Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decentralization
Decentralization Defined: Firms that grant substantial decision making authority to the
managers of subunits are referred to as decentralized organizations. Most firms are neither
totally centralized nor totally decentralized.
In centralized decision making, decisions are made at the very top level, and lower level
managers are charged with implementing these decisions.
Decentralized decision making allows managers at lower levels to make and implement key
decisions pertaining to their areas of responsibility. The practice of delegating decision-making
authority to the lower levels of management in a company is called decentralization.
Advantages/Disadvantages of Decentralization
Advantages
Disadvantages
Cost center: A cost center is a subunit that has responsibility for controlling costs but not for
generating revenues.
Most service departments (i.e., maintenance, computer) are classified as cost centers.
Production departments may be cost centers when they simply provide components for another
department.
Cost centers are often controlled by comparing actual with budgeted or standard costs.
Profit center: A profit center is a subunit that has responsibility of generating revenue and
controlling costs.
Investment center: An investment center is a subunit that is responsible for generating revenue,
controlling costs, and investing in assets.
An investment center is charged with earning income consistent with the amount of assets
invested in the segment.
In many decentralized organizations, the output of one division is used as the input of another.
As a result, the value of the transferred good is revenue to the selling division and cost to the
buying division. This value, or internal price, is called the transfer price.
When one division of a company sells to another division, both divisions as well as the company
as a whole are affected.
Thus, the profits of both divisions, as well as the evaluation and compensation of their managers,
are affected by the transfer price.
Since profit-based performance measures of the two divisions are affected, transfer pricing often
can be an emotionally charged issue. The above exhibit illustrates the effect of the transfer price
on two divisions of a company. Division A wants the transfer price to be as high as possible
while Division C prefers it to be as low a as possible.
o Market price
o Cost-based transfer prices
o Negotiated transfer prices
If there is a competitive outside market for the transferred product, then the best transfer
price is the market price.
In such a case, divisional managers’ actions will simultaneously optimize divisional
profits and firm-wide profits.
Furthermore, no division can benefit at the expense of another. In this setting, top
management will not be tempted to intervene.
The market price, if available, is the best approach to transfer pricing.
Finally, top management may allow the selling and buying division managers to negotiate a
transfer price.
This approach is particularly useful in cases with market imperfections, such as the ability of an
in-house division to avoid selling and distribution costs that external market participants would
have to incur.
Using a negotiated transfer price then allows the two divisions to share any cost savings resulting
from avoided costs.
Minimum Transfer Price (Floor): The transfer price that would leave the selling division no
worse off if the good were sold to an internal division than if the good were sold to an external
party. This is sometimes referred to as the ‘‘floor’’ of the bargaining range.
Maximum Transfer Price (Ceiling): The transfer price that would leave the buying division no
worse off if an input were purchased from an internal division than if the same good were
purchased externally. This is sometimes referred to as the ‘‘ceiling’’ of the bargaining range.