Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• Completely randomised design Test at 1% for the significant difference amongst the treatment
1 2 3 means
8,2 7,7 6,9 ( )
2
2
Y = 920.65
2 G 116,5
ij CF = = = 904,8167
8,7 8,4 5,8 N 15
=− = − =
2
9,4 8,6 7,2 S
S
T
r R
nCF
91
7
,
33
05
90
4
,
81
67
12
,
51
38
9,2 8,1 6,8 SST = Yij2 − CF = 920, 65 − 904,8167 = 15,8333
8,0 7,4
𝑆𝑆𝐸 = 𝑆𝑆𝑇 − 𝑆𝑆𝑇𝑟 = 15.8333 − 12.5138 = 3.3195
6,1
SSE = Yij2 − Rn = 920, 65 − 917,3305 = 3,3195
2
T Observations ni Ri Ri2
n
1 8,2 8,7 9,4 9,2 4 35,5 315,0625
2 7,7 8,4 8,6 8,1 8,0 5 40,8 332,928
3 6,9 5,8 7,2 6,8 7,4 6,1 6 40,2 269,34
15 116,5 917,3305
ANOVA
Source SS df MS F Ftab (0.01)
Treatments 12,5138 2 6,2569 22,6208 6,93
Errors 3,3195 12 0,2766
Total 15,8333 14
H 0 : 1 = 2 = 3 H a : at least two of the treatment means differs
Since 22,6208 ≥ 6,93, we reject the null hypothesis at 1% level of significance and conclude that at least two of the
treatment means differs.
1 1
1 1 CI ( 1 − 3 ) = (Y1 − Y3 ) tne;1− MSE +
CI ( 1 − 2 ) = (Y1 − Y2 ) tne;1− MSE +
n1 n3
2
2
n1 n2
( 0, 2766 )
1 1
= ( 8,875 − 8,16 ) t12;0.995 ( 0, 2766 ) +
1 1 = ( 8,875 − 6, 7 ) t12;0.995 +
4 5 4 6
= 0, 715 3, 055 ( 0,3528 ) = 2,175 3, 055 ( 0,3395)
= 0, 715 1, 0778 = 2,175 1, 0372
= −0,3628;1, 7928 = 1,1378;3, 2122
Zero is included in the interval meaning mean 1 and Zero is not included in the interval meaning mean 1 and 3 do
2 don’t differ differ
t distribution critical values
Lower tail probability (1 − )
df 0.75 0.90 0.95 0.975 0.99 0.995 0.9975 0.999
1 1.000 3.078 6.314 12.706 31.821 63.657 127.321 318.309
2 .816 1.886 2.920 4.303 6.965 9.925 14.089 22.327
3 .765 1.638 2.353 3.182 4.541 5.841 7.453 10.214
4 .741 1.533 2.132 2.776 3.747 4.604 5.598 7.173
5 .727 1.476 2.015 2.571 3.365 4.032 4.773 5.893
6 .718 1.440 1.943 2.447 3.143 3.707 4.317 5.208
7 .711 1.415 1.895 2.365 2.998 3.499 4.029 4.785
8 .706 1.397 1.860 2.306 2.896 3.355 3.833 4.501
9 .703 1.383 1.833 2.262 2.821 3.250 3.690 4.297
10 .700 1.372 1.812 2.228 2.764 3.169 3.581 4.144
11 .697 1.363 1.796 2.201 2.718 3.106 3.497 4.025
12 .695 1.356 1.782 2.179 2.681 3.055 3.428 3.930
13 .694 1.350 1.771 2.160 2.650 3.012 3.372 3.852
14 .692 1.345 1.761 2.145 2.624 2.977 3.326 3.787
15 .691 1.341 1.753 2.131 2.602 2.947 3.286 3.733
16 .690 1.337 1.746 2.120 2.583 2.921 3.252 3.686
17 .689 1.333 1.740 2.110 2.567 2.898 3.223 3.646
18 .688 1.330 1.734 2.101 2.552 2.878 3.197 3.610
19 .688 1.328 1.729 2.093 2.539 2.861 3.174 3.579
20 .687 1.325 1.725 2.086 2.528 2.845 3.153 3.552
21 686 1.323 1.721 2.080 2.518 2.831 3.135 3.527
22 .686 1.321 1.717 2.074 2.508 2.819 3.119 3.505
23 .685 1.319 1.714 2.069 2.500 2.807 3.104 3.485
24 .685 1.318 1.711 2.064 2.492 2.797 3.090 3.467
25 .684 1.316 1.708 2.060 2.485 2.787 3.978 3.450
1 1
CI ( 2 − 3 ) = (Y2 − Y3 ) tne;1− MSE +
n2 n3
2
( 0, 2766 )
1 1
= ( 8,16 − 6, 7 ) t12;0.995 +
5 6
= 1, 46 3, 055 ( 0,3185 )
= 1, 46 0,9730
= 0, 487; 2, 433
Y 2
ij = 849,55 CF =
15
= 828,8167
( 0, 2794 )
1 1
= ( 6,36 − 8, 7333) t12;0.995 +
5 6
= −2,3733 3, 055 ( 0,3201)
= −2,3733 0,9779
= −3,3512; −1,3954
1 1
CI ( 1 − 3 ) = (Y1 − Y3 ) tne;1− MSE +
n1 n3
2
( 0, 2794 )
1 1
= ( 6,36 − 6,825 ) t12;0.995 +
5 4
= −0, 465 3, 055 ( 0,3546 )
= −0, 465 1, 0833
= −1,5483;0, 6183
( 0, 2794 )
1 1
= ( 8, 7333 − 6,825 ) t12;0.995 +
6 4
= 1,9083 3, 055 ( 0,3412 )
= 1,9083 1, 0424
= 0,8659; 2,9507
1 70 75 68 81 4 294 21 609
2 66 59 55 63 4 243 14 762.25
3 59 66 39 42 4 206 10 609
4 41 57 39 55 4 192 9 216
a 4 4 4 4 16 56 196,25
Cj 236 257 201 241 935
Test at 5% level of significance for the difference between the treatment and block means.
CF =
(935)2 = 54 639,0625 Y 2
ij = 57 139
16 all
Ri2
SSTr = − CF = 56 196,25 – 54 639,0625 = 1 557,1875
b
C 2j
SSB = − CF = 55 056,25 – 54 639,25 = 417,6875
a
H0a: the treatment means are the same, Haa: not the null hypothesis.
H0b: the block means are the same, Hab: not the null hypothesis.
TRM 1 2 3 b Ri Ri2
b
1 11,3 12,4 10,9 3 34,6 399,0533
2 14,2 14,3 13,7 3 42,2 593,6133
3 14,9 15,2 17,7 3 47,8 761,6133
4 12,2 11,3 12,5 3 36 432
a 4 4 4 12 2 186,2799
Cj 52,6 53,2 54,8 160,6
C 2j 691,69 707,56 750,76 2 150,01
a
Test at 5% level of significance for the difference between the treatment means, and the difference between
block means
CF =
(160,6)
2
= 2 149,3633 Yij2 = 2 193,2
12 all
Ri2
SSTr = − CF = 2 186,2799 – 2 149,3633 = 36,9166
b
C 2j
SSB = − CF = 2 150,01 – 2 149,3633 = 0,6467
a
Factor B
Factor A 1 2 3 Ri Ri2
nb
SS sub =
1
3
( )
85.82 + 90.52 + 84.52 + 70.52 + 73.52 + 67.52 − CF = 12 523.1667 – 12 376.8889 = 146.2778 (ab-1)
SSa =
Ri
− CF = 12 510.2778 -12 376.8889 = 133,3889 (a-1)
nb
SSb =
Ci
− CF = 12 389.3334 – 12 376.8889 = 12,4445 (b-1)
na
SSab = SS sub − SSa − SSb = 146.2778 – 133. 3889- 12.4445 = 0,4444 [(a-1)(b-1)]
SSE = SST − SSa − SSb − SSab = 154.6111 – 133.3889 – 12.4445 – 0.4444 = 8.3333 [ab (n-1)]
ANOVA
SOURCE SS df MS F Ftab (0.01)
SUB 146.2778 5 29.2556 42.1308 5.06
A 133.3889 1 133.3889 192.0923 9.33
B 12.4445 2 6.2223 8.9607 6.93
AB 0.4444 2 0.2222 0.3200 6.93
Errors 8.3333 12 0.6944
Total 154.6111 17
CF = = 423 180.4838
2 24
1 2 3 4 Rj R j
nb
1 288.2 293.2 256.5 248 1 085.9 147 397.3513
Y 2
ij = 426 145.81
Fac A 2 288.2 288.1 252.2 250.9 1 079.4 145 638.045 all
SS sub =
1
2
( )
288.22 + 293.22 + 256.52 + 2482 + 288.22 + 288.12 + ..... + 252.6 2 − CF = 425 211.425 – 423 180.4838 = 2 030.9412
R 2i
SS a = − CF = 423 493.7163 -423 180.4838 = 313.2325 (a-1)
nb
C 2i
SSb = − CF
na = 424 728.315 – 423 180.4838 = 1 547.8312 (b-1)
SSab = SS sub − SSa − SSb = 2 030.9412 – 313.2325 – 1 547.8312 = 169.8775 (a-1) (b-1)
SSE = SST − SSa − SSb − SSab = 2 965.3262 – 313.2325–1547.8312– 169.8775= 934.385 [ab (n-1)]
ANOVA
SOURCE SS df MS F Ftab (0.01)