Calandra Young 1

Co-Teaching Models and Paraeducator Action Plan

Part 1: Co-Teaching Models

Definition and Visual Advantages and Instructional Positive Effects Responsibility

Co- of Model Disadvantages Strategies and
Teaching Accountability
Model:
One instructor has num To plan the classes, the Each teacher watches Enable teacher General education
1. One ber one responsibility at teachers require limited pupils determining how continuous teacher: leads the
Teaching, the same time as the coordination / to interpret instructions transmission of lesson.
One opposite gathers unique  collaboration. On a correctly while the guidance. Special education
Observing observational facts on c selected subject, the reverse corresponds to Information is as teacher,
ollege students or the stronger trainer (the only teaching. should be obtained paraprofessional:
instructing instructor. one who teaches) will in the context of the observes, collects
The key to disguise the partner's weak comment. data, and control
this approach is to spot. Nevertheless, not behavior.
have a every instructional expert
focus for observation (T can make absolutely use of
reahy, &Gurnagus;, this pattern (Drescher,
2010). 2014).
In this teaching style, This approach fosters While most directions Allow teacher to General education
2. One each instructor acts as a collaboration between are provided by the lead give lessons without teacher: Teach the
Teaching, lead tutor, and the other teachers in general and instructor, the help interruption. lesson.
One is beneficial through special educations in the teacher that roam the Special education
Assisting assisting with same classroom. Teachers room and assist any teacher,
administrative tasks, can represent and share students in need of paraprofessional:
providing individual teaching practices, and more assistance. assist students with
student assistance, and during direct instruction disabilities,

performing small group and classroom exercises,
events (Johnson, & students can receive
Brumback, 2013). additional feedback and
assistance. Nevertheless, it
does seem to be a power
imbalance. The students
are more likely to follow
instructions from lead
teachers (Keene, 2018)
The set of co-teachers In this model, every
3. Station split the scope of instructor should prepare
Teaching teaching into sections an area or lesson
and the students into individually, based on their
classes. Classes invest a intensity. In fact, the same
defined amount of time material is presented to the
at every stop. The two pupils, but they can be
teacher-led stations will divided into different levels
often use an enabling them to develop
autonomous station better beyond their abilities
(Treahy, & Gurnagus, (Drescher, 2014).
2010).
Teachers prepare By dividing the class into
4. Parallel together but every smaller groups, the
Teaching instructor teaches half teachers can provide the
the classroom (Treahy, students with more
& Gurnagus, 2010). individual attention as well
as better social control.
Nevertheless, this model
often needs each instructor
to be equally strong in the
field they are teaching,
timing well, and
Calandra Young 2
manage behavior,
lead small group
activities, help
with
administrative
tasks.
For pupils, each station By using station Both teachers: plan
has a question to teaching methods, lessons, prepare
address and the the teachers will materials and
assignments have to be minimize the setup establish stations.
fairly straightforward. period, and plan the
In addition the students learning material. It
will mention the also creates
important concepts opportunities for a
specifically. large student
population to
assume some
responsibility for its
learning
environment.
All instructors conduct Learning with a Both teachers: plan
a question-and-answer smaller group for lessons, lead
conversation on specific improves respect for individual groups.
subjects and provide the willingness of Paraprofessional:
equal opportunities for every student and Help teachers set
disabled students to teacher to track the up classroom /
explore the material. students and learn materials.
the topics. Supervising and
managing
behaviors of the
students.
 Calandra Young 3

communicating effectively
(Keene, 2018).
Alternative teaching Each approach offers the One teacher leads a Students with Both teachers: plan
5. methods include students with outstanding group through reading / disabilities can lessons, prepare
Alternative different approaches for differentiating incentives to research to explore the achieve the same classroom /
Teaching the students to learn the introduce themselves to material; the other academic outcomes materials, and
same knowledge. The general education. It also teacher leads a group as their peers in the establish them.
learning result for all lets teachers give guiding through observing / same classroom, as
subjects is the same; actions to vulnerable practicing, for example, alternative guidance
however the technique pupils. Nevertheless, this to understand the are offered to match
of teaching is special. approach still increases the contents. The teachers their own needs.
(Brumback, & Johnson, productivity of inclusion will decide the approach Teachers are more
2013). classroom by dividing is most appropriate and able to control /
special education students successful for disabled interfere with
(Keene, 2013). students. behaviour.
Both teachers take an Students in this version The special schooling Both teachers should Both instructors ar
6. Team active part in the lesson. provide for the teacher makes it show their expertise e chargeable
Teaching One can also model / simultaneous instruction of possible for college and be reasonably for making
demonstrate while two methods and children with able to exercise their plans and main les
speaking / explaining viewpoints. Furthermore, disabilities to translate teaching skills. By sons.
the alternative. both students need to share the commands of contrast, disabled Paraprofessional: a
Additionally, teachers their opinions on the matter standard educational students are much ssist with
can position play or flip in fair measure. This instructors into extra more likely to preparation,
to instructions for approach requires a lot of comprehensible content method the standard administrative
delivery (Treahy, & effort from the teachers to based on their personal curriculum and tasks,
Gurnagus, 2013). carry out the exercises needs. reduce the inclusion. and classroom man
together (Keene, 2013). agement.
 Calandra Young 4

Part 2: Paraeducator Action Plan

Recently, the students with disabilities are being widely included in the common school, which includes more paraeducators

guide to help them get to learn and do things. As a result, special school teachers were given greater responsibility for supervising and

guiding paraeducators ' practice in school settings (Douglas, Chaplin, & Nolan, 2016). Paraeducators are in fact an essential aid to

which all special educators and college students should have access. They are the ears and eyes of the study room to provide the first-

rate education possible for students with disabilities. Or put it another way, paraeducators are critical parts of public education. Unless

they have a respectful and successful partnership, the lecture room would be well managed and the students would gain full support

and assistance in disclosing the program as a whole. Trainer and paraeducator therefore need to have open and honest discussions

regarding standards and guidelines inside the lecture room to make certain the capacity of the scholars to interpret.

Obviously, paraeducators are not teachers, and they work in a different way than teachers, even though they take the teaching

process regionally (Dalley, 2017). Teachers must plan for paraeducators to ensure that their roles and duties in the classrooms are fully

apprehended. Paraeducers need to be officially aware of what instructions they can provide and how they can effectively follow the

student. Of one, Ms. Jeter should compose a schedule of her paraeducator and explain exactly what she wants paraeducators to do with

the special training students in her study room. Obviously, the paraeducator has no experience in teaching splendid college students,

and there are / aresubject(s)she / he will not qualify to provide individual instructions. The written plan can help the paraeducators to

outline her / his roles and responsibilities meanwhile to assist Ms. Jeter in training and supervise the paraeducator's quality of work. In

addition, with the presence of two students with emotional troubles, Ms. Jeter can ask for assistance from the paraeducator in monitor
 Calandra Young 5

(collecting data) and intervene behavioral/ emotional outburst (Douglas, 2016). In addition, Ms. Jeter can anticipate the execution of

administrative tasks by her paraeducator, supporting with lesson preparation, school room transitions and/or scholarly evaluations. Ms.

Jeter is responsible for providing the paraeducator with all current and therapeutic instruction he / she wants to successfully conduct

his / her paintings, as well as supervising and coordinating his / her paintings to meet the intellectual and behavioral needs of the

scholars as stated within the IEP. The best teaching strategy that Ms. Jeter can use with the paraeducator in her study room, according

to the example, is "one counseling, one assisting" techniques. Ms. Jeter is a lead professor, who is mainly responsible for providing all

students with lesson and instructions. Whereas, the paraeducator can flow into the study room under the direction of Ms. Jeter to

maintain the correct study atmosphere and to assist the students of the special schooling class. The paraeducators can either include

individualized instructions or help in controlling actions in order not to disrupt the schedules in school rooms (Keene, 2013).

Both Ms. Jeter and the paraeducator would like to maintain transparent and professional dialogue and allow their relationship

better. For example, they can schedule weekly lesson plans in which Ms. Jeter can provide the paraeducator with an explanation of the

content / curriculum / instructions and help him / her to understand which part(s) he / she needs additional guidance to enforce special

education. Furthermore, at the beginning of the day, Ms. Jeter may hold a short and casual interaction to eliminate the behaviors /

situations of the students and/or discuss problems that may impact the daily routine of the school, and speak to the paraeducator about

how to strengthen it for day relaxing.

There's importance in communication. Hence, before wearing any plans, Ms. Jeter and her paraeducator need to discuss with

each special. It is very necessary for the paraeducator to understand their duties, obligations and how the activities relate to the
 Calandra Young 6

students ' larger desires. Nonetheless, they want to follow the plan that faculties professionals such as preferred / special training

teachers, college psychiatrists, and different staff who are allocated to paintings of special school students are writing for the pupils.

Co-planning between study room teachers and paraeducator is on an ongoing basis the most useful techniques to keep the school room

well maintained and to give the scholars, particularly the individuals who specialize in schooling, the safe and efficient obtaining of

surrounding expertise.
 Calandra Young 7

References

Dalley, A. M. (2017). Teacher and paraeducator perceptions of a hierarchical to hierarchical-collaborative relationship (Order No.

10262568). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1886408441). Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.uh.edu/docview/1886408441?accountid=7107

Douglas, S. N., Chapin, S. E., & Nolan, J. F. (2016). Special Education Teachers’ Experiences Supporting and Supervising

Paraeducators: Implications for Special and General Education Settings. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(1), 60–

74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406415616443

Drescher, T. (2014). Crossing the Special-General Education Divide at the Post-Secondary Level: Observations and Outcomes of Co-

Teaching across Curricula. 122.

Keene, M. E. (2018). Co-teaching in inclusion classrooms: An investigation of secondary inclusion practices  (Order No. 10813459).

Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2077034055). Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com.ezproxy.lib.uh.edu/docview/2077034055?accountid=7107

Johnson, N., & Brumback, L. (2013). Co-teaching in the science classroom: The one teach/one assist model. Science Scope, 36(6), 6-

9.

Treahy, D., & Gurganus, S. (2010). Models for special needs students. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(8), 484-490.