NPar Tests

[DataSet4]

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

USIA MASA KERJA

N 100 100
a,b
Normal Parameters Mean 32.04 10.90
Std. Deviation 9.315 8.173
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .109 .147
Positive .109 .147
Negative -.066 -.113
Test Statistic .109 .147
c
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .005 .000 c
a. Test distribution is Normal.
b. Calculated from data.
c. Lilliefors Significance Correction.

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=BAGIAN DIVISI JABATAN L_BMI L_USIA L_MASA APT JENISAPT

PENGGANTIANAPT CARAPAKAI L_LAMA RXMEROKOK L_GGNPEND
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies
Statistics

BAGIAN DIVISI JABATAN L_BMI L_USIA L_MASA APT

N Valid 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Statistics

PENGGANTIA
JENIS APT N APT CARA PAKAI L_LAMA RX MEROKOK
N Valid 100 100 100 100 100
Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Statistics

L_GGN PEND
N Valid 100
Missing 0

Frequency Table

Page 1
 BAGIAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid AREA 1 3 3.0 3.0 3.0
CONE RACE 2 2.0 2.0 5.0
CUTTING 8 8.0 8.0 13.0
FORGING 1 7 7.0 7.0 20.0
FORGING 10 10 10.0 10.0 30.0
FORGING 11 12 12.0 12.0 42.0
FORGING 4 9 9.0 9.0 51.0
FORGING 5 6 6.0 6.0 57.0
FORGING 6 12 12.0 12.0 69.0
FORGING 7 9 9.0 9.0 78.0
FORGING 8 7 7.0 7.0 85.0
FORGING 9 9 9.0 9.0 94.0
FORGING, CUTTING &
CONERACE 1 1.0 1.0 95.0

FORKLIFT 4 4.0 4.0 99.0

HEATING F5 & F9 1 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

DIVISI

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid PRODUCTION I 100 100.0 100.0 100.0

JABATAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid ADM SAP 2 2.0 2.0 2.0
ADMIN 1 1.0 1.0 3.0
FOREMAN 1 1.0 1.0 4.0
LEADER 16 16.0 16.0 20.0
NON-OPERATOR 26 26.0 26.0 46.0
OP. FORKLIF 3 3.0 3.0 49.0
OPERATOR 50 50.0 50.0 99.0
SECTION HEAD 1 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

Page 2
 L_BMI

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 42 42.0 42.0 42.0
2 6 6.0 6.0 48.0
3 52 52.0 52.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_USIA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 75 75.0 75.0 75.0
2 25 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_MASA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 47 47.0 47.0 47.0
2 53 53.0 53.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

APT

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid TIDAK 1 1.0 1.0 1.0
YA 99 99.0 99.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

JENIS APT

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid EAR PLUG 100 100.0 100.0 100.0

PENGGANTIAN APT

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid >5 HARI SEKALI 80 80.0 80.0 80.0
2-5 HARI SEKALI 20 20.0 20.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

Page 3
 CARA PAKAI

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid TAHU 99 99.0 99.0 99.0
TIDAK TAHU 1 1.0 1.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_LAMA

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 89 89.0 89.0 89.0
2 11 11.0 11.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

RX MEROKOK

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid TIDAK 56 56.0 56.0 56.0
YA 44 44.0 44.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

L_GGN PEND

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent
Valid 1 92 92.0 92.0 92.0
2 8 8.0 8.0 100.0
Total 100 100.0 100.0

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=L_BAG L_DIVISI L_JABATAN L_BMI L_USIA L_MASA L_APT L_JENIS L_GANTI
L_CARA L_LAMA L_ROKOK BY L_GGNPEND
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ RISK
/CELLS=COUNT ROW
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Page 4
 Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
L_BAG * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_DIVISI * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_JABATAN * L_GGN
PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%

L_BMI * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%

L_USIA * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_MASA * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_APT * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_JENIS * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_GANTI * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_CARA * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_LAMA * L_GGN PEND 100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%
L_ROKOK * L_GGN PEND
100 100.0% 0 0.0% 100 100.0%

L_BAG * L_GGN PEND

Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_BAG 1 Count 1 2 3
% within L_BAG 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
2 Count 2 0 2
% within L_BAG 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
3 Count 6 2 8
% within L_BAG 75.0% 25.0% 100.0%
4 Count 78 4 82
% within L_BAG 95.1% 4.9% 100.0%
5 Count 4 0 4
% within L_BAG 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
6 Count 1 0 1
% within L_BAG 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_BAG 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Page 5
 Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 18.865 5 .002
Likelihood Ratio 10.972 5 .052
Linear-by-Linear
Association 12.759 1 .000

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 9 cells (75.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for L_BAG (1 / a
2)

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

L_DIVISI * L_GGN PEND

Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_DIVISI 1 Count 92 8 100
% within L_DIVISI 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_DIVISI 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value
a
Pearson Chi-Square .
N of Valid Cases 100
a. No statistics are computed because L_DIVISI is a constant.

Page 6
 Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for L_DIVISI (1 a
/ .) .

a. No statistics are computed because L_DIVISI is a constant.

L_JABATAN * L_GGN PEND

Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_JABATAN 1 Count 42 5 47
% within L_JABATAN 89.4% 10.6% 100.0%
2 Count 50 3 53
% within L_JABATAN 94.3% 5.7% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_JABATAN 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .839 1 .360
b
Continuity Correction .299 1 .585
Likelihood Ratio .842 1 .359
Fisher's Exact Test .469 .292
Linear-by-Linear
.830 1 .362
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.76.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for L_JABATAN
(1 / 2) .504 .114 2.234

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1 .947 .841 1.067

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1.879 .475 7.444
2
N of Valid Cases 100

Page 7
L_BMI * L_GGN PEND
Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_BMI 1 Count 37 5 42
% within L_BMI 88.1% 11.9% 100.0%
2 Count 6 0 6
% within L_BMI 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
3 Count 49 3 52
% within L_BMI 94.2% 5.8% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_BMI 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.743 2 .418
Likelihood Ratio 2.153 2 .341
Linear-by-Linear
Association 1.134 1 .287

N of Valid Cases 100

a. 3 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .48.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for L_BMI (1 / 2) a

a. Risk Estimate statistics cannot be computed. They are only computed for a 2*2 table without empty cells.

L_USIA * L_GGN PEND

Page 8
 Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_USIA 1 Count 73 2 75
% within L_USIA 97.3% 2.7% 100.0%
2 Count 19 6 25
% within L_USIA 76.0% 24.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_USIA 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 11.594 1 .001
b
Continuity Correction 8.877 1 .003
Likelihood Ratio 9.756 1 .002
Fisher's Exact Test .003 .003
Linear-by-Linear
11.478 1 .001
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2.00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for L_USIA (1 /
2) 11.526 2.152 61.723

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1 1.281 1.024 1.601

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

.111 .024 .516
2
N of Valid Cases 100

L_MASA * L_GGN PEND

Page 9
 Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_MASA 1 Count 46 1 47
% within L_MASA 97.9% 2.1% 100.0%
2 Count 46 7 53
% within L_MASA 86.8% 13.2% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_MASA 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 4.155 1 .042
b
Continuity Correction 2.786 1 .095
Likelihood Ratio 4.702 1 .030
Fisher's Exact Test .063 .044
Linear-by-Linear
4.113 1 .043
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.76.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for L_MASA (1 /
2) 7.000 .828 59.186

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1 1.128 1.007 1.263

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

.161 .021 1.262
2
N of Valid Cases 100

L_APT * L_GGN PEND

Page 10
 Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_APT 1 Count 91 8 99
% within L_APT 91.9% 8.1% 100.0%
2 Count 1 0 1
% within L_APT 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_APT 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .088 1 .767
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .168 1 .682
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .920
Linear-by-Linear
.087 1 .768
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
For cohort L_GGN PEND =
1 .919 .867 .974

N of Valid Cases 100

L_JENIS * L_GGN PEND

Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_JENIS 1 Count 92 8 100
% within L_JENIS 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_JENIS 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Page 11
 Chi-Square Tests

Value
Pearson Chi-Square .a
N of Valid Cases 100
a. No statistics are computed because L_JENIS is a constant.

Risk Estimate

Value
Odds Ratio for L_JENIS (1 / a
.) .

a. No statistics are computed because L_JENIS is a constant.

L_GANTI * L_GGN PEND

Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_GANTI 1 Count 18 2 20
% within L_GANTI 90.0% 10.0% 100.0%
2 Count 74 6 80
% within L_GANTI 92.5% 7.5% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_GANTI 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square .136 1 .712
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .129 1 .719
Fisher's Exact Test .659 .503
Linear-by-Linear
.135 1 .714
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.60.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Page 12
 Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for L_GANTI (1
/ 2) .730 .136 3.920

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1 .973 .830 1.140

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1.333 .291 6.117
2
N of Valid Cases 100

L_CARA * L_GGN PEND

Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_CARA 1 Count 91 8 99
% within L_CARA 91.9% 8.1% 100.0%
2 Count 1 0 1
% within L_CARA 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_CARA 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square .088 a 1 .767
b
Continuity Correction .000 1 1.000
Likelihood Ratio .168 1 .682
Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .920
Linear-by-Linear
.087 1 .768
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .08.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
For cohort L_GGN PEND =
.919 .867 .974
1
N of Valid Cases 100

Page 13
L_LAMA * L_GGN PEND
Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_LAMA 1 Count 81 8 89
% within L_LAMA 91.0% 9.0% 100.0%
2 Count 11 0 11
% within L_LAMA 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_LAMA 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.075 1 .300
b
Continuity Correction .200 1 .654
Likelihood Ratio 1.948 1 .163
Fisher's Exact Test .593 .380
Linear-by-Linear
1.064 1 .302
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .88.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
For cohort L_GGN PEND =
1 .910 .853 .972

N of Valid Cases 100

L_ROKOK * L_GGN PEND

Page 14
 Crosstab

L_GGN PEND
1 2 Total
L_ROKOK 1 Count 53 3 56
% within L_ROKOK 94.6% 5.4% 100.0%
2 Count 39 5 44
% within L_ROKOK 88.6% 11.4% 100.0%
Total Count 92 8 100
% within L_ROKOK 92.0% 8.0% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-

Value df sided) sided) sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 1.208 1 .272
b
Continuity Correction .530 1 .467
Likelihood Ratio 1.201 1 .273
Fisher's Exact Test .295 .233
Linear-by-Linear
1.196 1 .274
Association
N of Valid Cases 100
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3.52.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

95% Confidence Interval

Value Lower Upper
Odds Ratio for L_ROKOK
(1 / 2) 2.265 .511 10.049

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

1 1.068 .944 1.207

For cohort L_GGN PEND =

.471 .119 1.866
2
N of Valid Cases 100

T-Test
[DataSet6]

One-Sample Statistics

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

L_GGN PEND 100 1.08 .273 .027

Page 15
 One-Sample Test

Test Value = 1
95% Confidence Interval of the
Mean Difference
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Lower Upper
L_GGN PEND 2.934 99 .004 .080 .03 .13

T-Test
[DataSet8]

One-Sample Statistics

N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean

L_GGN PEND 100 1.08 .273 .027

One-Sample Test

Test Value = 1
95% Confidence Interval of the
Mean Difference
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Difference Lower Upper
L_GGN PEND 2.934 99 .004 .080 .03 .13

Page 16