You are on page 1of 4

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316452444

Control of an SSSC for Oscillation Damping of


Power Systems with Wind Turbine Generators

Conference Paper · April 2017


DOI: 10.1109/ISGT.2017.8085974

CITATIONS READS

0 73

2 authors, including:

Muthanna Al-Sarray
University of Arkansas
12 PUBLICATIONS 8 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Transient Stability of Power Systems with FACTS devices View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Muthanna Al-Sarray on 25 April 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Control of an SSSC for Oscillation Damping of
Power Systems with Wind Turbine Generators
Muthanna Al-Sarray and Roy A. McCann
Dept. of Electrical Engineering
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas, USA
rmccann@uark.edu

Abstract— The increased adoption of wind generation capacity genetic algorithm (GA) and ensemble decision trees. In [5] the
into worldwide electric power systems presents many challenges researchers suggested using GA for enhancing the security of
due to the intermittent nature of this energy resource. The power systems through control of FACTS devices. Others have
equipment for flexible ac transmission systems (FACTS) are the shown optimal power flow (OPF) being achieved with FACTS
focus of this paper with the goal of overcoming the difficulties of
achieving improved electric power system reliability with large
devices for minimizing wind power curtailment ([6]-[7]). Other
penetration of wind generation. FACTS equipment can also researchers have considered the constraints imposed by
contribute towards reducing the cost of power system expansions electricity market transactions on variable renewable energy
by better utilizing existing assets to defer future infrastructure resources by the use of FACTS devices [8-10]. From these
expenses. In addition, FACTS equipment can minimize issues previous research efforts, FACTS equipment have been
concerning adequate damping of power oscillations, transmission identified as a promising technology for maximizing the use of
capacities, and frequency regulation. The paper presents research renewable energy resources while maintaining adequate overall
results on improving power oscillation damping and increased power system reliability. However, previous research has not
transmission capacities under dynamic conditions using static focused on using FACTS equipment in systems suffering from
synchronous series compensator (SSSC) technology. Detailed
analysis and simulation of these factors are considered under
multiple contingencies with renewable resources such as a wind
normal and faulted in the power system network. Results of this turbine generators. Therefore, this work highlights employing
investigation help in understanding the improvements that can be FACTS devices in cases that have double events with a large
achieved by incorporating SSSC equipment in systems having contribution from wind capacity.
large participation factors associated with wind turbine This paper focuses on the use of static synchronous series
generators. compensators (SSSC) to dampen power system oscillation and
to limit the impact of fault-induced disturbances in systems with
Keywords; power oscillation damping; static synchronous series large amounts of wind generation. The test-case benchmark
compensator; wind turbine.
considered has five buses, three generators (one of which is an
I. INTRODUCTION aggregate wind multi-turbine wind farm), and a three-phase
dynamic load with 2202 MVA [11, 12]. The purpose of this
Renewable energy resources such as wind turbine research is to gain an understanding of SSSC devices as an
generators produce variable energy depending on the effective approach to increase the reliability of electric power
meteorological conditions and the resultant wind velocity. systems in terms of the effects of power flow with large
However, this variability created difficulties for operating contributions from wind generation sources, particularly in the
within power system constraints such as frequency regulation case of multiple sequential contingencies.
and thermal limits [1]. The default remedial action of abrupt
wind generation ramp-rates is curtailment in order to avoid II. FACTS AND SSSC MODELING
exceeding conductor limits and frequency disturbances. In FACTS devices encompass a large class of power electronic
order to minimize the loss of potential energy harvested under technologies that can be used to modify power flows in order to
a variety of wind conditions, there has been a number of control maximize transmission line capacity reduce power system
methods proposed to reduce the disruptive effects of wind oscillation [13]. The SSSC is a series-connected converter that
transients [2]. can modify line voltages for compensating capacitive and
Recent developments in power systems have proposed inductive effects [14- 15]. The SSSC configuration shown in
FACTS equipment for improving load flow constraints and Fig. 1 is capable modifying real and reactive power by
disturbance minimization in transmission networks that have controlling the angular position of the series injected voltage,
significant renewable resources. [3] and [4] examined finding where VS is the voltage of the system, VCONV is the converted
the suitable FACTS locations and identifying the fault zones for voltage to the SSSC, VSC is the voltage source converter, and
FACTS-based transmission line via machine learning such as a Vdc is the voltage of a power storage [16- 18].
This research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation This research incorporates the ability of an SSSC to be
Industry/University Cooperative Research Center on Grid-connected Advanced operated in real-time to improve the dynamic and transient
Power Electronics Systems (GRAPES) under grant number 0934390.
B1 B2
B1

B3
B4
B3

B4
B2

Fig. 10. Active power at four buses and SSSC with POD.
Fig. 7. Reactive power at four buses and SSSC without POD.

Vqref
Vqinj

B3
B2

B1
B4

Fig. 11. Reactive power at four buses and SSSC with POD.

Consequently, SSSC functions to reduce the impacts of wind


Fig. 9. Injected voltage and active power at bus 2 with POD.
generation fluctuations while also keeping power flows within
for both active and reactive power. The POD of SSSC modifies maximum rated capacities and reducing the effects of the fault
the Vqref and injects voltage to reduce the variation in power clearing on the overall system.
flow. Overall, the results in Fig. 11 indicate the beneficial role of
The impact of wind turbine generation is illustrated in Fig. the SSSC in reducing power system oscillations resulting as a
4. The active power has small oscillation, especially after the consequence of multiple fault events when influenced by large
disturbance, due to voltage changes in the system that influence amounts of wind generation capacity.
the induced voltage in the wind turbine generators. This V. CONCLUSION
variation has a small effect on the other generators due to
supplying the same load for the overall network. Both active and This research indicates that an SSSC with POD control can
reactive power of the wind generator are impacted by the significantly improve power system damping while also
disturbance in terms of regulating the voltage and power flow. reducing the severity of power flow transients that are induced
by fault disturbances in systems with significant wind
generation capacity.
Vqref
REFERENCES
Vqinj
[1] Y. Liu, J. R. Gracia, S. Hadley, Y. Liu, “Wind/PV Generation Frequency
Regulation and Oscillation Damping in the Eastern Interconnection (EI),”
Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report ORNL/TM-2013/587, Dec. 2013.
[2] S. Xia, X. Luo, K. W. Chan, M. Zhou and G. Li, "Probabilistic Transient
Stability Constrained Optimal Power Flow for Power Systems with
Multiple Correlated Uncertain Wind Generations," IEEE Transactions on
Sustainable Energy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1133-1144, July 2016.

[3] E. Ghahremani, I. Kamwa, “Optimal Placement of Multiple-Type FACTS


Devices to Maximize Power System Loadability Using a Generic
Graphical User Interface,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 28,
No. 2, pp. 764-778, May 2013.
[4] S. R. Samantaray, “A Data-Mining Model for Protection of FACTS-
Based Transmission Line,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol.
Fig. 8. Injected voltage and active power at bus 2 without POD. 28, No. 2, pp. 612-618, April 2013.
[5] E. Ghahremani, I. Kamwa, “Analyzing the effects of different types of Impedance Modulator,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 25,
FACTS devices on the steady-state performance of the Hydro-Québec No. 4, pp. 2940-2949, October 2010.
network,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, [13] A. K. Verma, A. Srividya, B. C. Deka, J. Morrow, “Impact of a FACTS
pp. 233 – 249, February 2014. controller on reliability of composite power generation and transmission
[6] A. Nasri, A. J. Conejo, S. J. Kazempour, M. Ghandhari, “Minimizing system,” Electric Power Systems Research (Elsevier), Vol. 72, Issue. 2,
Wind Power Spillage Using an OPF with FACTS Devices,” IEEE pp. 125-130, December 2004.
Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 2150-2159, [14] B. Pal, B. Chaudhuri, “Robust Control in Power Systems,” New York,
September 2014. NY, Springer Science, 2005, Ch. 4, pp. 39-58.
[7] M. Sahraei-Ardakani, K. W. Hedman, “A Fast LP Approach for Enhanced [15] M. Rohal, Ravi, “Application of SSSC Based Power Oscillation Damping
Utilization of Variable Impedance Based FACTS Devices,” IEEE Controller for Transient Stability Enhancement of Multimachine system
Transactions on Power Systems, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 2204-2213, May for Unsymmetrical Faults,” Power India International Conference
2016. (PIICON), Delhi, India, 2014, pp 1-6.
[8] H. A. Mohammadpour, Md. M. Islam, Enrico Santi, Y. J. Shin, “SSR [16] L. Gyugyi, C. D. Schauder, K. K. Sen, “Static synchronous series
Damping in Fixed-Speed Wind Farms Using Series FACTS Controllers,” compensator: a solid-state approach to the series compensation of
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 76-86, transmission lines,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, Vol. 12, No.
February 2016. 1, pp. 406-417, January 1997.
[9] J. I. L. Uchôa, F. K. A. Lima, C. G. C. Branco, “FACTS Applied to Fixed [17] M. A. R. Vidal, E. T. Iglesias, “Real 200kVA Static Synchronous Series
Speed Wind Turbines to Meet Grid Code Requirements,” 24th Compensator Test Bench for Control Strategy Verification and Validation
International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE 2015), Rio de Using Matlab,” Grenoble PowerTech (POWERTECH), Grenoble, France,
Janeiro, Brazil, 2015, pp 1-6. 2013, pp 1-6.
[10] A. Elmitwally, A. Eladl, J. Morrow, “Long-term economic model for [18] K. K. Sen, “SSSC - Static Synchronous Series Compensator: Theory,
allocation of FACTS devices in restructured power systems integrating Modeling, and Applications,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery,
wind generation,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, Vol. 10, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 241-246, January 1998.
Issue. 1, pp. 19-30, January 2016. [19] M. H. Haque, “Evaluation of First Swing Stability of a Large Power
[11] G. Sybille and P. Giroux, “Simulation of FACTS controllers using the System with Various FACTS Devices,” IEEE Transactions on Power
MATLAB Power System Blockset and Hypersim real-time simulator,” Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 1144-1151, August 2008.
IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting, Vol. 31, pp. 488-491, [20] S. C. Swain, S. Mahapatra, S. Panda, “Damping of Power System
January 2002. Oscillations Using SSSC-based Supplementary controller,” International
[12] P. Couture, J. Brochu, G. Sybille, P. Giroux, A. O. Barry, “Power Flow Journal of Electronics Communications and Electrical Engineering, Vol.
and Stability Control Using an Integrated HV Bundle-Controlled Line- 3, Issue. 1, pp. 25-35, January 2016.

View publication stats

You might also like