Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THIRD ISSUE
“Sales managers are doing what the company asks them to do but, in November 7, 2008 CA REVERSED NLRC’s
NLRC REVERSED THE ARBITER’S
the process, they earn less” SC REVERSED CA’S RULING DECISION
DECISION ON APPEAL
De dios wrote that he had checked Tongko’s record and found that he It found that an employment In petition for certiorari with
That there’s an employer-employee
had earned a lot more money in the year 2000 than in 1999. The letter relationship existed CA.. It ruled that NLRC gravely
relationship and Tongko was
contained that, de dios was worried of Tongk’'s ability to lead his abused its discretion, that no
illegally dismissed.
region in achieving Manulife’s goal as Tongko have not been proactive relationship existed.
with recruit to earn agency growth.
De Dios made changes in the interim: June 29, 2010 January 25, 2001
1. Tongko will hire at his expense a competent assistant to lessen SC GRANTED MANULIFE’S MOTION FOR SC DISMISSED TONGKO’S MOTION FOR
his load. RECONSIDERATION RECONSIDERATION
2. Kevin and the rest of the Agency operations will deal with the It found that Tongko failed to comply with the Tongko continued to be governed by the Agency
North Star Branch in Autonomous fashion. guidelines of de Dios’s letter as a ground for agreement from the star until the end of his
Tongko will still be responsible for meeting the objectives of the termination of Tongko’s agency, is a matter that relationship with Manulife. His agency status
remaining groups under Metro North, his central unit and the rest of NLRC cannot rule upon in the absence of an never changed except to the extent of a being a
the sales managers in Metro North employer-employee relationship lead agent.