You are on page 1of 9

Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., Vol. 36, No. 12, pp.

1981–1989, 2010
Copyright Ó 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Printed in the USA. All rights reserved
0301-5629/$ - see front matter

doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.09.001

d Original Contribution

DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF ROTATOR CUFF TEARS


WITH ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE
IMAGING – A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN 77 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS
WITH A SURGICAL REFERENCE

PETRI SIPOLA,* LEA NIEMITUKIA,* HEIKKI KRÖGER,y IMKE HÖFLING,y and URHO VÄÄTÄINENy
* Department of Clinical Radiology, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; and
y
Department of Orthopaedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, University of Eastern Finland and Kuopio University Hospital,
Kuopio, Finland

(Received 19 May 2010; revised 23 August 2010; in final form 5 September 2010)

Abstract—The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance
artrography (MRA) for the detection and measurement of rotator cuff tears, using surgical findings as a standard.
A total of 77 consecutive patients with suspected rotator cuff tears were prospectively studied with US and MRA.
Rotator cuff tears were identified by US with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive
values of 92%, 45%, 91% and 50%, respectively, and by MRA with values of 97%, 82%, 97% and 82%, respec-
tively. US was not reliable for differentiating between partial and full thickness tears. US and MRA underestimated
the tear sizes by an average of 15 mm and 4 mm, respectively. Our results suggest that US could be used as
a screening test to confirm a suspected rotator cuff tear. In patients with negative findings, an MRA should be
considered for substantiation. (E-mail: petri.sipola@kuh.fi). Ó 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medi-
cine & Biology.
Key Words: Rotator cuff, Ultrasonography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Sensitivity and specificity.

INTRODUCTION Few studies to date have compared the accuracy of


US and MRI for identifying tears of the RC or quantifying
Rotator cuff (RC) disorders accounts for about 10% of all
the size of the tears, and those studies that have been con-
shoulder pain (Meislin et al. 2005). Imaging should be
ducted previously have presented conflicting results
able to confirm a RC tear and evaluate its extent and
(Nelson et al. 1991; Martin-Hervas et al. 2001; Teefey
size. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate
et al. 2004; Fotiadou et al. 2008). Therefore, the aim of
method for diagnosing tears and assessing sizes (de
the present study is to compare the accuracy of US and
Jesus et al. 2009), but it is quite expensive. In addition,
MRA for the detection and measurement of RC tears
many institutes have long waiting lists for MRI, and it
using surgical findings as the standard in a prospective
is generally not as readily available as ultrasonography
study setting.
(US), both of which factors may cause delays in patient
treatment. Moreover, MRI is sometimes contraindicated
in some patients, such as those with claustrophobia and MATERIALS AND METHODS
most patients with pacemakers. US is an alternative
We studied patients admitted to Kuopio University
imaging method, but it has shown variable results in the
Hospital with signs and symptoms of RC tears. The Kuo-
diagnosis of RC tears (de Jesus et al. 2009). The inconsis-
pio University Hospital Institutional Review Board
tency of accuracy has discouraged many practitioners in
approved the study protocol, and informed consent was
the use of shoulder US as a diagnostic tool in rotator
obtained from all patients. Inclusion criteria were acute
cuff pathology.
or chronic shoulder pain and suspicion of RC disease.
Patients who had undergone conservative treatment,
including physiotherapy for at least 3 months, without
Address correspondence to: Petri Sipola, Department of Clinical
Radiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Puijonlaaksontie 2, FI-70210 sufficient symptom relief were recommended for surgery.
Kuopio, Finland. E-mail: petri.sipola@kuh.fi We prospectively enrolled 79 consecutive patients.

1981
1982 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 36, Number 12, 2010

Two patients had medical conditions that prevented changing the probe angle and/or hand position. Tendon
the planned operation; consequently, the operation for volume loss on the bursal side was also interpreted as
these patients was performed more than 12 months a tear. A full‑thickness tear was diagnosed when the hy-
after the imaging studies and patients were excluded poechoic area or volume loss extended from the bursal
from the study. Accordingly, the final study population surface to the articular surface of the tendon. Otherwise,
consisted of 77 patients (40 male and 37 female patients). the tear was diagnosed as a partial-thickness tear. Tear
The average age was 57 y (range: 42 to 76 y). Of the 77 size was determined by measuring the maximal antero-
patients, right and left shoulders were surgically treated posterior diameter of the hypoechoic area on still images.
in 53 (69%) and 24 (31%) patients, respectively. All MRA was performed on a Siemens Vision 1.5 T
patients underwent a US study. Of the 77 patients, two scanner (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) equipped
(3%) could not undergo MRA due to claustrophobia. with a flexible surface coil. Slice thicknesses were
MRI was performed without an intra-articular contrast 3 mm in all sequences. The following MRI sequences
agent in seven patients; three of these patients were were performed: an oblique coronal T1-weighted spin-
unwilling to receive an injection of contrast agent and echo (SE) repetition time/echo time ([TR]/[TE]), 650
four had not been properly identified as study participants ms/20 ms; a T2-weighted fat-saturated dual-echo fast
when the imaging was done. spin-echo (FSE), 3500/16; an oblique sagittal T2-
weighted dual-echo FSE, 3500/16, 98; an axial T2*-
Imaging and image analysis weighted gradient echo two-dimensional FLASH, 580/15,
US and MRA were carried out within 3 h of each flip angle 15 ; and a T1-weighted fat‑saturated SE, 800/
other. First, the MRI was performed without a contrast 20. For artrography, 1 mL gadopentetate dimeglumine
agent. Patients were then examined with US. After that, (Magnevist; Berlex Laboratories, Wayne, NJ, USA) in
a contrast agent was injected with US guidance. Finally, a concentration of 469.01 mg/mL was diluted in 250
a second MRI was performed with a contrast agent. Inter- mL of saline; 10 to 20 mL was then injected with US
pretation of MRI was done using MR images before and guidance into the glenohumeral joint using a posterior
after contrast agent simultaneously. approach (Koivikko and Mustonen 2008).
US was performed with an Aloka SSD-500 scanner After the imaging studies, the patients were returned
fitted to a high frequency (7.5 MHz) linear array trans- to the MRI unit, and we obtained T1-weighted fat-satu-
ducer (Aloka Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Tissue harmonic rated SE 800/20 images in the sagittal oblique, coronal
imaging was not used. US was performed by three radiol- oblique and axial planes, and T2-weighted FSE 4500/96
ogists, each with more than 10 y experience in shoulder images in the coronal oblique plane. We acquired the
US and all of whom were blinded to the MRI findings. T1-weighted images without contrast to compare signal
The transducer was applied directly to skin lubricated intensity before and after the administration of a contrast
with gel. Focus was adjusted according to the depth of agent. In four patients studied without contrast agent, the
the target tissue. Imaging was performed on the long sequences were variable (not shown).
and short axes of the tendon. The probe was set perpen- All MRA images were interpreted by one radiologist
dicular to the tendon surface and the angle of the probe who had 1 y of experience in musculoskeletal MRI at the
and tendon was changed to fill hypoechoic areas caused beginning of the study. In MRI analysis, a partial-
by an anisotropic effect. thickness tear was diagnosed when a sharply delineated
The subscapularis (SSC), supraspinatus (SSP), and region in the cuff displayed increased signal intensity
infraspinatus (ISP) tendons were assessed. The SSC was that communicated with either the articular or bursal
evaluated with the forearm rotated externally. The SSP surface of the RC on a T2-weighted MRI. A full-
was evaluated with the arm on the ipsilateral side. In thickness tear displayed increased signal intensity that
addition, the SSP was assessed with the hand behind extended through the full thickness of the cuff substance
the patient’s back (Crass position) or on the waist (modi- on T2-weighted images.
fied Crass position) for better exposure of the tendon On MRA images, a partial‑thickness tear was diag-
from underneath the acromion (Crass et al. 1987; Ferri nosed when the contrast agent entered the cuff substance
et al. 2005), when the patient could assume these without reaching the subacromial bursa. A full-thickness
positions. To make the ISP more accessible, the patient tear was diagnosed when the contrast agent was detected
placed the ipsilateral hand across the chest on top of the on the MR image throughout the full thickness of the RC
contralateral shoulder. and/or when the contrast agent was detected in the suba-
US findings were analyzed during the examination cromial bursa. The tear size was measured as the maximal
by the radiologist who performed the examination. A anteroposterior size of the increased signal intensity on
tear was diagnosed when a hypoechoic area was detected T2-weighted images or the maximal concentration of
that could not be altered in appearance or position by the contrast agent within the substance of the RC on
Comparison of US with MRA to detect and measure rotator cuff tears d P. SIPOLA et al. 1983

MRA images. The higher value was selected to represent thickness tear in 8 (19%) and no tear in 11 (14%) patients.
the maximal tear size. The mean time between imaging and surgery was 2.3
months (range: 0 to 9.5 months). The tear locations are
Surgery shown in Table 2. The SSP tendon was the only tendon
Surgery was performed by three experienced ortho- involved in more than half the cases, and it was involved
paedic surgeons. Of the 77 patients in the study, the in combination with other tendons in 65 (99%) of 66 total
mini-open operation technique was performed in 27 cases.
(36%) and the arthroscopic technique was performed in Figure 1 depicts US and MRA findings in RC
50 (64%). The size and type (partial/full thickness) of tendons that are shown to be normal via arthroscopy.
tendon tear was determined and measured from anterior Table 3 shows the RC cuff findings on US, MRA and
to posterior and from lateral to medial dimensions. Any during surgery. Table 4 shows the diagnostic accuracy
involved tendons were also identified. Intraoperatively, of US, and Table 5 shows the diagnostic accuracy of
a sterile ruler or a calibrated arthroscopic probe was MRA. US had a high positive predictive value for RC
used to define both the anteroposterior and the mediolat- tear (Fig. 2). Of the 10 partial-thickness tears assessed
eral size of the tear. The anteroposterior size was used by US, six (60%) were identified as full-thickness tears
for statistical analysis. during surgery. Of the cases that showed no detectable
tear on US, half displayed a RC tear in surgery, usually
Statistical analysis a full-thickness tear (Fig. 3).
Data are presented as the mean 6 1 standard devia- MRA was highly sensitive for detecting tears (sensi-
tion, the mean 1 range, or the number (n) and percent of tivity 5 97%), but less sensitive (sensitivity 5 88%) for
the total (%). The paired sample t-test and the Wilcoxon the diagnosis of full-thickness tears. The specificity of
signed-rank test were used to analyze differences MRA was considerably higher than that of US (Figs. 4
between the imaging methods in measurements of tear and 5). The post-test probability of detecting a RC tear
size. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient was after a normal MRA was considerably lower than after
used for correlation analyses. Statistical analysis was per- US (18% vs. 50%).
formed with SPSS for Windows (version 17.0; SPSS, Patients were additionally divided into two groups
Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set based on body mass index (BMI) as follows: group 1
at a p value less than 0.05. had a BMI that ranged from 18.1 to 28.2 kg/m2 and group
2 had a BMI between 28.3 to 40.6 kg/m2. No significant
RESULTS differences in diagnostic accuracy between these groups
were found.
The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown In 47 patients, a full-thickness tear was correctly
in Table 1. Of the 77 patients, the diagnosis at surgery was detected on both US and MRA. These patients were
a full-thickness tear of the RC in 58 (75%), a partial- selected for a comparison of tear size measurements.
The RC tear sizes in US, MRA and surgery were, respec-
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of patients with tively, 25 6 9 mm (range: 4 to 48 mm), 36 6 13 mm
a suspected rotator cuff tear (range: 11 to 65 mm) and 40 6 15 mm (range: 10 to
Mean or n (%)
70 mm). Accordingly, US and MRA underestimated the
N 5 77 Range average tear size by 15 mm (p , 0.001) and 4 mm
(p , 0.05), respectively (Fig. 6).
Pain duration (m)* 21 2–144
Symptoms (no. patients)y
Pain at heavy work 2/72 (3)
Pain at light work 28/72 (39)
Pain at rest 42/72 (58) Table 2. Tear location in patients discovered during
Range of motion ( ) surgery for a rotator cuff tear
Flexionz 128 40–180
Elevationx 114 35–180 Tendon type n (%) n 5 65*
Internal rotation{ 61 20–95
External rotation{ 56 0–95 SSP 37 (57)
Etiology of suspected tear (no. patients) SSP and ISP 14 (22)
Traumatic 17/77 (22) SSP and SSC 9 (14)
Degenerative 60/77 (78) SSP, ISP and SSC 4 (6)
ISP 1 (2)
* Data were not obtained in 6 (8%) patients.
y Data were not obtained in 5 ((7%) patients. SSP 5 supraspinatus tendon; ISP 5 infraspinatus tendon; SSC 5 sub-
z Data were not obtained in 6 (8%) patients. scapularis tendon.
x Data were not obtained in 7 (9%) patients. * In one patient with a partial-thickness tear, the tear location was not
{ Data were not obtained in 13 (17%) patients. recorded.
1984 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 36, Number 12, 2010

Fig. 1. Arthroscopically proven normal rotator cuff tendons. (a) Long- and (b) short-axis sonographic views, (c) oblique
coronal and (d) oblique sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance images, and (e) oblique coronal and (f) trans-
verse T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance images after injection of intra-articular contrast agent show
homogeneous tendons.

In both methods, underestimation was higher in tear size by at least 10 mm in seven patients (15%; p ,
large tears than small tears (Figs. 7 and 8). Tear size 0.05). Patient body weight and BMI were associated
overestimation was rare. Of the 77 patients in our study, with the difference between MRA and surgery in tear
US overestimated the tear size by at least 10 mm in only size estimations (r 5 .291, p ,0.05 and r 5.313, p ,
one (2%) patient. In contrast, MRA overestimated the 0.05, respectively). There was no correlation between
Comparison of US with MRA to detect and measure rotator cuff tears d P. SIPOLA et al. 1985

Table 3. Comparison of US and MRI data in the Table 5. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance
diagnosis of rotator cuff tears artrography in the detection of rotator cuff tears
Operative diagnosis No tear vs. full- or No full-thickness
partial-thickness tear vs. full-thickness
Full-thickness Partial-thickness No tear, tear N 5 75 tear N 5 75
tear, n 5 58 tear, n 5 8 n 5 11
Sensitivity, mean or n (%) 62/64 (97) 50/57 (88)
Diagnosis with US, 48 (62) 6 (8%) 3 (4) Specificity, mean or n (%) 9/11 (82) 17/18 (94
n (%) 6 (8) 1 (1) 3 (4) PPV, mean or n (%) 62/64 (97) 50/51 (98)
4 (5) 1 (1) 5 (7) NPV, mean or n (%) 9/11 (82) 17/24 (71)
Accuracy, mean or n (%) 71/75 (95) 67/75 (89)
Diagnosis with MRA, (n 557*) (n 5 7y) (n 5 11)
n (%) 50 (67) 1 (1) 0 (0) PPV 5 positive predictive value; NPV 5 negative predictive value.
6 (8) 5 (7) 2 (3)
1 (1%) 1 (1) 9 (12)
for detecting tears, particularly partial-thickness tears
US 5 ultrasonography; MRA 5 magnetic resonance artrography.
* In one patient with a full-thickness tear, MRA was not performed.
(Nelson et al. 1991; Martin-Hervas et al. 2001). In a
y In one patient with a partial-thickness tear, MRAwas not performed. more recent studies with a surgical reference, US and
MRI were shown to have comparable accuracy for
anthropometric measurements and the difference between identifying (Teefey et al. 2004; Fotiadou et al. 2008)
US and surgery tear size estimations. and measuring (Teefey et al. 2004) the size of full- and
partial-thickness RC tears. To the best of our knowledge,
DISCUSSION the current study is the second largest in the literature to
Main findings date that compares the accuracy of US and MRI with
We found that US had a high positive predictive a surgical reference. Our findings are concordant with
value for diagnosing a RC tear and that MRA was a recent meta‑analysis, which showed that MRA was
a more specific method for detecting a tear. Both the most sensitive and the most specific technique for
methods, particularly US, underestimated the tear size diagnosing both full- and partial-thickness RC tears
of large tears. In contrast, US usually did not overestimate (de Jesus et al. 2009).
tear size, but overestimations were not uncommon with We did not find a difference in diagnostic accuracy
contrast-enhanced MRA. Patient obesity did not influ- between the high and low BMI groups, although the
ence the overall accuracy of imaging tests, but it reduced difference between MRA and surgery tear size measure-
the accuracy of MRA in tear size detection. Our results ments was associated with BMI and body weight. This
indicate that US can be used to confirm a RC tear. observation is consistent with previous findings that
However, US cannot reliably determine the tear extension obesity reduced the diagnostic value of MRI (Nelson
(partial- or full-thickness tear). MRA can provide a reli- et al. 1991). In the current study, obesity may not
able estimate of tear extension and can enable measure- have influenced the accuracy of US because we used
ment of the tear size more accurately than US. The a relatively low frequency probe. The high frequency
reliability of MRA in the detection of tear size is reduced transducer, however, may improve the sensitivity to
in obese patients. detect tears, especially partial-thickness tears (Fotiadou
et al. 2008).
Comparison of findings to previous studies The SSP tendon is a key location for a RC tear. It was
Previous studies that compared the accuracy of US involved in 98% of tears. To diagnose a RC tear accu-
and MRI produced controversial results. In two older rately, special attention should be paid to the SSP tendon.
studies, US was found to be less sensitive than MRI In contrast, when no tears are detected in the SSP tendon,
it is highly probable that the patient has no RC tear. In our
Table 4. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography in the study, an isolated SSC tear was not found in any patients.
detection of rotator cuff tears Indeed, tears of the SSC tendon have rarely been reported
and have usually been associated with trauma (Gerber
No tear vs. full- or No full-thickness
partial-thickness tear vs. full-thickness and Krushell 1991).
tear, N 5 77 tear, N 5 77 Our finding that US can be considered the imaging
modality of choice for the initial detection of full- and
Sensitivity, mean or n (%) 61/66 (92) 48/58 (83)
Specificity, mean or n (%) 5/11 (45) 10/19 (53) partial-thickness RC tears in patients with a history and
PPV, mean or n (%) 61/67 (91) 48/57 (84) clinical findings that do not suggest any other intra-
NPV, mean or n (%) 5/10 (50) 10/20 (50) articular disorder is in concordance with previous studies
Accuracy, mean or n (%) 66/77 (86) 58/77 (75)
(Farin et al. 1995; Teefey et al. 2004; Fotiadou et al.
PPV 5 positive predictive value; NPV 5 negative predictive value. 2008).
1986 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 36, Number 12, 2010

Fig. 2. (a) Long-axis (b) and short-axis sonographic views of the left supraspinatus (SSP) tendon show absence of
tendons. (c) Corresponding oblique coronal and (d) oblique sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance images show
absence of tendon related to a massive rotator cuff tear. The medial retraction (arrow in c) of the stump of the SSP tendon
is seen. In ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, a full-thickness tear of 30 and 55 mm, respectively, were
diagnosed. Surgery revealed a full-thickness tear of the SSP and infraspinatus tendons measuring 60 mm.

Fig. 3. (a) In a long-axis sonographic view of the subscapularis (SSC) tendon, no abnormalities were found. (b) Trans-
verse T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance arthographic image shows that contrast material has extended under
the insertion of the SSC tendon onto the lesser tuberosity (arrows). Surgery revealed a 50-mm full-thickness tear of the
supraspinatus and SSC tendons.
Comparison of US with MRA to detect and measure rotator cuff tears d P. SIPOLA et al. 1987

Fig. 4. (a) Long-axis sonographic view of left supraspinatus tendon insertion shows a hypoechoic defect (cursor: X and x)
that was interpreted as a full-thickness tear that measured 17 mm. (b) An oblique coronal T2-weighted magnetic reso-
nance (MR) image shows a focal area of increased signal intensity, and an oblique coronal T1-weighted fat-saturated
MR arthographic image obtained after injection of the MR imaging contrast agent shows no abnormalities (c). MR
findings suggest a partial-thickness tear on the bursal side. Surgery revealed a partial-thickness tear of the supraspinatus
tendon.

Fig. 5. (a) Long-axis and (b) short-axis sonographic views of the left supraspinatus (SSP) tendon insertion show a hypo-
echoic defect (cursor: X and x) that was interpreted as full-thickness tear measuring 16 mm. (c) An oblique coronal and (d)
transversal T1-weighted fat-saturated magnetic resonance (MR) arthrogram obtained after injection of the MR imaging
contrast agent show that (c) the contrast material extended under the insertion of the SSP tendon and (d) the subscapularis
tendon. The contrast agent, however, did not communicate with the subdeltoid bursa, which was interpreted as partial-
thickness tears of the tendons. Surgery revealed a partial-thickness tear of the SSP tendon, and no tear in the subscapularis
tendon.
1988 Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology Volume 36, Number 12, 2010

Fig. 6. A typical case showing underestimation of large tear. (a) In a short-axis sonographic view, a 25-mm full-thickness
tear was found (cursor: X and x). (b) In a corresponding oblique sagittal T2-weighted magnetic resonance image,
the measurement of the tear size was 39 mm. The tear measurement sites are marked with X-marks. Surgery revealed
a 50-mm full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons.

Study limitations differences in the predictive accuracy of US and MRA


Currently, more high frequency transducers to (post-test probability of disease: 91% vs. 97%, respec-
diagnose tendon abnormalities with US are commonly tively), US is a suitable method for screening suspected
recommended (Robinson 2009). We could not study torn RCs. Given the long waiting lists associated in large
the influence of harmonic imaging for diagnosis of RC part with the increasing demand for MRI to diagnose
tear (Strobel et al. 2004). We also did not control the other diseases and the problem that no alternative
influence of patient positioning to tear size estimates imaging methods may be available, our results suggest
(Ferri et al. 2005). that more patients could undergo primary imaging with
US instead of MRI.
CONCLUSIONS However, a negative US finding cannot be used to
rule out the diagnosis of a RC tear. Our findings suggest
In general, US displayed lower accuracy than MRA
that MRI is required to confirm a negative diagnosis in
for measuring RC tears. Because we found no marked
patients with signs and symptoms of RC tear who have

Fig. 7. Accuracy of ultrasonography (US) tear size measure- Fig. 8. Accuracy of magnetic resonance image (MRI) tear size
ments compared to the surgical reference. The y-axis shows measurements compared to the surgical reference. The y-axis
the difference between tear sizes measured during surgery shows the difference between tear sizes measured during
(operation) and by US analysis. Negative numbers indicate surgery (operation) and by MRI analysis. Negative numbers
that the US value was an overestimation. The x-axis shows indicate that the MRI value was an overestimation. The x-axis
the range of actual tear sizes measured during the operation. shows the range of actual tear sizes measured during the opera-
Each symbol represents one patient. tion. Each symbol represents one patient.
Comparison of US with MRA to detect and measure rotator cuff tears d P. SIPOLA et al. 1989

not experienced symptom relief after 3 months of conser- Fotiadou AN, Vlychou M, Papadopoulos P, Karataglis DS, Palladas P,
Fezoulidis IV. Ultrasonography of symptomatic rotator cuff tears
vative treatment. Also, although open surgery currently is compared with MR imaging and surgery. Eur J Radiol 2008;68:
uncommon due to improved arthroscopic techniques, in 174–179.
cases where open surgery is considered for a suspected Gerber C, Krushell RJ. Isolated rupture of the tendon of the subscapula-
ris muscle. Clinical features in 16 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;
large tear, MRI should be used to assess the tear size 73:389–394.
more accurately. Finally, our study demonstrated that Koivikko MP, Mustonen AO. Shoulder magnetic resonance arthrogra-
US was not reliable for differentiating between partial- phy: A prospective randomized study of anterior and posterior
ultrasonography-guided contrast injections. Acta Radiol 2008;49:
and full-thickness tears; therefore, the diagnosis of 912–917.
a partial-thickness tear based on US alone should be Martin-Hervas C, Romero J, Navas-Acien A, Reboiras JJ, Munuera L.
made with caution. Ultrasonographic and magnetic resonance images of rotator cuff
lesions compared with arthroscopy or open surgery findings.
Acknowledgments—The authors thank Marja-Liisa Sutinen, RN, for J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2001;10:410–415.
technical assistance. Meislin RJ, Sperling JW, Stitik TP. Persistent shoulder pain: Epidemi-
ology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead
NJ) 2005;34:5–9.
Nelson MC, Leather GP, Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA, Freedman MT. Eval-
REFERENCES uation of the painful shoulder. A prospective comparison of
magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomographic arthrogra-
Crass JR, Craig EV, Feinberg SB. The hyperextended internal rotation phy, ultrasonography, and operative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am
view in rotator cuff ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1987;15: 1991;73:707–716.
416–420. Robinson P. Sonography of common tendon injuries. AJR 2009;193:
de Jesus JO, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Nazarian LN. Accuracy of MRI, MR 607–618.
arthrography, and ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears: Strobel K, Zanetti M, Nagy L, Hodler J. Suspected rotator cuff lesions:
A meta-analysis. AJR 2009;192:1701–1707. Tissue harmonic imaging versus conventional US of the shoulder.
Farin PU, Jaroma H. Acute traumatic tears of the rotator cuff: value of Radiology 2004;230:243–249.
sonography. Radiology 1995;197:269–273. Teefey SA, Rubin DA, Middleton WD, Hildebolt CF, Leibold RA,
Ferri M, Finlay K, Popowich T, Stamp G, Schuringa P, Friedman L. Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears.
Sonography of full-thickness supraspinatus tears: Comparison of Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging,
patient positioning technique with surgical correlation. AJR 2005; and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone
184:180–184. Joint Surg Am 2004;86:708–716.

You might also like