1 of 20

Boron

By

Ian Beardsley

Copyright © 2020 by Ian Beardsley


 2 of 20



 3 of 20

Periodic Table of the AI Elements

It is quite interesting that we can pull out the core artificial intelligence elements from the
periodic table of the elements in such a way that it allows for a three by three matrix:

Because we can number them according to their properties:

E13 E14 E15

E23 E24 E25

E33 E34 E35

13 is an element in row 1 and must be boron because it has three valence electrons. 14 is carbon because
it is in row 1 and has four valence electrons. And so on. So, instead of element Si we have E_24, and
instead of element Ge, we have E_34, and so on. B and P and Ga and As are doping agents for Si and Ge.

Three by three matrixes are the most important because they are associated with vectors in three
dimensional space, and thus are used for taking the cross product between two vectors.

00001: The properties of artificial intelligence substances form the basis of Universal Structure.
 4 of 20

Asymmetry in AI Elements
The primary elements of artificial intelligence (AI) used to make diodes and transistors, silicon (Si) and
germanium (Ge) doped with boron (B) and phosphorus (P) or gallium (Ga) and arsenic (As) have an
asymmetry due to boron. Silicon and germanium are in group 14 like carbon (C) and as such have 4
valence electrons. Thus to have positive type silicon and germanium, they need doping agents from group
13 (three valence electrons) like boron and gallium, and to have negative type silicon and germanium they
need doping agents from group 15 like phosphorus and arsenic. But where gallium and arsenic are in the
same period as germanium, boron is in a different period than silicon (period 2) while phosphorus is not
(period 3). Thus aluminum (Al) is in boron’s place. This results in an interesting equation.

Si(A s − G a) + G e(P − Al ) 2B
=
SiG e G e + Si

The differential across germanium crossed with silicon plus the differential across silicon crossed with
germanium normalized by the product between silicon and germanium is equal to the boron divided by
the average between the germanium and the silicon. The equation has nearly 100% accuracy:

28.09(74.92 − 69.72) + 72.61(30.97 − 26.98) 2(10.81)

=
(28.09)(72.61) (72.61 + 28.09)

0.213658912 = 0.21469712

0.213658912
= 0.995
0.21469712
We found (Beardsley, Mathematical Structure, 2020) that the differential across silicon (P-Al)
times germanium (Ge) over boron (B) plus the differential across germanium (As-Ga) times
silicon (Si) over boron (B) was equal to the harmonic mean between Si and Ge. This was
interesting because aluminum is used as what I called a dummy doping agent element, which
when inserted predicts the actually doping agent boron, that seems out of place in the periodic
table where the core artificial intelligence elements are concerned. This is written:

Si Ge 2SiG e
(A s − G a) + (P − Al ) =
B B Si + G e

I find it interesting that the AI elements can be pulled out in a 3X3 matrix because the AI elements seem
to be core to everything in the Universe. I wrote earlier:

00002: It may be we can only understand biological life relative to some other construct, like artificial
intelligence.
 5 of 20

Stokes Theorem states:

∫S ∮C
⇀ ⇀ ⇀ ⇀
(∇ × u ) ⋅ dS = u ⋅dr

⇀ ⇀
i j⃗ k
⇀
∇×u = ∂ ∂ ∂
∂x ∂y ∂z
u1 u 2 u3

i⃗ j⃗ k⃗
∂ ∂ ∂ Si
∂x ∂y ∂z = (As − G a) i ⃗
B
Si Si
0 B
(G a)z B
(As)y

i⃗ j⃗ k⃗
∂ ∂ ∂ Ge
∂x ∂y ∂z = (P − Al ) j ⃗
B
Ge Ge
B
(Al )z 0 B
(P)x

u ⃗ = (u1, u 2, u3) v ⃗ = (v1, v2, v3)

(G a)z j ⃗ + (As)y k ⃗
Si Si
u ⃗ = 0i ⃗ +
B B

(G a)z j ⃗ + (As)y k ⃗
Si Si
u ⃗ = 0i ⃗ +
B B
We know the harmonic mean H of a function is

1
H= b
1
∫
b−a a
f (x)−1d x
And, that the arithmetic mean A of a function is
b
1
b − a ∫a
A= f (x)d x
We have

Si Ge Ge − Si
(As − G a) + (P − Al ) = Ge
B B ∫Si dxx
 6 of 20

But, we want to use Stokes theorem so we want the integral in the numerator. So, we make the
approximation

H≈A

And, we have

∫0 ∫0 [ B ]
1 1 Ge
Si Ge 1
Ge − Si ∫Si
(As − G a) + (P − Al ) d x d y ≈ xd x
B

But, this is only 80% accurate. We find it is very accurate if we say

4
f (x) = x
5
Which yields

∫0 ∫0 [ B ]
1 1
Si Ge 1 4 Ge
Ge − Si 5 ∫Si
(As − G a) + (P − Al ) d x d y ≈ xd x
B

We have by molar mass

Si 28.09
(G a) = (69.72) = 181.1688g /m ol
B 10.81
Ge 72.61
(Al ) = (26.98) = 181.2227g /m ol
B 10,81
Si 28.09
(As) = (74.92) = 194.68111g /m ol
B 10.81
Ge 72.61
= (30.97) = 208.02328g /m ol
B 10.81
Thus,…

u ⃗ = 181z j ⃗ + 195y k ⃗

v ⃗ = 181z i ⃗ + 208y k ⃗
 7 of 20

We can break up our integral into two integrals u, and v:

1 1 Ge
Si 1 1
∫0 ∫0 B 3 (Ge − Si ) ∫Si
(As − G a)d yd z ≈ xd x

1 1 Ge
Ge 2 1
∫0 ∫0 B 3 (Ge − Si ) ∫Si
(P − Al )d x d z ≈ yd y

Holding x constant and y constant in our u and v integrals we have subtle eclipses in the y-z
planes and x-z planes respectively:
 8 of 20

By Molar Mass
We found that the differential across silicon (P-Al) times germanium (Ge) over boron (B) plus the
differential across germanium (As-Ga) times silicon (Si) over boron (B) was equal to the
harmonic mean between Si and Ge. This was interesting because aluminum is used as what I
called a dummy doping agent element, which when inserted predicts the actually doping agent
boron, that seems out of place in the periodic table where the core artificial intelligence
elements are concerned. This is written:

Si Ge 2SiGe
(As − G a) + (P − Al ) =
B B Si + Ge
 9 of 20

By Density

We ask if the asymmetry in the AI elements in the periodic table due to boron results in a
dynamic equation by molar mass, then does it as well by density? While molar mass is due to the
composition of elements, density is due to the balance between the strong nuclear force holding
protons together balanced by their electric forces that are mutually repulsive.

The density of boron is 2.340 grams per cubic centimeter, that of phosphorus (white
phosphorus) is 1.88 grams per cubic centimeter and gallium is 5.904 grams per cubic centimeter.
 10 of 20

Arsenic is 5.7 grams per cubic centimeter, germanium is 5.323 grams per cubic centimeter and
aluminum is 2.7 grams per cubic centimeter. We have the following scenario:

Again we see boron breaks the symmetry in that period three densities are on the same order and
period 4 densities are on the same order, but that of boron is almost the same as silicon in period
three. We see that semiconductor material Si is the the average between doping agent P and
would be doping agent aluminum that takes the place of boron and, that, the average doping
agent Ga and semiconductor material Ge is approximately the average of doping agent As. Thus
we have:

Ga-As=0.204 (differential across Ge)

Al-P=0.82 (dummy differential across Si)

Si~B

Ge/Si~B

Si
(0.82) = 0.816
B
Ge
(0.204) = 0.464
B
0.816
= 1.7586
0.464

GeSi = 3.52

3.52
= 1.76 ≈ 1.7586
2
 11 of 20

(Al − P) GeSi
B≈ Ge
G a − As 2
Si + P
2≈
2
And, we have

2Ge(G a − As)
B≈ GeSi
Si(Al − P) + P(Al − P)

The first factor takes the form of the harmonic mean between a and b, H:

2a b
H=
a+b

And the second term takes the form of the geometric mean between a and b, G:

G= ab

The equation is 94.68% accurate.

2(5.323)(5.904 − 5.7)
(5.323)(2.33) = 2.2155
2.33(2.7 − 1.88) + 1.88(2.7 − 1.88)
2.2155
= 94.68
2.340
Aluminum, while a dummy in the equation used to arrive at the dynamics due to asymmetry by
way of boron actually is widely used in AI because it is a conductor, which makes it an electric
shield, so it can be used to enclose electrical circuitry to protect it from electric fields. Thus we
have the two equations by molar mass and density respectively:

2Ge(G a − As)
B≈ GeSi
Si(Al − P) + P(Al − P)

∫0 ∫0 [ B ]
1 1
Si Ge 1 4 Ge
Ge − Si 5 ∫Si
(As − G a) + (P − Al ) d x d y ≈ xd x
B

But

2Ge(G a − As)
B≈ GeSi
Si(Al − P) + P(Al − P)

Can be written
 12 of 20

B
[Si(Al − P) + P(Al − P)] ≈ GeSi
2Ge(G a − As)

But

GeSi

Is the geometric mean between Ge and Si. The geometric mean between a and b is given by:

( b − a ∫a )
1
G f¯ = ex p log f (x)d x

Thus our equation in terms of density can be put in integral form as well:

∫0 ∫0 [ 2Ge(G a − As) [ ]]
1 1 Ge

( Ge − Si ∫Si )
B 1
Si(Al − P) + P(Al − P) d x d y = ex p log(x)d x

And we see that this integral is correct:

5.323(ln(5.323) − 5.323) − 2.33(ln(2.33) − 2.33) = 3.936

3.936
= 1.315
5.323 − 2.33
e 1.315 = 3.725

Which is close to

(5.323)(2.33) = 3.52

3.52
= 0.945
3.725
94.5%
 13 of 20

By Atomic Radius

I then considered atomic radii of these elements.

14 of 20
 15 of 20

The atomic radii data varies some from source to source. Here I use data set 4 (previous page)
that is the average of respective values in data sets 1, 2, and 3. We have looked at molar mass,
and density and the dynamic relationships that result in terms of them do to the asymmetry
introduced into the AI elements in the periodic table. It is natural to look at radius next. It has a
lot to do with the structure and properties of the elements just like is true of the their molar
masses and densities.

Here we have the differential across Si, times Si/B plus the differential across Ge times Ge/B is
the golden ratio, phi, times the arithmetic mean between Si and Ge in atomic radius.

(Al-P)=143-116=36

(Ga-As)=19

(36)(115/88)=36(1.3)=46.8

19(123/88)=19(1.4)=26.6

46.8+26.6=73.4

(115+123)/2=119

119
= 1.62 ≈ Φ = 1.618
73.4
Si Ge Si + Ge
(Al − P) + (G a − As) =Φ
B B 2
The golden ratio and the golden ratio conjugate are the solution of the quadratic

(b)
2
a a a b
− − 1 = 0 that meets the conditions = and a=b+c

b b c

a 5−1 1
Where Φ = and ϕ = , ϕ= .
b 2 Φ
We have already said
b
1
b − a ∫a
f¯ = f (x)d x

Thus by radius the integral form of the equation is:

 16 of 20

∫0 ∫0 [ B ]
1 1 Ge
Si Ge Φ
Ge − Si ∫Si
(Al − P) + (G a − As) d xdy = xd x
B
 17 of 20

The Generalized Equation

Returning to the Asymmetry in the AI Periodic Table:

(As − G a) and (P − Al ) by molar mass or

(Al − P) and (Al − P) by density or

(Al − P) and (G a − As) by atomic radius

Are respectively ΔE1 and ΔE2

And, the ratios

Si Ge
and by molar mass or
B B
B B
Si and P by density or
2Ge(G a − As) 2Ge(G a − As)
Si Ge
and by atomic radius
B B
Are, quotients Q1, and Q2, respectively, then if

∇ = (ΔE1, ΔE2 )

Q = (Q1, Q2 )

And, since the geometric mean, arithmetic mean, quadratic mean (root mean square), harmonic
mean are special cases of the generalized mean:

1 n p p1
(n ∑ )
xi p= 0,1, 2, -1,…
i=1

Then the generalized form of our equations is:

1 n p p1
(n ∑ )
∇⋅Q =C xi
i=1

Where C is some constant. This is all the following equations:

 18 of 20

Si Ge Ge − Si
(As − G a) + (P − Al ) = Ge
B B ∫Si dxx

By molar mass.

∫0 ∫0 [ 2Ge(G a − As) [ ]
1 1 Ge

( Ge − Si ∫Si )
B 1
Si(Al − P) + P(Al − P)] d x d y = ex p log(x)d x

By density.

∫0 ∫0 [ B ]
1 1 Ge
Si Ge Φ
Ge − Si ∫Si
(Al − P) + (G a − As) d xdy = xd x
B

By atomic radius.

While this is the arithmetic mean when p=1, and the harmonic mean for p=-1, I have used it as
the geometric mean for p=0, which we can see explodes to infinity at zero. But, since I am a
physicist and not a mathematician, I assume taking the limit as p—->0 is the same as evaluating
it at zero. But, as physicists undergo courses of mathematics, I do understand how to present
equations in terms of the formalities of mathematics. The proper way to treat this as a
mathematician is, the limit as p goes to zero is the geometric mean because

∏
M 0(x1, …, xn ) = n xi
i=1

However we can generalize the equation to include the geometric mean without having to take
the limit as p goes to zero using the f-mean. We have:

1 n
(n ∑ )
−1
M f (x1, …x n ) = f ⋅ f (x i )
i=1

The power mean is obtained by letting

f (x) = x p

Thus, our equation becomes:

1 n
(n ∑ )
−1
∇ ⋅ Q = Cf ⋅ f (x i )
i=1

It is the geometric mean if

 19 of 20

f (x) = log(x)

00001: The properties of artificial intelligence substances form the basis of Universal Structure.

00002: It may be we can only understand biological life relative to some other construct, like artificial
intelligence.

00003: It is a purpose of biological life (C, N, O, H) to discover the properties of (P, B, Si) so it can make
computing machines which are ultimately necessary to its survival.

00004 That node manufacturing technology (semiconductors) is possible on this planet by way of
naturally occurring substances on this planet (Si, P, B) then the possibility exists that these elements have
such properties by intention outside of ourselves.

00005 That the semiconducting elements found on this planet have the same properties throughout the
Universe, and are in great abundance, would indicate they were not made expressly for humans.

00006: The problem is we don’t know what exists in the microcosmos, we must look at it with itself, we
must use the photon to look at the atom, and it is on the same order of magnitude, so it has to much of an
effect on it for determinism, hence the uncertainty principle saying we can’t know what is there, only the
probability of what is in a given region for a given time.

00007: I can see two scenarios here: One, since there are billions of galaxies, each with billions of stars
the probability for life to occur around a handful of them was high, and the Sun is one of these stars. Or
two, The algorithm put in place was for the Big Bang to create hydrogen, then that condensed into stars
which made from it carbon throughout the universe, and having four valence electrons, it could form with
the hydrogen in long chains, the hydrocarbons, from which DNA synthesized proteins, and life arose
across the universe as a single uniform idea throughout. Elements like silicon have four valence electrons
as well but, are more suitable for making artificial intelligence when doped with phosphorus and boron…
 20 of 20

The Author