You are on page 1of 3

Article

pubs.acs.org/crystal

Pressure Effects on the Size of Type‑I and Type-II Si-Clathrates


Synthesized by Spark Plasma Sintering
S. Stefanoski, M. C. Blosser, and G. S. Nolas*
Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620, United States
*
S Supporting Information

ABSTRACT: The crystallinity of clathrate-I Na8Si46 and clathrate-II Na24Si136


was investigated as a function of applied pressure and temperature employing
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

spark plasma sintering. Na8Si46 and Na24Si136 with full Na and Si occupancies
were obtained at 450 and 600 °C, respectively. Microcrystalline powders were
Downloaded via CHULALONGKORN UNIV on August 13, 2020 at 10:27:55 (UTC).

obtained at 60 MPa, and single crystals were obtained at 100 MPa. The size of
the crystals increased with pressure for the clathrate-II Na24Si136, while a
threshold value in pressure separated microcrystalline and single-crystal
clathrate-I Na8Si46.

1. INTRODUCTION products were investigated as a function of the applied pressure


In spark plasma sintering (SPS), a pulsed dc current is sourced and temperature.
through a specimen enclosed in a punch and die assembly 2. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
placed between two electrodes. The two electrodes, which
The Na4Si4 precursor was synthesized by direct reaction of elemental
source current through the specimen and die assembly, also act
Na (Alfa Aesar, 99.98%) and Si powder (Alfa Aesar, 99%). A Na/Si
for application of uniaxial pressure. The application of electrical atomic ratio of 1.1:1 was placed inside a tungsten crucible that was
current in SPS influences the generation and mobility of point inside a sealed stainless steel canister and reacted at 650 °C for 36 h.
defects.1 The fast heating rates and more uniform heating, as The resulting product was a dark gray crystalline material and was used
compared with other consolidation techniques, generally result as the precursor in the SPS process.
in faster densification, and have typically been employed for the The SPS investigations were carried out using the Thermal
densification of refractory materials.2−4 These characteristics Technology, Inc. 10-3 system. Na4Si4 precursor was loaded in a
make SPS a state-of-the-art consolidation technique.2−4 In graphite die with uniaxial pressures of 60, 80, and 100 MPa applied
addition to consolidation, SPS was employed for the synthesis using graphite punches. The maximum pressure applied with graphite
die and punches was 100 MPa. Tantalum foil was used to prevent
of various materials ranging from ceramics to metals, polymers, direct reaction between the precursor and the graphite die and
and semiconductors.5−7 punches, as well as to provide a tight fit of the die assembly. Pulsed dc
The SPS approach allows for mass transport of ions to take current, with a pulse-on time of 36 ms and a pulse-off time of 2 ms,
place within a precursor while under pressure. It can, therefore, was sourced through the precursor and die from the bottom electrode
be used for clathrate formation and crystal growth. Recently, (anode) to the top electrode (cathode) while under uniaxial pressure
SPS was used for the synthesis of single-crystal clathrate-II in a vacuum of 10−3 Torr for 3 h after flushing the chamber three times
Na24Si136.8 Intermetallic clathrates represent open-framework with high-purity N2. The product of the reaction was separated from
materials in which guest atomic species are enclosed within the any unreacted Na4Si4 by washing with ethanol and distilled water.
Single-crystal XRD data of Na8Si46 and Na24Si136 crystals were
host framework.9,10 The interest in group 14 clathrates stems
obtained at 293 K on a STOE diffractometer using a graphite
from the unique properties that have been reported in these monochromator and a Mo Kα fine-focus sealed tube with a
materials,9,11−19 making them promising for a range of wavelength of 0.71073 Å. Structural refinements were performed
applications, including thermoelectric,9,14,15 magnetocalor- using SHELXL-97 (Tables S1−S5 in the Supporting Information).
ic,16,17,20 optoelectronic,12,21 and superconductivity.19 Single Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected with a
crystals of clathrate-II Na24Si136 were synthesized via SPS at 600 Bruker D8 Focus diffractometer in Bragg−Brentano geometry using
°C under uniaxial pressure of 100 MPa for 3 h.8 At 550 °C, Cu Kα,β radiation and a graphite monochromator. NIST Si 640c
approximately 10% of clathrate-I Na8Si46 was observed as an internal standard was used for determination of lattice parameters.
impurity, whereas reactions performed at 700 °C yielded a
similar fraction of α-Si.8 The synthesis procedure reported here Received: September 14, 2012
allows for the selective synthesis of single-crystal Na8Si46 and Revised: November 16, 2012
Na24Si136 using SPS. Size and crystallinity of the clathrate Published: November 20, 2012

© 2012 American Chemical Society 195 dx.doi.org/10.1021/cg3013443 | Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 195−197
Crystal Growth & Design Article

Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) were collected using a JEOL other.22−27 Also, impurities of α-Si have been typically observed
JSM-6390LV, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopic (EDS) data in NaxSi136 using this technique.22−27 It is also known that an
were collected using an Oxford INCA X-Sight 7582M. insulating oxide layer can readily form on the grains of
microcrystalline specimens28 and presents difficulties in
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION densification and interpretation of the measured data.29,30
Specimens with the clathrate-I and clathrate-II crystal structures Less than 5 wt % α-Si and no clathrate impurities were
were synthesized by SPS processing of Na4Si4 at the respective observed in the clathrate-II Na24Si136 microcrystalline specimen
temperatures of 450 and 600 °C, and uniaxial pressures of 60, using this SPS approach (Figure S1, Supporting Information).
80, and 100 MPa for 3 h. As described in ref 8, Na transport Only single-crystal Na24Si136 are free of α-Si and other
occurs during SPS, thereby resulting in a redox reaction. The impurities and allow for intrinsic physical properties measure-
temperature ramp rates were 100 °C/min for the clathrate-I ments.31 It is, therefore, of interest to investigate the size and
phase, and 25 °C/min up to 450 °C and then 10 °C/min up to crystallinity of single-crystal clathrates employing SPS.
600 °C for the clathrate-II phase. Selective synthesis was Details of the SPS synthesis parameters, including temper-
achieved by choosing the appropriate temperature, 450 °C for ature, T, pressure, P, and average size, L, of the resulting
the clathrate-I phase and 600 °C for the clathrate-II phase products, are given in Table 1. The grain size of the powders
(Figure 1; Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). No was calculated using the Debye−Scherrer equation.32,33 The
average size of the single crystals was obtained from SEM
analyses.

Table 1. Processing Conditions for SPS Synthesis from the


Precursor Na4Si4
T (°C) P (MPa) phase crystallinity L (μm)
450 60 clathrate-I microcrystalline 10
80 clathrate-I microcrystalline 10
100 clathrate-I single crystal 150
550 60 clathrate-I + II microcrystalline 10
80 clathrate-I + II microcrystalline + single 10/150
crystal
100 clathrate-I + II microcrystalline + single 10/150
crystal
600 60 clathrate-II microcrystalline 15
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction patterns of powdered Na8Si46 and Na24Si136,
80 clathrate-II single crystal 50
collected from crushed single crystals, Na4Si4, and Si demonstrating
100 clathrate-II single crystal 250
the selective synthesis of single-crystal clathrates at 100 MPa.
650 100 silicon nanocrystalline 0.065

change in the precursor was observed at temperatures below


400 °C. At 550 °C, a mixture of both phases was observed. SPS The average size of the clathrate-I phase does not change as
processing at 650 °C yields the α-Si phase. The highest yield of the pressure is increased from 60 to 80 MPa (Table 1), in
single crystals was achieved at 450 and 600 °C for the clathrate- contrast to the clathrate-II phase. The average crystal size for
I and clathrate-II phases, respectively, at 100 MPa. This the clathrate-II phase at 80 MPa is smaller than that at 100
approach allowed for the selective synthesis of single-crystal MPa, suggesting that the crystal size increases with increasing
(Figure 1) and microcrystalline (Figure S1, Supporting pressure. In the case of the clathrate-I phase, 100 MPa seems to
Information) Na8Si46 and Na24Si136 as a function of the applied be the optimum pressure for graphite tooling at which single-
pressure. At 60 MPa, high-purity microcrystalline products crystal growth takes place. SPS processing at 60 and 80 MPa
were observed. When the pressure was increased from 60 to 80 resulted in only microcrystalline products, whereas at 100 MPa,
MPa, clathrate-II single crystals started to form but clathrate-I only single crystals were observed at the appropriate temper-
single crystals formed at 100 MPa. atures. The average size of the single-crystal products, 150 and
Compositions with stoichiometries of Na8Si46 and Na24Si136 250 μm for the clathrate-I and clathrate-II phases, respectively,
were obtained from refinement of the single-crystal XRD data (Table 1) is comparable to that obtained from other single-
(Tables S1−S5, Supporting Information). Compositions with crystal synthesis methods.34 At 550 °C and 100 MPa, a mixture
stoichiometries of Na8Si46 and Na24Si136 were obtained from of powders and single crystals of both clathrate phases was
the refinement of powder XRD data collected on microcrystal- observed (Table 1). The relative clathrate fraction in the
line clathrate-I and clathrate-II specimens, respectively (Tables synthesis product as a function of reaction time was also
S6−S8, Supporting Information). EDS analyses of these single investigated. When the precursor was reacted at 600 °C for 30
crystal stoichiometries, Na7(1)Si46 and Na23(1)Si136, corroborate min, the clathrate-I phase was estimated to be approximately
the single-crystal XRD results. The crystal structure for the 60%, whereas the clathrate-II phase was approximately 40%,
microcrystalline specimens of both phases was obtained from from powder XRD analyses (Figure S4, Supporting Informa-
Rietveld refinement (Figures S2 and S3, Supporting Informa- tion). As the reaction time increased at the same temperature,
tion). the intensity of the clathrate-I reflections in the XRD spectra
Microcrystalline Na8Si46 and Na24−xSi136 (0 < x < 24) decreased. For a reaction time of 3 h, only the clathrate-II phase
clathrates have traditionally been synthesized by thermal was observed.
decomposition of the Na4Si4 precursor under dynamic vacuum The average size of Si obtained by SPS processing of the
with one clathrate phase present as an impurity in the Na4Si4 precursor at 650 °C is 65 nm (Table 1). Si nanoparticles
196 dx.doi.org/10.1021/cg3013443 | Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 195−197
Crystal Growth & Design Article

of 3 nm can been synthesized by a microwave assisted (11) Adams, G. B.; O’Keefe, M.; Demkov, A. A.; Sankey, O. F.;
technique35 and are of interest for the green chemistry as they Huang, Y.-M. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 8048.
are considered to be nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegrad- (12) Moriguchi, K.; Munetoh, S.; Shintani, A. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62,
able.35,36 The high heating rates and localized heating in the 7138.
(13) Connetable, D. Phys. Rev. B 2007, 75, 125202.
SPS, considered two of the most important factors for the (14) Nolas, G. S.; Cohn, J. L.; Slack, G. A.; Schujman, S. B. Appl.
synthesis of Si nanoparticles,35 may reveal SPS to be a Phys. Lett. 1998, 73, 178.
promising method for the synthesis of Si nanoparticles. Further (15) Cohn, J. L.; Nolas, G. S.; Fessatidis, V.; Metcalf, T. H.; Slack, G.
investigations are necessary in order to determine the full A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1999, 82, 779.
potential of SPS in this direction. (16) Hermann, R. P.; Keppens, V.; Bonville, P.; Nolas, G. S.;
Grandjean, F.; Long, G. J.; Christen, H. M.; Chakoumakos, B. C.;
4. CONCLUSION Sales, B. C.; Mandrus, D. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97, 017401.
(17) Phan, M. H.; Woods, G. T.; Chaturvedi, A.; Stefanoski, S.;
Selective synthesis of single-crystal and microcrystalline Nolas, G. S.; Srikanth, H. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 252505.
clathrate-I Na8Si46 and clathrate-II Na24Si136 was achieved via (18) Kawaji, H.; Horie, H. O.; Yamanaka, S.; Ishikawa, M. Phys. Rev.
SPS. The size of the product increased with pressure in the case Lett. 1995, 74, 1427.
of clathrate-II Na24Si136, in contrast with the clathrate-I Na8Si46. (19) Yamanaka, S.; Enishi, E.; Fukuoka, H.; Yasukawa, M. Inorg.
Microcrystalline specimens were obtained at 60 MPa and Chem. 2000, 39, 56.
single-crystal specimens at 100 MPa, at temperatures of 450 (20) Paschen, S.; Carrillo-Cabrera, W.; Bentien, A.; Tran, V. H.;
and 600 °C for the clathrate-I and clathrate-II phases, Baenitz, M.; Grin, Yu.; Steglich, F. Phys. Rev. B 2001, 64, 214404.
respectively. This approach may also have promise for the (21) Gryko, J.; McMillan, P. F.; Marzke, R. F.; Ramachandran, G. K.;
preparation of nanocrystalline Si, as Si nanoparticles with an Patton, D.; Deb, S. K.; Sankey, O. F. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 62, R7707.
average size of 65 nm were synthesized by SPS. (22) Kasper, J. S.; Hagenmuller, P.; Pouchard, M.; Cros, C. Science


1965, 150, 1713.
(23) Cros, C.; Pouchard, M.; Hagenmuller, P. J. Solid State Chem.
ASSOCIATED CONTENT 1970, 2, 570.
*
S Supporting Information (24) Beekman, M.; Nenghabi, E. N.; Biswas, K.; Myles, C. W.;
Figures showing XRD patterns and Reitveld refinement data, Baitinger, M.; Grin, Yu.; Nolas, G. S. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 5338.
tables containing XRD and Rietveld refinement data, and (25) Horie, H.; Kikudome, T.; Teramura, K.; Yamanaka, S. J. Solid
crystallographic data in CIF format.This material is available State Chem. 2009, 182, 129.
(26) Ramachandran, G. K.; Dong, J. J.; Diefenbacher, J.; Gryko, J.;
free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.


Marzke, R. F.; Sankey, O. F.; McMillan, P. F. J. Solid State Chem. 1999,
145, 716.
AUTHOR INFORMATION (27) Reny, E.; Gravereau, P.; Cros, C.; Pouchard, M. J. Mater. Chem.
Corresponding Author 1998, 8, 2839.
*E-mail: gnolas@usf.edu. (28) He, J.; Klug, D. D.; Uehara, K.; Preston, K. F.; Ratcliffe, C. I.;
Tse, J. S. J. Phys. Chem. 2001, 105, 3475.
Notes (29) Santana, C. J.; Jones, K. S. J. Mater. Sci. 1996, 31, 4985.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.


(30) Mott, N. F. J. Solid State Chem. 1973, 6, 348.
(31) Beekman, M.; Schnelle, W.; Bormann, H.; Baitinger, M.; Grin,
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Yu.; Nolas, G. S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 018301.
(32) Scherrer, P. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Göttingen 1918, 26, 98.
We acknowledge support by the U.S. Department of Energy,
(33) Langford, J. I.; Wislon, A. J. C. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1978, 11, 102.
Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Materials Science and (34) Stefanoski, S.; Beekman, M.; Wong-Ng, W.; Zavalij, P.; Nolas,
Engineering, under Award No. DE-FG02-04ER46145 for G. S. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1491.
single-crystal synthesis, structural analyses, and measured and (35) See, for example: Atkins, T.; Louie, A. Y.; Kauzlarich, S.
simulated pXRD, SEM, and EDS measurements and analyses. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 294006.
We also acknowledge C. D. Malliakas and M. G. Kanatzidis for (36) Park, J. H.; Gu, L.; von Maltzahn, G.; Ruoslahti, E.; Bhatia, S.
collecting the single-crystal XRD data. N.; Sailor, M. K. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 331.

■ REFERENCES
(1) Chen, W.; Anselmi-Tamburini, U.; Garay, J. E.; Groza, J. R.;
Munir, Z. A. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2005, 394, 132.
(2) Tokita, M. J. Soc. Powder Technol., Jpn. 1993, 30, 790.
(3) Munir, Z. A.; Anselmi-Tamburini, U.; Ohyanagi, M. J. Mater. Sci.
2006, 41, 763.
(4) Schmidt, J.; Boehling, N.; Burkhardt, U.; Grin, Yu. Sci. Technol.
Adv. Mater. 2007, 8, 410.
(5) Omori, M. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 2000, 287, 183.
(6) Galy, J.; Dolle, M.; Hungria, T.; Rozier, P.; Monchoux, J.-Ph.
Solid State Sci. 2008, 10, 976.
(7) Nygren, M.; Shen, Z. Solid State Sci. 2003, 5, 125.
(8) Beekman, M.; Baitinger, M.; Borrmann, H.; Schnelle, W.; Meier,
K.; Nolas, G. S.; Grin, Yu. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 9642.
(9) Nolas, G. S.; Slack, G. A.; Schujman, S. B. Semiconductors and
Semimetals; Tritt, T.M., Ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, 2000;
Vol. 69, p 255.
(10) Rogl, P. Thermoelectrics Handbook: Macro to Nano; Rowe, D. M.,
Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2006; pp 32−1.

197 dx.doi.org/10.1021/cg3013443 | Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 13, 195−197

You might also like