Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summarypublication PDF
Summarypublication PDF
asdf
United Nations
National Implementation of Agenda 21:
A Summary
asdf
United Nations
New York, August 2002
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The material used in the National Implementation of Agenda 21: A Summary is based upon
information contained in national reports submitted by Governments since 1994 to the Commission
on Sustainable Development. The Secretariat would like to thank the 130 countries that have sub-
mitted national reports thus far. Special thanks also go to the National Focal Points who have played
an important role over the years in coordinating the preparation and submission of these reports.
The Secretariat is most grateful to all the graduate students that over the years have participated
in our work through the United Nations Internship Programme and the United Nations volunteers.
Their assistance in identifying and analyzing information contained in national reports to be reflected
in the current report, which required enormous concentration, patience and accuracy, has been
invaluable.Without their assistance, the preparation of this summary would not have been possible.
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii
PREFACE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
PART I: GLOBAL CHARTS ON SELECTED ISSUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
AGRICULTURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
COMBATING POVERTY ............................................8
DECISION-MAKING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
EDUCATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
ENERGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
FRESHWATER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
HEALTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
OCEANS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
PART II: SAMPLER OF REGIONAL AND NATIONAL LEVEL INFORMATION . . . 25
COMBATING POVERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
HEALTH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
ANNEXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
Annex I. Table on International Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
Annex II. Countries’ Reporting Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
iii
PREFACE
The National Implementation of Agenda 21: A Summary provides an overview of the gene-
ral status of national implementation of Agenda 21, based upon the national reports and 2002
Country Profiles submitted by Governments to the Commission on Sustainable Development
(CSD). The report in its entirety (approximately 300 pages), complete with tables and charts, is
available on the National Information web page of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development
website at the following address: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/.This published
version provides an illustrative summary of a selection of both sectoral and cross-sectoral issues,
which are among those being discussed at the World Summit on Sustainable Development
(WSSD) in Johannesburg, South Africa in 2002.
The National Implementation report was prepared by the National Information Analysis Unit in
the Division for Sustainable Development of the United Nations Department of Economic and Social
Affairs (UN/DESA). Since 1993, this Unit has analyzed and maintained national reports submitted to
the CSD by Governments through their designated National Focal Points, and 1997 and 2002 Country
Profiles prepare for the Earth Summit +5 and the World Summit on Sustainable Development, respec-
tively.The Unit is in the process of developing a web-enabled database on national implementation
which will, when completed, significantly facilitate interaction between the UN Secretariat and the
National Focal Points in requesting and submitting future national reports, as well as provide better
service to world-wide users for searching and retrieving specific information.
Information services are not static but rather dynamic dimensions of the work of the Division
for Sustainable Development, and therefore we welcome any feedback, comments and suggestions to
this report as well as to any aspects of the Division’s work related to national information analysis.
Jo Anne DiSano
Director
Division for Sustainable Development
Department of Economic and Social Affairs
United Nations
iv
INTRODUCTION
The National Implementation of Agenda 21: A Summary has been prepared to provide a global
outlook of the status of national implementation of Agenda 21.The full report, covering all the chap-
ters of Agenda 21 and those issues that have been separately addressed by the CSD in recent years,
will be available on the web at: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/.
It should be noted that the information contained in the 2002 Country Profiles submitted to the
National Information Analysis Unit after 24 May 2002 and prior to the WSSD will be continuously ana-
lyzed and reflected in the full report at the aforementioned website.
The report is based upon the national information provided by Governments as part of the
national reporting process on the national implementation of Agenda 21 dating back to 1994. It also
responds to the request made by Governments in Resolution 2001/PC/1 entitled “Progress in the
preparatory activities at the local, national, sub-regional, regional and international levels as well as
by major groups”, whereby, in paragraph 7, it invites the Secretariat to prepare a “Trends Report”
based on the national reports/country profiles submitted to the CSD.
Part I of this summary version illustrates global charts on selected issues and Part II illustrates a
sample of charts on regional and national implementation related to two key issues: Combating
Poverty, and Health.
1
METHODOLOGY
A decision was made to report only on a selection of issues, Programmes and Projects reflect those mentioned in the
since the purpose is only to give a preview or glimpse into the specific chapter of Agenda 21 (with paragraph references) and
national implementation of Agenda 21 for which information is on which information was provided.
sufficiently available; namely: Education aspect focuses on public awaress-raising, train-
- Agriculture; ing and the inclusion of the sustainable development concept in
- Combating Poverty; curricula.
- Decision-Making (e.g. institutions and strategy issues); Information aspect focuses on management of data on sus-
- Education (based on sectoral perspectives); tainable development ranging from comprehensive information
- Energy (part of consumption & production issue); systems to ways to collect and manage information such as
- Freshwater; inventories, surveys and databases.
- Health;
Financing relates to domestic financing, e.g. subsidies,
- Information (based on sectoral perspectives); and,
taxes, incentives and “polluter pays” principle.
- Oceans.
Technology relates to issues such as forecasting (e.g. disas-
This report illustrates those activities that are most repre-
ter forecasting), genetic resource conservation, biodiversity
sentative across regions (Africa, Asia & Pacific, Europe & North
research and alternative energy sources.
America, Latin America & Caribbean, and Western Asia).
Cooperation focuses on aspects of international coopera-
The following aspects, including Means of Implementation,
tion not considered in international agreements (which are pre-
have been integrated into the sectoral issues: decision-making,
sented in Annex I) such as: forms of cooperation within states or
major groups participation, education, information, financing,
sharing information systems at the regional level.
technology and international cooperation. Issue-specific expla-
nations for these aspects are given in conjunction with the The analysis of the status of national implementation is
graphics presented; a generic glossary is given below: qualitative in nature; it shows that a particular activity is either:
a) implemented; b) in progress; or c) information is not appli-
Decision-Making refers to a) Coordinating Body; and b)
cable.
Participation of Major Groups in decision-making. Major Groups
participation may comprise all 9 of them or, when specific major The analysis was conducted as follows: First, at the National
groups appear to be crucial to the decision-making process, they level (Table Form) to establish the status of implementation on a
have been highlighted accordingly. country-by-country basis.
2
Second,at the Regional level (Bar Chart) where countries were cific name is mentioned despite there being evidence of the
grouped into regions and the information summarized in terms of body’s existence from the content of the text. In this and other
the percentage of countries in a region which have either:a) imple- similar cases, despite this “lack of a specific name”, the interpre-
mented a particular activity; or b) that activity is in progress. tation that has been applied is that the country indeed has a spe-
Third, the Global level (Pie Chart), where activities both cific activity in place. A second example relates to Sustainable
implemented and in progress by a particular region have been Development Strategies. Many countries reported having such
grouped by category (e.g. Education).These are represented by strategies, despite the fact that only one dimension of sustainable
pie charts where the share of a pie for each region under each development (e.g. the environmental aspect) was highlighted. In
issue represents the percentage of activities in that region that these cases, the National Programmes for Environment and
are implemented and/or in progress for that element or category Development, or National Environmental Action Plans that are
of implementation. nationally considered Sustainable Development Strategies have
been reflected in this Report as such.
This report provides an analysis of the national implementa-
tion status for two of the cross-sectoral issues: combating pover- The English translations for the 2002 Country Profiles submit-
ty, and health at national, regional and global levels. A further ted by Russian Federation and Tajikistan are not yet available. Some
seven issues, agriculture, decision-making, education, energy, reporting countries have provided updated information on a few
freshwater, information and oceans are presented at the most chapters thus, their other chapters may not be up-to-date.
aggregated, global level. The web version of the full National National Assessments versus Country Profiles: It should be
Implementation Report will provide all three layers of analysis of noted that the purpose, approach, format and nature of the
information. Issues (or groups of issues) not included in this cur- National Assessments, prepared by countries for the
rent report are: atmosphere, biodiversity, changing consumption Johannesburg Summit, are distinctively different from those of
patterns (consumers), demographics, desertification, forests, haz- the Country Profiles which formed the basis of this National
ardous/solid/radioactive wastes, human settlements, industry, Implementation of Agenda 21 report. The former exercise was
international cooperation, land management, mountains, sustain- intended to provide findings of the ten-year review and assess-
able tourism, toxic chemicals, trade and transport. ment of national implementation, often conducted through
Every effort has been made to reflect, as accurately as possi- multi-stakeholders dialogues or national forums. It was focused
ble, the information submitted by each country. However, occa- on identifying major achievements, challenges and priorities for
sional ambiguities and voids in the texts submitted by countries the future. The Country Profiles, on the other hand, provide
may have required that some interpretation be applied. For exam- chapter-by-chapter or issue-by-issue overview of the latest state of
ple, a country may have named a Coordinating Body for a specific affairs or information.The latter uses a very standardized format.
issue in 90% of the cases. However, in 10% of the cases, no spe-
3
PART I:
GLOBAL CHARTS
ON SELECTED ISSUES
5
EXPLANATORY NOTE
6
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
AGRICULTURE
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education
Europe & North America Europe & North America
17% Europe & North America
Asia & Pacific 14% Asia & Pacific 14%
Asia & Pacific 10%
9% 10% Latin America & Carib. Latin America & Carib.
Latin America & Carib. 8%
10% 8%
Africa
Africa 9%
Africa 7%
W. Asia W. Asia
9% 2%
2%
W. Asia
2%
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America Europe & North America Asia & Pacific Europe & North America
15% Asia & Pacific 16% 6%
10% 17%
Latin America & Carib. 8% Latin America & Carib.
8% 6% Latin America & Carib.
6%
Africa Africa
Africa 4% 8%
8% W. Asia W. Asia
W. Asia 1% 3%
2%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
7
EXPLANATORY NOTE
8
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
COMBATING POVERTY
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America Europe & North America
Europe & North America 15% Asia & Pacific 16%
10% 10%
Asia & Pacific 28% Latin America & Carib.
17% Latin America & Carib.
7% 8%
Africa Africa
8% W. Asia 8%
3% W. Asia
3%
Africa
Latin America & Carib.
19% 15%
Cooperation
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America
9% 15%
Latin America & Carib.
5%
Africa
4% W. Asia
2%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation
9
EXPLANATORY NOTE
10
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
DECISION-MAKING
Africa
10%
W. Asia
3%
This Global Pie Chart represents percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress focusing on national institutions and strategies.
11
EXPLANATORY NOTE
The following aspects of Education were drawn from specific 12. Training Programmes on Biodiversity Conservation
sectoral chapters. (Biodiversity)
2. Universal Access to Basic Education (Combating Poverty) 13. Public Awareness-Raising on Water Conservation
(Freshwater)
3. Public Awareness-Raising on Health (Health)
14. Professional Training Programmes on Toxic Chemicals
4. Vehicle Volume Reduction Campaign (Transport)
(Toxic Chemicals)
5. Public Awareness-Raising Programme on Climate Change
15. Public Awareness-Raising on Recycling (Hazardous, Solid
(Atmosphere)
and Radio Active Wastes)
6. Public Awareness-Raising on Sustainable Land Use
(Land Management)
12
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
EDUCATION
W. Asia
Not Applicable 2%
1%
This Global Pie Chart represents percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress based on sectoral perspectives.
13
EXPLANATORY NOTE
14
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
ENERGY
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Information
Asia & Pacific Europe & North America Europe & North America Europe & North America
4% 8% Latin America & Carib. Asia & Pacific 16% 16% Latin America & Carib.
8% Asia & Pacific
3% Latin America & Carib. 7% 4%
5%
Africa Africa
4% 5% Africa W. Asia
W. Asia 1%
4%
2%
W. Asia
2%
Technology Financing
Europe & North America Europe & North America
18% Asia & Pacific 15%
Asia & Pacific 7%
11% Latin America & Carib.
Latin America & Carib. 4%
7%
Africa
4% W. Asia
2%
Africa
9%
W. Asia
3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
15
EXPLANATORY NOTE
16
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
FRESHWATER
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education
Europe & North America Europe & North America Europe & North America
16% 18% Asia & Pacific 7%
Asia & Pacific Latin America & Carib. Asia & Pacific Latin America & Carib.
10% 10% Latin America & Carib. 7% 8%
9% 9%
Africa
6% W. Asia
3%
Africa
8% W. Asia Africa
3% 7% W. Asia
3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
17
EXPLANATORY NOTE
18
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education
Europe & North America Asia & Pacific Europe & North America
16% 9% 14% Asia & Pacific Europe & North America
Asia & Pacific 8% 14%
8% Latin America & Carib.
Latin America & Carib. 7% Latin America & Carib.
7% 7%
Africa Africa
Africa 9% 9%
8% W. Asia W. Asia
2% W. Asia 3%
2%
Cooperation
Europe & North America
15%
Asia & Pacific Latin America & Carib.
9% 7%
Africa W. Asia
5% 3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
19
EXPLANATORY NOTE
20
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
INFORMATION
W. Asia
Not Applicable 2%
1%
This Global Pie Chart represents percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress based on sectoral perspectives.
21
EXPLANATORY NOTE
22
REPORTED INFORMATION ON NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
OCE ANS
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Information
Asia & Pacific Asia & Pacific
Europe & North America Asia & Pacific Europe & North America 9% Europe & North America
7% 14% 8% 15% 14%
Latin America & Carib. Latin America & Carib.
8% Africa 6%
Africa Africa Latin America & Carib. 6%
7% 6% 7%
Technology
Asia & Pacific
9% Europe & North America
14%
Africa Latin America & Carib.
6% 6%
Not Applicable
8% W. Asia
3%
The Global Pie Charts represent percentages of activities that are regionally implemented and/or in progress for the element or category of implementation.
23
PART II:
25
AFRICA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 53
90% 48
80% 42
70% 37
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
60% 32
50% 27
40% 21
30% 16
20% 11
10% 5
0% 0
y . . . . e
es og og pp du
P.
en
h.
od nc
s
y
O
rit
c r
Pr
ut
vi
om
.B tO
E ta
us
lP
G
cu
lA
r ic is
N
Se en
no
d a en
W
Se
or ci s s
ca
As
of
Ba
ge
om an
of
o & m
Lo
ng
p.
C oy l
p.
di
in
ci
re pl to ra
si
1. W
In
ci
of
rti
u f F
ou
te
rti
ct 9. s
p.
to m
Pa
of
es a
Pa
til
H
.E
ci
ru
p.
st en cc ul
rti
5.
6.
10
ci
2.
Pa
ra m A
rti
nf e /M
1. Bi
Pa
I nc
3.
1 .
7. va
4.
d 12
8 .A
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION IN PROGRESS
26
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Chad
25 Kenya
Egypt
Benin
Congo
Gabon
Eritrea
Angola
Ghana
Guinea
Djibouti
Algeria
Burundi
26 Lesotho
Ethiopia
Gambia
Comoros
Cameroon
Botswana
Cape Verde
Cote d'Ivoire
Burkina Faso
24 Guinea-Bissau
Equatorial Guinea
COUNTRIES
27
6. Housing Security Programmes for
the Poor
COMBATING POVERTY
Women
Programmes & Projects
Combating Poverty
Decision-Making
Decision-Making
Education
Services
the Poor
Women
Poverty
Making
Making
COUNTRIES
27 Liberia
28 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
29 Madagascar
30 Malawi
31 Mali
32 Mauritania
33 Mauritius
34 Morocco
35 Mozambique
36 Namibia
37 Niger
38 Nigeria
39 Rwanda
40 Sao Tome and Principe
41 Senegal
42 Seychelles
43 Sierra Leone
44 Somalia
45 South Africa
46 Sudan
47 Swaziland
48 Togo
49 Tunisia
50 Uganda
51 United Rep. of Tanzania
52 Zambia
53 Zimbabwe
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 10 1 3 2 2 8 12 4 6 6 7 7
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 9 5 8 5 9 7 7 8 9 11 8 1
% IMPLEMENTED 19% 2% 6% 4% 4% 15% 23% 8% 11% 11% 13% 13%
% IN PROGRESS 17% 9% 15% 9% 17% 13% 13% 15% 17% 21% 15% 2%
28
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 44
91% 40
82% 36
73% 32
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
64% 28
55% 24
45% 20
36% 16
27% 12
18% 8
9% 4
0% 0
g. .
dy es og p. u. ce
P.
en
h.
o p Ed
O
rit
Bo c
Pr
r n
ut
vi
om
O ta
us
lP
G
cu
lA
. r t c is
N
Se en si
no
rd a en
W
Se
ci s
ca
As
of
oo Ba
ge
om n
of
& m
Lo
ng
p.
C na oy al
p.
di
ci
re i pl to
si
1. W
er
In
ci
of
rti
u of .F
ou
rti
ct s t
p.
Em
Pa
of
9 es ila
Pa
t
H
ci
ru
p.
en t
st . cc ul
rti
5.
6.
10
ci
2.
Pa
ra m A
rti
nf ce /M
1. Bi
Pa
I
3.
n 1 .
7. va
4.
d 12
8 .A
IMPLEMENTED
IN PROGRESS
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION NOT APPLICABLE
29
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Fiji
Iran
India
China
26 Nepal
Nauru
Japan
Bhutan
Kiribati
Cyprus
Australia
Maldives
Malaysia
Mongolia
Myanmar
Cambodia
Indonesia
Micronesia
Kyrgyzstan
Afghanistan
Kazakhstan
Bangladesh
Korea, DPR of
Marshall Islands
Brunei Darussalam
COUNTRIES
30
6. Housing Security Programmes for
the Poor
COMBATING POVERTY
Combating Poverty
Decision-Making
Decision-Making
Education
Services
the Poor
Women
Poverty
Making
Making
COUNTRIES
27 New Zealand
28 Pakistan
29 Palau
30 Papua New Guinea
31 Philippines
32 Republic of Korea
33 Samoa
34 Singapore
35 Solomon Islands
36 Sri Lanka
37 Tajikistan*
38 Thailand
39 Tonga
40 Turkmenistan
41 Tuvalu
42 Uzbekistan
43 Vanuatu
44 Viet Nam
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 19 7 11 0 11 22 23 14 19 17 18 18
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IMPLEMENTED 43% 16% 25% 0% 25% 50% 52% 32% 43% 39% 41% 41%
% IN PROGRESS 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2% 2% 0%
% NOT APPLICABLE 0% 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
31
EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 48
83% 40
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
67% 32
50% 24
33% 16
17% 8
0% 0
y s . . . . e
og og pp du
P.
en
h.
od nc
s
ce
O
rit
r
Pr
ut
i
om
.B tO
E ta
us
lP
G
rv
cu
lA
ic is
N
Se en
no
d a en
W
Se
or ci s s
ca
As
of
Ba
ge
om an
of
o & ym
Lo
ng
p.
C l
p.
di
in o
ci
e pl to ra
si
1. ur W
In
ci
of
rti
f F
ou
e
rti
t 9. s at
p.
to Em
Pa
of
uc es
Pa
til
H
ci
p.
st
r en . c ul
rti
5.
6.
10 c
ci
2.
Pa
fra m .A
rti
ce i/M
Pa
In 11 .B
3.
7. an
4.
Ad
v 12
8.
IMPLEMENTED
IN PROGRESS
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION NOT APPLICABLE
32
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Italy
24 Latvia
Ireland
France
Estonia
Albania
Greece
Belarus
Iceland
Canada
Croatia
Austria
Georgia
Andorra
Finland
Armenia
Belgium
Bulgaria
Hungary
Germany
Denmark
26 Lithuania
Azerbaijan
25 Liechtenstein
Czech Republic
COUNTRIES
33
6. Housing Security Programmes for
the Poor
COMBATING POVERTY
Combating Poverty
Decision-Making
Decision-Making
Education
Services
the Poor
Women
Poverty
Making
Making
COUNTRIES
27 Luxembourg
28 Malta
29 Monaco
30 Netherlands
31 Norway
32 Poland
33 Portugal
34 Republic of Moldova
35 Romania
36 Russian Federation*
37 San Marino
38 Slovak Republic
39 Slovenia
40 Spain
41 Sweden
42 Switzerland
43 The FYR of Macedonia
44 Turkey
45 Ukraine
46 United Kingdom
47 United States of America
48 Yugoslavia, Fed. Rep. Of
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 30 8 12 1 18 21 30 20 26 22 28 26
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 0 1 4 2 3 3 7 6 3 3 2 0
ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IMPLEMENTED 63% 17% 25% 2% 38% 44% 63% 42% 54% 46% 58% 54%
% IN PROGRESS 0% 2% 8% 4% 6% 6% 15% 13% 6% 6% 4% 0%
% NOT APPLICABLE 0% 0% 0% 31% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 33
91% 30
82% 27
73% 24
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
64% 21
55% 18
45% 15
36% 12
27% 9
18% 6
9% 3
0% 0
y . . . . e
es og og pp du
P.
en
h.
od nc
s
y
O
rit
ic Pr
r
ut
om
.B tO
E ta
us
lP
G
rv
cu
lA
ic is
N
Se en
no
d a en
W
Se
or ci s s
ca
As
of
Ba
ge
om an
of
o & m
Lo
ng
p.
C oy l
p.
di
in
ci
re pl to ra
si
1. W
In
ci
of
rti
u f F
ou
te
rti
ct 9. s
p.
to Em
Pa
of
es a
Pa
til
H
ci
ru
p.
st en . cc ul
rti
5.
6.
10
ci
2.
Pa
ra m A
rti
nf e /M
1. Bi
Pa
I nc
3.
1 .
7. va
4.
d 12
8 .A
IMPLEMENTED
IN PROGRESS
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION NOT APPLICABLE
35
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
Haiti
26 Peru
Chile
Cuba
Brazil
Belize
Bolivia
22 Mexico
Guyana
24 Panama
21 Jamaica
Grenada
Ecuador
Bahamas
Dominica
25 Paraguay
Colombia
Barbados
Honduras
Argentina
23 Nicaragua
Guatemala
Costa Rica
El Salvador
Dominican Republic
Antigua and Barbuda
COUNTRIES
1. Coordinating Body on Combating
Poverty
36
6. Housing Security Programmes for
the Poor
COMBATING POVERTY
Combating Poverty
Decision-Making
Decision-Making
Education
Services
the Poor
Women
Poverty
Making
Making
COUNTRIES
27 St.Kitts and Nevis
28 St. Lucia
29 St Vincent & the Grenad.
30 Suriname
31 Trinidad and Tobago
32 Uruguay
33 Venezuela
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 11 6 11 4 9 6 10 5 8 4 11 8
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 0 1 0 1 1 5 6 6 6 9 5 1
ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IMPLEMENTED 33% 18% 33% 12% 27% 18% 30% 15% 24% 12% 33% 24%
% IN PROGRESS 0% 3% 0% 3% 3% 15% 18% 18% 18% 27% 15% 3%
% NOT APPLICABLE 0% 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
37
WESTERN ASIA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
COMBATING POVERTY
100% 12
83% 10
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
67% 8
50% 6
33% 4
17% 2
0% 0
dy es g. g. p. u. ce
P.
en
h.
o o p Ed
O
rit
Bo c
Pr Pr
n
ut
vi
om
tO ta
us
cu
lA
. r l c is
N
Se en i
no
rd ia en
W
Se
s
as
ca
nc As
of
oo
ge
om
of
& m
Lo
B
ng
p.
C na oy al
p.
di
ci
e i pl to
si
1. r W
er
In
ci
of
rti
tu of .F
ou
rti
s t
p.
Em
Pa
of
uc 9 es ila
Pa
t
H
ci
p.
r en t
st . cc ul
rti
5.
6.
10
ci
2.
Pa
ra m A
rti
nf ce /M
1. Bi
Pa
I
3.
n 1 .
7. va
4.
d 12
8 .A IMPLEMENTED
IN PROGRESS
NOT APPLICABLE
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
38
WESTERN ASIA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
COMBATING POVERTY
Combating Poverty
Decision-Making
Decision-Making
Education
Services
the Poor
Women
Poverty
Making
Making
COUNTRIES
1 Bahrain
2 Iraq
3 Israel
4 Jordan
5 Kuwait
6 Lebanon
7 Oman
8 Qatar
9 Saudi Arabia
10 Syrian Arab Republic
11 United Arab Emirates
12 Yemen
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 4 0 0 0 1 3 2 4 1 1 3 1
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 1 2 2 1 1 2 4 4 3 5 2 2
ISSUE NOT APPLICABLE 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IMPLEMENTED 33% 0% 0% 0% 8% 25% 17% 33% 8% 8% 25% 8%
% IN PROGRESS 8% 17% 17% 8% 8% 17% 33% 33% 25% 42% 17% 17%
% NOT APPLICABLE 0% 0% 0% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
39
AFRICA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
100% 53
90% 48
80% 42
70% 37
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
60% 32
50% 27
40% 21
30% 16
20% 11
10% 5
0% 0
. .
dy re og og ss ce
.
G
gy
e
e
og
o a e an
ar
Pr Pr
ar
M
te
.B C en
Pr
st
C
l
ra
l
of
d na on tro ar i
lth
al
ss
ng
or
p.
St
er i
Aw
rn
rit
ea
ci
on
ni
o
at lA
IV
ut
rti
an
C
at
H
C ic ra
H
1.
Pa
/M .N bl
/M
Pl
c
ry se at
e
4.
si
Pu
al
7
2.
ily
ea til
Ba
a
at
9. ul
m
im is
-n
r
3.
Fa
.D
re
.P i/M
P
8
5.
6
.B
6.
10
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION IN PROGRESS
40
AFRICA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
6. Access to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
COUNTRIES
1 Algeria
2 Angola
3 Benin
4 Botswana
5 Burkina Faso
6 Burundi
7 Cameroon
8 Cape Verde
9 Central African Republic
10 Chad
11 Comoros
12 Congo
13 Cote d'Ivoire
14 Dem. Rep. of the Congo
15 Djibouti
16 Egypt
17 Equatorial Guinea
18 Eritrea
19 Ethiopia
20 Gabon
21 Gambia
22 Ghana
23 Guinea
24 Guinea-Bissau
25 Kenya
26 Lesotho
41
Decision-Making Programmes and
& Projects Education Cooperation
to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Access to
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
27 Liberia
28 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya
29 Madagascar
30 Malawi
31 Mali
32 Mauritania
33 Mauritius
34 Morocco
35 Mozambique
36 Namibia
37 Niger
38 Nigeria
39 Rwanda
40 Sao Tome and Principe
41 Senegal
42 Seychelles
43 Sierra Leone
44 Somalia
45 South Africa
46 Sudan
47 Swaziland
48 Togo
49 Tunisia
50 Uganda
51 United Rep. of Tanzania
52 Zambia
53 Zimbabwe
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 19 1 9 10 11 10 6 11 6 8
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 1 8 10 6 9 8 8 9 11 1
% IMPLEMENTED 36% 2% 17% 19% 21% 19% 11% 21% 11% 15%
% IN PROGRESS 2% 15% 19% 11% 17% 15% 15% 17% 21% 2%
42
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
100% 44
91% 40
82% 36
73% 32
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
64% 28
55% 24
45% 20
36% 16
27% 12
18% 8
9% 4
0% 0
y . . e
ar
e
og og ss
.
od
G
nc
gy
e
e
og
e
ar
ar
Pr r
M
te
.B lC en ta
Pr
lP
C
is
ra
of
d a n
tro ar
al
lth
s
ng
or
p.
St
rn tio As
rn
ri Aw
ea
ci
e on
ni
o
at
e
IV
ut
rti
l
an
C
at
H
C ic ra
H
1.
Pa
M bl
l/M
N
Pl
/
c
e te
ry 7.
4.
si
as u
a
a
2.
ily
til
Ba
a .P
at
e
ul
m
rim is
-n
9
3.
Fa
D
re
P /M
6. 8. Bi
P
5.
6.
.
10
IMPLEMENTED
IN PROGRESS
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION
43
ASIA AND THE PACIFIC: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Access to
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
1 Afghanistan
2 Australia
3 Bangladesh
4 Bhutan
5 Brunei Darussalam
6 Cambodia
7 China
8 Cyprus
9 Fiji
10 India
11 Indonesia
12 Iran
13 Japan
14 Kazakhstan
15 Kiribati
16 Korea, DPR of
17 Kyrgyzstan
18 Lao, People's Dem. Rep.
19 Malaysia
20 Maldives
21 Marshall Islands
22 Micronesia
23 Mongolia
24 Myanmar
25 Nauru
26 Nepal
44
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
Access to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
27 New Zealand
28 Pakistan
29 Palau
30 Papua New Guinea
31 Philippines
32 Republic of Korea
33 Samoa
34 Singapore
35 Solomon Islands
36 Sri Lanka
37 Tajikistan*
38 Thailand
39 Tonga
40 Turkmenistan
41 Tuvalu
42 Uzbekistan
43 Vanuatu
44 Viet Nam
TOTAL IN EXISTENCE
IMPLEMENTED 21 8 20 16 20 17 12 20 16 17
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
% IN EXISTENCE
IMPLEMENTED 48% 18% 45% 36% 45% 39% 27% 45% 36% 39%
% IN PROGRESS 0% 0% 5% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
45
EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
100% 48
83% 40
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
67% 32
50% 24
33% 16
17% 8
0% 0
dy re g. g. ss ce
e
.
G
gy
e
og
o ro
ar
o a e n
ar
Pr
M
te
.B C en ta
C
Pr
lP
C
al is
ra
of
n ar
al
d ro
lth
s
ng
or
p.
St
n o
rn
er iti nt Aw As
ea
ci
ni
o
e
at r
IV
ut o
rti
al
at
an
C
H
C ic
H
1.
Pa
/M
M l er
.N
Pl
y/
c
se ub t
4.
si
al
ar 7 ila
2.
ily
ea
Ba
P
at
t
9. ul
m
-n
r im is
3.
Fa
re
D
.P 8. /M
P
Bi
5.
6
6.
.
10
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION IN PROGRESS
46
EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Access to
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
1 Albania
2 Andorra
3 Armenia
4 Austria
5 Azerbaijan
6 Belarus
7 Belgium
8 Bosnia and Herzegovina
9 Bulgaria
10 Canada
11 Croatia
12 Czech Republic
13 Denmark
14 Estonia
15 Finland
16 France
17 Georgia
18 Germany
19 Greece
20 Hungary
21 Iceland
22 Ireland
23 Italy
24 Latvia
25 Liechtenstein
26 Lithuania
47
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Access to
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
27 Luxembourg
28 Malta
29 Monaco
30 Netherlands
31 Norway
32 Poland
33 Portugal
34 Republic of Moldova
35 Romania
36 Russian Federation*
37 San Marino
38 Slovak Republic
39 Slovenia
40 Spain
41 Sweden
42 Switzerland
43 The FYR of Macedonia
44 Turkey
45 Ukraine
46 United Kingdom
47 United States of America
48 Yugoslavia, Fed. Rep. Of
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 36 20 28 20 12 26 11 25 23 29
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 0 5 9 2 5 7 5 7 4 0
% IMPLEMENTED 75% 42% 58% 42% 25% 54% 23% 52% 48% 60%
% IN PROGRESS 0% 10% 19% 4% 10% 15% 10% 15% 8% 0%
48
LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
100% 33
91% 30
82% 27
73% 24
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
64% 21
55% 18
45% 15
36% 12
27% 9
18% 6
9% 3
0% 0
. .
dy re og og ss ce
.
e
G
gy
e
og
a
ar
Bo e an
ar
Pr Pr
M
te
C en
Pr
st
C
. l
ra
l
of
na on ar i
al
rd tro
lth
ss
ng
p.
St
i
rn
oo er rit Aw
ea
ci
on
ni
lA
e
at
IV
ut
rti
at
an
C
H
C ic ra
H
1.
Pa
bl
l/M
/M .N
Pl
c
ry se at
e
4.
si
Pu
ta
7
2.
ily
ea til
Ba
a
na
9. ul
m
im is
e-
r
3.
Fa
.P .D i/M
Pr
8
5.
6
.B
6.
10
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION IN PROGRESS
49
LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
6. Access to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
COUNTRIES
1 Antigua and Barbuda
2 Argentina
3 Bahamas
4 Barbados
5 Belize
6 Bolivia
7 Brazil
8 Chile
9 Colombia
10 Costa Rica
11 Cuba
12 Dominica
13 Dominican Republic
14 Ecuador
15 El Salvador
16 Grenada
17 Guatemala
18 Guyana
19 Haiti
20 Honduras
21 Jamaica
22 Mexico
23 Nicaragua
24 Panama
25 Paraguay
26 Peru
50
Decision-Making Programmes & Projects Education Cooperation
Access to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
27 St.Kitts and Nevis
28 St. Lucia
29 St Vincent & the Grenad.
30 Suriname
31 Trinidad and Tobago
32 Uruguay
33 Venezuela
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 18 7 11 7 11 12 5 13 10 12
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 1 2 6 5 1 6 3 4 4 2
% IMPLEMENTED 55% 21% 33% 21% 33% 36% 15% 39% 30% 36%
% IN PROGRESS 3% 6% 18% 15% 3% 18% 9% 12% 12% 6%
51
WESTERN ASIA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
100% 12
83% 10
PERCENT OF COUNTRIES
NUMBER OF COUNTRIES
67% 8
50% 6
33% 4
17% 2
0% 0
. .
dy re og og ss ce
.
G
gy
e
og
a
Bo e an
ar
Pr Pr
M
ar
te
C en
Pr
st
C
. l
ra
l
of
rd na on tro ar i
lth
al
ss
ng
p.
St
er i
oo rit Aw
n
ea
ci
on
ni
lA
er
at
IV
ut
rti
an
C
H
at
C ic ra
H
1.
Pa
/M .N bl
l/M
Pl
c
ry se at
e
4.
si
7 Pu
2.
a
ily
ea til
Ba
a
at
9. ul
m
im is
n
r
3.
Fa
e-
.P .D i/M
Pr
8
5.
6
.B
6.
10
IMPLEMENTED
MEANS OF IMPLEMENTATION IN PROGRESS
52
WESTERN ASIA: REPORTED INFORMATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGENDA 21:
HE ALTH
to Primary/Maternal
7. Nutrition Programmes
Decision-Making
Access to
6. Access
COUNTRIES
6.
1 Bahrain
2 Iraq
3 Israel
4 Jordan
5 Kuwait
6 Lebanon
7 Oman
8 Qatar
9 Saudi Arabia
10 Syrian Arab Republic
11 United Arab Emirates
12 Yemen
TOTAL IMPLEMENTED 6 0 2 0 0 3 0 5 2 5
TOTAL IN PROGRESS 0 2 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 1
% IMPLEMENTED 50% 0% 17% 0% 0% 25% 0% 42% 17% 42%
% IN PROGRESS 0% 17% 25% 8% 8% 25% 25% 8% 25% 8%
53
ANNE XES
55
ANNEX I.
100% 190
180
90% 170
160
80%
150
140
70%
130
120
60%
110
100
50%
90
80
40%
70
60
30%
50
40
20%
30
10% 20
10
0% 0
l l
ity ea se ea ds es ild
o
n
y
ES
e
rs l
ot
et
io
ng
tr S n h
a la op C
at
IT
Ky
af
ve on B e
ha
i h et Pe
ic
8. he
os
od ft
C
M
tif
4.
t
.W
6.
Bi
Bi 7. o us of
er
e
at
10 o
es
2.
w
1. en s
lim
La ht
D
g
9.
C
di ig
5.
.R
3.
n
.I 12
11
56
ANNEX I.
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for
RATIFICATION OF INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
57
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for
Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
58
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for
Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
59
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for
Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
60
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for
Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
61
All information current as of 24 May 2002 except for
Kyoto Protocol which is current as of 17 June 2002
5. Desertification Convention
1. Biodiversity Convention
7. Montreal Protocol
8. Basel Convention
4. Kyoto Protocol
62
OFFICIAL CONVENTION NAMES AND SOURCES:
Biodiversity Convention = Convention on Biological Diversity UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
Biosafety Protocol = Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
Biological Diversity
Climate Change Convention = United Nations Framework Convention on UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
Climate Change
Kyoto Protocol = Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Convention on UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
Climate Change
Desertification Convention = United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
in Those Countries Experiencing Serious Drought and/or Desertification
Particularly Africa
CITES Convention = Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of UNEP, CITES Secretariat
Wild Fauna and Flora
Montreal Protocol = Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
Basel Convention = Basel Convention to the Control of Transboundary Movements UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
of Hazardous Wastes
Law of the Sea = United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
Wetlands Convention = Ramsar Convention on Wetlands of International Importance The Ramsar Secretariat, The World
Conservation Union
Indigenous Peoples = Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention International Labour Organization
Rights of the Child = Convention on the Rights of the Child UN Office of Legal Affairs, Treaty Section
63
ANNEX II.
1. List of reporting countries to the CSD that have submitted 3. List of non-reporting countries to the CSD:
2002 Country Profiles: Afghanistan, Andorra, Angola, Azerbaijan, Belize, Bhutan, Bosnia
Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belgium, Benin, and Herzegovina, Burundi, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Central African
Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Cyprus, Democratic People’s
Cuba, Czech Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of Korea, Djibouti, Dominica, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea,
Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Fiji, Finland, France, Gambia, Ethiopia, Gabon, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Kiribati, Kuwait,
Ghana, Greece, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, Indonesia, Iran, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Lesotho, Liberia, Libyan Arab
Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Jamahiriya, Maldives, Mali, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Micronesia
Madagascar, Malawi, Malta, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Morocco, (Federated States of), Mozambique, Nauru, Oman, Palau, Papua
Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Nicaragua, Norway, Pakistan, Paraguay, New Guinea, Rwanda, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint
Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Seychelles, Sierra
Russian Federation*, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Slovakia, Leone, Solomon Islands, Somalia, Sudan, Togo, Trinidad and
Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Syrian Arab Republic, Tobago, Turkmenistan, Tuvalu, United Arab Emirates, Vanuatu,
Tajikistan*, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Yemen, and Zambia.
States of America, Uzbekistan, and Venezuela. Total 60
Total 79
* 2002 Country Profiles pending translation into English.
64
Cover, back and inside illustrations courtesy of the United Nations Postal Administration:
http://www.un.org/Depts/UNPA