QFD: House of Quality

Project:
Revision:
Date:

Correlations
Positive +
Negative −
No Correlation

Relationships
Strong ●
Moderate ○
Weak ▽
Direction of Improvement
Maximize ▲
Target ◇
−
Minimize ▼
+
Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Direction of Improvement ▲ ▼ ◇ Customer Competitive Assesment
Requirements
Functional

Func. Requirement 1

Func. Requirement 2

Func. Requirement 3

Competitor #1: Product Name

Competitor #2: Product Name

Competitor #3: Product Name

Competitor #4: Product Name

Maximum Relationship
Customer Importance
Relative Weight

Customer
Weight Chart

Our Product
Requirements
(Explicit and
Row #

Row #
Implicit)
0 1 2 3 4 5

1 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||| 57% 8 1 Cust. Requirement 1 ▽ 3 3 4 1 5 1

2 ||||||| 14% 2 9 Cust. Requirement 2 ○ ● 5 4 1 2 4 2

3 |||||||||||||| 29% 4 3 Cust. Requirement 3 ▽ ○ 1 2 4 0 2 3

4 4

5 5

6 6

7 7

8 8

9 9

10 10

11 11

12 12

13 13

Our Product
14 14
Competitor #1
Competitor #2
15 15
Competitor #3
Competitor #4
16 16
Target for Functional

Target for Functional

Target for Functional

Requirement #1

Requirement #2

Requirement #3

Target

Max Relationship 1 3 9
Technical Importance Rating 85.714 42.857 214.29
Relative Weight 25% 13% 63%
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Weight Chart
||||||||||||

||||||

Our Product
Competitor #1: Product Name
Competitor #2: Product Name
Competitor #3: Product Name
Technical Competitive Assesment
1 3 4 2
2 3 5 1
3 0 4 5
4 1 5 4

Competitor #4: Product Name 5 5 2 1

5

Our Product
4

Competitor
#1
Competitor
3

#2
Competitor
#3
2

Competitor
#4
1
0

Template Revision: 0.9 Date: 4/23/2010

Column # 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Christopher Battles