Primary sources provide first-hand accounts that allow historians to draw their own conclusions, but they are limited in availability and biased by the viewpoint of their creator. Secondary sources analyze and interpret primary sources, giving context but risking author bias. Both have value, though primary sources are preferred for original research due to their proximity to the event.
Primary sources provide first-hand accounts that allow historians to draw their own conclusions, but they are limited in availability and biased by the viewpoint of their creator. Secondary sources analyze and interpret primary sources, giving context but risking author bias. Both have value, though primary sources are preferred for original research due to their proximity to the event.
Primary sources provide first-hand accounts that allow historians to draw their own conclusions, but they are limited in availability and biased by the viewpoint of their creator. Secondary sources analyze and interpret primary sources, giving context but risking author bias. Both have value, though primary sources are preferred for original research due to their proximity to the event.
Activity 1. Primary sources and secondary sources of historical data have
their own benefits as well as advantages and disadvantages. In this part, you are required to give a concise explanation/ discussion on the following items. (10 pts each item)
1. What are the benefits of using primary sources?
2. Do you affirm that primary sources are superior to secondary sources?
Explain.
3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of accessing secondary