Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Comprehension
Not recognising the multiword form This problem is particularly severe when we can't work
out the meaning of the item from the individual words that make it up. Learners may
assume that the words each contribute meaning independently.
7. Word order
Some learners instinctively avoid separating the verb and particle in Type 3 multiword
verbs, and they may avoid doing this even when the direct object is a pronoun. *We don't
have room to put up you
8. Avoidance
Learners may prefer using single-word verbs to multiword verbs and verbal expressions,
even when the single word seems odd or archaic. This is not, however, necessarily
technically incorrect. (*)I prefer bathing to showering.
9. Over-using multiword forms
Many of the more idiomatic multiword forms have very restricted connotations, and
adventurous language learners may miss these. *Excuse me, waiter. Could I please cough up
now? (cough up normally expresses unwillingness and is extremely colloquial)
Modal verbs
12. Comprehension
In most contexts modal verbs are pronounced in a very weakened form and learners may
fail to hear or identify them. This doesn't always stop the learner from understanding the
essential message, but it may do. For example, if the 164 1 Modal verbs learner doesn't hear
can in the following, she may interpret the statement as a promise rather than as an offer. I
can collect the children from school for you.
19. Pronunciation
Learners may over-emphasise modal verbs in contexts where they would normally not be
stressed. This may give the impression that they are contradicting something that has
already been said and can lead to people misinterpreting their attitude. In many contexts
stress is the most important feature we use to distinguish between can (generally not
stressed) and can't (generally stressed). Iflearners inappropriately stress can, people may
understand that they have said can't.
20. Comprehension
In context, learners usually understand what a speaker or writer intends, even where they are
unaware of how choosing between infinitive and -ing forms can make a difference to meaning.
The present
29. Comprehension
Learners generally have far more difficulty in using present tenses correctly than in
understanding them. Even if they don't know or are unclear about the difference in meaning
Omitting 'third person s' Many learners forget the 'third person s' even when they have
reached a high level of accuracy and general competence in the language. *My father smoke
too much. *She believe I lied to her. between different tenses, in most cases there is plenty
of information in the context to help them understand whether, for example, an action is
temporary or not.
The future
33. Comprehension
Learners generally have far more difficulty in using future tenses correctly than in
understanding them. Even if they don't know or are unclear about the difference in meaning
between different tenses, in most cases there is plenty of information in the context to help
them understand whether, for example, an action is premeditated or not.
38. Form
Using auxiliary verbs Learners sometimes miss out auxiliary verbs. *What you going to do?
*Will you staying here? They also sometimes use infinitives as auxiliaries instead of
-ingforms and vice versa. *The family is go get into the car. *It'll getting colder this evening.
They may also add unnecessary auxiliaries. *With music on the Internet, we will don't need
to buy CDs any more.
39. Infinitives
Learners may also be unsure when to use a bare or full infinitive. *I shall to see her again
next week.
The past
41. Comprehension
Learners may have some problems in understanding the differences between these tenses,
but these rarely lead to serious misunderstanding since the distinctions are often
unimportant and already clear in the context. The greatest source of potential
misunderstanding is in sentences like these: He left when I got there/He'd left when I got
there. I knew he liked mel! knew he'd liked me. Here, the learner has to: • recognise the
significance of the tense choice (simultaneous events or in sequence). • hear the (barely
perceptible) difference between he left/liked and he'd left/liked. Native speakers are often
unsure whether they've heard the past simple or past perfect, and may ask a question to
check this.
44. Avoidance
Learners often avoid what they feel they don't properly know yet. Particularly in speaking,
learners may play safe by avoiding the more complex past tenses. For example, they may
use the past simple to make any reference to past time. *Yesterday I got up early because I
went to the antiques market. When I got to the market it already opened.
45. Over-use
They may also over-use a form because they have learned a rule which is incomplete or
inaccurate. This learner seems to have grasped that we use the past perfect simple for
actions that are further back in the past, but isn't yet aware of the other factors which make
us choose this tense. *I had graduated from university and then I had joined the army. I
started working several years later.
46. Misuse
The past 1 229 In the following example, it is difficult know whether the learner is avoiding
the past perfect continuous or is making a 'slip' in the process of composing the sentence.
Mistakes like this are particularly common when learners use phrases with for and since.
This may be because they have previously made an effort to associate for and since with
present perfect rather than present simple or continuous forms. *She has been living in
England for a long time but she still didn't speak English
47. Pronunciation
Many learners 'over-pronounce' the regular past tense ending, adding an entire syllable to
the base form of the verb, rather than simply adding a final consonant.
48. Comprehension
Misunderstanding rarely results from uncertainty about the differences between these
tenses, or between these tenses and past tenses. However, the following can cause
difficulty.
59. Simplification
Under the pressure of on-the-s\}ot communication, learners may leave words out or
simplify grammar. For example, they may use the word order of a statement rather than the
more complicated word order of a question. This happens frequently in all question forms,
particularly after question words (what when, etc.), perhaps because these already show
that the sentence is a question. It also happens particularly in negative questions (see the
second example below), perhaps because they include so many grammatical elements
(tense, question form and negative). *What you have brought us? *Why you haven't done
it?
61. Comprehension
Used to Many learners understand this form to refer to habitual activity in the present,
perhaps because they have come across and remembered be+ used to+ -ing (e.g. I'm used to
getting up early), or because the two forms have been taught together and they forget
which is which. Would Learners often know would as a modal verb which expresses
hypothetical meaning (e.g. I would be happier in another job), and may understand this
meaning instead of its reference to the past. They may also simply fail to hear would, for
example understanding I go when someone has said I'd go.
63. Avoidance
Many learners avoid using would altogether to refer to past time. They may also neglect
opportunities to use used to. As in the following piece of writing, learners often simply
choose other ways of expressing past time.
64. Over-use
The following is an extract from a learner's homework, written after a lesson which focused
on used to. The repetition of used to seems unnatural.
66. Spelling
Learners sometimes make mistakes in the spelling of used to: *I use to like chocolate. *Did
you used to eat meat? These mistakes are also common among native speakers.
67. Comprehension
Learners are sometimes confused by the tense and pronoun changes that can occur in
reported speech, particularly if their first language doesn't involve making similar or parallel
changes. For example, they may understand Mary said she was ill to mean that she was ill
prior to saying this, and they may understand Mary said I was wrong to mean that Mary was
talking about herself.
Conditional sentences
74. Comprehension
If learners have studied conditional sentences, when they come across them in reading
English they generally don't have problems of understanding, although they may still be
misled by sentences which don't include if or one of the obvious conditional conjunctions
such as as long as or supposing. In listening, conditional sentences pose much more of a
problem. In many languages conditional meaning is signalled by adverbs in the conditional
clause or by an expression added to the end ofthe conditional clause. There may also be very
strict rules about the order of clauses. Learners who speak one of these languages (e.g.
Chinese) may have difficulty in recognising conditional sentences, particularly if the order of
clauses doesn't match the order in their first language. Also, we frequently pronounce if and
auxiliary verbs which establish the time reference of the sentences (e.g. would, would have)
so indistinctly that learners may fail to pick them out. Learners may also be misled by the use
of past tenses to refer to present time, and may understand that phrases like if I spoke
Russian ... refer to the past. We sometimes leave out the if clause when we are giving advice.
Learners of English are sometimes confused by this use. A: I slept badly again last night.
80. Avoidance
It is very common for learners to find ways of expressing themselves which enable them not
to use language they find 'difficult'. Often, the conditional Type 3 is particularly daunting,
and learners may consciously or unconsciously avoid it. (*)I didn't see him so I didn't run
away. (Ifl'd seen him, I'd have run away.)