The Transient Response of Heat Exchangers PDF

Rochester Institute of Technology
RIT Scholar Works

Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections
5-1-1995
The Transient response of heat exchangers

David Bunce
Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses
Recommended Citation
Bunce, David, "The Transient response of heat exchangers" (1995). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion
in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact ritscholarworks@rit.edu.
The Transient Response of Heat Exchangers
by
David J. Bunce
A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment

ofthe requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering
Approved By:
Professor Satish G. Kandlikar

(Thesis Advisor)
Professor Robert 1. Hefuer
Professor Alan H. Nye
Professor Charles W. Haines

(Department Head)
DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
MAY 1995
Abstract
The transient response of heat exchangers to a change in inlet temperature of one
of the fluids is of much interest in industrial practice. Due to the complexity of the
problem, no generally accepted solutions exist. This thesis presents an extensive survey of
major solutions available in literature and identifies the ranges of parameters for which
solutions are not available. A commercially available thermal network solver software
package (Thermonet) will be used to model the transient response of heat exchangers.
The software package will be verified using five existing solutions found in literature. The
software package will be utilized to generate transient solutions for a counterflow heat
exchanger covering a wide range of parameters useful in engineering practice. The results
are presented in tabular form. Important parametric influences are discussed and effects of
process and geometrical variables on the transient performance is evaluated.

Acknowledgments
I would like to express my sincere gratitude to Dr. Satish Kandlikar whose insight,
encouragement, and guidance were crucial to the completion of this work. I would also
like to thank my wife Hoinu for her love and support, and above all thanks to God, for
without Him we can do nothing.

PERMISSION GRANTED:
I, David J. Bunce, hereby grant pennission to the Wallace Memorial Library of the
Rochester Institute of Technology to reproduce my thesis entitled "Transient Response of
Heat Exchangers" in whole or in part. Any reproduction will not be for commercial use or
profit.
May 12,1995
David J. Bunce
Table of Contents
List of Tables ui
List of Figures iv
List of Symbols vi
1. Introduction 1
2. Theoretical Background 5
3. Literature Review 11
3.1 Introduction 11
C*
3.2 Solutions for =
0 13
3.3 Solutions for Parallelflow Configurations 21
3 .4 Solutions for Counterflow Configurations 24
3.5 Solutions for Crossflow Configurations 31
3.6 Recommendations from Available Solutions 36
4. Application of Thermal Network Solver 38
5. Validation of Thermal Network Solver Accuracy 45
6. Results for Counterflow Heat Exchangers 57
7. Discussion of Results 63
8. Conclusion 64
9. References 66
10. Appendices 68
A. Derivation ofGoverning Differential Equations

B. Investigation of Solution by Myers (1970)
td*
C. Influence of on transient response
List of Tables
Table Page
3.1 Solutions for C*=0 14
3.2 Solutions for parallel flow configurations 21
3.3 Solutions for counterflow configurations 24
3.4 Constants utilized in solution by Romie( 1984) 28
3.5 Solutions for crossflow configurations 31
4.1 Optimum number of segments 41
5.1 Comparison summary 45
6.1 Results for NTU =

0.5, "cT*= 1.0 60
6.2 Results for NTU= 1.0, "c7*= 1.0 61
6.3 Results for NTU =

3.0, ~C^~*= 1.0 62
ui
List of Figures
Figure Page
1.1 Typical counterflow heat exchanger 2
12 Steady state operating conditions before and after a

step change in hot fluid inlet temperature 2
13 Step input 3
14 Frequency input 3
1.5 Impulse input 3
2. 1 Counterflow heat exchanger and incremental control volume 6
3 1 . Typical temperature response for the Cm fluid for a step

change in the inlet temperature oftheCmax fluid 16
3 .2 Typical temperature response of the Cm,, fluid for a step

change in the temperature of the Cmm fluid 19
3.3 Outlet temperature response for

a step change in the inlet
temperature of the Cmi,, fluid, Myers (1967) 20
3.4 Solutions for counterflow configurations, London etal. (1964) .... 25
3 5 . 90% response times for a crossflow heat exchanger,

Myers etal. (1967) 33
4 1 . Thermal network model of a counterflow heat exchanger 38
4.2 Temperature vs. time step 42
4.3 Temperature vs. time step 43
4.4 Temperature vs. timestep 44
5 1 . Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

London etal. (1964) 47
IV
Figure Page
52 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

London etal. (1964) 48
5 3 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by Romie ( 1 984) ... 49
5.4 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution

by Romie (1984) ... 50
5.5 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by Rizika (1956) ... 51
5.6 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by Rizika (1956) ... 52
5.7 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

Myers et al. (1970) 53



Myers etal. (1967) 56
List of Symbols
A heat transfer area
C fluid heat capacity rate (equation 2.2)

Cp specific heat at constant pressure
C heat capacitance (equation 2. 1)

C*
dimensionless heat capacity rate (equation 2. 10)
C*
dimensionless wall heat capacitance (equation 2.13)
E dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equation 3.10 and 3.19)
h heat transfer coefficient
L heat exchanger length
M mass of fluid or wall material in heat exchanger
NTU number of heat transfer units(equations 2.9, 3.12 and 3.21)

q heat transfer rate
R dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equation 3.11 and 3 .20)

R*
dimensionless thermal resistance ratio (equation 2. 1 1)
T temperature
T(0) Steady state outlet temperature before transient input has been applied
T(t) Outlet temperature at time t
T(oo) Steady state outlet temperature after transient input has been applied
*
T dimensionless temperature (equation 2.7)
t time
t*
dimensionless time (equation 2. 12)
U dwell time, the amount of time required for a fluid particle to pass through the heat
exchanger
ta*
dimensionless dwell time (equation 2.14)
td,min dwell time of Cm, fluid
U overall heat transfer coefficient
V dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equation 3. 13 for parallel flow, equation
3.22 for counterflow))

W mass flow rate
X*
dimensionless distance (equation 2.8)
x position along flow direction
Greek
r|0 fin efficiency
sf*
dimensionless temperature response (equations 2. 16 and 2. 17)
9 dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equations 3 9, . 3 17

. and 3 1 8)
.
VI
Subscripts
h hot fluid
c cold fluid
w heat exchanger wall
i initial
min minimum heat capacitance rate fluid
max maximum heat capacitance rate fluid
1 stepped fluid
2 unstepped fluid
Vll
1 Introduction
.
A heat exchanger is said to be operating in the steady state when the inlet and
outlet temperatures of the two fluids are constant over time. As one of the fluids
experiences a change in its inlet temperature, the heat exchanger undergoes a transient
excursion. When a heat exchanger is part of a complex system such as a process plant,
power plant, or air

conditioning system, the system designer often is required to determine
the performance of the heat exchanger under transient operating conditions. This
information may be required either for process control or for determining the influence of
thermal stresses in the different components of the heat exchanger. Figure 1.1 shows a
typical counterflow heat exchanger commonly used in engineering practice. Figure 1 .2
shows steady state operating conditions before and after a step change in hot fluid inlet
temperature for a typical counterflow heat exchanger.
There are three major types of transient inputs:
1) Step input, Figure 1.3. A sudden change in inlet temperature or flow rate to a new,
constant value.
2) Frequency input, Figure 1.4. A periodically varying change in inlet temperature or flow
rate.
1.5. A in inlet temperature flow rate of infinite

3) Impulse input, Figure change or
amplitude but infinitesimal duration.

Th,i
I.
lc,o ^-
r Tc,i
?
Th,o
Figure 1.1 Typical counterflow heat exchanger
Initial steady state operating conditions
Steady state operating conditions after step input
Input step change
Response 1
Response 2 / }
POSITION
before and after a

Figure 1.2 Steady state operating condidtions
step change in hot fluid inlet temperature.
D
H
ffl
TIME
Figure 1.3 Step input
Oh
TIME
Figure 1.4 Frequency input
TIME
Figure 1.5 Impulse input

In many applications, the transient disturbances that occur in heat exchangers are
approximated closely by a step function. For this reason most solutions to the transient
problem are for step functions at the inlet. Therefore the focus of the present work is
aimed at studying the transient response of heat exchangers subjected to a step inlet
condition.
The solutions available for steady state heat exchanger analysis are readily
available, well verified and

generally convenient to utilize. The same cannot be said for
transient heat exchanger analysis. As will be seen later, the transient problem is much
more complex and no generally applicable solutions exist. Many authors have presented
solutions in literature which are applicable over limited ranges of parameters. The most
recent comprehensive survey of this topic was presented by Rohsenow and Hartnett in
1985. Since that time many solutions have been presented in literature. An extensive
literature survey will discuss major solutions to date for direct transfer type heat
exchangers (excluding shell and tube type). After identifying the ranges of parameters for
which no solutions are available in literature, a finite difference model will be utilized to
generate results for counterflow heat exchanger performance under transient conditions.
2. Theoretical Background
2.1 Idealizations.
In order to derive governing differential equations describing transient behavior of
a heat exchanger the following idealizations are generally made (Shah, 1981).
1) The temperature of both fluids and the wall are functions of time and position.
2) Heat transfer between the exchanger and the surroundings is negligible. There are no
thermal energy sources within the exchanger.
3) The mass flow rate of both fluids do not vary with time. Fluid passages are uniform in
cross section giving a uniform fluid inventory in the heat exchanger.
4) The velocity and temperature of each fluid at the inlet are uniform over the flow cross
section and are constant with time except for the imposed step change.
5) The convective heat transfer coefficient on each side, and the thermal properties of both
fluids and the wall are constant, independent of temperature, time and position.
6) Longitudinal heat conduction within the fluids and wall as well as the transverse
conduction within the fluid is neglected.
7) The heat transfer surface area on each fluid side is uniformly distributed in the heat
exchanger.
8) Either the fouling resistances are negligible or they are lumped with thermal resistances
of the wall.
9) The thermal capacitance of the heat exchanger enclosure is considered negligible
relative to that of the heat transfer surface.
2.2 Governing differential equations.
In order to derive the governing differential equations, consider a counterflow heat
exchanger and an incremental control volume shown in Figure 2.1.
Lh.o Hot Fluid Th.;
Wall
Tc.i Cold Fluid
< x * <-dx-*
Figure 2. 1 Counterflow heat exchanger and incremental control volume
Before continuing, some definitions are in order. Heat capacitance, C ,

is defined
as the product of mass and specific heat:
Heat capacitance
=
C =
Mcp (2.1)
Heat capacity rate, C, is the product of mass flow rate and specific heat:
Heat capacity rate =

C =
Wcp (2.2)
Applying an energy balance to incremental control volumes around the hot fluid, cold
fluid, and wall yields the

following differential equations after simplification (see Appendix
A for further details):
ChT7 +c*z77 +<vM)M ~tJ= (2-3)
- d T d T , w
v
C'~bt~C'L~d7 -ôhA)e(Tw ~TC)=0

(2.4)
CwYf-(VohA\(Th -Tw)+(r,0hAl(T -Te)=0

(2.5)
Refer to the nomenclature for definition of various terms. In order to completely define
the problem, initial and boundary conditions are required. The initial conditions are
obtained from the steady state temperature distribution prior to the transient input.
The boundary conditions are the input temperature change of the stepped fluid to its new
value and the constant inlet temperature of the unstepped fluid.
Based on the above differential equations, the dependent fluid and wall
temperatures are functions of the following variables and parameters:
Th,Tc,Tw = f(x,Th,i,Tc,i,Ch,Cc,(r|0hA)h,(TlohA)c,flow arrang.,t, C , C , Cc ) (2.6)
Eleven independent variables and parameters exist for the dependent fluid and wall
temperatures for a given flow arrangement. Because the differential equations and
boundary conditions are available, it is possible to formulate a set of dimensionless
parameters by a purely analytical approach. These dimensionless parameters are not
unique; the choice of the form of each dimensionless group is based on the usefulness to
the designer. Cima and London (1958) define the following dimensionless parameters
which are in widespread use today:
7/(0 -r(0)
T* =
(2.7)
TM -no)
X* =
x/L =
dimensionless flow length variable (2.8)
NTU =
UA/Cnrin =
number of transfer units (2.9)
C* =
Cri/Cnux =
capacity rate ratio (2 10)
On hA) on the Cm side

sfiLTT-
R* =
=thermal resistance ratio (2.11)
(r;0hA)ontheCminside
t* =
t/tdî
=
dimensionless time variable (212)
C =
C / din =
wall capacitance ratio (2.13)
j^ ^^ .^ ^ (2 M)
tdontheCmaxside
timax
We now have:
Th*,Tc* =
f(X*,NTU,C*,t*,R*, C V) (2.15)
X*
The variable
representating the location within a heat exchanger can be eliminated
because the temperature histories of primary interest in process applications are the outlet
temperatures of each fluid which occur at either X* =

0 or
X* =
1 .
Some authors have proposed an alternate designation for the dependent
dimensionless variables (We prefer to call them transient temperature effectiveness for
sides 1 and 2):
. T,(,)-T,(0)
' <2'6)
-T,M-m
._r,<r)-r,)
Where the subscript 1 refers to the fluid which had a step input imposed on it and the
subscript 2 refers to the unstepped fluid. All temperatures in equations (2. 16) and (2.17)
refer to outlet temperatures. With this nomenclature, the functional dependence can be
stated as:
sti*,8f,2* =
fTNTU,C*,t*,R*,"C V) (2.18)
The reader can now appreciate the complexities involved in a transient heat exchanger
problem since it requires a solution of three simultaneous partial differential equations for
temperature as a function of time and position. The solution depends on six independent
groups as well as exchanger flow arrangement. No general solution to this problem exists.
Available solutions are usually restricted to certain values or ranges of independent
variables.
Objectives of the present work are to present a thorough review of major solutions
available in literature. Emphasis will be placed on the application of these solutions to
practical engineering situations. A commercially available thermal network solver
software package (Thermonet) will be utilized to model the transient response of heat
exchangers. Thermonet will be utilized to generate solutions over a wide range of
parameters covering cases for which no solution currently exists.
10
3. Literature Review
3.1 Introduction
Many solutions to the transient heat exchanger problem exist in literature.
Typically, an investigator will utilize one or more of the following methods to obtain a
solution.
Direct analytical solution of the governing differential equations: Several idealizations
and restrictions are incorporated to develop a closed form solution.
Finite difference schemes: The governing differential equations can be modeled with
computer based finite difference schemes. This eliminates the need for restrictions on
independent variables. The data from this procedure is analyzed in an effort to
develop some approximate, empirically based solutions.
Electromechanical analog tests: The transient response of a heat exchanger is modeled
using an equivalent electrical circuit consisting of capacitors to represent wall
capacitance, and electric resistors to represent fluid flow and heat transfer resistances.
Cima and London (1958) first utilized this method to develop some approximate
solutions. A number of modifications to these solutions have been suggested in recent
literature.
of the problem
As was previously mentioned, the complexity generally prohibits
the development of a general solution valid for all values of independent parameters.
Most solutions are restricted to specific values or ranges of values of the independent
11
variables. Most major solutions found in literature will be discussed in this paper.
Limiting idealizations and restrictions will be discussed for each solution. In order to
simplify presentation, solutions will be categorized as follows:
1) Solutions valid for all flow arrangements with

C* =
0 (see section 3.2 for
C*
explanation of =
0)
2) Solutions valid for parallel flow arrangements.
3) Solutions valid for counter flow arrangements.
4) Solutions valid for crossflow arrangements.
12
C*
3.2 Solutions for =
0
In condensers and evaporators the heat capacity rate of one fluid is infinite (except
C*
for the pressure drop effect on saturation temperature), which means is very small and
can be approximated as zero. For these types of heat exchangers, the temperature of the
Cnux fluid can be approximated as constant throughout the exchanger. Solutions for these
cases are valid for heat exchangers with any arrangements. Solutions of this type are
further broken down into two categories:
-
A step input change in the Cnin fluid.
-
A step input change in the Cax fluid.
Table 3.1 summarizes solutions found in literature which are valid for all flow
C*
arrangements with
=
0.
13
C*
Table 3.1 Solutions for =
0
Restrictions Solution Mefliod Reference
Step change in C fluid
t*
0 < < 1 Analytical Rizika (1956)
cT'î
Analytical London etal.(1959)

R* =
oo or Q, *=0
Analytical London etal.(1959)
R* =
0 or Cw "=0
R*=l
"
5
Electromechanical analog London etal.( 1959)
and C^ >
R*=l and NTU=3 Electromechanical analog London et al.(1959)

"Cw"
"=20 Electromechanical analog London et al.(1959)

and NTU=3
c7*>i Finite Difference Myers et al. (1970)

R* t*
> 1 and > 1
Analytical Myers et al. (1970)
~C^ "> 100
Step change in C^, fluid

"c"
R*
"
Electromechanical analog London etal. (1959)
=
1 and > 20
R* London
=
1 and NTU =
1 Electromechanical analog et al. (1959)
*
Electromechanical analog London etal. (1959)
NTU =
1 and Cw 20
t*>l Analytical Myers et al. (1967)
14
3.1.1 Step change in inlet temperature of Cmgc fluid.
In this case, sudden changes in the inlet temperature of the condensing or
evaporating fluid occur due to sudden changes in the system pressure. The graphical
representation of this scenario can be seen in Figure 3.1.
Rizika
One of the early investigators to present a solution to this problem was
*
R*
(1956). He obtained an exact solution for 0 < t*
< 1 and all values of C and
1 -e
~x
[7 sinh(Jif / Y) +cosh(X / YJ]
F * = ; ; (3.1)
f-2
\~exp(-NTU)
*
NTU(\ +R *)(l +R * 4w *)t
X = ~^-=
^
(3-2)
*
2R*C
-H/2
*
4R*C
Y = (3.3)
(l+R*-w*) _
t*
(1981) in a comprehensive survey points out that in the above solution, a

Shah
between 0 and 1 is relevant only for cases with Cw < 1 . London et al. (1959) present
for the two

R* =
qo and
R* =
0 as well as results for
analytical solutions limiting cases,
specific values of NTU, T^ *, and R*

based on electromechanical analog tests.
15
Inlet temperature
---'''Ss&
Temperature response 1
C
Cmax Ruid
) Input Step Change
POSITION
Figure 3.1 Typical temperature response for the Cmm fluid for a step change
in the inlet temperature of the Cmax fluid.
16
Myers et al. (1970) obtained finite difference solutions for intermediate and large
values of Cw *. Myers used data obtained from the finite difference solution to
extrapolate the exact solution given

by Rizika (1956). The results are as follows:
*
e/-2 =1 -A exp[-B(t *-i)/Cw *] (3.4)
~z
A ,
1 -e [Y sinh(Z / Y) +cosh(Z / Y)]
A =1 (35)
l^pHVTV)
2NTU(l+R*)C*
B=
ftrzsinh(Z/r)
(3.6)
A
I (\+R*^Cw *) J[l -exp(^TTU) _
ntu(\+r*)(i+r*-k: *)
2 "
<">
JKî
This solution shows excellent agreement with the finite difference solutions of
Myers et al. (1970) within the following ranges:
t*>l
R*>1
The range for which the above solution by Myers is valid has been discussed in several
comprehensive surveys on the subject of transient heat exchanger behavior. Kays and
*
London (1964) report this range to be C > 100. Shah (1981) states that the applicable
* <
range is 1 < Cw 2000. Myers (1970) makes the statement that his solution is valid for
"intermediate" * in this thesis to clarify

values of C A detailed study was undertaken
this apparent discrepancy. It has been shown conclusively in Appendix B that the above
17
solution by Myers is valid for all values of Cw *
greater than 1 . It should be noted that
Myers (1970) states as one of his assumptions that the temperature of the infinite
capacitance rate fluid is initially at zero when it is suddenly stepped to a value T at time t
=
0. This solution by Myers eliminates many of the restrictions utilized by the previous
solutions of London et al (1959).
Myers also proposes an analytical solution for Cw > 100 making extensive use of
Bessels functions.
3.1.2 Step change in the inlet temperature of the C^. fluid.
A graphical representation of this scenario case is shown in Figure 3.2. London et
al. (1959) have developed approximate solutions for this case for specific values of NTU,
R*
Cw and These solutions are approximate and were obtained from electromechanical
analog test results. The paper by Myers et al. (1967) presents an analytical solution to the
C*
more general problem of a crossflow heat exchanger where is not constrained to be
C*
zero. Myers applies the constraint of
=
0 to his more general solution and determines
that solution is a function of two independent variables, namely;
NTU/R*
(i+R*)2(t*-iyc
The solution can be obtained directly from the analytical expression given by Myers but it
again involves integration of Bessels functions and is inconvenient to use. Fortunately
Myers has supplied a convenient graphical solution which is easy to utilize. As seen from
18
Figure 3.3, the exact solution for a step change in the noncondensing or evaporating fluid
can be represented on one graph.
?
?
x
?
? Input step change
?
+
*
^
-^c&*
Temperature response 1
c
Cmax Fluid
POSITION
Figure 3.2 Typical temperature response of the Cm, fluid for a step
change in the temperature of the Cm, fluid.
19
1.0
1 lo 1 1 '
0.2
2-
0.8
"
=
0.5
=-"
0.6
1^-
*
f,l
0.4
y^
-
5
20/ /
0.2 >/50 /
v'
OO
1 1 ! 1
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
- (1+R*)2(T*-1)/C*
;,
2 w
Figure 3.3. Outlet temperature response for

a step change in the inlet
temperature of the Cu, fluid, Myers (1967)
20
3.3 Solutions for Parallel Flow Configurations
Table 3.2 summarizes solutions found in literature for parallel flow configurations.
Table 3.2 Solutions for parallel flow configurations.
Restrictions Solution Method Reference

Dwell time of fluids are equal or both fluids are gases Analytical Romie (1985)
Thermal capacitance of the core is assumed to be Analytical Li (1986)
negligible compared to the thermal capacitance of the
stepped fluid.
Both fluids must be gases. Analytical Gvozdenac(1987)
Romie (1985) presented a solution for a parallel flow heat exchanger. The
solution to the transient problem is presented as a function of six new dimensionless
groups defined as follows:
x
(3.8)
c
e =
(3.9)
i j c.wall
E =
(3-10)
C,
R =
(hA)2 (3.11)
(hAl
1 1
=Cmin
(312)
NTU (hA\ \hA)2\
r L L
mm
1/ (3.13)
wall V2 vi
Where v is the velocity and the subscript 1 refers to the stepped fluid and the
subscript 2 refers to the unstepped fluid. Romie introduced the constraint that the
21
dimensionless parameter V as defined by equation 3.13 must be zero. As can be seen from
equation 3.13, this will be valid if the velocities of the two fluid streams are equal.
Alternatively, if both fluids are gases then the absolute value of V will be very small and
can be equated to zero whether or not the velocities are equal. With this constraint, the
temperature response is a function of four independent variables, namely 6, E, R, and
NTU (see equations 3.9-13). Romie utilizes Laplace transforms to obtain an analytical
solution. The solution is very complex and involves integration of Bessel functions.
Romie presents several graphs of solutions for specific values of the dimensionless groups.
Solutions for parallel flow heat exchangers are also proposed by Li (1986). Li
introduces the idealization that the thermal capacitance of the core is negligible compared
to the thermal capacitance of the stepped fluid. This idealization will be valid when the
stepped fluid is a liquid. In a steel heat exchanger, the specific heat of water is about ten
times the specific heat of steel, hence the thermal capacitance of the core may be negligible
in many cases. In general, Li's solution is valid for liquid to liquid heat exchangers, or
liquid to gas heat exchangers where the liquid is the stepped fluid. The fluid velocities
need not be equal. Analytical solutions are obtained for the case where the velocities of
the two fluids are equal and for the case where the velocities are not equal. The solution
for the case of unequal velocities is again very complex involving integration of Bessel
functions. However, the solution for the case of equal velocities is relatively
straightforward.
22
Gvozdenac (1987) also presents a solution for parallel flow heat exchangers. His
solutions are restricted to the cases where the thermal capacities of the two fluids are
negligible relative to the thermal

capacity of the heat exchanger core. This restriction will
be valid if fluids are gases. Solutions are derived by using the method of successive
approximations and the Laplace transform method. A significant feature of this work is
that it is valid for any type of input change in temperature (step function, sinusoidal,
exponential, etc.).
23
3.4 Solutions for Counterflow Configurations
Table 3.3 summarizes solutions found in literature which are valid for counterflow
configurations.
Table 3.3 Solutions valid for counterflow configurations.
Restrictions Solution Type Reference

C* =
l Electromechanical analog Cima and London (1958)
R* =
l
"
10 < ~C7 < 40
.6 <, NTU <. 8

C* Electromechanical analog London etal. (1964)
=
l
Cw ">100
1.5 <; NTU <;8
S2*
only
C* London
=
l Electromechanical analog etal. (1964)
C ">100
1.55NTU^6
R*
.25 <, <; 4
Eti*
only
See below Finite difference Romie (1984)
Both fluids gases Analytical Gvozdenac (1987)
Cima and London (1958) investigated the transient response of counterflow heat
exchangers used for a specific application

-
namely a gas turbine regenerator. Heat
C* R*
exchangers used for this purpose can be closely approximated as having
=
1 and
=
1 . These restrictions reduce the number of independent variables to four :
ef,1*,sfa* =
fTNTU, Cw *,t*,ta*) (3.14)
They further simplify the problem by only solving for the temperature response of the
London discovered that virtually insensitive to

8f,2*
Cima was
unstepped fluid, ef,2*. and
*
e^*
U* > 10. It was also noted that an empirical correlation of
variations in -for
C
24
*
versus t*/( 1. 5+ C *) accurately predicted transient response for 0 < Cw < 50. They
were thus able to reduce the problem to two independent parameters:
ef,2* =
fTNTU, t*/(1.5+~c7 *)) (3.15)
London et al. (1964) again utilize electromechanical analog results to provide more
solutions to this problem. They provide solutions for the stepped fluid temperature
response (eti*) in addition to the unstepped fluid response (eta*)- The experiments
R* < R*<
conducted by London et al. demonstrate convincingly that in the range 1/4 4
have no measurable influence on ep*. All the above results can be depicted in one graph
as seen in Figure 3.4.
T*/(l-5 + C*)
w
'f,2 'f.l
Figure 3.4 Solutions for counterflow configurations, London et al. (1964).
25
Romie (1984) utilizes a finite difference method to propose a simple empirical
relation using slightly different dimensionless groups than he used for parallel flow:
X =-
(316)
4--IH
l vl RCwall J
(3.17)
C
min
=0 (318)
C
k. wall .,
,. C2 (3.19)
R =
(hA)2 (3.20)
(hA\
1 1
=C
+-
(3.21)
NTU \(hA\ (hA)2
Cmin
(3.22)
+-
V
CWall [y2
Lv2 vi
Where v is velocity and the subscript 1 refers to the stepped fluid and the subscript
2 refers to the unstepped fluid. The dimensionless parameters as defined by Romie are
previously discussed as follows:

related to the dimensionless parameters
R = (3.23)
R
26
1+
V =
(3.24)
cw I *d
<>2 =^
C * (3-25)
'W
If step change is on Cm, side:
/*
-I
=-
0\ (326)
c *
w
E (3.27)
If step change is on Cx side:
* *
r *</ -l
*l =
(3.28)
Cw*td*
C<
E =
(3.29)
Romie presents a solution in compact empirical form:
7/(0
a fl,
"l +F "l +F
=
1 -Ae Be (3.30)
cOt J0,
^=lê~l+V l+V
-De (3.31)
T2(*
27
A Ml O -f 9. m O Pi Ml Ml
* 83 ss -* a 32 IA lA
oo
o -r
Ml t/1 SS as 3R
tm
A M
Ml
ss SS SS art Ml 58 38 58 A Ml
Pi A mi o a t* m r a lt t% m *
o Ml A Ml > -. -P O -r A M O Ml A 7 A P A A A A A A
-J A -/ A
Pi A m * ia r trt *A > Ml O r mi e* Pi P* Ml O A Pi A P* A P* A Ml O
r* p 38 83 58 38
*
S3 33
aoa
AM
a r*
A
ia p*
-*
a r*. 3?
Ml
Ml r*
art art rt
art P* P* P*
OPi
ia r*
-P Ml
- r* Ml P*
P* Ml 35 aa
Ml
*
pi r* - P*
Ml Ml
Ml P-.
O M|
mi r* Ml P* 85
-*o oo o o --
O o o o C O "- e e o o o e o c s. o o o o o o o o o O o O O o e O O o e
i 1 i i 1 1
9
*
Ml art Oo (A r o m M art m mi Ml O Pi A Pi A - O Pi Pi Pi Pi mi
as Pi Ml Pi Pi 5S o 38 * Ml S3 o o 83 SS 83
-rt
Pi Pi Pi Ml aa Pi 83 A C S3 Pi Pi Pi Ml Pi Pi
V OO o O O
A IA (A IA O aa IA mi m Pi Ml Ml aa P Pi art A Pi mi Pi Pi Pi P Pi P* A M O
33 33 S3
SS 35 35
<u Pi Prt
p* r
o pi Ml Pi
/ *A
P4 M *
art P*
art frt P*
P
-/
-P Pi
Ml <*
Ml Pi SS SS art*
Ml Ml Pi Pi
A O
Pi
Ml A
Ml Prt 83 Ml Prt 35
A A
P Pi
M -? M OPi o P m mi M < OPi P* aaMl p*

art 82 W lA 33 83 * p* 38 M -* M Ml 38 53 33 art art O -? Ml SS A art A - 38 M M A
1 A
00
P Pi A O Ml M O M r* o p< a Ml a* Ml Ml O art O Pi o M Pi A Pi Ml A M Pi A
epi
-)
t Pi A - tA r* ia rt *A S3 Ml P Ml A m m p* art Pi 33 58 M A A Pi
a art M A M Pi A *> A * M 7 M 83 Ml M 83 art - -p o - O -P art rtf O * O -P O # O A A
o O O oa OO O O o e o o o o o o o o o e O O O o O O o o o e O O
CD 00 ae -
p-O
I 1 i 1
a M Pi
r* e* m o m M * o M M a art Pi A A A A A A A A O A
S3 a
r* p* / M
art
33 33 33 33 SS O A 88 A A A A A A 33 A A
X>
p* t* Of* M O mi m O O O Pi A O Pi O A A Ml ^ Ml A Pi art
3R 8H
85 J 33
M
Pi M r* r* Or* Ml P* P* Pi Pi Ml a* A P* aa |>* A A
G <u -" A 85 Pi A 85 -
art
Ml Pi */ Z OMI S3 A Ml AMl art M O Ml O M O Ml A Ml
O dd dd m d -rt O dd O - d
do*
o Ml OP* Ml Pi A art P* M o Pi M A art O M

o a V
P*
A 3?
Pi art
a o
M M
o < n m o o
art
Ml P* P* art OO
-P
8 35 83 art Ml P* M S3 * 35 A M A Ml A A
CO
MM A M - M M M - M - M MO Pi M Pi 3~ - - 3" Pi -P P* Ml art 1 O Ml A A Ml M 3*
a A MM Pi
Pi P Pi -P
T3 a P art O O O Ml - p* Pi -P
33 A Ml Ml Ml
38 S3 m m
-*
88 art Ml P O 33 33 r* p* Pi Pi S3 Ml Ml Ml P* p* M P mm Pi A Pi
aM ao * p*
r P*. Pi P* art ft M f* OP- p* p* 33
Pi
Pi M Pi Pi art Ml o *- O art Ml Pi Pi art Ml
o art
N OO OO o o o pÔ OO oo o o d e d d d di d d d o dd dd dd d O
1 t 1 1 1 1 o o o'o OA
S
o o o o M A O Pi Ml Ml O A A A A Pi A A Pi A Ml Ml Ml Pi
28
4 P*
O O 53 33 33 33 S3 35 art Prt p n -P / MM 33 38 A A A A Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml A A A A A A
co p* Pi Pi P Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi p- Prt Prt Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi Pi
* M Pi. * Pi -- " r* r* *. rm et w Pi Pi Pi Pi
* Pi Pi Ml -a aa
<5 A -7 Ml r O Ml Ml Ml
co 88
OP-
aa. a*
p o
a
M aJ
33
o o
o r
M P4
m p* 35 O Pi 33 -P P* g A P* A Ml Prt Pi # Pi
G o r* p* - ** m> r* 88 ar> rtf* Sr o m

PMl P* Pi Ml A O r* o 4
,
P* Ml P* Pi Ml
d o o o o o O M d e d -- d -< d d O a- d - d d -
O o'ei - O o ea r0 o
O
o O rt MM o - O Ml A Pi Pi Pi Ml O Pi A O Ml A A A O Ml Pi Pi Ml
p * -4A
art a a M p 83 38 a e IÔ o - P*
- art rt o o P* O Ml Ml Ml A -P Ml A A A Ml P* rtj A -rt Ml
a a a m m M * Ml M Ml rtf Ml MJ mi i P M art Ml Ml Ml m mi Ml d mi P* Ml Ml wi d mi A Ml Ml Ml
Pi
Ml Pi Ml
-P O Ml O A O -rt O P* o A O P- O
of M|
55
(A M *1?
-* art Ml Ml
33 88 58 r A Ml O * Pi 58 Ml O 58 P- Pi A O A A
as S3 ee SS o
*
o > Is -1
- O
P*
oo
o
88 O Ml Pi aa P* Ml f* Pi O art Ml * Pi ^ m
art Ml A Pi O art
d
P
H o d oo o o o o e'o o o OO o o o'o e -
e pi C Pi O Pi d d -* d 1 O Pi C Pi pi
1 1 1
1
s o
* art f- Ml V art <* art art o o Ml - O O P* Ml Ml P* o o - p* rt Ml rt/ Ol
S3
m p
a a
* a
<e r* m o o o o 5o SS Ml M M P* *f A Pi A Ml Ml Ml Pi A Ml A -J A Ml O
Ml Ml Ml Ml M Ml Ml M aa
Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml Ml *t
art art Pi M Pi Pi
rt Pi a al
O A A P*
9 -rt O A r* o Ml O
8=
r-
p r-
r-
o
o - o M> Ml
J art
Ml P*
Ml Ml
-.
O Ml A Ml 88 53 28 A Q mi Pi 38 38 SS -a Prt o A A
Ml M M O P* Ml Ml P* -P -# rtf P* Ml O Ml Ml A -P -
- A Ml <6 mi r*.
AO / o a IA O) n o r* O
<u Mi O '
O O O O o O Pi e pi d mi d mi d Ml d Pi d pi O Pi d Ml d -i d mi
o do o o o o o o o
O M o o Ml o o Ml o o
o o M o o Ml o
HI
a O d Pi e Pi d Pi
O art O
Ml Ml Ml
Ml Ml Ml
A o o o Pi Pi Pi
o Pw P Pi
o m o o
m - - - - d d d
d d o art
28
T(t) represents the outlet temperature at time t and T(x) represents the final steady state
outlet temperature after the step input has been imposed. Romie presents the constants
A,a,B,b,C,c,D,d in tabular format as can be seen in Table 3.4.
It should be noted that this solution by Romie was derived by assuming the initial
inlet temperatures of both fluid streams are 0C and that the stepped inlet temperature is
1C. These idealizations are not as restrictive as they appear. His solution can be utilized
for any values of inlet temperatures if the left hand side of equations 3.30 and 3.3 1 are
replaced with the respective dimensionless temperature expressions:
a6, bd,
7j(Q -7j(0)
J -7~^
l +y ~Y+V
l +K , ,
=1 -Ae -Be (3.32)
*i() -2i(0)
c0z d e^
2 l +V 1 +y
(3.33)
-1
=1 -Ce -De
r2(o* -t2(0)
state outlet temperature before the step input has been

T(0) represents the steady
imposed. The values of T(0) and T(qo) can be calculated using steady state analytical
solution methods such as the eftectiveness-NTU method. As can be seen from Ronries
most of the solutions are for either V =

0 OR V =
4. For realistic values of
tabular data,
td*
between .25 and 4.0 it can be seen from equation 3.24 that in order for V to be equal
to zero,
C*
must be infinitely large. This could be closely approximated by some gas to
29
gas heat exchangers. In order for V to be equal to 4.0 while still realistic
maintaining
C*
values of td*, must be between .3 and 1.3. This leads to the conclusion that Romies
solution is valid over a somewhat limited range of

Cw*
values.
Romies solution produces inaccurate results for the stepped fluid for times less
than one dwell time. The cause of this can be seen in equation 3. 17. The term L/vi in this
equation represents the dwell time of the stepped fluid. For values of dwell time greater
than t, the value of 9 will be negative which will lead to unrealistic temperatures when
substituted into equation 3.32.
Gvozdenac (1987) presents an analytical solution for counterflow heat exchangers
with the only restriction that the thermal capacities of the two fluids are negligible relative
to the thermal capacity of the heat exchanger core. This restriction will be met if both
fluids are gases with heavy separating walls. The smallness of this capacity ratio physically
represents the fact that the fluid dwell times are small compared to the duration of the
transient. The solution proposed by Gvozdenac is valid for any type of input change in
temperature (step function, sinusoidal, etc.) The practical application of the explicit
analytical solutions is somewhat complicated. Gvozdenac suggests that a numerical
integration scheme can be implemented to calculate solutions. See Gvozdenac (1987) for
further details.
30
3.5 Solutions for Crossflow Configurations
Table 3.5 summarizes solutions found in literature which are valid for crossflow
heat exchanger configurations.
Table 3 5 . Solutions for crossflow configurations
Restrictions Solution Method Reference
Finite Difference Dusinberre(1959)

One fluid mixed, other unmixed Analytical Myers etal. (1967)
mixed fluid stepped
Cw "large
Both fluids unmixed Finite Difference Yamashita et al. (1978)
Both fluids gases Analytical Romie (1983)
Both fluids unmixed
Both fluids gases Analytical Gvozdenac (1986)

Both fluids unmixed
Both fluids gases Analytical Spiga,Spiga (1987)

Both fluids unmixed
Delta input only Analytical Spiga, Spiga (1988)

Both fluids unmixed
Both fluids gases Analytical Chen, Chen (1991)
Both fluids unmixed
Delta input only Analytical Chen, Chen (1992)

Both fluids unmixed
Both fluids unmixed Analytical Spiga, Spiga (1992)
One of the first researchers to investigate the transient behavior of crossflow heat
exchangers was Dusinberre (1959) who proposed a finite difference method to describe
the transient behavior. Very straightforward finite difference equations are presented
which can easily be incorporated into a spreadsheet or computer program. Gas to gas
heat exchangers are the primary focus of the paper by Dusinberre, however, equations are
presented in the appendix of his paper which can be used when one of the fluid streams is
a liquid. Dusinberre only considers one specific case and does not verify his solutions with
any other source.
31
Myers et al. (1967) analyzed the transient response of a crossflow heat exchanger
with one fluid mixed and the other fluid unmixed. Solutions are presented for the case
where the mixed fluid has a temperature change applied to it. The solution also requires
"
*
that the value of C be "large". Myers be sufficiently
et al. propose that C will
large if it meets the following condition:
a(l+R*)2C*
<05 (3.19)
(a+R*)C*
(^ -l)
a =1 "*
(3"20)
N =-f (3.21)
1
<M\ (hA)2
<a\p
The analytical solution presented by Myers et al. is quite complex, involving
integration of Bessel functions. In addition, compact graphical representation of their
results is not feasible due to the large number of independent variables. The authors
present a useful graph (Figure 3.5) which can be used to determine the time required to
attain a 90% response for t*

> 10 and large Cw . The variables used in Figure 3.5 are
defined as follows:
M(a+R*)
A'=
(3.22)
AJ(l+R*)
B (3 23)
-cT. ,+*?)
32
50
1 1 ' /'
/
/
-f.i
/ /
40
/
y
/ 0/
30
/ / 2 /
/
/
^
Z, 20 / 5
^
)
/ /
/ P"
=10^-
10
n
r i i i i i
10 20 30
A'
Figure 3.5 90% response times for a crossflow heat exchanger Myers et al. (1967)
33
P' =
Ml -a)
(3 24)
M=
["'_ (3.25)
JhA\Cl
Yamashita et al. (1978) analyzed the transient response of a crossflow exchanger
with both fluids mixed. A finite difference method was utilized to present graphical
solutions for specific values of independent variables. They considered one of five groups
(ta*, 1/ Cw , R*, NTU, C*) as a variable while fixing the value of the others to be unity.
Romie (1983) proposes a solution utilizing the Laplace transform method. His
results are valid for crossflow exchangers with neither gas mixed. The idealization is made
that the thermal capacities of the masses of the two fluids contained in the exchanger are
negligibly small relative to the thermal capacity of the exchanger core. As previously
discussed, this will be true if both fluids are gases. The form of the solution is quite
complex, requiring computer implementation. Romie does present some very useful
graphical solutions which encompass the following ranges (see equations 3. 19 -

3.21 for
definition of these parameters):
1<NTU<8
6<E<1.67
.5<R<2.0
34
Gvozdenac (1986) and Spiga and Spiga (1987) present a more general analytical
solution which allow arbitrary initial and inlet conditions. The solutions are only valid for
gases. In a later paper, Spiga and Spiga (1988) propose a solution where fluids can be
gases or liquids. Their results are valid only for a deltalike (impulse) change in the inlet
temperature of one of the fluids.
Due to the complexity of the numerical results presented by Spiga and Spiga
(1987, 1988) computer implementation is required which itself can be a formidable task.
Chen and Chen (1991, 1992) propose straightforward computer implementation
techniques which increase computational efficiency.
Spiga and Spiga (1992) propose an exact analytical solution to the transient
response due to a step change in inlet temperature of the hot fluid. Fluids are not
constrained to be gases.
35
3.6 Recommendations from Available Solutions
There are many solutions available in literature to the transient heat exchanger
problem. However, each solution is valid over a limited range of independent parameters.
Some solutions derived from an analytical approach are valid for a wide range of
independent parameters but the complex form of the solutions makes their application
unlikely in a design situation. The following information will attempt to direct the reader
toward a solution that not only is valid for a wide range of parameters but can also be
conveniently utilized.
C*
3.6.1 Solutions for =
0.
For a step change in the Cmax fluid, the approximate solution by Myers et al. (1970)
is valid for a broad range of parameters. The solution has been verified by finite difference
solutions by Myers et al. The form of the solution is very straightforward (see equations
3.4 through 3.7) and can be easily implemented in a design situation.
For a step change in the Cmu, fluid, the solution by Myers et al. (1967) is very
useful due to its wide range of application. The explicit analytical solution is cumbersome,
graphical representation of Myers solution

involving integration of Bessel functions. The
(Figure 3.3) can be conveniently utilized to obtain results.
3.6.2 Solutions for Parallel flow Configurations
Most available solutions to date are derived by analytical means and as a result the
final solutions are very complex to utilize. However, Romie (1985) and Li (1986) present
several graphical representations of their solutions for specific values of independent
36
variables. If the values of the specific independent variables match those of a certain
application, the graphs can be used to determine transient response.
3.6.3 Solutions for Counterflow Configurations
The electromechanical analog results of London et al. (1964) shown in Figure 3.4
can be utilized if C* =
1 and other restrictions are met (see Table 3.3). The empirical
solution by Romie (1984) covers a wider range of parameters while maintaining a simple
empirical expression (equations 3.32, 3.33). As previously discussed, Romie's solution
for the response of the stepped fluid is valid for times greater than one dwell time.
3.6.4 Solutions for Crossflow Configurations
As with parallel flow, crossflow heat exchangers have been analyzed by primarily
analytical techniques, with the resulting solutions being cumbersome to implement. For
both fluids being unmixed gases, Romie (1983) presents several graphical representations
of his analytical solutions. These graphical solutions cover a fairly wide range of
independent parameters.
The only solution available for the transient response to a step change when one or
more of the fluids are liquids is by Spiga and Spiga (1992). Some graphical
representations of the analytical solution are presented but are valid only for a very limited
range of independent parameters.
37
4. Application of Thermal Network Solver
The transient response of a heat exchanger subjected to a step inlet temperature
"Thermonet"
change of one of the fluids was modeled using
-
a commercially available
thermal network solver. Thermonet utilizes a finite difference algorithm to solve transient
heat transfer problems. A heat exchanger can be modeled by discretizing it's length into a
fixed number of segments. Fluid convection resistance, wall conduction resistance and
fluid flow capacitance are modeled for a counterflow heat exchanger as shown in Figure
4.1.
Hot Fluid
^VVj
Resistors:
CoM Fluid
101 -
110 Hot Fluid Flow Capacitance 1/mCp
201 -210 Cold Fluid Flow Capacitance 1/mCp
301 -
310 Hot Fluid Convective Resistance 1/hA
401 -
410 Cold Fluid Convective Resistance IThA
501 -
510 Wall Resistance t/kA
Figure 4. 1 Thermal netwprk model of a counterflow heat exchanger
38
In order to determine the optimum number of segments that should be used in the
thermal network, three models 20

utilizing 5, 10, and segments compared. For each case,
the steady state performance calculated

by Thermonet is compared to the exact steady
state performance derived from effectiveness -NTU relations. As can be seen in Table 4. 1,
a 10 segment model shows very little deviation from theoretical (0. 1% or less) for NTU <
1.0. However, for NTU > 1.0 the 10 segment model shows deviations greater than 1%.
For values of NTU > 1.0, the 20 segment model has better accuracy, with deviations
generally less than 1%. Based on this information, a 10 segment model will be sufficient
for NTU <

1.0, while a 20 segment model should be utilized for 1.0 < NTU < 5.0.
Once the optimum number of segments is determined, it is necessary to choose an
appropriate time step in transient analysis. The optimum time step is one that achieves the
desired accuracy without requiring excessive computation time. Since Thermonet is based
on a finite difference scheme, one would expect that the smaller the time step, the more
accurate the solution. This, however, is not the case as can be seen in Figures 4.2 -
4.4 of
temperature vs. time step. The data in each of these figures was obtained by varying the
chosen time step utilized by Thermonet, while keeping all other parameters constant. At
very small time steps, erratic behavior is observed. This behavior is likely due to
computational roundoff error propagation. The solution at these small time steps is most
As time steps should be avoided. As a general rule of

likely in error. a result, very small
thumb, time steps equal to or larger than one half of the dwell time of the Cmm fluid have
been found to be reasonable. Decreasing the time step by a factor of 10 from its largest
39
value results in a deviation of approximately 0.2 degrees C. A further reduction in time
step by a factor of 10 lead to much larger deviations.
40
1 CM ao CO*
CO ro3
CO 03 i>~ CM
c CO (O o r- r~ CM o co o 00 IO CO O)
*
0) O o o o co CO ao co CM CM o IO CO CM
o o o o o O o co
E CO CM CO
^-
IO p
3) d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d
0
<?
O
15 CM
o
co o CM CO CO CO
T
i-^ CO CO
I c
a>
o CO CM o o CO
co
00 o * CO CO
CM CM CO io o o o o 03 CO CM CO CM CM 00
o
o E d d
o o o o o o O CO CO 03
T-
CO 5
o d d d d d d d d d *
1-
0
E
a
c (O CO r- CO 00 o o ao o l- 03 CO oo
o C
a>
t- co
io
s
oo
ao 03 O ao
ao CO 03 CO oo CO IO CM
'is E CM 5 CO r- r
p CO l* IO CO
> at d d d d d d d d CO CO CM CM CM IO d
0 0
O ?
o
a> co CM CO CO ao CO O
T
co
CO co co ao <o o CO 03 IO 03 CO
*
3 p co CO o CO IO CM m o CO co CO CM
h-
co CO d ^* CM d d r^: d co d d d
Z co l* io IO CO co o CM o co ao
c
Ul
 o ao CM 00 CM CO co co IO
O e CM CO CO CO CM ao CO o CO CM i*~ o CM
a> 0) O co CD O CO CM 1*- CM
CO M d d d CO IO CM
E r- CO co d * CM IO 03 i>~ co <n
3) IO CO IO CM co 3
a
<?
0) Q o
X)
M
E 8
CM 1^ co CO IO lO 1^ CM co
2
3
c
o O
ao co 03 00 IO
O CO
IO 1^
03
s IO
CM CO CM
CM 00 co O
c ts E co d d d
c
CM IO 03 d r: d
3> CO IO co IO CM IO CO ao
E 0
Q.
o 0
E
?
0 O
E
4* ao co co
<*
CM co CO CM o CO co CM
Q. C CD 5i CO CM ao m co o IO CM o CO
r-
O o ao 03 03 oo CO aov-
p p
3 E i--
CO d CM d d d d CM d d d
o 3> co o o 03 CO IO CM IO CO 00
a
IO
.> o o o o o O o o o o o o o o o o
O o CM o CM o CM o CM o CM o CM o CM o CM
(0
0)
0
Q. s
0 E
0
c I-
CM CO ao
<o CO l- ao 1^ IO co
CO CO IO s 03 CO oo
It d d d d d d d d
Ul
o o o o o o o o
IO IO IO
to
p p p p
*
d d d d
o
o CO i* CO
m o o
3 p
d CM IO
Z
41
CN
--
o
- r
o.
0
-*-
(tf)
0
E
00 H
ON
II a 
s 0
o o
3
0
s nj
CN 0
II H a.
* rt
0
H
ON CN CN
II 0
r"> 3
H "-"
oo
pt-
_. T
*
Wl
Ô
00
*> 2
o
CN
spools wz ib aaniBaaduisi
42
o.
0
C/3
0
E
H
>
0
\-
3
0
Q.
E
0
H
co
0
u-
3
ao
spuoaas nnfr l ajnjBjaduwx
43
0
on
0
E
H
>
0
l_
3
?0
Q.
E
0
H
ti-
3)
spnooas oi }B ajniBJsdmax
44
5. Validation of Thermal Network Solver
Accuracy
Thermonet results were compared with five existing solutions found in literature
for transient performance of heat exchangers. These solutions are briefly summarized in
Table 5. 1 below. The solutions were chosen for purpose of comparison because they
cover a variety of operating parameters as well as solution methods.
Table 5.1 Comparison Summary

Author Application Solution Method Comparison Stepped Fluid Unstepped Fluid
figure # Mean Difference Mean Difference
London et al. Counterflow Electromechanical 5.1 9.09% 1.81%
C*
(1964) =
l analog 5.2 3.29% 2.65%
Romie Counterflow Finite Difference 5.3 0.66% 1.80%
(1984) Start-up 5.4 0.69% 1.54%
conditions
C*
Rizika =
0 Analytical 5.5 1.74%
(1956) 0 t*
1 5.6 0.81%
Step change in
Cmx fluid
C*
Myers et al. =
0 Finite Difference 5.7 0.19%
(1970) Step change in 5.8 0.23%

Cmax fluid
Myers et al. C*=0 Analytical 5.9 3.18%
5.10 1.84%
(1967) Step change in
C mm Quid
The percent mean difference was calculated as follows:
average difference between solutions over the time domain x 100%

total change in fluid outlet temp, from time t =
0 to t =
qo
As can been seen in Table 5. 1 the largest mean difference is for the comparison with the
London's derived by experimental techniques

solution by London (1964). solution was
(electromechanical analog) and may have some error associated with it. The comparison
with analytical solutions is more relevant and should be used as a test for validity. Two
45
analytical solutions were utilized for comparison. The results from the solution by Rizika
(1956) were calculated directly from his analytical expression. Thermonet gives results
within 1 .74% of the solution by Rizika. Results from Myers et al. (1967) were calculated
from a graphical representation of his analytical solution. Thermonet gives results within
3.18% of the solution by Myers. Part of this difference could be attributed to inaccuracies
in the graphical representation of his solution.
46
u u
c c
o
o
s s Q o
o
8
e
o
1
o 2
CN
f I 3
On
CO
c
o
O c
O o
>>
* C
o
-a
'3
b o
i/-T 05
CN 3
11
0
On a
o. o
a.
II 0
* C/5 3
E "o
of o H
o c
o o
0
H
H
o
c
o
ao
c
*
V a.
E
o
U
o
o
in
3
00
+ + +
O o o o o o o o o
o r~ c*1
o ON 00 vO l/-> ST
CN
47
o
O
o
t
s
I 1 i i
I t ..
o
m
CO
T
NO
ON
etj
0
C
o
o
o C
00
ON
3
>>
X>
*
C
O
U
3
O "o
CI n
ON CN
ON T3
S
e e
o
I
w
o
S CM
n
0
CN c
II o
H 0
JS
H
o c
in
II o
CM
* c
CO
a.
E
o
U
CN
o
o
0
V)
o
ir>
+
O O o O
On 00 r- no m en
(3 saajSaij) Aiiuwadniai
48
IT)
in
ro
00
ON
o
--
CO Pi
CN
ON c
CO o
II
* o
in
CN c
o
*
8 o
Pi
c
<o
o
CN CN
II 0
4=
H
o
c
co o
O
II o.
*
s
o
u
CO
in
0
3)
E
in
(3 893J33Q) ajniBoadmax
49
O
0 h>
B a O
o

2 e
? *
It 00
On
o
in
On
On
c
o
'
O "o
II o
o
*
Pi en
o
GO
.
CN c
o
II o
ro
0
H J3
H
**
o
c
o
GO
* '5
a,
O
E
o
CN
V
in
3
oo
._ o
o o o o o o o o o
o On 00 r
"O m rr CO CN
(3 sa&iSaa) 9JiBJ9daiax
50
NO
in
ON
2
ON
o c
00 o
in
* o
GO
5
oT c
On o
00 ae
rs
CN a
II o
GO
*
+-
Pi 0
c
o
ON s
0
X!
H
4(
S O
c
o
GO
II
"i
a.
E
o
U
in
in
3>
E
(3 833J33<I) 3JIUBJ3dni3X
51
NO
m
ON
XI
00
c
o
00
o
GO
c
o
II
* e 1o
Pi CO
CO
in c
CU
o
s
H
<+-
o
c
o
CM
* c
U o.
E
o
U
vq
in
0
3
oo
E
(3 saajSaa) ainiBjadinax
52
in
CN
r-
On
CN
0
GO
U.
0
CO
X>
s c
ob o
o
n
J #i
CM
ON
ON c
00 o
"9
CN e
II
* o
CM
Pi
ON
B Io
0
X
H
o
c
o
co
c
a.
E
o
r~-
>n
0
v-
in 3
00
E
(3 89%i33<i) %in}U3dai3x
53
,_
--
ON
ON
00
0
GO
X)
*
i o
.-
vo
u CM
C
7
*
o
Pi
o
GO
CN
II
I c
o
0
X
--
* H
II o
*
c
U o
GO
ex
co
E
o
u
00
0
Ui
CN
3
00
E
ON t ON rf On T
Tj- "3-
CO ro CN CN
(3 saaj&arj) ajiuvjadinax
54
r^
NO
ON
tf
* '
c.
o
NO
J*
I NO
ON
73
o
in GO
On
NO
X
r-H
a
II o
*
s '
U
ON
1
o
ro
CN
c
o
* I Io
Pi
GO
as c
m o
ro
o
c
II
s
*
s
a
CN E
o
U
ON
<n
22
3
00
E
NO NO NO
NO in in ro
NO
(3 saaiSsQ) aaiusaadraax
55
00
r~
NO
ON
fl
f 4
c
0
r>-
0
0
X
** H
I VO
ON
c<3
CM
Ui
0
X
CO
c
II in o
*
O
o
CM
ro
c
o
* 8
oi
o
CM
S -4-
ro 0
H c
o
0
X
H
CO
c
o
* CO
c
a.
S
o
O
CN
in
u
fc
CO CN ON 00 NO
ro ro ro
(3 S33d33(l) 3JIUBJ9<lni3X
56
6. Results for Counterflow Heat Exchangers
It has been previously noted that even though a large number of solutions exist to
the transient heat exchanger problem, few

only a are likely to be utilized in a design
situation due to the complexity of some solutions. Of the four heat exchanger
configurations previously discussed, configurations with C* =

0 currently have the most
useful solutions available. Solutions for this configuration cover a wide range of
parameters and can be easily calculated. The same cannot be said for parallel flow,
C*
counterflow, and crossflow configurations with * 0. Due to the thermal advantages
and the common application of counterflow heat exchangers in engineering practice, the
availability of a solution that covers a wide range of variables and that can be conveniently
utilized would be very useful. The solutions currently available in literature are either too
restrictive or too complicated to utilize (see section 3 for a complete discussion of
available solutions). Transient solutions valid for counterflow configurations will be
generated using Thermonet computer software and the results will be presented in tabular
form. A tabular scheme is developed to present solutions covering the following ranges of
parameters:
Dimensionless Values of Parameters for Table Generation

Parameter
NTU 0.5 1.0 3.0

C*
0.2 0.6 1.0
R*
0.5 1.0 2.0
*
C 1.0 10.0 50.0 100.0 400.0 1000.0
td*
0.25 1.0 4.0
57
The range of parameters was chosen to cover practical heat exchanger
many
applications. In order to present every possible combination of the above parameters ,

a
large number of tables would be required. Fortunately, some simplifications can be made.
Cima and London (1958) stated that transient solutions are

virtually insensitive to
*
C*
variations in U*
for =
1 and Cw > 10. To verify this, transient solutions were
calculated from Thermonet using two different values of

U*
while all other parameters
td*
remained the same. The values of used were 0.2 and 4.0. This represents a change in
U*
by a factor of 16. The results of these comparisons are summarized below (actual
comparisons can be found in Appendix C):
*
C*
Solutions for Cw =
50.0 are virtually insensitive to changes in ta*
for values of
ranging from 0.25 to 1.0. There is less than a 1% difference in the two solutions over
the vast majority of the solution domain. The largest deviation of 2.3% occurs in the
C*
unstepped fluid at
=
1 shortly after the time step is imposed.
*
ta*
Solutions for Cw =
10.0 are more dependent on variations in There is over a
3% difference in the two solutions over a large portion of the solution domain.
The above results greatly reduce the number of tables needed to present solution for the
above parameters. Solutions for values of Cw > 50 will have very little dependence on
t4*. An intermediate value of

U* =
10 was used in the generation of the solutions to
minimize the largest possible deviation to approximately 1%. Solutions for values of
58
Cw =
10 are presented for two separate ranges of
to*
This minimizes the largest
possible deviation to approximately 2%. The solutions generated utilizing Thermonet are
*
reported in Tables 6. 1 through 6.3. Only solutions for Cw =
1.0 are presented,
generation of solutions for other values of Cw "is part ongoing work at RIT.
59
* oo CN *o
8 3 m WN. *o s 00 8 3; S a * en
8
OO
r^
NO
OO On at 8 OO
On
oo
8 in m
m
en
V
OO
*o
00 <n
oo 8 m
On
>n
On
r-
o-
oc
O
OO
On
O O o d o o d o o
cn to C O o d o O O so o o O o O c C
CN
CN
M II II
* *
* <n oo oo
rt Qi
CN OO a On 0\ 0\ On 8 8 8 8 *
8 3 P NO
a
m 00
8 8 8 8 n ô NO
a
oo
o o o o d d d d
oo On On On CN in oo On On Os 8 8 8
O d d d d O EC o o O O O O
* en o NO m
8 CN C1 V) \o P p OO 8 ON 8 On
CN
r*l
<n
r- oo 8 3 8 a oo
8 T
a
ri
8
r-
^r ON r*i >n
rf
r-
o
p O CO o O O O O tf O d O o o O o O
il n
* * *
rt PC rt
* OO oo On oo o * r~-
oo OO 5 s On On 8 8 8 8 o
n
OO
ON
0O
en
On 8 a oo
On 8 8 8 *
s * o ON oo
ff m
* OO 00
s>
O 3 o o o O O 8 o
* m OO o CN O NO *
8 cn en n NO p OO OO 8 a On
CN CN
*n 8
oo m
o! at 8
r-
On
OO
On 8
* in m en r-
S
m
8 en v>
s
r^ oo
O o CO o o O o o CO o O
n o
n li II
* * *
rt rt
* <* o NO *n DO
s a On a On 8 8 8 8 s o
m oo 8 a; * oo
On 8 8 8 en On
s ft en On
a in r- oo
8
els'
O O O o
<3*
""
O O o O o o o
m en OO m *
n 8 en m NO P oo oo a ON a S ft
Cl
V)
ON
oo
On
oo at a On 8 8 8 VI o <n
15 00 CN m
K
r- oo OO
O o o o o CO O O o o O
co-
O o
cn
^"
o o o
est CN
II II II
* *
rt rt
* O o V) OO * On
tN r- 8 On On On 8 8 8 8 8 8 cor
8
Cl
s 00 at a 8 8 8 8 8 g * DO
CN
oo
m R
ON
on a 8 oo
8 8 8 8
V o o ~ ~ ^ ~ O o O o ~ ~
u1
o O o
*
1-5 CN NO m OO * CN o o -1-
O CN en \o P oo a On a o> <*> vt 8 fS oo On a 8 a oo
ON
OO
On m
m
>n
oo
NO P o
a 8
r- oo 00
II no CO O o O o O O o o O o o *o Cd o O o o CO o O <r> o o o
o o
n II II
11 II li
* *
* *
rt * *
r-
g
n oo
_ en
no 00 a a On 8 8% 8 8 8 OO
o
OO
m \o oo
cn
8 a a
oo
On 8 8 8 8 3 CN n P
en
00 8 a 8
oo
On 8 8
di'
CO o o o o o O O CO o o O ^~
o o O O
fc
V5
* r-
DO CN o O VI * CN CN VO >n oo * *
O o CN NO P OO oo On On a 8 "1 m V) 8 P oo ol On a ON 8 8 c5*
en
en
n
DO
NT) p OO On a ! On
oo OO
CO o o o o O CO o o O O o O O O O o
VI <n
II II II II
* * *
rt Pi
* OO <n Ô * On
H V) OO 3, & On a 8 8 8 8 8 m <n OO a On On 8 8 8 8 en
O 9 CN
NO
NO
oo 8 a NO OO
On 8 8
CO o o O o o o o O " <o O o o O o O w O o O O o
NO 35
* r- * *
8 CN en in t> 00 oo On $ 8 n <n VI OO 30 On On On On On On 1 en m On a v\ 7n 7n 8 8
CN
3 o o O O o o O O O O
CN
CO o o o o O O O
CN
CO O O o O
II II
* *
1* Qi
* en ON * oo * in On NO DO
CN NO On 8! 8 8 g 8 8 8 8 8 Os On 8 8 8 8 8 8 CN s oo On On On 8 8 8 8 8
to O o o O o o CO o O CO O o o O O "~~
' *~~
' ~"
* 00 O n 00 * CN On oo * m oo n OO oo
O CN NO 00 00 3
On On P S a m 8 r- oo a a 8 ON a On en OO oo a On ON On On 8
cn o O o o O o o o o o O o O 3O o o o O O o O CO O O O
d o o
II *ll II
II II il
* * *
* *
rt
* IT) * 00 On ON n DO * in en n in OO
a CN
NO CO a a 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o en NO oo a On 8 8 8 8 8 s CN >n s oo On On On On 8 8 8
o o o o o O o 3 o o O o O O ~ ~ " " <o o o o O O O O ^~
r * On
* o in # CN OO oo m O r> OO OO
oo
O est
CNI
NO s P oo 00 a Oa On 8 m <n NO p oo On a 8 OnOn On 2; a "n NO oo oo a 3N 8 On On 8
2 O o o o o o O o o o O CO O O o o o O O O CO o o O O O O
CO >n
II n II
*
rtf
*
Si * CN On oo oo DO
Pi
en oo CN in
O m
n p On * s 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 m V) oo a; On On 8 8 8 8 o CN. 4 3 r- DO On ON On 7\ 8 8
eo o o O o ci O O o O O " CO o O o O ""*
*r\ o o
r^ _ OO <n CN On NO m O r-
+
^-
VI in VI o in o V") O m * OO CN NO -* OO CN NO "* 00
f ** *
It rs *- ^ II CN rN m m Tf TT n m if z> N CN N n n TT *f
J
J **
60
*
a'
3
Vi
3
H
es
2S
61
ON oo CN On in On
* is oo O r^ r-*
n
CN 5 oo
<n 8 P P n
oo 00
On
OO On a
*
CN
en 8
m
OO
n
oo
DO
00 On a g On
en
8
*
u
a
en ô
oo
en
r-
en
oo
3
OO g a I m
Os 8
IS
On
On
r~
On
CN o o O O o o o O O
CN CN
II II
*
S * On On m en 00 n
*
Pi
3 P
en CN ô m P"
en
5" O
oo en
en
NO
in 1 r- oo I
*
o
OO
o CN
00
en
CN
VN
en
NO
S
r-
en
oo
p
oo 8
en
en
o
CN 8
CN
3
8 s
p 8 p s 00
5! 8
o O CO
O o O O
NO CN O ON <n On
*
P 8 5
* m OO CN en CN OO oo Os oo en OO On oo m O
CO
v>
CN
o
3
O
*n
O
00
o
00
n
oo
o
oo
On
CO ON
O o
a CN
en S 8 f OO
in
oo
OO
OO 8 CN
S Vt
rTs 8
CO
9
CN NO
8
CN
(Ts s VI
8 OO
p O O o o O O O O O o O o O O o
II
II ll II
* * *
* *
rt o in On CN On Pi CN r^
*
Pi
* 3 On NO oo p^
*
m en en a !C n 8 s P On
*
g
oo m *
? Sf CN _ o CN in NO V)
P n en CN
is
rn, t O r*- 00 oo On o m VI NO P 00 oo On a 8
o O O O o O o CO o o o o
NO CN o On n O
#
P a * OO
8 5
NO en CN oo oo en OO On oo w
m
CN 9 m 15 oo
p- oo
*n
oo oo On
en
ON en a 8 ft oooo
oo
oo
CN
ON a m
On 8
#
a
CN
NO 3 oo
*o
oo Os
CN
ON s m
ON 8
P
ON
OO
Os
VI O O o o o o O o O
II II n
* *
rt CN CN DO m CN Pi o oo OO n On NO Pi CN
*
8 5 *
P *
a CN en NO m
CN
O
o
NO
CN en
O
<n 8
o o
P p
o o
CN
OO
o
no ON
OO
o O
OO
en
o
CN
CN
O
^
o
m
V-l
O
1 P
o
81
o
00
o
On 8
m
o
en
CN
o
% 8 & VI
oo 1 en
ON
V")
ON
o
oo ON * CN n CN en 0 en ^
ft
& 4 fi 8 & CN m On
S
OO
a p oo
*
oo NO p oo oo DO
in NO oo is! On ol On en in rS oo On On ON ON ON 9 8 P- OO ON a On On On On o^
o O O o o O O O O O O o o O O o o o O O O
CN CN
II II il
*
oi oo oo On OO DO Pi o r- o oo m r- pi f- Os * CN VI so en
g *? s a 18
*
a a * a S *
P 8 8
CN
On no o
ON o m n oo ON ON On o 5 m p DO OO ON On ON Os On
o O o o o O O o O
*
e
r- r- ,_ L NO
l-H *
P *
0 a 9 in 8 P ? <n
00 oo oo ON a On en a OO
\o P en
oo
00
00 ON On
n
On 8 a On *
V)
NO E DO 8 On
n
On 8 ON $
OO
On
00
ON
en
II <o O O O o o o o sO o o o O O O O VO o O O O O O
o O o
II n n
II
* *
* * *
Pi in en *n Pi ON o oo CN >n Pi OO m oo en Os en en
*
8 P 8 8 *
P 3 * 2; 8
1 CN 1 r-
m NO p^ oo oo 00 o\ S 8 3
OO
o CN
in
3 NO p 00 oo On I 8
O
On o
oo
9
o
in
NO
oo
r- oo ON 1 8
oo
ON 8
o O O O o o o
o oo n r- On NO O t*\ OO NO oo en ON ON n O P--
o
#
$ K Sf *
8 p P P *
^ X CN s 3
2 en rs T n no p P- oo oo oo On On ON en n *o oo oo On ON On 8 Os On 5 NO oo Os On Os On ON Os On
m
w o o o o o m
is O o O O Vi O o o o o O o o O
"3 II 11 II
Vi
* *
rt oo CN Pi sO OS OO On in CN oo CN NO CN CN On Os
m
8 p P *
a
p 8
#
*
en p m
en
in
<n
SO 00
m
oo oo ON 3I o
n OO Ô
en S sD SI ON en
On
n
Os On
<n ON
en 8 CN
OO
oo
oo
en
Os
in
ON
r-
ON
DO
On
en CO o o o o o o O o o o o
\o fc
u
ON en in oo VI en en NO 00 Os oo ON en Os en
s p
*
P 8 iIi
*
#
*n
oo 8
en
On
*n
On On
oo
ON 8 S18 n
oo On
in
On On
DO
ON g1 8 8 oo
m
On 8
oo
On g 8
o O o O O O o o o O O O O O O o o O O o o o o
CN CN CN
II II
* * *
Pi Pi OO f"- Pi <n ON ON oo en
m
a 8 8 8 8 a 8 8 8 8
*
o
IS m
no On On
m
ON ON g O
*
CN
o
o
CN m 1 OO I On 8 g CN
CN m
O
r
o
i On
O
OO
On Os On O O O
CO o o o o O "* " *" *""' o o o "~ " "" ~
p- en On en CN ON m On CN en en
CN en m *n oo <n n en
a *
P
*
a 3 8
v-t
n3 <n
f?N a
0O
ON 8
*
CN
en
OO
*n ?1g a 8
oo
0\
OO
On ON % 8
CN
| oo
CI
ON
o
n
Os On
oo
On
oo
On
O
8
O
On
On
On
On
O
8
O
CN CO d o o o o o o o O O CN o o
d d n
II II
n II
n * *
* *
*
Si On p- oo
rt On
p
m en
P
NO
Pi
* CN ON NO
8 8 8 8 8
*
3n oo en
8
n oo
ggggg
*
n
NO
en
oo
CN
On On 8 8 gg CN
I OO
Ô
<n
oo a
oo
Os O
CO o o O o ~ ~ ^ ~ -" o O ^~ " o O O O o ~ " "
NO CN m oo DO CN DO en en
a
m
s a
p- CN
p
CN * On en
P On Os On
* oo m p oo OO 8 a On ON
1
* CN CN ON OO en
03 d
5d o o o
CN in
O
OO On
On
O n
en
O
NO
m
o
OO OO On
O
8 ON
O
ON
O
Os
O
On On
in
NO oo
o
8 ON ON
o
On On On On On On
O
II II
II
#
Si S: o VI m
Pi
* o CN
P
en in O
oo
8
ON oo CN in
P 8 g CN
1 o
g g
ggggg
* >o oo n oo oo
>n
8
v-i oo
O en <n oo On On 8 O en m 8 ON 8 8
CO
CO d o O o o
d O o o "" *~ ~~ "" ~"
*r\ o o
<N
II
*
o CN en en
CN
^>
on
*r <n NO
NO
no
CN
r-
*
*
II
1
f
*'
"T
O
OO
O
CN NO
~
o
CN
T
CN
oo
CN
CN
m
NO
en
o
T
T oo
1
*
* -<r oo CN
~
NO * oo CN
m
NO ^r oo
*3
<*
,3
L.
62
7. Discussion of Results
Of the six dimensionless parameters (NTU, C*. R*, ^ \ t*, U*) needed to
define a transient solution, the parameter which has the greatest effect on the length of
"
time required to complete a transient is Cw *. Recall that the definition of Cw is the
ratio of wall capacitance to capacitance of the Can fluid:
Cw =
Cw / C (MCpJw.u/CMCpXnin
Hence, the larger the value of Cw *, the larger the wall is in relation to the fluids. If the
wall is large compared to the fluids, a large amount of time will be required to reach new
steady state operating conditions because the thermal energy stored in the wall must be
"
dissipated. Therefore, large values of Cw imply long time durations for the heat
exchanger to reach new steady state operating conditions. Knowledge of this value will
give the designer a general idea of the transient response of a heat exchanger.
td*
It is demonstrated by comparison runs using Thermonet that the parameter has
very little influence on transient solutions for C > 50. The condition that exhibited the
C*
most dependence were for values of Cw =
50, =
1 .0,
NTU =
0.5.
C*
It can be seen in Table 6. 1 for NTU =
0.5 that the value of has only a slight
influence on the transient solution. As the value of NTU increases (Tables 6.2 and 6.3)
C*
has a greater effect.
63
8. Conclusions
Unlike steady state heat exchanger analysis, transient heat exchanger analysis is
very complex. No generally accepted solution exists. Many authors have presented
solutions in literature which are applicable

only to limited ranges of parameters. An
extensive literature survey has been presented in this thesis which has discussed major
solutions available in literature. The application of solutions by Romie (1984) and
Myers(1970) has been discussed in detail, presenting information not clearly discussed in
the respective papers. Recommendations have been made regarding the application of
solutions found in literature.
A thermal network solver software package (Thermonet) has been successfully
utilized to model the transient response of heat exchangers. Thermonet solutions have
been verified with five existing solutions found in literature.
Transient solutions valid for counterflow heat exchangers have been generated for
Cw =
1 .0 and presented in a convenient tabular format. A tabular format has been
developed to present solutions covering a wide range of independent parameters believed
applicable to many practical applications. These solutions represent a significant
contribution to the field of transient heat exchanger analysis for the following reasons:
The solutions are valid for counterflow heat exchangers which are often utilized in
industry due to their thermal advantages.
64
Cw*
Solutions cover a wider range of values than the solution by Romie (1984).
Solutions for the stepped fluid are valid for times less than one dwell time, the solution
by Romie is not accurate in this range.
Solutions are valid for a much wider range of parameters than the solution by London
et al. (1964)
Solutions are much more convenient to utilize than the analytical solution of
Gvozdenac (1987)
65
9. References
Bunce, D.J., Kandlikar, S.G., 1995, "Transient Response of Heat Exchangers", Presented at the Second
ASME-ISHMT conference in Mangalore, India, December
28-30, 1995.
Cima, R.M., London, A.L., 1958, "The Transient Response of a Two-Fluid Counterflow Heat Exchanger-
The Gas-Turbine Regenerator", Trans. ASME, vol. 80, pp. 1 169-1 179.
Chen, H., Chen, K., 1991, "Simple Method for Transient Response of Gas-to-Gas Cross-flow Heat
Exchangers with Neither Gas Mixed", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 34, pp.289 1-
2898.
Chen, H., Chen, K., 1992, 'Transient Response of Crossflow Heat Exchangers With Finite Wall
Capacitance", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 114, pp. 752-755.
Dusinberre, G.M., 1959, "Calculation of Transients in a Cross-Flow Heat Exchanger", Journal of Heat
Transfer, vol. 81, pp. 61-67.
Gvozdenac, D.D., 1986, "Analytical Solution of the Transient Response of Gas-to-Gas Crossflow Heat
Exchanger with Both Fluids Unmixed", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 108, pp. 722-727.
Gvozdenac, D.D., 1987, "Analytical Solution of Transient Response of Gas-to-Gas Parallel and
Counterflow Heat Exchangers", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 109, pp. 848-855.
Kays, W.M., London, A.L., 1964, "Compact Heat Exchangers", Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York
Li, C.H., 1986, "Exact Transient Solutions of Parallel-Current Transfer Processes", Journal of Heat
Transfer, vol. 108, pp. 365-369.
London, A.L., Biancardi, F.R., Mitchell, J.W., 1959, "The Transient Response of Gas-Turbine-Plant Heat
Exchangers
Regenerators, Intercoolers, Precoolers, and Ducting", Journal of Engineering for Power, vol
81, pg. 433^48.
London, A.L., Sampsell, D.F., McGowan, J.G., 1964, "The Transient Response of Gas Turbine Plant Heat
ExchangersAdditional Solutions for Regenerators of the Periodic-Flow and Direct-Transfer
Types",
Journal of Engineering for Power, vol. 86, pp. 127-135.
Myers, G.E., Mitchell, J.W., Lindeman,C.F., 1970, "The Transient Response of Heat Exchangers Having
anInfinite Capacitance Rate Fluid", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 92, pp. 269-275.
Myers, G.E., Mitchell, J.W., Norman, R.F., 1967, "The Transient Response of Crossflow Heat
Exchangers, Evaporators, and Condensers", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 89, pp. 75-80.
Rizika, J. W., 1956, "Thermal Lags in Flowing Incompressible Fluid Systems Containing Heat
Capacitors", Transactions of ASME, vol.78, pg. 1407-1413.
Romie, F.E., 1985, "Transient Response of the Parallel-Flow Heat Exchanger", Journal of Heat Transfer,
107, pp. 727-730.
vol.
66
Romie, F.E., 1984, "Transient Response of the Counterflow Heat Exchanger", Journal of Heat Transfer,
vol. 106, pp. 620-626.
Romie, F.E., 1983, "Transient Response of Gas-to-Gas Crossflow Heat Exchangers With Neither Gas
Mixed", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 105, pp. 563-570.
Exchangers"
Shah, R.K., 1981, "The Transient Response of Heat in "Heat Exchangers Thermal-Hydraulic
Design"
Fundamentals and
Spiga, G, Spiga, M., 1987, "Two-Dimensional Transient Solutions for Crossflow Heat Exchangers With
Neither Gas Mixed", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 109, pp. 281-286.
Spiga, M., Spiga, G, 1988, 'Transient Temperature Fields in Crossflow Heat Exchangers With Finite
Wall Capacitance", Journal of Heat Transfer, vol. 1 10, pp. 49-53.
Spiga, M., Spiga, G, 1992, "Step Response of the Crossflow Heat Exchanger With Finite Wall
Capacitance", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 35, pp. 559-565.
Yamashita, H., Izumi, R., Yamaguchi, S., 1978, "Analysis of the Dynamic Characteristics of Cross-Flow
Heat Exchangers with Both Fluids Unmixed", Bulletin of the JSME, vol. 21, pp.479^185.
67
Appendices
68
Appendix A
Derivation of governing differential equations
The control volume shown in Figure A. 1 shows all energy transfer terms
associated with control volumes for the hot fluid, cold fluid, and wall. During its flow
through the control volume, the hot fluid transfers heat to the wall by convection resulting
in reduction of its outlet enthalpy and internal stored thermal energy.
Figure A. 1 Incremental control volume for counterflow heat exchanger

Applying an energy balance for a control volume around the hot fluid yields:
(Energy);,, -
(Energy)^ =
(Energy)stored
f d Th
[0,^+ f ll f_ dx]d Th
(A1)
*JJ-*A-p7J77
d Th
ChTh ~ChTh -Q, dx -
d x
f dx]B Th 9 Th B Th , v kiV \
+c*77a +c*T7*
PtJtt =('<A rr"F* "rÂ3)
multiply both sides by L/dx
5 Th d Th
Ch+ChL-
=Kv0hA)h\Th -Tw)
"
(A.4)
O t OX
A similar energy balance for the cold fluid yields equation 2.4.
Applying an energy balance around the wall:
(Energy)ou,=
(Energy^ -
(EnergyVred
f^w~
ax]d^
(A5>
dqh
J|TT
=
~
~dqc W
l L o t
M> \Th -*>

-^ f^ -*>
-&) (A6)
multiply both sides by L/dx
Cw -(l<M\(lh ~Tw) +Go^)A(% -O =0 (A-7)

~jf
Appendix B
Investigation of Solution by Myers et al.(1970)
The approximate solution proposed

by Myers et for
al. (1970) is shown to be valid
Cw* >
all values of 1 Table B. 1 summarizes the values for each comparison figure that
follows.
rableB.l
* R*
C NTU Fluids Figure #
5.3 0.49 1.6 Water -

Water B.l
30.4 0.49 1.6 Water- Water B.2
100.0 2.0 1.6 Air- Air B.3
4000.0 2.0 1.6 Air-Air B.4
10000.0 2.0 1.6 Air- Air B.5
14020.0 2.0 1.6 Air -Air B.6
All of the above solutions were generated with the following inlet temperatures:
Temp of Cmh, fluid Temp of Cnm fluid

(Degrees C) (Degrees C)
Before Step 100.0 0.0
Input
After Step 100.0 50.0
Input
o
ON
u
vi
i_
U
Xi
c
o
o
Vi
c
o
e
o
u
o
c/5
w
c
e o
H
5*-
O
e
o
Vi
c
cS
a.
S
o
U
CO
u
a
E
o 00 *o ^r cN O
o 00 SO VO SO SO s
r- r- SO
00
(3 saaiSaa) aiiUBJadurai
o
SO
Os
CO
o
CN v>
ha
U
x>
e
o
O
o
o
C/3
c
O
o
e
o
o
00 I
v
Vi
*-*

O Vi
CO u
>>
X
c
o
o
CN
o
c
o
B
Q
o U
V o
O Vi
CN w
u
c
E o
V
X
H
o CM
in o
E
o
C/3
n
CO
a
E
o
U
o
o
DQ
u
t~
3
00
E
xl-
"T Os xt OS ON >t Os
O-
</-> Tr CO en CN CN
(3 slogan;) ajimuadarax
o
OS
 t * CO CO CN CN
(3 saajSsa) wnjBjaduiax
o
CN
r-
ON
Vi
u
U
X
c
00 o
o
en
C
o
B
e
o
Vi
u
c
e o
u
X
H
c
o
Vi
n
CO
a.
E
o
SO
CQ
 <fr CO co CN CN
(3 saaiSaa) ainjiuadiirai
Appendix C
In order to determine the influence td*

of on transient solutions, Thermonet was
utilized to generate solutions that could be compared against each other. For each set of
parameters listed in table C. 1, two solutions were generated, one solution for td* =
0.2 and
one solution for td* =

4.0. The two results are then compared to determine the influence
td* R*
of on the solution. The first task was to determine the values of NTU, C*, and
Cw*
which yield the highest deviation. For =
50 and NTU =
.5 this was seen to be
C* =
R* C*
1 .0 and =
0.5. Once the values of and
R*
which produce the largest deviation were
determined, the influence of NTU was then investigated. It can be seen in table C. 1 that a
value of NTU =
5.0 did not increase the amount of deviation. It can then be concluded
C*
that the parameter values that produce the largest deviation are NTU =
0.5, =
1 .0,
and
R* Cw*
=
0.5. These parameter values are expected to produce the largest deviation for =
10 as well.
Table C. 1 Summary of influence of t< i*
on transient solutions.
Cw* =
50.0
C* R*
NTU Max. % difference Table #
0.5 0.25 0.5 1.21 % C.2
0.5 0.25 2.0 1.21% C.3
0.5 1.0 0.5 2.32 % C.4
0.5 1.0 2.0 2.26 % C.5
5.0 1.0 0.5 2.02 % C.6
Cw* =
10.0
C* R*
NTU Max % difference Table #
0.5 1.0 0.5 8.60 % C.7
Table C.2
Cw* C*
=
50 NTU =
0.5 =
0.25 R*=0.5
td* =
0.2 td* =
4.0 % difference
time stepped unstepped stepped unstepped stepped unstepped
0 51.1323 24.7169 51.1323 24.7169 0.000 0.000

6.25 70.7555 25.5762 70.7595 25.8866 0.006 1.214
12.5 74.9829 26.6139 74.9918 26.9130 0.012 1.124
18.75 78.4263 27.4949 78.4388 27.7504 0.016 0.929
25j 81.3094 28.2172 81.3241 28.4326 0.018 0.763

31.25 83.7125 28.8068 83.7285 28.9890 0.019 0.632
37.5 85.7073 29.2872 85.7240 29.4416 0.019 0.527
43.75 87.3573 29.6778 87.3740 29.8048 0.019 0.428
50 88.7175 29.9947 88.7338 30.0999 0.018 0.351
56.25 89.8355 30.2517 89.8510 30.3397 0.017 0.291
62.5 90.7522 30.4597 90.7666 30.5319 0.016 0.237
68.75 91.5017 30.6278 91.5149 30.6856 0.014 0.189
75 92.1135 30.7635 92.1255 30.8126 0.013 0.160
81.25 92.6116 30.8728 92.6224 30.9119 0.012 0.127
87.5 93.0165 30.9609 93.0261 30.9944 0.010 0.108
93.75 93.3451 31.0318 93.3534 31.0572 0.009 0.082
100 93.6112 31.0887 93.6186 31.1113 0.008 0.073
106.25 93.8266 31.1344 93.8330 31.1515 0.007 0.055
112.5 94.0005 31.1711 94.0058 31.1844 0.006 0.043
118.75 94.1408 31.2005 94.1455 31.2121 0.005 0.037
125 94.2538 31.2240 94.2577 31.2319 0.004 0.025
131.25 94.3449 31.2429 94.3480 31.2488 0.003 0.019
137.5 94.4182 31.2580 94.4206 31.2624 0.003 0.014
143.75 94.4769 31.2700 94.4791 31.2730 0.002 0.010
150 94.5240 31.2796 94.5256 31.2830 0.002 0.011
Table C.3
*
C
V-'W
==
50 NTU =
0.5 C* =
0.25 R ==
2.0
td*
time =
0.2 td* =
4.0 % difference
stepped unstepped stepped unstepped stepped unstepped
0 51.1323 24.7169 51.1323 24.7169 0.000 0.000

3.125 70.7555 25.5762 70.7595 25.8866 0.006 1.214
6.25 74.9829 26.6139 74.9918 26.9130 0.012 1.124
9.375 78.4263 27.4949 78.4388 27.7504 0.016 0.929
12.5 81.3094 28.2172 81.3241 28.4326 0.018 0.763
15.625 83.7125 28.8068 83.7285 28.9890 0.019 0.632
18.75 85.7073 29.2872 85.7240 29.4416 0.019 0.527
21.875 87.3573 29.6778 87.3740 29.8048 0.019 0.428
25 88.7175 29.9947 88.7338 30.0999 0.018 0.351
28.125 89.8355 30.2517 89.8510 30.3397 0.017 0.291
31.25 90.7522 30.4597 90.7666 30.5319 0.016 0.237
34.375 91.5017 30.6278 91.5149 30.6856 0.014 0.189
37.5 92.1135 30.7635 92.1255 30.8126 0.013 0.160
40.625 92.6116 30.8728 92.6224 30.9119 0.012 0.127
43.75 93.0165 30.9609 93.0261 30.9944 0.010 0.108
46.875 93.3451 31.0318 93.3534 31.0572 0.009 0.082
50 93.6112 31.0887 93.6186 31.1113 0.008 0.073
53.125 93.8266 31.1344 93.8330 31.1515 0.007 0.055
56.25 94.0005 31.1711 94.0058 31.1844 0.006 0.043
59.375 94.1408 31.2005 94.1455 31.2121 0.005 0.037
62.5 94.2538 31.2240 94.2577 31.2319 0.004 0.025
65.625 94.3449 31.2429 94.3480 31.2488 0.003 0.019
68.75 94.4182 31.2580 94.4206 31.2624 0.003 0.014
71.875 94.4769 31.2700 94.4791 31.2730 0.002 0.010
75 94.5240 31.2796 94.5256 31.2830 0.002 0.011
Table C.4
Cw* C*
=
50 NTU =
0.5 =
1.0 R* =
0.5
td* = td*
.2
=
4 % difference
0 53.3504 36.6496 53.3504 36.6496 0.000 0.000

6.25 73.0031 39.6188 73.0154 40.5394 0.017 2.324
12.5 77.3195 43.0672 77.3472 43.9627 0.036 2.079
18.75 80.8997 45.9995 80.9395 46.7863 0.049 1.711
25 83.9529 48.4296 84.0013 49.1143 0.058 1.414
31.25 86.5469 50.4403 86.6010 51.0329 0.063 1.175
37.5 88.7434 52.1029 88.8007 52.6137 0.065 0.980
43.75 90.5980 53.4771 90.6563 53.9158 0.064 0.820
50 92.1589 54.6124 92.2177 54.9879 0.064 0.688
56.25 93.4720 55.5501 93.5282 55.8705 0.060 0.577
62.5 94.5718 56.3242 94.6258 56.5970 0.057 0.484
68.75 95.4931 56.9628 95.5434 57.1948 0.053 0.407
75 96.2626 57.4906 96.3092 57.6866 0.048 0.341
81.25 96.9047 57.9252 96.9473 58.0910 0.044 0.286
87.5 97.4395 58.2834 97.4782 58.4236 0.040 0.241
93.75 97.8847 58.5798 97.9195 58.6970 0.036 0.200
100 98.2548 58.8240 98.2858 58.9219 0.032 0.166
106.25 98.5623 59.0250 98.5896 59.1066 0.028 0.138
112.5 98.8174 59.1904 98.8413 59.2585 0.024 0.115
118.75 99.0289 59.3267 99.0497 59.3832 0.021 0.095
125 99.2042 59.4392 99.2220 59.4857 0.018 0.078
131.25 99.3493 59.5321 99.3645 59.5700 0.015 0.064
137.5 99.4693 59.6085 99.4821 59.6391 0.013 0.051
143.75 99.5686 59.6713 99.5793 59.6959 0.011 0.041
150 99.6507 59.7232 99.6594 59.7426 0.009 0.032
Table C. 5
Cw* R*
=
50 NTU =
0.5 C*=1.0 =
2.0
td* =
0.2 td =
4.0 % difference
0 53.3504 36.6496 53.3504 36.6496 0.000 0.000

3.125 88.1830 39.6400 88.2064 40.5367 0.027 2.262
6.25 90.5454 43.0852 90.5930 43.9618 0.053 2.035
9.375 92.2231 46.0098 92.2858 46.7867 0.068 1.689
12.5 93.6046 48.4342 93.6752 49.1155 0.075 1.407
15.625 94.7426 50.4406 94.8159 51.0346 0.077 1.178
18.75 95.6796 52.1002 95.7523 52.6157 0.076 0.989
21.875 96.4516 53.4725 96.5210 53.9179 0.072 0.833
25 97.0873 54.6067 97.1521 54.9901 0.067 0.702
28.125 97.6104 55.5438 97.6700 55.8726 0.061 0.592
31.25 98.0412 56.3177 98.0952 56.5990 0.055 0.500
34.375 98.3958 56.9567 98.4441 57.1966 0.049 0.421
37.5 98.6879 57.4841 98.7305 57.6882 0.043 0.355
40.625 98.9282 57.9194 98.9656 58.0926 0.038 0.299
43.75 99.1257 58.2784 99.1585 58.4251 0.033 0.252
46.875 99.2889 58.5746 99.3168 58.6979 0.028 0.211
50 99.4228 58.8188 99.4468 58.9231 0.024 0.177
53.125 99.5332 59.0201 99.5534 59.1077 0.020 0.148

56.25 99.6238 59.1860 99.6409 59.2595 0.017 0.124
59.375 99.6985 59.3228 99.7127 59.3842 0.014 0.104
62.5 99.7598 59.4355 99.7716 59.4867 0.012 0.086
65.625 99.8105 59.5283 99.8200 59.5708 0.010 0.071
68.75 99.8521 59.6048 99.8597 59.6399 0.008 0.059
71.875 99.8863 59.6678 99.8922 59.6968 0.006 0.049
75 99.9145 59.7197 99.9190 59.7434 0.004 0.040

Table C.6
Cw* C*
=
50 NTU =
5.0 =
1.0 R* =
0.5
td* =
0.2 td* =
4.0 % difference
0.00 28.63588 61.36412 28.63588 61.36412 0 0

10.23 28.64532 72.26808 28.64593 73.72906 0.002129 2.021605
20.45 28.67432 80.99748 28.67691 82.51867 0.009025 1.878076
30.68 28.73314 87.39566 28.73987 88.8297 0.023419 1.640856
51.14 28.97003 95.81677 28.99367 97.07901 0.081626 1.317353
71.59 29.38729 101.0106 29.441 102.1396 0.182783 1.117717
92.05 29.97384 104.522 30.06866 105.5459 0.316342 0.979554
102.27 30.3189 105.887 30.437 106.8662 0.389529 0.924819
112.50 30.69012 107.0652 30.83257 108.0043 0.464143 0.877081
122.73 31.08154 108.0951 31.24836 108.9969 0.536708 0.834289
132.95 31.48703 109.0038 31.67787 109.8709 0.606078 0.795508
153.41 32.31768 110.5367 32.55296 111.3415 0.72801 0.728092
163.64 32.73327 111.1898 32.98876 111.9652 0.780506 0.697446
184.09 33.54644 112.3206 33.83489 113.0443 0.859847 0.644277
194.32 33.93837 112.8131 34.24001 113.5119 0.888796 0.619451
214.77 34.68335 113.6797 35.00493 114.3309 0.927197 0.572829
225.00 35.03454 114.0633 35.36245 1 14.6906 0.935976 0.549894
245.45 35.68954 114.7439 36.02517 115.3266 0.940413 0.507795
255.68 35.99349 115.0471 36.33029 115.6083 0.935736 0.487783
276.14 36.55475 115.59 36.88936 116.1095 0.915356 0.449421
286.36 36.81273 115.8331 37.14426 116.3326 0.900569 0.431214
306.82 37.28521 116.2702 37.60799 116.7311 0.865686 0.39641
317.05 37.50083 116.4665 37.81821 116.9092 0.846333 0.380105
337.50 37.8954 116.8209 38.19876 117.2273 0.80053 0.347905
347.73 38.07455 116.9804 38.37067 117.3701 0.777745 0.333141
368.18 38.40152 117.2675 38.68104 117.6258 0.727872 0.305618
378.41 38.5492 117.3976 38.82086 117.7395 0.704699 0.291229
398.86 38.81852 117.6328 39.07285 117.945 0.655177 0.265463
409.09 38.94019 117.7389 39.18626 118.0374 0.63192 0.253534
429.55 39.16145 117.9307 39.39045 118.2024 0.584751 0.230388
450.00 39.35561 118.0984 39.5676 118.3466 0.538653 0.210137
Table C. 7
Cw* C* R*
=
10 NTU =
0.5 =
1.0 =
0.5
td* =
0.2 td* =
4.0 % difference
0 53.3504 36.6496 53.3504 36.6496 0.000 0.000

1.5625 69.1950 38.5725 69.2212 41.1956 0.038 6.800
3.125 78.0114 41.7899 78.1192 45.7204 0.138 9.405
4.6875 82.9367 45.1666 83.1379 49.2029 0.243 8.937
6.25 86.7139 48.2135 86.9874 51.8389 0.315 7.519
7.8125 89.6797 50.7628 89.9975 53.8342 0.354 6.051
9.375 92.0024 52.8115 92.3390 55.3433 0.366 4.794
10.9375 93.8157 54.4250 94.1512 56.4820 0.358 3.779
12.5 95.2271 55.6835 95.5472 57.3393 0.336 2.973
14.0625 96.3231 56.6606 96.6199 57.9890 0.308 2.344
15.625 97.1723 57.4171 97.4409 58.4759 0.276 1.844
17.1875 97.8296 58.0018 98.0676 58.8434 0.243 1.451
18.75 98.3374 58.4533 98.5444 59.1195 0.211 1.140
20.3125 98.7292 58.8016 98.9074 59.3285 0.180 0.896
21.875 99.0313 59.0699 99.1830 59.4860 0.153 0.704
23.4375 99.2640 59.2765 99.3921 59.6040 0.129 0.553
25 99.4431 59.4355 99.5504 59.6918 0.108 0.431

The Transient Response of Heat Exchangers PDF

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Transient Response of Heat Exchangers PDF

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rochester Institute of Technology

RIT Scholar Works

The Transient response of heat exchangers

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses

A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment

Professor Satish G. Kandlikar

Professor Robert 1. Hefuer

Professor Alan H. Nye

Professor Charles W. Haines

DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

The transient response of heat exchangers to a change in inlet temperature of one

process and geometrical variables on the transient performance is evaluated.

without Him we can do nothing.

3.3 Solutions for Parallelflow Configurations 21

3 .4 Solutions for Counterflow Configurations 24

3.5 Solutions for Crossflow Configurations 31

3.6 Recommendations from Available Solutions 36

4. Application of Thermal Network Solver 38

5. Validation of Thermal Network Solver Accuracy 45

6. Results for Counterflow Heat Exchangers 57

A. Derivation ofGoverning Differential Equations

3.1 Solutions for C*=0 14

3.2 Solutions for parallel flow configurations 21

3.3 Solutions for counterflow configurations 24

3.4 Constants utilized in solution by Romie( 1984) 28

3.5 Solutions for crossflow configurations 31

4.1 Optimum number of segments 41

5.1 Comparison summary 45

6.1 Results for NTU =

6.2 Results for NTU= 1.0, "c7*= 1.0 61

6.3 Results for NTU =

1.1 Typical counterflow heat exchanger 2

12 Steady state operating conditions before and after a

1.5 Impulse input 3

2. 1 Counterflow heat exchanger and incremental control volume 6

3 1 . Typical temperature response for the Cm fluid for a step

3 .2 Typical temperature response of the Cm,, fluid for a step

3.3 Outlet temperature response for

temperature of the Cmi,, fluid, Myers (1967) 20

3.4 Solutions for counterflow configurations, London etal. (1964) .... 25

3 5 . 90% response times for a crossflow heat exchanger,

4 1 . Thermal network model of a counterflow heat exchanger 38

4.2 Temperature vs. time step 42

4.3 Temperature vs. time step 43

4.4 Temperature vs. timestep 44

5 1 . Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

52 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

5 3 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by Romie ( 1 984) ... 49

5.4 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution

5.5 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by Rizika (1956) ... 51

5.6 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by Rizika (1956) ... 52

5.7 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

5.8 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

5.9 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

5.10 Comparison of Thermonet solution to solution by

C fluid heat capacity rate (equation 2.2)

C heat capacitance (equation 2. 1)

NTU number of heat transfer units(equations 2.9, 3.12 and 3.21)

R dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equation 3.11 and 3 .20)

T(t) Outlet temperature at time t

V dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equation 3. 13 for parallel flow, equation

3.22 for counterflow))

9 dimensionless quantity defined by Romie (equations 3 9, . 3 17