Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(Sitech Services C.V. provided part of the information for the project)
To verify that the inspection approach will deliver the same weld quality as
with the original planned NDT Technique (RT), a comparison of both PAUT
and RT was executed on:
- 3 welded samples (samples numbered; 1, 4, 5)
Techniques used:
- PAUT (3.5Mhz 16 element, double sided, sectorial scan 45-70 graden)
(under skip, distance wedge to weld 10mm and 4mm)
- RT (double wall image)
- Computer Tomography (CT) as non-destructive alternative for macro
sectioning
Findings:
- PAUT and RT results were very similar.
- Computer Tomography results have proven that no major indications have
been missed by either RT and PAUT.
Conclusion:
- This means that PAUT inspection technique offers the same level of weld
quality as radiography and therefore a suitable replacement for RT
30 N.Acc.
30% Acc.
20 20%
10 10%
0 0%
Continuous welding in 2 shifts from 06.00 in the morning till 00.00 hours
Safety & environment: no radiation, no chemical waste
Safety & production: no evacuation off areas, continuous work in the
surrounding production area’s which were still online
Partly repair of welds possible = not total cut outs = time saving
Real time analysis for instant feedback to the welders
Setup and inspection reports in electronic format
Cost per weld < 100 Euro per weld, including all costs for the validation,
comparison testing with RT and CT.
Conclusion: Making the selection of the NDT technique subject to the total
cost approach can generate large savings. UT in lieu of Radiography can
reduce your turnaround time significantly is safer and better for the
environment.
Elschot 30
4905 AZ Oosterhout
The Netherlands
Tel: +31162425588
E-mail: info@sonovation.com
Managing Director
Fred Gabriëls
E-mail: fred.gabriels@nl.tuv.com