. The test column was filled with the suspension up to 1.3 m
h0 is the initial height of the settling curve (m) and agitated with compressed air for about 1 min to provide
α and C are the parameters describing solids settling uniform concentration throughout the depth. The solids profiles
(kg m-2 h-1 and m h-1) were determined in successive tests at the moments 0.0, 0.35,
X0 is the initial solids concentration (kg m-3). 0.78, 1.17, 1.87, 2.25 and 4.0 h after the agitation. The samples
were collected starting from the top port downwards. The sample
It is shown in Appendix I that the model agrees with the Work volumes were 50 to 100 ml. The solids concentrations of the
and Kohler (1940) approach. samples were determined according to Standard Methods (1985).
The partial derivative of Eq. (2) gives: In addition to the profile determination settling of the inter-
face was measured as a function of time for estimating settling
∂h(t, h0) CX0 CX0 tα parameters. The parameters were estimated with SAS institute
= + (1 - ) (1 + ) e-tα/(X h )
0 0
software for data analysis by using Eq. (1) as a non-linear
∂h0 α α Xh0
1.0 1.0
height (m)
height (m)
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500
concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3) concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3)
1.5 1.5
t=47 min t=70 min
1.0 1.0
height (m)
height (m)
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500
concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3) concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3)
1.5 1.5
t=112 min t=135 min
1.0 1.0
height (m)
height (m)
0.5 0.5
0.0 0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500 0 100 200 300 400 500
concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3) concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3)
1.5
t=240 min
1.0
height (m)
measured
0.5 computed
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500
concentration (kg CaCO3 m-3)
Figure 6
Measured and computed (by Eq. (2) and (3)) solids profiles as a function of height at different moments
h0 where:
dh(t, h0) is the settling velocity of the surface.
dt
dh(t, h0) α
=C- h(t, h0)
h(t1) dt X0h0
h(t2) the model for the concentration in the water-solids interface can be written:
H(t1) X 0h 0
X(t, h) = a
h(t, h0) - (C - h(t, h0))t
X0h0
O t1 t2
*
time NOTE: ho is considered as constant in Appendix II.
According to the Work and Kohler (1940) approach h0/H0=Oh(t2)/OH(t1). One method for examining the structural identifiability of models that are
Because t1/OH(t1)=t2/Oh(t2) and H(t1)/OH(t1)=h(t2)/Oh(t2) then h0/H0=h(t2)/ non-linear in parameters is the power series approach (Pohjanpalo 1978).
H(t1)=Oh(t2)/OH(t1)= t2/t1. By replacing h(t2) and H(t1) with Eq. (2) the ratio The approach analyses the Taylor series expansion of the model response
h0/H0 can be written as: around time zero checking if the successive derivatives have a unique
solution for the parameters to be identified.
The two first derivatives of the model for batch settling curve are:
d2h(0, h0)Xh0
α= and C as:
dt2
which is equivalent to:
d2h(0, h0)
CX0H0h0 CX0H0h0 CX0H0h0 CX0H0h0 dh(0, h0) dt2
+ (H0h0 - )e-t1α(X0H0) = + (H0h0 - )e-t1α(X0H0) C= - h0
α α α α dt dh(0, h0)
dt
Appendix II
the model is structurally identifiable under the experimentation. In fact the
The point htg(t) where the tangent drawn to the settling curve cuts the model is even globally identifiable except for the case when α/X = C which
vertical axis (see Fig. 2) is mathematically defined as *: indicates the solids blanket interface is not settling at all and dh(0, h0) = 0
and d2h(0, h0) = 0. dt
dh(t, h0) dt2
htg(t) = h(t, h0) - t
dt