Smt Nanjamma vs The Special Deputy Commissioner on 14 February, 2011

Karnataka High Court

Smt Nanjamma vs The Special Deputy Commissioner on 14 February, 2011
Author: D.V.Shylendra Kumar
IN THE HIGH COUT OF KARNATAKA
AT BANGALORE

Dzmizd t.his~: ihe 14"'? day Of February. 201 1

BEFORE:

THE HOIWBLE MR JUSTICE 1) V SHYLENDRQ; ~

Writ' Pezmon No. 38762 of2610..1KLR§f§f{V'/5§.{J';'2j' BETWEEN ' ' ' "

SMT NANJAMMA WfO KRISHNA RAJU, S/O SARIGE SUBBARAJAPPA AGED ABOUT 69
YEARS. .

R/AT NO233. 2ND MAENVRCEXD. 5 SRD CROSS, KAMALANACEARAL ' BANGALORE

PE3'E"I"I'IONER V ____ Adv. and ' " 2. M"}§'Shivaraju, Adv] AND: "

:. "mg; Si3i?§fLL\1.V D§;P°u'1*Y..£E0MM£ss10NER E3sAi\J_{C}AI.,O RE': U} STRK CT

'}3ANC3.A1.0RE . ..... .. .

1 n ., 1:11;: AsS IS*1'ANT COMMISSIONER _ "£3A:\:t:;A1',C;RE;--.s<)U'1'H SU'BVE)1V1SIOE\§

.__3ANGp~..,1.c>¥§{:'

3. TH 'D' ¥i?AE5'I;;'I'Y TAHSILDAR ESARLJAPURA NADA KACIHEZRL E~}ARJ;KU3'U RA H (3

EL} 5 V' * r ;ra:~zEI«:Ar, '£'AE-UK.

. _ 13;wc;AI,,c3RE I}IS'§'§3ZI{i"IT 5%. SEERI V15'-I"IWANA'I"H S/O S.V KONDA REDDY

MAJOR, Rf :"X'1.' SARIAPEFRA.

SARJIAPURA E"£O'£3LI.

ANEKA1,'1'ALUK SANGALORIE }I}iS'I'RIC'l' I;EsI>O§:3;a {By Sri Venkatesh Docideri, AGA R31"
R1 '%:§_) R.f3;-.1 "- ' Sri RO'Oer"I D'Scn.12:"*é:, AOV. for R~'i;~ .. ._ in b < A Sr1'.Vishwanath,
Part:y~i115§>ers'O«n 'fer C:,fR 4i}._ V 7 THIS E'E'E'E'I'ION IS FILED
UNOEmxIi9I.ICI,I:é;':I_2;e.ANDv'L2~2'%7O;r THE: CONS'IT3'U'I'ION OF INDIA, _PRAYI'NO~
TO _C§'.«\l_,IV; 'mi; EI\E'£'IRE: RRCOROS ON mg: £*"_'iI;£3, OF *-'I'I~Ie R:
v;..N...,g2.I3*I?Is:OI~;r. ?E:'§'ITI1ON I\IO.359/O-108 AND QE";fASH. 1.HE*O¥<OI»:R
I;)'£'.25.1E.10. PASSED BY THE R1 IN RI:'.\IIs3IOI\I~..vI>E.iI_'I*I'IOIx'I «. $10,159/O'?¥O8 IN
R'ESPE3C'}' OF THE LAND" ~B}3}AR3NC}' $*I'.N"Q.2I9/4"'I»I.eAsI;m\IG I ACRE} 38 GUNTAS
S1--TL?'A'.I'£ZD vA'Y~-.._"SAR-JAPURA VHLLAGEEL. SARJAPU-RA HOBLI. ANEKA1, >VID~E
BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE WP AND ETC, A V' g . * ..

Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/193032398/ 1

 Smt Nanjamma vs The Special Deputy Commissioner on 14 February, 2011

THIS I>Iz;'I*II"I'=:i:);$%* CC:;"I&'Eii?&'3"':OE'\EV .PRiI,IMINARY HEARING, TIIIS DAY,

'I'E_%E. '{3QE';}§R'_.I7 EADE*'1fi~iE2_«--FQ«I,I,,()WINC3: Nptxxfithwéténx-Idijlg"~._fI:e:ijs--
court having emphaticaliy e1arified'fI;ha§, 'e;IitIf'1es"'~..§_f1'<.'the revenue records Cannot
conclude 'cyrj. i'SO3.V(;'7_E§;.}T§'§S}3u'[C between warring parties ciaiI'iIi.g...i{1e Emmexrzxble
p:tOpe1"ties claiming under the "'sg>.riI*5: t'.i5$i1e (3I:'1:.I1de1V7(}iffere13t persons and that the
diepute 'if';.é{1~§1i'1._ ':3,jI.*I resolved Ony before .21 civil court, such 1'£'iig21m:S
'?.i:1..d"?;;I'é%3*en11e 21u'i'.1'1(}1'if;ie--.:a=. funC':iO:11rIg under the Karnataka Land Rex-'e:m.:e
Anti, 1.964 [for short, the Act] are more att:"aei.ive pers<:me to get. orders in favour of"t;«:1e or the
other party by seeking the entries in the»,fe1%e1i'L;e reeerds to be changed. t,iI3.KCFd or even
rI};i1*12pL11;"i'£',ed émcgl if suffere adveree orders in the pr0e(:es';_ tih1'Q:1"1"g§,§j court
invokmg writ jurisdieiien edm.piaining-"I.01ieA'o1*'.0f.hee§*a defect or even an illegality
th'éit.:§)e1fha;5s.xfiiifbeizgnevitabiy present: 111 the orders p};'ssed_"A1§y_ zéiztiiorities.

2. Present unfit petitieo to the titie in respect of 1 'acre' .36' guiatas ofland in Sy N0 219 /4110f
Sa'rjapL1ra hebli, Anekal taluk, a, dispufe betweeVf1vi;:i1e"p.etiti~aner, who claims as an heir of
Sarige Su15b§i:a.y2ipp'E:_," daughter in law of the said perscfjii; and the__vVfeL1rth respondellt,
who claims that his x"K"(')I1Ci§£1HH§'E)(iCi'§;f, had purchased the Very land ._th.: bther eieeedent
of Appajappa, who is Z:.1C1I'1;'I'}|.f,f,('3v(.:v£':}._1;Eé3e% executed Sake deed in favour of Sarige
S'L;b'b211"a1yé1pp21, is; net 23; dispute that ctan be reseixzed by » , c{isn3§--fg,seti.

inere iinkoring of oi1t.ries in the revemio records. but if pariieo so ChGO$ can be resolved oniy
before a Civi}--'"o-ourt.

3. No need to examine such disputes passed by revenue authorities that, too in

.WIfui.'£.._ji1ifi'E3Ci1C'ii§'C:IflV and therefore this wrii. petition the interested parézy to
appr_oaCIri'*._oivi1 to his/her right, titie and interesxf suchiii-ar_u1'd"and it is only the
determi.natior1 of thégciv-iol (,'f)1 iI"f[_ wh«ic.h can resohxe the dispute beiweozi the
_.§,1ajfiILos--_ aa:nc'i."'i,re'*$1iue eniries are I'f3qL1i1'd to a:;Li*'i:o:I;éitiéaHy conformity with su
Ch fCv"«SOi¥,l't§OV1'V1u Q 4i:iifi'1--. Cou rt. 4' Excépi for tVV'£1_e4V23.3:)"ox%:'c:é' observation,
this 'W'E'it petition is Sofa EEEQQE

Indian Kanoon - http://indiankanoon.org/doc/193032398/ 2