Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Casing Design PDF
Casing Design PDF
CASING DESIGN
Types of Casing
the total desired depth. Some of the strings are as follows (Figure 3-1).
-drive or structural
-conductor
-surface
-liners
-tubing
The first string run or placed in the well is usually the drive pipe or
conductor casing. The normal depth range is from 100-300 ft. In soft-rock
areas the pipe is hammered into the ground with large diesel hammer. Hard-rock
areas require that a large diameter shallow hole be drilled before running and
cementing the well. A primary purpose of this string of pipe is to provide a fluid
38
conduit from the bit to the surface. An additional function of this string of pipe
39
Structural Casing:
between the drive pipe and surface casing. Typical depth range from 600-1000
ft. Purpose of this pipe includes solving additional lost circulation or hole caving
Surface Casing:
-support the weight of all casing strings (except liners) run below the surface pipe.
Intermediate Casing:
formation pressures. Since higher mud weights are required to control these
circulation or stuck pipe. It is used to isolate salt zones or zones those cause
40
Liners:
Drilling liners are used for the same purpose of intermediate casing.
Instead of running the pipe to the surface, an abbreviated string is used from
the bottom of the hole to a shallower depth inside the intermediate pipe. Usually
the overlap between the two strings is 300-500 ft. Drilling liners are used
control without the expense of running a string to the surface. When a liner is
used, the upper exposed casing, usually intermediate pipe, must be evaluated
with respect to burst and collapse pressures for drilling the open hole below the
liner.
Production Casing:
The production casing is often called the oil string. The pipe may be set at
a depth slightly above, or below the pay zone. The pipe has the following
purposes:
41
Grade:
The pipe grade is the designation that defines the pipe’s yield strength
and certain special characteristics. The grade usually consists of a letter and a 2
or 3 digit number such as N-80. As the letter proceeds, the pipe increases in
yield strength. N-80 has greater yield strength than H-40. The numerical code
indicates the minimum yield strength of 80,000 psi. The average yield strength
is usually 10,000 psi greater than the minimum yield, 90,000 psi for N-80 pipe.
The minimum value is used in burst and collapse resistance calculations, whereas
the average is used for biaxial evaluation. C pipe is a controlled yield pipe used
primarily in environments.
Weight:
The pipe weight is usually defined in pounds per foot. The calculated
WL = (Wpc L ) + ew
L = length of pipe, ft
The cross-sectional area of the pipe can be approximated from the pipe weight;
Ap = 0.29 Wpc
42
Range:
Diameter:
The drilling engineer must consider three types of diameter data when
planning the tubular program. These are outer, inner and drift diameter.
Burst:
The burst rating of the casing is the amount of internal pressure that the
pipe can withstand prior to failure. The internal yield pressure for pipe is
Example 3-1:
Calculate the internal yield (burst) pressure for 26.40 lb/ft, N-80, 7.625
inch pipe. Assume it has a wall thickness (t) of 0.328 inch. Use the API minimum
43
wall thickness factor of 0.875. Recalculate the results and use 95 % wall
thickness.
Solution:
P = 6020 psi
P = 6540 psi
Example 3-2:
A drilling engineer must design a production casing string for sour gas
service. The maximum anticipated surface pressure for the 5.5 inch OD pipe is
20800 psi. The engineer’s company dictates that pipe used in sour service will
not have a yield strength greater than 90,000 psi. After the engineer reviewed
the available, commonly used weights and grades of casing, he realized that the
string must be specially rolled to meet his requirements. Determine the wall
thickness requirements for the pipe. Use the yield strength of 90,000 psi and
assume that the API tolerance of 87.5 % wall thickness. Round up the wall
44
Solution:
Collapse:
vary depending on the D/t ratio. The collapse resistance is separated into four
categories.
b) plastic collapse
c) transition collapse
d) elastic collapse
The D/t range must be evaluated and the proper equation must be
strength collapse pressure is not a true collapse pressure, rather the external
pressure (Pyp) that generates minimum yield stress (Yp) on the inside wall of a
tube.
45
The formula for yield strength collapse pressure is applicable for D/t
The applicable D/t ratios for yield strength collapse are given in Table-11-6.
The minimum collapse pressure for the plastic range of collapse (Pp) is
calculated as:
Pp = Yp [ (A / (D/t)) – B ] – C
The formula for minimum plastic collapse pressure is applicable for D/t
values ranging from (D/t)pt to the intersection for (D/t)t, transition collapse
Example 3-3:
An engineer must calculate the collapse rating for the following section of
pipe. Using the API tables and equations, calculate the collapse pressure to the
nearest 10 psi.
Grade: N-80
Weight: 47 lb/ft
Solution:
46
1-Determine the D/t ratio:
D = 20.392 inch
From Table:
A = 3.071 : B = 0.0667:
C = 1955
Pp = Yp [ (A / (D/t)) – B ] – C
Pp = 4756 psi
The minimum collapse pressure for the plastic to elastic transition zone (Pt)
is calculated:
(Pt) = Yp [F /(D/t) – G]
The minimum collapse pressure for the elastic range of collapse is calculated as:
Example 3-4:
The collapse rating for 47.0 lb/ft, C-95 grade, 9.625 inch pipe must be
calculated. The wall thickness is unknown. Use the API formulas and tables.
47
Solution:
Ap = 0.29 Wp
Ap = 13.63 inch2
2.Determine the wall thickness of the pipe from the cross sectional area.
ID = 8.676 inch
t = (OD –ID) / 2
t = (9.625 – 8.676) / 2
t = 0.4745 inch
4. The formula for C-95 pipe with a D/t ratio of 20.284 are:
Pp = Yp [ (A / (D/t)) – B ] – C
Pp = 5168 psi
48
Axial Stress:
equivalent grade:
Example 3-5:
The engineer must calculate the collapse pressure for the following pipe
characteristics.
0.362 inch
Solution:
2. D/t = ?
49
Pp = Yp [ (A / (D/t)) – B ] – C
Pp = 5742 psi
The pipe body strength is the axial load required to yield the pipe. It is
the product of the cross-sectional area and the specified minimum yield
Example 3-6:
has a wall thickness of 0.495 inch. Determine the pipe body yield strength.
Solution:
ID = OD – 2t
ID = 10.75 – 2 (0.495)
ID = 9.76 inch
Py = 1,275,000 psi
50
Setting Depth Selection for Intermediate and Deeper Strings:
Setting depth selection should be made for the deepest strings to be run
in the well and then successfully designed from the bottom string to the
surface.
-The first criteria for selecting deeper casing depths are to let mud weights
if the casing string will become stuck when running it into the well. These
-The initial design step is to establish the projected formation pressures and
fracture gradients. In fig. 3-2a, a 15.6 ppg formation pressure exists at the
hole bottom. To reach this depth, well-bore pressures greater than 15.6 ppg will
-The pressures that must be considered include a trip margin of mud weight to
pressures associated with running the casing, and a safety factor. These
pressures usually range from 0.2 –0.3 ppg, respectively, and may vary due to
mud viscosity and hole geometry. Therefore, the actual pressures at the bottom
51
of the well include the mud weight required to control the 15.6 ppg pore
pressure and the 0.6 - 0.9 ppg mud weight increases from the swab, surge and
-As a result, formation exhibiting fracture gradients less than 16.5 ppg or less
(15.6 ppg + 0.9 ppg) must be protected with casing. The depth at which this
depth.
52
-The next step is to determine if pipe sticking will occur when running the
casing. Pipe sticking generally can occur at the point where the maximum
differential pressures are encountered. In most cases, this depth is the deepest
-Field studies have been used to establish general values for the amount of
The following equations can be used to determine the new intermediate depth if
sticking is a concern.
P = (MW – 9) x 0.052 x D
(P / 0.052 D) + 9 = MW
An arbitrary limit of 2000-2300 psi is normally used for P. The mud weight
from above equation can be used to locate the depth where the P value will
exists.
MW – TM = P
53
The depth at which the formation pressure, P, occurs is defined as the
new intermediate pipe depth. The deepest liner setting depth is established
procedure subtract the swab, surge and safety factors from the fracture
sections of the hole. The depth at which this pressure is encountered becomes
Example 3-7
Use Fig. 3-3 to select liner and intermediate setting depths. Assume a
differential pressure limit of 2200 psi. Use the following design factors.
Solution:
1.From Fig. 3-3, the maximum equivalent mud weight that will be seen at the
54
2.Construct a vertical line to intersect the fracture gradient curve (Fig. 3-3a).
The depth of intersection, 13000 ft, is the tentative intermediate casing setting
depth. All shallower formations must be protected with casing because their
3.Evaluate the tentative depth for differential sticking by assuming that 14.3
Since 2480 psi > 2200 psi, intermediate pipe can not safely run to 13,000 ft.
55
4. The intermediate pipe depth is:
P = (MW – 9) x 0.052 x D
MW = 13.7 ppg
MW – TM = P
13.7 – 0.3 = P
P = 13.4 ppg
From Fig. 3-3b, a 13.4 ppg formation pressure occurs at 10,900 ft.
5.The deepest possible setting depth for the liner is determined by evaluating
What is the maximum formation pressure below 10,900 ft and that can
56
Figure 3-3 (a) Tentative intermediate setting depth (b) Intermediate
depth
From Fig. 3-3c, a 16.3 ppg formation pressure occurs at 16300 ft. The
depth is defined as the deepest allowable depth for setting the liner.
57
Figure 3-3 (c) Selection of the deepest liner depth (d) Final
configuration
58
Surface Casing Depth Selection:
Example 3-8:
59
Figure 3-4 (a) Intermediate casing evaluation,
(b) Equivalent mud weight-fracture gradient relationship
60
A vertical line from 12.8 ppg intersects the fracture gradient in normal region,
sticking is a problem.
2. Assume that 12.3 ppg will be used at the bottom of the well and determine if
Since 1544 psi is less than the arbitrary limit of 2200 psi intermediate casing
will not be used for pipe sticking considerations. Therefore, only surface casing
is required.
3. Construct the fracture gradient curve to determine the depth at which the
fracture exceeds the kick loading mud weight. Perform a first trial calculations
at 1000 ft.
The fracture gradient at 1000 ft is 12.0 ppg. Since the kick loading is greater
61
4. Results from several iterations are given below and plotted on Fig. 3-4b.
Example 3.9
Use Fig. 2-3a, to determine the proper setting depth for intermediate
pipe.Assume 0.3 ppg factor for swab and surge and a 0.2 ppg safety factor. Use
a arbitrary maximum limit of 2200 psi differential pressure for normal pressure
zones.
Solution:
62
2. Determine the formations that can not withstand 16.4 ppg pressures, i.e.
those formations must be protected with casing. Construct a vertical line from
16.4 ppg to an intersection of the fracture gradient line (Fig. 2-2b). The depth
example.
problem when running the casing to 8600 ft. The mud required to reach 8600 ft
is,
Since the pipe can be run to 8600 ft without differential sticking, the depth
becomes the actual intermediate setting depth rather than the tentative depth.
pressure exceeds the 3000-3300 psi range. In this case, pressure is 2700 psi
at 8600 ft.
63
Design of a Complete Casing String
section used in order to obtain a string which will satisfy the desired design
factors with the least investment. Thus the starting point for a design is a
statement of the weights and grades of easing available, together with the
that the physical properties almost universally considered are joint strength,
Once the available casing and the design factors to be used have been
determined, all grades and weights of casing which will not meet the
requirements for internal yield are eliminated. It will be called that the worst
possible conditions are used in determining loading data. In line with this, the
Pws, and the external pressure is assumed to be zero. Thus the minimum
allowable internal yield strength for the casing to be used in the string is,
Pi = Pws Ni
For casing which will meet the requirements for internal yield, the controlling
factor in the lower portions of the string is collapse pressure, and the controlling
64
factor in the upper portions of thie string is joint strength (or, possibly,
due to the external fluid column, and that the internal pressure is zero.
Accordingly, the lowest section of the casing string will be composed of casing of
the least expensive weight and grade which will satisfy the equation;
Pc = 0.052 Nc Ls
where, Ls is the setting depth for the casing and is the density (in ppg) of the
external fluid column. The factor 0.052 ( 0.433 / 8.33) is the pressure
gradient of tlic fluid column. In determining setting depths for sections other
than the lowest, the effect on collapse pressure of longitudinal tension must be
solutions.
controlling factor in casing string design. From this point to the top of the
string, the primary considerations are joint strength and longitudinal yielding.
Fj = W Nj
Ym Aj = W Na
consideration.
65
Example 3-10
Design a 7 inch 8000 ft. combination casing string for a well where the
mud weight is 12 ppg and the expected formation pressure gradient is 0.5 psi/ft,
using a worst possible loading assumptions. All weights of API casing in grades J-
55 and N-80 are available. The design factors to be satisfied are 1.125 for
collapse, 2.00 for joint strength, 1.25 for yield strength and 1.00 for internal
Solution:
The available casings are listed below. In case the reservoir pressure is
The minimum internal yield for any section of the string must be:
Pi = Pws x Ni
66
Grade Weight Pi Pc K Fj s Fj s Ym Aj
0 0
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
This requirement excludes the use of 20 lb, J-55 casing (that has an internal
yield pressure of 3740 psi) at any point in the string. Since all other weights and
grades have internal yield pressure greater than 4000 psi, they are retained for
67
further considerations. The lowest section of the string will consist of the least
Pc = 0.052 Nc Ls
will consist of 29 lb,- N-80 casing with long threads and coupling. The length
of section-1 is limited (physically) only by the axial load which can be sustained
Wmax = Fj / Nj
Wmax = Ym Aj / Na
which is greater than the setting depth. The next lowest section (hereafter
called Section-2) will consist of next lighter casing, namely, 26 lb, N-80 casing
with long threads and coupling. Neglecting the effect of axial tension, (due to
68
the weight of Section-1 suspended below it) the setting depth of Section-2 is,
Ls = Pc / (0.052 Nc )
This is the first assumed setting depth of Section-2. Under this assumption, the
Ls = Pc / (0.052 Nc )
This is the second assumed setting depth of Section-2. Under this assumption,
and hence,
69
Pcc = 5320 / 1,283,000 [(SQRT 1.646 x 1012 – 0.606 x 109) – 14,210]
The weight of Section-1 and the collapse pressure of Section-2 are, under this
assumption is 14,790 lb and 5260 psi respectively. The resulting setting depth
agrees with the third assumed setting depth of 7490 ft, which is thus taken to
be correct setting depth for Section-2. Also, for Section-2 the maximum joint
load is:
Wmax = Ym Aj / Na
Since the weight of casing suspended below section-2 is 14,790 lb, the
which is greater than the setting depth. Section-3 will consist of 23 lb N-80
casing with long threads and couplings, which has an uncorrected collapse
pressure of 4300 psi. Again neglecting the effect of axial tension due to the
70
weights of Sections 1 & 2, the first assumed setting depth for Section-3 is:
Ls = Pc / (0.052 Nc )
From which the second assumed setting depth for Section-3 is:
Ls = Pc / (0.052 Nc )
By continuing trial and error procedure, the setting depth for Section-3 is
calculated to be 5780 ft. For this setting depth, the total weights of section 1
and 2 are 59200 lb and the collapse pressure of Section-3 is 4060 psi.
71
The maximum allowable joint load for Section-3 is:
which is again greater than the setting depth. Thus collapse pressure continues
to be the controlling factor, and will determine the setting depth of Section-4.
The least expensive of the remaining grades and weights is 26 lb, J-55 casing
with short thread and couplings, and this will constitute Section-4. The setting
depth of Section-4 is found by trial and error to be 5310 ft, and the total
weight of Sections 1,2 and 3 is 71,400 lb, and the collapse pressure of
Section-4 is 3730 psi. The maximum allowable joint and yield loads for Section-
4 are, respectively:
72
Since 3890 ft is less than the allowable setting depth of Section-4, the
setting depth for Section-5 is governed not by collapse pressure but by joint
strength. Section-5 composed of 26 lb, J-55 casing with long threads and
For Section-5 maximum allowable joint and yield loads are, respectively.
and,
It is obvious that Section-6 must consist of casing with a joint strength greater
than that of Sction-5 (i.e. greater than 395,000 lb). No weight of J-55 casing
will satisfy this requirement, and we therefore must use 23 lb, N-80 casing with
long threads and couplings. For section-6, allowable joint and yield loads are,
respectively.
73
400,000 / 2.00 = 200,000 lb
Section-7 must consist of casing with a joint strength greater than 400,000 lb.
The obvious choice is 26 lb, N-80 casing with long threads and couplings. For
this casing the maximum joint and yield loads are 230,000 lb and 384,000 lb
Since this is greater than the allowable setting depth of Section-7, this section
74
Section Interval. ft Length, ft Grade Weight Coupling
8000
7490
5780
Example 3-11:
combination string using the collapse design chart for 7 inch casing?
Solution:
Section-1 consist of 29 lb, N-80 casing. Section-3 consist of 26 lb, N-80 casing.
Neglecting the effect of axial loading, Ls for Section-2 is 91,000 lb (Figure 3-
5). Therefore:
Ls = 91,000 / 12 = 7580 ft
75
This is the first assumed setting depth. On this assumption, the axial load on
Section-2 is:
From Fig. 3-5, Ls = 90000, and the second assuming setting depth is:
and within the limits to which the chart can be read, Ls , is again 90,000. Thus
76