The Value of IT

Refection
How do IT investments create value? Enable value creation?

IT investments make an incentive by adding to the foundation and funding to the organization. These investments
unmistakable frameworks and foundation that give current and future value to the organization, yet, they don't inc
value on their own. The manner in which these ventures make value is by empowering different divisions to work
the more productively and with less expense. They speed measures, which in wording includes esteem. Concernin
empowering esteem creation, I think this is the place the IT ventures have a superior result on view of the framew
that are made can have uncommon reserve funds for the organization. As expressed the speculations fundamentall
empower different divisions to reduce expenses and speed their work. Venture the board frameworks, flexibly cha
frameworks, and time/charging frameworks are largely instancing of speculations an organization can make that w
make? Instant value as investment funds and more lean financial plans.

How might we get a quantitative handle on the level of value provided by IT?

Barton adopted the strategy of finding the general estimation of the organization and afterward attempting to think
about the amount of an effect IT has on that number. I think he was destined for success, yet he simply expected to
burrow more profound for some better numbers. The sum spent on IT as the extent of the organizations generally
would give in any event a dollar sum for IT inside the organization. Eventually, IT has a ton of natural value that c
be handily translated quantitatively. This makes the scrape considerably more intricate.

What light does the consultants’ report shed on the matter of Davies’ firing and the subsequent choice of B
as CIO? What (if anything) does it add to the IT value discussion?

This reveals insight into the thinking for letting Davies go. It shows that IVK needs to move away from the Type 1
initiative structure and toward a more Type 2, and at the end Type 3 structure. Also, this says that IVK no doubt
considered Barton to be to a greater extent a Type 2 or 3 leader, or possibly an individual with the higher capabilit
arriving at Type 2 or 3 on the grounds that there is no motivation to move him to CIO in the event that they didn't
that potential in him.
us
e
Ti
thi
p
s
En
is
w Knowledge Management Report
En
te Date
in
or
te
r
cel
rks
de Blue cells are calculated for you. You do not need to enter anything in them.
Kn
lhe
Co
tai
o
at
et
m
ls
wl
rig
ar
pa
in
ed

Company Name
ht.
eCo
ny
ge
in
Na
nt
M
cel
m
en
an
ls
e
En
tag
in
ta
te
e
thi
cel
rbl
m
lsde
een
co
at
tai
st
t Knowledge Management Statistics
lu
rig
ls
ar
St
m
ht.
tin
in
ati
gn.
Inf
sti
Tit
cs Knowledge content
in
ra Knowledge area 1 Knowledge area 2 Knowledge area 3
le
str
cel
la
lof
uc
be
th
tu
at
l is Number of pieces of content
ere 95 90 90
rig
in
w
ht.
An
cel
or
nu
Ne
l Estimated total number of pieces of content required 100 150 100
ks
xt
al
at
he
Co
ins
rig
et
ht. Percentage completed
tr
sts 95.00% 60.00% 90.00%
is
ta
uc
in
tio
bl
cel
en
En
lst
is
te
at
in
ar Knowledge infrastructure — annual costs Knowledge area 1 Knowledge area 2 Knowledge area 3
rrig
tin
cel
de
glht.
tai
En
in
A1 Presentation and search capability $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
ls
te
0.
cel
in
lrEn
Da
at Document management capability $40,000.00 $40,000.00 $40,000.00
d
te
rig
Us
in
ht.
er
cel File storage and network access $35,000.00 $35,000.00 $35,000.00
Ne
St
l
xt
ati
E1
ins
sti Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
.tr
cs
uc
ta Total infrastructure costs
tio $125,000.00 $125,000.00 $125,000.00
bl
n
e
is
st
in
ar
cel
tin End-user statistics Knowledge area 1 Knowledge area 2 Knowledge area 3
lg
A1
in
7. Page 2 of 4
cel
l
 Number of active users with access 450 500 500
En
te Number of users logging in within last 7 days 49 233 93
r
de
tai Percentage 10.89% 46.60% 18.60%
ls
in
Co Number of users logging in within last 30 days 89 387 237
nt
en Percentage 19.78% 77.40% 47.40%
t
Su
b
mi
ssi Content submission Knowledge area 1 Knowledge area 2 Knowledge area 3
on
ta
bl Number of pieces of content submitted by users 134 78 215
e
st
ar Number of pieces of content accepted 93 68 186
tin
g
in Acceptance rate 69.40% 87.18% 86.51%
cel
l
at
rig
ht.

Page 3 of 4
 USER ACTIVITY
600

500

400

300

200

100

0
Knowledge area 1 Knowledge area 2 Knowledge area 3

Number of active users with access Number of users logging in within last 7 days Number of users logging in within last 30 days