Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s12205-011-0969-3
www.springer.com/12205
···································································································································································································································
Abstract
Similarity simulation of induced joints is a key technical problem arising from failure mechanism study of Roller Compacted
Concrete (RCC) arch dams with induced joints by using physical model test. This paper proposes an original fracture mechanics-
based method for simulating induced joints in physical model test and presents results obtained from model test of Shapai RCC arch
dam in Sichuan Province, China. Test was performed to obtain values of fracture toughness of prototype (RCC) and model (gypsum)
materials. The relation between fracture toughness and stress intensity factor of induced joint was analyzed, and crack propagation
condition and physical model simulation method of induced joint were proposed. The proposed induced-joint simulation method was
applied in the model test of Shapai arch dam; the anticipated effect of induced joints to reduce tensile stress was confirmed and the
cracking process, the failure pattern and mechanism of Shapai RCC arch dam were obtained. These results provided valuable data for
the engineering design and construction of Shapai RCC arch dam, which survived Wenchuan Earthquake of May 12, 2008 without
suffering any damage. Its sound performance resulted directly from the well-thought design, which greatly benefited from these
comprehensive investigations.
Keywords: high RCC arc dam, induced joint, fracture property, similarity simulation, failure mechanism, Wenchuan Earthquake
···································································································································································································································
*Associate Professor, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan Uni-
versity, Chengdu 610065, China (E-mail: chenyuan8899@163.com)
**Professor, State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University,
Chengdu 610065, China (Corresponding Author, E-mail: zhanglin_scdx@163.com)
***Lecturer, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (E-mail: jianyechen@163.com)
****Professor, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (E-mail: lichaoguo@163.com)
*****Senior Experimentalist, College of Water Resources and Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China (E-mail: yagg_727@163.com)
− 327 −
Yuan Chen , Lin Zhang Jianye Chen Chaoguo Li, and Chengqiu Hu
been systematically studied to assure their safety during extreme 2. Description of Shapai RCC Arch Dam
loading conditions including earthquakes.
As most RCC arch dams are constructed or being constructed Shapai RCC arch dam is located on Chaopo River, Aba Tibetan-
in China, research activities on induced joint concentrate mainly Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China. As
in China; relevant reports in other countries are relatively rare shown in Fig. 1, it is a single-curvature arch dam consisting of
and mostly focused on its engineering applications. In China, a three arcs. With a height of 132 m, it is one of the highest RCC
number of studies have been carried out to investigate the arch dam in the world.
working mechanism and effects of the induced joint. Zeng et al. According to the construction schedule, dam body above EL.
(1996) and Zeng and Ma (1998) proposed a model for evaluating 1810 m was to be poured in high temperature months. In this part
the equivalent strength and presented criteria for identifying of dam, the tensile stress distribution due to thermal effects would
cracking of induced joint, and conducted fracture mechanics- extend remarkably if only dealt with by induced joints. It is also
based numerical assessment of cracking in induced joint. Huang necessary to use transverse joints in the upper-middle part of the
et al. (2000) proposed a model for evaluating the equivalent dam to reduce the adverse effects of thermal stress. After
fracture strength of induced joints, and simulated cracking of comparison of various combinations of induced joints and
induced joints during construction and operation periods for a transverse joints, a plan consisting of two induced joints and two
RCC arch dam, and others (Liu et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2005) transverse joints, as shown in Fig. 2, was chosen for further study.
have presented modifications to this model. Zhao et al. (1995)
proposed a rigidity-load method, and adopted the total stress- 3. Fracture tests
strain relation for concrete and three-segment strain-softening
curve to analyze typical structures of induced joint in RCC arch 3.1 Material and Preparation of Specimens
dams. Gu (2005) investigated the working mechanism and Gypsum is chosen as the model material for simulating roller-
effects of induced joints by a nonlinear method based on linear compacted concrete for two reasons: (1) its Poisson’s ratio is
elastic fracture mechanics and a virtual fracture model. approximately equal to that of concrete and rock, and (2) its
The studies mentioned above mainly focused on numerical Young’s modulus can be easily modified in a large range by
simulation of induced joints. Physical model test is an important adjusting water-gypsum ratio. In order to study the similarity of
alternate to numerical simulation and can be combined with
numerical analysis to conduct comprehensive analyses of major
engineering problems and provide insight for engineering design.
Except many fracture tests on the specimens with induced joints
have been reported (Huang et al., 2010; Bi et al., 2009; Zhang
and Ye 2006; Wei and Liu 2005), there are little literatures
introducing model tests of RCC arch dams with induced joints
(Peng et al., 2008; Wang, 1998; Li et al., 1996). And in these few
model tests, the induced joints were simulated only by the
geometry similarity condition. This test method is not proper. To
study the cracking and failure mechanism of RCC arch dams
with induced joints, the similarity simulation of cracking pro-
perties of induced joints is very important. Therefore, the key
problems involved in this experimental study include theoretical
basis for similarity simulation of induced joints and test methods.
This paper proposes an original fracture mechanics-based Fig. 1. Plan and Section of Shapai RCC Arch Dam: (a) Plan, (b)
similarity simulation method for conducting model testing of Crown Section
structures with induced joints and presents results obtained from
physical modelling of a RCC arch dam. In order to develop a
similarity simulation technique, fracture tests were performed to
obtain the fracture toughness of prototype material (RCC) and
model material (gypsum). The relation between material fracture
toughness and stress intensity factor of induced joint was analyzed
based on fracture mechanics theory, and the cracking similarity
conditions and simulation method of induced joint were proposed.
With the proposed similarity simulation technique, a comprehen-
sive experimental study on failure mechanism of Shapai RCC arch
dam was carried out. In the end, this dam’s performance during
Wenchuan Earthquake of May 12, 2008 is summarized. Fig. 2. Joint Distribution in Shapai RCC Arch Dam
Fracture behaviour was obtained by three-point bending test. model material gypsum, designated as KICm, increases from 0.02
Typical load P vs. loading-point deflection ä curves for RCC and to 0.0671 MN/m3/2 as m decreases from 1.90:1 to 1.05:1.
gypsum specimens are shown in Fig. 4.
According to Refai and Swartz (1988), the mode I fracture 3.3 Modified Fracture Toughness of RCC Considering the
toughness values KIC can be calculated by the following formula: Size Effect
Many studies conclude that there is a prominent size effect on
PmaxL ⎛ s ⎞
KIC = -------------- f ----
3⁄2 ⎝ ⎠
(1) the fracture toughness of concrete (Barr et al., 1985). Fracture
WH H
1⁄2
toughness generally increases with specimen size until the
s s s 3⁄2 s 5⁄2
f ⎛ ----⎞ = 2.9 ⎛ ----⎞ – 4.6 ⎛ ----⎞ + 21.8⎛ ----⎞ dimension reaches 2.0×2.0×2.0 m (Width×Height×Length) (Xu
⎝ H⎠ ⎝ H⎠ ⎝ H⎠ ⎝ H⎠
and Zhao, 1991). Therefore, the experimental values obtained
s 7⁄2 s 9⁄2
– 37.6 ⎛ ----⎞ + 38.7 ⎛ ----⎞ (2) from fracture test should be modified to reflect the size effect.
⎝ H⎠ ⎝ H⎠
Based on an experimental study on a large number of specimens
where, Pmax is the final critical load of crack propagation, taken with different sizes, Xu and Zhao (1991) propose that the fracture
as the maximum load measured in the fracture test; L=0.4 m; toughness of a specimen with H = 2.0 m and s = 1.0 m is 1.9 times
W=0.1 m; H=0.1 m; and s=0.05 m. that of a specimen with H =0.1 m and s = 0.05 m. This conclusion
The fracture toughness values of RCC and gypsum specimens was used to modify the values of KICp obtained from testing of
calculated by Eqs. (1) and (2) based on experimental data are smaller samples. The modified values of KICp range from 0.84 to
1.10 MN/m3/2, with an average K'ICp of 0.97 MN/m3/2.
Table 1. Fracture Test Results of Prototype and Model Materials where, KIp , KICp are the stress intensity factor and fracture
RCC Gypsum toughness of prototype induced joint, respectively; KIm , KICm are
the stress intensity factor and fracture toughness of model
Pmax KICp Pmax KICm
No. No. m induced joint, respectively; and CKI, CKIC are the ratio of stress
(N) (MN/m3/2) (N) (MN/m3/2)
I-1 1440.0 0.501 II- 1 1.10:1 182.11 0.0610
intensity factor and fracture toughness, respectively.
The stress intensity factor KI of induced joint is related to the
I-2 1289.5 0.456 II- 2 1.05:1 216.06 0.0671
magnitude of load, joint dimension and configuration, etc. It can
I-3 1340.0 0.474 II- 3 1.32:1 131.30 0.0443 be calculated by the following equation (Murakami, 1987):
I-4 1250.0 0.442 II- 4 1.60:1 81.58 0.0275
πa
K1 = σ 2b ⋅ tan ⎛ ------⎞ (7)
I-5 1259.0 0.445 II- 5 1.90:1 59.34 0.0200 ⎝ 2b⎠
I-6 1323.0 0.468
where, 2a and 2b are the length and spacing of induced joint,
I-7 1640.0 0.579 respectively; and σ is the normal stress on the induced joint
I-8 1500.0 0.530 surface. A schematic of the induced joint is shown in Fig. 6.
By using Eq. (7), the stress intensity factors of prototype and
model induced joint can be expressed as:
interrupted plate with equal joint length and joint spacing. The
πa
configuration of the induced joints is shown in Fig. 5. KIP = σp 2bp ⋅ tan ⎛ --------p⎞ = Fp σp π ap (8a)
⎝ 2bp⎠
These discontinuous joints form a group of macro-cracks with
certain orientation in the dam, which can be simplified as 2b πa
Fp = --------p ⋅ tan ⎛ --------p⎞ (8b)
Category I crack. When the load increases, stress concentrates at π ap ⎝ 2bp⎠
the joint tip, causing initial cracking at the joints. According to
πa
fracture mechanics, stress intensity factor is an effective para- KIm = σm 2bm ⋅ tan ⎛ --------m-⎞ = Fm σm π am (9a)
⎝ 2bm⎠
meter to reflect the magnitude of stress field at the joint tip, and
therefore its value is an indicator of crack instability. Once the 2b πa
Fm = --------m- ⋅ tan ⎛ --------m-⎞ (9b)
stress intensity factor KI reaches a critical value, i.e. fracture π am ⎝ 2bm⎠
toughness KIC, the crack enters to an unstable state and may start
where, Fp, Fm are the finite width modification coefficients for
to propagate. The crack propagation condition of Category I
prototype and model induced joint, respectively. Substituting
crack is described as (Xu and Zhao, 1991):
Eqs. (8) and (9) into Eq. (6), the ratio of stress intensity factor can
KI = KIC (3) be calculated as:
To conform to the similarity principle of crack propagation in KIp Fp σp π ap 1⁄2
CKI = -------
- = -------------------------- = CF Cσ Ca (10)
the model test, the ratios of stress intensity factor and fracture KIm Fm σm πam
toughness of prototype and model induced joints must be the
same: where, CF is the ratio of the finite width modified coefficients; Cσ
is the ratio of normal stress; and Ca is the ratio of joint length.
KIp = KICp (4) Thus, the similarity condition of crack propagation of induced
KIm = KICm (5) joint can be described as:
KIp KICp
CKI = -------
- = ---------- = CKIC (6) CKI = CKIC = CF ⋅ Cσ ⋅ Ca
1⁄2
(11)
KIm KICm
above, material of induced joint should also conform to the joint length and spacing. Based on the similarity condition of
similarity condition of shear strength. The shear strength on the crack propagation and the length and spacing of prototype joints,
joint surface can be described as (Fumagalli, 1973): the model joint length 2am and spacing 2bm were found to be
approximately 40 and 120 mm, respectively. With these model
τ = fσ + c (12)
joint parameters, CKI was found to be 16.7, which is very close to
where, τ is the shear strength; σ is the normal stress; f is the CKIC, indicating the crack propagation similarity condition is
coefficient of friction; and c is the cohesion. According to the satisfied. The size and fracture properties determined based on
similarity theory of model test, the similarity condition of shear the geometry and crack propagation similarity conditions are
strength is expressed as: summarized in Table 2.
the lower part of dam; that at the arch crown was greater than
that in the ends of the arch. The radial deformation was greater
than the tangential; the max radial deformation, i.e. 34.2 mm,
was found on the arch crown of the crest.
2. With regard to the distribution of principal stresses on the
upstream dam face under normal load, the principal com-
pressive stress mainly occurred in the arch crown, and the
principal tensile stress mainly occurred at the abutment. The
max principal compressive and tensile stresses were 3.34 MPa
(EL. 1810 m, arch crown) and -1.74 MPa (EL. 1790 m, the
left abutment), respectively.
3. As for the distribution of principal stress on the downstream
Fig. 8. A Perspective View of the Model Dam
dam face under normal load, the principal compressive stress
mainly occurred in the abutment, and the principal tensile
stress mainly occurred at the arch crown. The max principal
compressive stress and tensile stress were 6.04 MPa (EL. 1770
m, the right abutment) and -1.73 MPa (EL. 1770 m, arch
crown), respectively.
4. In the failure test of Shapai arch dam, the max load reached at
3.2P0. The overloading safety factor of Shapai dam is assessed
as 3.2.
5. The cracking process and the failure pattern were obtained.
Cracks initiated in the lower-middle part of downstream dam
Fig. 9. Layout of Strain and Deformation Measurement in the face, and propagated upwards. No. 2 and 3 induced joints
Model Test initially fractured at El. 1790 m. Three main cracks were ob-
(similar to Modified Mercalli Intensity scale). Yet, there were no simply by the geometry similarity condition. Instead, it should
comprehensive seismic studies conducted on this project due to be determined according to the similarity condition of crack
its presumed low design intensity. Reservoir was around normal propagation.
operation level during the earthquake. This dam was a major 6. Considering combined effects of friction and cohesion on the
safety concern immediately after the earthquake. shear strength, the joint surface can be simulated by copper
Aerial photo and site inspection conducted at the post- sheet wrapped with polyester film to satisfy the similarity con-
earthquake reconnaissance revealed that one of the ruptured dition of shear strength.
subfaults was only 10 km away from the dam site. Fortunately, 7. In the failure test of Shapai RCC arch dam, the similarity
no apparent damages were found on the dam and foundation; simulation of induced joint was realized in the model, the
abutment reaction body was stable; only local shallow rock effects of induced joints on tensile stress reduction and irre-
loosening or sliding was observed. Fig. 12 shows views from gular thermal crack control were confirmed. In addition, the
downstream and upstream of Shapai arch dam after the structure property, overloading safety factor, failure process
earthquake. No cracking was found at the locations of induced and pattern of the high RCC arch dam were obtained. The
and transverse joints after careful inspection; there was almost no failure mechanism of the high RCC arch dam with induced
noticeable damage found on other part of the dam. It can be joints was revealed. These results provide a scientific basis for
concluded that Shapai arch dam survived Wenchuan Earthquake design and construction of this project.
without suffering any damage. 8. Shapai arch dam survived Wenchuan Earthquake without
Without any special anti-seismic research and design, the suffering any damage; no cracks were found at the locations of
superb overload capacity and seismic resistance of Shapai arch induced and transverse joints. Its sound performance resulted
dam performed in Wenchuan Earthquake resulted directly from directly from the well-thought engineering design and high-
the well-thought engineering design and high-quality construc- quality construction, which greatly benefited from those com-
tion, which greatly benefited from those comprehensive investi- prehensive investigations. The superb performance of Shapai
gations, as discussed by Chen (2009) and Wang (2009). This dam during Wenchuan Earthquake is surprising and it is
shows that extensive and intensive scientific researches are very worthwhile to conduct further research on the potential seismic
important and necessary to the engineering safety, even without resistance of RCC arch dams.
any specific research on one subject.
Acknowledgements
7. Conclusions
This study was sponsored by the National Natural Science
This paper summarizes results of a comprehensive study on Foundation of China (Grant No. 50879050), and the National
the failure mechanism of a high RCC arch dam with theoretical Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program)
analysis, material fracture test, and model dam failure test. The (Grant No. 2010CB226802). The authors would like to express
actual performance of Shapai arch dam during May 12, 2008 their thanks to Prof. Jiankang Chen, and Prof. Liyong Zhang, all
Wenchuan Earthquake was also described. The following con- of Sichuan University, for their valuable suggestions and com-
clusions can be made: ments.
1. Through fracture test of RCC specimens, the mode I fracture
toughness was found in the range of 0.442-0.579 kN/cm3/2 References
with an average value of 0.5105 MN/m3/2; considering the size
effect the facture toughness was modified to be 0.84-1.10 kN/ Barr, B. I. G., Hasso, E. B. D., and Sabir, B. B. (1985). “Effect of test
cm3/2 with an average of 0.97 kN/cm3/2. specimen on the fracture toughness of concrete.” Cement and
2. Through fracture test of gypsum specimens, the relation Concrete Research, Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 833-841.
Bi, Z., Wang, X. Z., Huang, Z. Q., and Song Y. P. (2009). “Experimental
between water-gypsum ratio and fracture toughness was ob-
research on equivalent strength of roller compacted concrete crack
tained. It confirms that the fracture toughness decreases with director.” Journal of Wuhan University of Technology, Vol. 31, No.
increasing water-gypsum ratio. This relation can be used to 8, pp. 10-13 (in Chinese).
interpolate the fracture toughness of gypsum material used in Chen, H. Q. (2009). “Lessons learned from Wenchuan earthquake for
model test. seismic safety of large dams.” Earthquake Engineering and
3. Based on the theory of fracture mechanics, the relation Engineering Vibration, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 241-249.
between fracture toughness and stress intensity factor was Chen, Q. H. (2003) “New design method of RCC high arch dam.” Proc.
analyzed, and the similarity condition of crack propagation of of the 4th International Symposium on Roller Compacted Concrete
(RCC) Dams, Madrid, Spain, pp. 427-430.
induced joint was proposed.
Fumagalli, E. (1973). Statical and geomechanical models, Springer-
4. In the model test, the simulation of induced joint should con- Verlag, New York.
form to two similarity conditions: similarity of crack propaga- Gu, A. J. (2005). “Analysis of the dam with crack directors based on
tion and similarity of shear strength. nonlinear fracture mechanics.” Journal of Hefei University of
5. The induced joint size of model dam cannot be determined Technology (Natural Science), Vol. 28, No. 12, pp. 1585-1589 (in