Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/224232433
CITATIONS READS
10 14,898
3 authors, including:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Massimo Mitolo on 10 March 2015.
Abstract—Street light systems are publicly accessible electrical the risk of breakdown of both layers of insulation is deemed
pieces of equipment out of the physical control of who operates/ extremely low.
owns them. Street lighting systems typically include low-voltage However, double insulation of Class II components of street
loads, distributed in a large area, and are collectively protected
by the same device. Under fault conditions, hazardous potentials lighting systems may actually fail during their life-cycle. This
may appear on the metal enclosures of these systems, and expose may be caused by lack of maintenance due to their possible large
people to shock hazards. To reduce the risk to an acceptable level, extension, as well as by their critical operating conditions, such
different solutions for the bonding and grounding are available. as, for example, car impacts or animal intrusions into poles. As
The Standard IEC 60364 and a current worldwide tendency seem a consequence, the loss of the double insulation of components
to encourage the use of Class II equipment for the street light sys-
tems. Class II components, such as the wiring systems, the light within metal poles, which may go undetected if the leakage cur-
fixtures, etc., have double or reinforced insulation. In this paper, rent is below the trip setting of protective overcurrent devices,
these authors analyze technical alternatives to protect against in- exposes people to the risk of electric shock.
direct contact in light of the IEC standards. In order to elevate the In this paper, the authors discuss possible alternatives for the
level of safety offered by Class II metal poles, the adoption of spe- protection against indirect contact in light of the aforementioned
cial circuitry and bonding connections to continuously monitor the
double insulation of metal poles is proposed. IEC standards. In addition, to increase the level of safety offered
by Class II metal poles in different grounding systems, the au-
Index Terms—Earth, exposed-conductive-parts, extra-
thors propose the adoption of special circuitry and bonding con-
neous-conductive-part, grounding electrode, light pole, neutral
residual current device, street lighting system, TI system, TN nections to monitor continuously the status of their double in-
system, TT system. sulation. Throughout the entire paper, the terms “ground” and
“earth” are used as synonyms.
I. INTRODUCTION
II. PROTECTION AGAINST INDIRECT CONTACT
TREET lighting systems are a typical case of distributed
S low-voltage loads located in large areas, and collectively
protected by the same device. In most cases, lighting systems of
AND TYPES OF GROUNDING SYSTEMS
Fig. 4. In TI systems, the neutral point is grounded and the poles (potential
ECPs) are Class II.
Fig. 2. (a) TT system with light poles collectively protected by the same FPD
and (b) independently protected by local protective devices LPD.
Fig. 5. Cast polyurethane resin (90 C) splice for Class II, multicore plastic
insulated cables.
at 400/230 V, the earth fault current caused by the faulty double Fig. 9. Feeder within the panelboard is disconnected from the CB for the insu-
insulation will not exceed 11 A. lation-to-ground test.
The metal pole can assume almost the whole supply value of
230 V, which is permitted for no more than 0.2 s. The ground
current may be even lower, if we consider the limitation effect the line, with a minimum of 1 km, and N is the number of
caused by the arc impedance. Arc faults to ground, in fact, are luminaries.
more likely to occur than bolted faults in ac low-voltage sys- For example, for a system with an extension not exceeding 1
tems. km, which supplies 30 luminaries, the minimum value of the in-
Consequently, it would be advisable to implement a mainte- sulation resistance is about ; a leakage current of about 3.5
nance program to: mA at 230 V corresponds to this value of insulation resistance.
• periodically inspect the publicly exposed lighting system Although conceptually simple, the aforementioned procedure
to confirm the absence of damages to the structures; is rather complex to perform, because the personnel must tem-
• periodically test the insulation between live conductors and porarily drive an auxiliary ground rod, not always an easy task
earth, as per the conceptual diagram presented in Fig. 8. in urban areas, and disconnect the feeder within the panelboard
The insulation-to-ground of the system will pass the test if (Fig. 9).
upon the application of a voltage of 500 V for 60 s, the resistance Attention is drawn on the fact that [1] states that metal struc-
measured is greater than: tures (such as fences, grids, etc.), which are in the proximity
• , if the test is conducted with all the luminaries of the street lighting system, but do not form part of it, need
disconnected (very unpractical); not be connected to the earth terminal of the installation. This
• , if the test is arranged with all the lumi- requirement applies to any outdoor lighting installation, regard-
naries connected; where L is the length in kilometers of less of the type of grounding system adopted. Reference [1] does
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
not clarify whther the aforementioned metal structures that are VII. PROPOSED SOLUTIONS
EXCPs constitute an exception and should be earthed.
The authors suggest two types of solutions, applicable in al-
ternative or combined, to improve the TI system:
1) an additional level of protection extended to all the com-
ponents of the street light system;
VI. PRACTICE IN THE U.S
2) a smart solution localized within the panelboard.
Reference [2], adopted in the U.S., prescribes that conduc- A. TI System With an Additional Level of Protection
tive enclosures of light poles be connected to the facility ground
system through an equipment ground conductor in the same Considering the basic benefits for safety of the double insula-
raceway as the line wires. However, not all light street systems tion, but also the difficulties in detecting its failure, the authors
are installed per [2]. suggest, as extra levels of protection (Fig. 10), the addition of
Outdoor lighting installations mounted by utilities are, in a residual current relay within the protective device and, one or
fact, in compliance with [9], which does not require protective both, of the following:
conductors to bond the conductive poles. In some systems, • employment of multiconductor cables with an integral pro-
the safety of steel, or aluminum, poles is exclusively entrusted tective conductor to reduce the risk of its accidental discon-
upon local ground rods connected to each pole, without any nection;
bonding connection to the source or to the other poles. • addition of a buried bare grounding wire to be connected
The resulting system is a TT, which may not necessarily have to each metal pole in TI systems.
its characteristic safety requirements, such as a very low earth The bare grounding wire will have a minimum cross-sectional
resistance for the single electrodes and/or the RCDs. Thus, low- area of and be buried at a minimum depth of 0.50 m
intensity ground faults might not be cleared at all, causing the below grade. This additional earth electrode will integrate the
permanent presence of stray voltages on publicly exposed en- natural electrode constituted by the plinth.
closures. In this arrangement, the protection against indirect contact is
This earthing arrangement is unsafe and, in fact, is not guaranteed by two levels:
permitted by [1], as mentioned in Section III. Details on the • a first level consisting of double insulated components;
safety reasons behind this prohibition have been discussed in • a second level consisting of the disconnection of the supply,
[5]. Modern systems use a three-wire, or four-wire distribution or the activation of an alarm, in the case of failure of the
line, which does include a ground wire. The ground conductor double insulation.
is bonded to the metal pole. The earth electrode system is
B. “Smartpanel” with an Insulation Monitoring Device
usually a ground rod, or a concrete-encased electrode obtained
by using the re-bars of the plinth of the pole, connected at the As explained in Section V, although conceptually simple, the
service point. maintenance in the TI system is rather complex, due to the prac-
The City of Los Angeles Street Lighting Guide, for example, tical difficulties setting up the insulation test circuit.
states that overcurrent devices (i.e., fuses or circuit breakers) To facilitate the testing procedure, and drastically reduce
without ground-fault protection shall protect all street lighting its costs, the authors propose the adoption of a “smartpanel”
systems. When circuit breakers are used, the neutral wire shall equipped with a special insulation monitoring device (IMD).
only be grounded at the service point, and an additional equip- The special IMD is composed of:
ment ground conductor shall be employed to bond together all 1) a permanent testing circuitry consisting of a double-insu-
steel components of the lighting system [7]. The aforementioned lated test switch and a ground test electrode permanently
arrangement constitutes a TN-S system. installed in an inspection well (Fig. 11).
As a further example of good practice, we can consider the re- The test switch has two positions: “power” and “test,” sep-
quirements of the Louisiana Highways Lighting Systems, which arated by an “open” status. The “power” position allows
prescribes that: “an equipment grounding conductor shall be in- the normal supply of the light fixtures. The “test” position
stalled with each new circuit and shall be connected to each new shorts together the live conductors, allowing the insulation
light pole and fixture.” test.
In New York City, the chronic problem of stray voltages ap- When the switch is in test position, the insulation tester
pearing on metal poles is being mitigated by installing noncon- (indicated as Mohm in Fig. 10) is connected to the live
ductive composite covers on utility service boxes, and intro- conductors and to the test electrode. Two connection ter-
ducing isolation transformers [5] within the poles. minals are available at the smartpanel to accept the insula-
These transformers allow the galvanic separation of the tion tester leads.
lighting circuit from the earth, thereby preventing the circula- 2) The insulation tester can be either enclosed in the panel
tion of currents, if the basic insulation of the circuit, or of other or external and portable. If the Mohm is enclosed in the
components within the pole, fails. panel, the insulation test can be performed on a daily basis
In addition, the utility has also developed a mobile detection without personnel involvement, thanks to a contactor that
vehicle (MDV) that can survey for stray voltages on metal poles automatically turns the test switch in the “test” position. If
while driving down the streets. MDVs are used to conduct an- the Mohm is portable, the insulation test is manual and has
nual surveys and prior to public events to enhance public safety. to be performed by maintenance personnel.
This article has been accepted for inclusion in a future issue of this journal. Content is final as presented, with the exception of pagination.
Fig. 10. The grounding electrode only operates upon failure of the double insulation (TT system).
TABLE II
COMPARISON AMONG THE DIFFERENT SMART SOLUTIONS
Giuseppe Parise (M’82-SM’03–F’10) was born in Massimo Mitolo (SM’03) received the Ph.D. degree
Luzzi (Cosenza), Italy. He received the Electrical in electrical engineering from University of Naples
Engineering degree from the University of Rome, “Federico II, ” Naples, Itraly, in 1990.
Rome, Italy, in 1972. His field of research is in analysis and grounding
He has been with the Department of Electrical En- of power systems. He is currently the Assistant
gineering, University of Rome “La Sapienza” since Electrical Department Head at Chu & Gassman,
1973 and is currently a Full Professor of Electrical New York. He has authored many journal papers,
Power Systems. He has authored about 190 papers and the textbook Electrical Safety of Low-Voltage
and two patents. Since 1975, he has been a Designer Systems.
of Power Electrical Systems in Buildings Complexes, Dr. Mitolo is very active within the IEEE IAS In-
such as in Roma Sapienza University City and Engi- dustrial & Commercial Power Systems Department,
neering Faculty, Polyclinic Umberto I, Italian Parliament, Campus Biomedical where he currently is the Chair of the Power Systems Engineering (PSE) Com-
Research Center. mittee, the Chair of the Power Systems Analysis Subcommittee, and the Chair
Prof. Parise received three Prize Paper Awards from the IEEE/IAS Power of the Power Systems Grounding Subcommittee. He is also an Associate Editor
Systems Department. Since 1983, he has been a member of Superior Council of of the PSE and ES Scholarone Manuscript. He is also the recipient of the Lu-
Ministry of Public Works. He is active in IEEE\IAS, Chair of IA Italy Section cani Insigni Award in 2009, for merits achieved in the scientific field. He is a
Chapter, Member at Large of Executive Board 2007-2010, and is past President registered Professional Engineer in Italy.
of AEIT Rome’s Section. He is Chair of Electrical Power Systems Researchers
of Sapienza University. He has been a Registered Professional Engineer since
1975.