Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN 2229-5518
Abstract— Electric load demand forecasting plays a vital role in securing the efficient operation of power systems. There is a need for
energy providers to track electricity periodically if it is adequate. If they don’t, other alternatives should be handled, such as a new power
station, which can provide all of them with ample supplies without interruptions. The researchers believe that evaluating the electricity
demand and reliable forecasts can help the power industry supply its energy and eventually draw investors to create electricity. This will no
longer trigger rotating brownouts and energy shortages in the region. This paper aims to provide accurate load forecasting from 2019 to
2028 in the Puerto Princesa distribution system utilizing double exponential smoothing. Exponential smoothing methods are prediction
approaches that are frequently used as automated forecasts to evaluate univariate time series because of their simplicity and robustness.
The researchers conducted various tests considering different values of smoothing parameters to determine the forecast with the minimum
error. The results obtained demonstrate that the energy consumption can be correctly estimated. Using the smoothing parameters α = 0.1
and β = 0.1, the energy consumption by 2028 is expected to be 393,572.6 MWh with a mean average percent error of 1.29%.
Index Terms— distribution system, energy consumption forecasting, exponential smoothing, load demand, long-term forecast, power
shortage, smoothing parameters
—————————— ——————————
IJSER
1 INTRODUCTION
modeling data patterns. The DES approach ensures high 2.2 Forecasting Using Double Exponential Smoothing
forecasting accuracy of the data model by considering patterns The double exponential smoothing is used when the data
that exist. DES is more reliable than Linear Pattern, Quadratic shows a trend. The level and trend are the two components
Trend, Exponential Rise, Moving Average (MA), Auto updated in each period [9]. The following is the formula used
Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), and Kalman for double exponential smoothing [3], [4]:
Filter methods [7], [8]. St Yt (1 )(St 1 Tt 1 ) (1)
In this paper, the Puerto Princesa Distribution System's
energy consumption for the year 2019-2028 was forecasted Tt (St St 1 ) (1 )Tt 1 (2)
using double exponential smoothing.
Yˆt n St nTt (3)
where St and Tt are the smoothed level and trend, and
2 METHODOLOGY are smoothing parameters (0 < < 1, and 0 < < 1), Yt is the
This part of the paper discusses the procedure in conducting actual value of the data in period t, and Yˆt n is the value of the
this study. Fig. 1 shows the conceptual framework of the forecast done from the origin of the forecast t.
study. There are several methods for determining the initial values
of the smoothed level and trend [9]. In this paper, linear
regression is used between the period and the energy
consumption to determine the initial values S1 and T1.
S1 Y1 (1 )(S0 T0 ) (4)
T1 (S1 S0 ) (1 )T0 (5)
The model equation for linear regression and the formula for
solving the values of the slope and intercept are:
IJSER
Y a bX (6)
n
( Xt X)(Yt Y )
b t 1
(7)
n
t 1
( Xt X)2
a Y bX (8)
where Xt is the period t, Yt is the energy consumption at time
t, Y and X are the mean of Y and X, respectively, a is the
intercept, and b is the slope. From (4) and (5), the value of S0 is
the intercept, and the value of T0 is the slope [8].
Y Yˆ
2
n
t 1 t t
MSE (10)
n
Yt Yˆt
n
Fig. 1. Conceptual Framework t 1
100%
Yt
MAPE (11)
n
2.1 Collection of Historical Data where Yt is the actual value, Yˆt is the forecasted value, and n
The annual energy consumption for 2014-2018 of the Puerto is the number of data points. The values of MAPE for
Princesa Distribution System was collected from the utility evaluating the forecast's accuracy are shown in Table 1 [8].
company. These will be used for the forecast in the next ten
years using double exponential smoothing.
IJSER © 2020
http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 11, Issue 11, November-2020 809
ISSN 2229-5518
TABLE 1 TABLE 4
MAPE VALUES FOR FORECAST EVALUATION FORECAST ERRORS OF VARIOUS SMOOTHING PARAMETERS
Value of MAPE Forecast Accuracy Test MAE MSE MAPE
Less than 10% High 1 0.1 0.1 2,508.9964 9,577,666.8743 1.29%
Between 10% to 20% Good 2 0.1 0.2 2,532.4473 9,716,529.5716 1.30%
Between 20% to 50% Reasonable 3 0.1 0.3 2,556.0885 9,859,826.6875 1.32%
Greater than 50% Low 4 0.1 0.4 2,579.9057 10,007,456.1252 1.33%
5 0.1 0.5 2,603.8845 10,159,331.4860 1.34%
6 0.2 0.1 2,677.4196 10,905,136.1924 1.38%
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 7 0.2 0.2 2,722.8946 11,224,181.5432 1.40%
The historical data of the annual energy consumption for 2014- 8 0.2 0.3 2,768.6298 11,559,408.7349 1.42%
2018, as shown in Table 2, were collected from Palawan 9 0.2 0.4 2,814.5252 11,910,526.5683 1.45%
Electric Cooperative. It was observed that the energy 10 0.3 0.1 2,823.3289 12,333,812.8949 1.45%
consumption in the Puerto Princesa Distribution System is 11 0.2 0.5 2,860.4830 12,277,338.5618 1.47%
increasing. 12 0.3 0.2 2,886.9013 12,867,084.9317 1.48%
13 0.4 0.1 2,944.1685 13,840,352.1714 1.51%
TABLE 2 14 0.3 0.3 2,950.1265 13,433,737.2267 1.52%
HISTORICAL DATA ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION 15 0.3 0.4 3,012.7173 14,032,963.2338 1.55%
Year t Energy Consumption (MWh) 16 0.4 0.2 3,020.3254 14,608,931.6344 1.55%
2014 1 149,258.4740 17 0.5 0.1 3,039.5770 15,399,489.8458 1.56%
2015 2 161,749.1021 18 0.3 0.5 3,074.3986 14,663,999.8312 1.58%
2016 3 180,486.9336 19 0.4 0.3 3,094.5526 15,428,662.4880 1.59%
20 0.5 0.2 3,122.1325 16,406,763.6380 1.60%
IJSER
2017 4 194,850.9336
2018 5 221,079.8156 21 0.4 0.4 3,166.2891 16,296,431.6280 1.63%
22 0.5 0.3 3,200.1624 17,476,402.9934 1.64%
23 0.4 0.5 3,235.0122 17,208,671.0736 1.66%
To determine the initial values of level and trend, linear
24 0.5 0.4 3,272.8049 18,599,560.0984 1.68%
regression was applied using the MS Excel® Analysis
25 0.5 0.5 3,339.2921 19,766,065.0911 1.71%
Toolpak. The linear regression yields an intercept value of
128,461.6974 and a slope value of 17,674.4515. These intercept
and slope values correspond to the values of S0 and T0, Upon comparing MAPE from the tests in Table 4, the
respectively. Using the smoothing parameters = 0.1 and lowest MAPE obtained was 1.29% with the smoothing
= 0.1, the smoothed level and trend initial values (S1 and T1) parameters = 0.1 and = 0.1. These values of smoothing
are 146,448.3814 and 17,705.6747. The values of the smoothed parameters were used to forecast the energy consumption for
level and trend for t = 1 up to t = 5 is shown in Table 3. the next ten years. The forecast model using double
exponential smoothing at = 0.1 and = 0.1 is
TABLE 3 Yˆ 216,824.7899 17,674.78103n
5n (12)
VALUES OF SMOOTHED LEVEL AND TREND FROM 2014-2018
The forecast results are shown in Table 5 and Figure 2, which
Energy Consumption Smoothed indicate that energy consumption through the next ten years
t Trend
(MWh) Level from 2019 to 2028 is increasing.
1 149,258.4740 146,448.3814 17,705.67472
2 161,749.1021 163,913.5607 17,681.62518 TABLE 5
3 180,486.9336 181,484.3606 17,670.54266 FORECASTED ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR THE YEAR 2019-2028
4 194,850.9336 198,724.5063 17,627.50296 Year n Energy Consumption (MWh)
5 221,079.8156 216,824.7899 17,674.78103 2019 1 234,499.57
2020 2 252,174.35
The mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), 2021 3 269,849.13
and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) at = 0.1 and 2022 4 287,523.91
= 0.1 was evaluated. The results obtained are MAE = 2023 5 305,198.70
2,508.9964, MSE = 9,577,666.8743 and MAPE = 1.29% 2024 6 322,873.48
The researchers also tested other values of the smoothing 2025 7 340,548.26
parameters to be used in the forecast. The results for these 2026 8 358,223.04
tests are shown in Table 4, along with the forecast errors MAE, 2027 9 375,897.82
MSE, and MAPE. 2028 10 393,572.60
IJSER © 2020
http://www.ijser.org
International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 11, Issue 11, November-2020 810
ISSN 2229-5518
IJSER
error by varying the smoothing parameters and . The
smoothing parameters with a value = 0.1 and = 0.1
obtained the lowest MAPE of 1.29% based on the tests
conducted. Using these smoothing parameters, the energy
consumption in the year 2028 is expected to be 393,572.6
MWh.
For future works, the double exponential smoothing can be
applied to other locations and other distribution systems. The
researchers also recommend applying optimization techniques
to determine the smoothing parameters which can produce
minimum forecast error.
REFERENCES
[1] S. Quaiyum, Y. I. Khan, S. Rahman, and P. Barman, “Artificial Neural
Network based Short Term Load Forecasting of Power System,” Int.
J. Comput. Appl., vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 975–8887, 2011.
[2] M. Y. Khamaira, A. S. Krzma, and A. M. Alnass, “Long Term Peak
Load Forecasting For The Libyan Network,” no. December, pp. 185–
193, 2018, doi: 10.21467/proceedings.2.23.
[3] A. C. Adamuthe, R. A. Gage, and G. T. Thampi, “Forecasting cloud
computing using double exponential smoothing methods,” ICACCS
2015 - Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Adv. Comput. Commun. Syst., pp. 3–7, 2015,
doi: 10.1109/ICACCS.2015.7324108.
[4] A. Chusyairi, N. S. P. Ramadar, and Bagio, “The use of exponential
smoothing method to predict missing service e-report,” Proc. - 2017
2nd Int. Conf. Inf. Technol. Inf. Syst. Electr. Eng. ICITISEE 2017, vol.
2018-Janua, no. February, pp. 39–44, 2018, doi:
10.1109/ICITISEE.2017.8285535.
[5] R. Gustriansyah, N. Suhandi, F. Antony, and A. Sanmorino, “Single
exponential smoothing method to predict sales multiple products,” J.
Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1175, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-
6596/1175/1/012036.
[6] F. Chen, Q. Li, J. Liu, and J. Zhang, “Variable smoothing parameter
of the double exponential smoothing forecasting model and its appli-
IJSER © 2020
http://www.ijser.org