Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(2083134X - Materials Science-Poland) Research On Energy Absorption Properties of Open-Cell Copper Foam For Current Collector of Li-Ions
(2083134X - Materials Science-Poland) Research On Energy Absorption Properties of Open-Cell Copper Foam For Current Collector of Li-Ions
8-15
http://www.materialsscience.pwr.wroc.pl/
DOI: 10.2478/msp-2019-0011
School of Energy and Power Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China
Quasi-static uniaxial compressive tests of open-cell copper (Cu) foams (OCCF) were carried out on an in-situ bi-direction
tension/compress testing machine (IBTC 2000). The effects of strain rate, porosity and pore size on the energy absorption of
open-cell copper foams were investigated to reveal the energy absorption mechanism. The results show that three performance
parameters of open-cell copper foams (OCCF), involving compressive strength, Young modulus and yield stress, increase simul-
taneously with an increase of strain rate and reduce with increasing porosity and pore size. Furthermore, the energy absorption
capacity of OCCF increases with an increase of porosity and pore size. However, energy absorption efficiency increases with
increasing porosity and decreasing pore size. The finite element simulation results show that the two-dimensional stochastic
model can predict the energy absorption performance of the foam during the compressive process. The large permanent plastic
deformation at the weak edge hole is the main factor that affects the energy absorption.
Keywords: open-cell copper foam; true stress-strain curve; energy absorption; finite element simulation
© 2019. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Research on energy absorption properties of open-cell copper foam for current collector of Li-ions 9
to the improvement of cycle performance. How- could absorb a large amount of energy. However,
ever, its instability caused microcracks on the sur- the energy absorption of OCCF is seldom. There
face of the porous Cu6 Sn5 alloy electrode, result- are still several major issues and questions like how
ing in a decreasing storage capacity during the lat- to analyze the impact of porous structure on en-
ter stage of cycling. Ionica et al. [22] observed ergy absorption efficiency from the standpoint of
that rod-like Cu nanostructures of Ni3 Sn4 metal- the mechanism.
lic compound can be grown on these 3-D struc- This paper experimentally analyzes the me-
tures for weakening the volume changes of elec- chanical properties of OCCF. The tests were con-
trode so that the electrode was able to maintain ducted under different strain rates by using an in-
its stability under a cycle rate of 500 mA h/g, and situ bi-direction tension/compress testing machine
also performance degradations after 200 times cy- (IBTC 2000). The effect of strain rate, porosity and
cles did not appear. According to previous studies pore size on the energy absorption efficiency of
in which copper foams and porous copper alloy OCCF have been analyzed. Finite element analy-
materials were used as negative electrode materi- sis method has been used to analyze the energy ab-
als or current collector, it can be found that elec- sorption mechanism.
trochemical performance of electrode material is
the priority of research. Because of the open-cell 2. Experimental
foams with an excellent compressive characteris-
tics, they are regarded as appropriate negative cur- 2.1. Specimen preparation
rent collector material. The energy variation caused In this study open-cell copper foams (OCCF)
by volume expansion could be buffered and ad- with the PPI (pores per inch, 1 in. = 25.4 mm) of
justed in Li+ intercalation process. In addition, the 5, 20, 30 and porosity of about 90.3 % to approxi-
storage capacity could be enhanced. The energy ab- mately 96.4 % were prepared. Five kinds of materi-
sorption mechanism of the foam materials focuses als with different pore sizes and porosities were cut
on aluminum foam currently. Qin et al. [23] an- into 24 mm × 30 mm cylindrical specimens by wire
alyzed energy absorbtion of aluminum foams un- cut electrical discharge machining (WEDM). The
der impulsive load using mesoscopic model. It was samples were weighed with an electronic weight,
concluded that the absorptive capacity was promi- the porosity P and the relative density ρR of the
nently related to the loading rate and strength of samples were obtained according to equation 1 and
hole-wall. Macroscopic analysis showed that the equation 2 [25]:
plastic strain and fracture of the pore wall were
the origin of energy absorption of the aluminum 4m
P = 1− (1)
foam. A. Jung et al. [24] investigated the energy πρh∅2
absorption properties of open-cell aluminum foams
covered with nickel or uncoated nickel and found ρR = 1 − P (2)
that aluminum foam partially or gradually cover-
ing with nickel had a promising capability to ab- where m, h, Φ are the standard sample of copper
sorb energy at a wide range of loading rates. Sun foam quality, height and diameter of the bottom cir-
et al. [25] investigated the mechanical properties cle, respectively; ρ is the density of pure copper.
of such Al/Cu hybrid foam. This method improved The characteristic parameters of the open-cell cop-
the ductility of Al/Cu hybrid foam and effectively per foam used in the experiments are collected in
enhanced the energy absorption capacity of open- Table 1. The optical micrograph for 3-D structure
cell foam. Rajak et al. [26] studied the compres- of specimen #2 is shown in Fig. 1.
sive behavior of the strain rate between 10−1 /s and
about 10−3 /s and found that the energy absorption 2.2. OCCF specimens testing
performance of the aluminum foam increased with The compressive tests on OCCFs were con-
the stress of the platform. The lower density foam ducted at different strain rates of 10−2 /s, 10−3 /s,
10 J IAN C HEN et al.
Table 1. Porosity and PPI values of the open-cell copper and densification stage. The compressive behavior
foams. of OCCFs under quasi-static loading is presented
in Fig. 2b.
Relative
No. Porosity [%] PPI In elastic stage, the deformation is caused by the
densities
pore struts. A linear relationship between stress and
1# 95.7 30 0.043 strain is observed. The value of strain is less than or
2# 96.4 20 0.036 equal to 0.05 ( 6 0.05). There is almost no change
3# 90.3 5 0.097 of the pore shape at the strain of 3 %, as shown
4# 92.5 5 0.080 in Fig. 2b. Moreover, Young modulus as well as
5# 95.8 5 0.042 the pore size and porosity decrease as the strain
rate increases. When stress increases, pore-struts
cause the further deformation. Irreversible defor-
mation occurs when the stress reaches the yield
strength of copper foam. The deformation comes to
the plastic stage. At this stage, a higher porosity and
larger size of pore lead to a decrease in compressive
strength. In Fig. 2b (true strain of 10 % or 25 %), a
random distribution of inclined deformation belt is
observed, which is perpendicular to or inclined at
an angle of 45°to the loading direction. Most pores
gradually collapse in these deformation areas and a
few of them collapse completely, which is the fea-
ture of failure mechanism of layer by layer collaps-
ing. The collapsed pores merge into a larger hori-
Fig. 1. Optical micrograph of open-cell copper foam. zontal deformation zone (black line marked area)
with further compressive load. Increasing the com-
pressive load results in increased densification of
and 10−4 /s using an in-situ bi-direction ten- the copper foams. That is, the deformation comes
sion/compress testing machine to obtain the OC- to the densification stage. A large amount of me-
CFs’ compressive performance. In the testing pro- chanical energy is absorbed during the whole de-
cess, the cross-head and specimens were lubri- formation process.
cated using vaseline to minimize the friction coef-
ficient between these two parts. Instantaneous dis- 3.2. Effect of energy absorption ability on
placement and analytical data were obtained. True strain rate, porosity and pore size
stress-strain curves based on porosity and pore size
The response curve of metal foams has a wide
were drawn based on the experimental data.
range of stress platform region in uniaxial compres-
sive test. The energy absorption ability Ev and effi-
3. Results and discussions ciency η are expressed as:
3.1. Analysis of true stress-strain curves Z ε max
EV = σ dε (3)
In Fig. 2a, the typical true stress-strain curves 0
of the quasi-static compressive test for five OCCF
specimens are presented. The specimens of differ- R ε max
σ dε
ent porosities and pore sizes were tested under dif- η= 0 (4)
ε max σ max
ferent strain rates. It clearly shown that the stress-
strain curves of copper foam at different strain rates where σ and is compressive stress and strain,
comprise three stages: elastic stage, plastic stage max is the maximum strain, σmax is the maximum
Research on energy absorption properties of open-cell copper foam for current collector of Li-ions 11
Yield stress
2.00 2.73 3.38 3.78 4.87 5.54 6.36 7.36 8.85
[MPa]
Plastic
0 0.04 0.13 0.17 0.22 0.29 0.32 0.36 0.39
strain
References
Fig. 7. The comparison of simulation curve and test [1] C HIANG Y. M., Science, 330(2010), 1485.
curve. [2] K ALNAUSA S., R HODES K., DANIEL C., J. Power
Sources, 196 (2011), 8116.
Table 3. Characteristic parameters relative error of test [3] L IANG B., L IU Y.P., X U Y.H., J. Power Sources, 267
(2014), 469.
and simulation.
[4] X IE W., Z HU X.K., Y I S.H., K UANG J.C., C HENG
H.F., Mater. Des., 90 (2016), 38.
Trail Simulated Relative
Parameter [MPa] [5] W U X.W., L I Y.H., L I C.C., H E Z.X., X IANG Y.H.,
curve curve error [%] J. Power Sources, 300 (2015), 453.
Young modulus [6] C HEN J.L., C HEN J., C HEN D., Z HOU Y., L I W.,
29.83 31.59 5.9 Mater. Lett., 117 (2014), 162.
E
Yield stress σy [7] L I W., C HEN J., L IANG H., L I C., Mater. Sci., 33
1.90 2.02 6.3
Compressive (2015), 356.
2.83 2.96 4.6 [8] YAO M., O KUNO K., I WAKI T., AWAZU T., S AKAI T.,
strength σc
J. Power Sources, 195 (2010), 2077.
[9] BAGGETTO L., V ERHAEGH N.A.M., N IESSEN
R.A.H., ROOZEBOOM F., J UMAS J.C., N OTTEN
P.H.L., J. Electrochem. Soc., 157 (2010), 340.
4. Conclusions [10] C HOU C.Y., K IM H., H WANG G.S., J. Phys. Chem. C,
115 (2011), 20018.
1. There are elastic stage, plastic stage and [11] M C D OWELL M. T., L EE S.W., WANG C.M., C UI Y.,
densification stage in the true stress-strain Nano Energy, 1 (2012), 401.
curve of OCCF, and the compressive [12] N GUYEN C.C., SONG S.W., Electrochim. Acta, 55
(2010), 3026.
strength, Young modulus and yield stress in- [13] B EAULIEU L.Y., B EATTIE S.D., H ATCHARDA T.D.,
crease with increasing strain rate and de- DAHN J.R., J. Electrochem. Soc., 150 (2003), 419.
creasing porosity and pore size. [14] B OGART T.D., C HOCKLA A.M., KORGEL B.A., Curr.
Opin. Chem. Eng., 2 (2013), 286.
2. Energy absorption efficiency of OCCF with [15] J IANG T., Z HANG S.C., Q IU X.P., Z HU W.T, C HEN
high porosity is higher than 65 %, and L.Q., J. Power Sources, 166 (2007), 503.
the highest efficiency is observed when the [16] H UANG L., C AI J.S., H E Y., K E F. S., S UN S.G., Elec-
strain is between 0.2 and 0.3. Increasing trochem. Commun., 11 (2009), 950.
[17] K E F.S., H UANG L., W EI H.B., C AI J.S., FAN X.Y.,
porosity and decreasing pore size improve YANG F.Z., S UN S.G., J. Power Sources, 170 (2007),
the energy absorption efficiency. 450.
3. The relative error of Young modulus, yield [18] K E F.S., H UANG L., C AI J.S., S UN S.G., Electrochim.
Acta, 52(2007), 6741.
stress as well as compressive strength be- [19] S HIN H.C., L IU M., Adv. Funct. Mater., 15 (2005), 582.
tween simulations and tests is 4.1 %, 9.8 % [20] A RBIZZANI C., B ENINATI M., L AZZARI M., M AS -
and 3.2 %, respectively. It shows that energy TRAGOSTINO M., J. Power Sources, 158 (2006), 635.
Research on energy absorption properties of open-cell copper foam for current collector of Li-ions 15
[21] Z HAO H.P., J IANG C.Y., H E X.M., R EN J.G., WAN [25] S UN Y., R IGOBERTO B., VANDERKLOK A. J.,
C.R., J. Membr. Sci., 310 (2008), 1. T EKALUR S. A., WANG W., L EE I., Mater. Sci. Eng.
[22] I ONICA B.C.M., L IPPENS P.E., A LDON L., O LIVIER A-Adv., 592 (2014), 111.
F.J., J UMAS J.C., Chem. Mater., 18 (2006), 6442. [26] R AJAK D.K., K UMARASWAMIDHAS L.A., DAS S.,
[23] Q IN F., Z HANG J.H., Z HANG Y.D., L IU J.C., G ONG K UMARAN S.S., J. Alloy. Compd., 656 (2016), 218.
Z.M., Compos. Struct., 124 (2015), 409. [27] Z UMAN P., Microchem J., 75(2003), 139.
[24] J UNG A., B EEX L.A.A., D IEBELS S., B ORDAS Received 2017-01-04
S.P.A., Mater. Des., 87 (2015), 36. Accepted 2018-06-13