Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Satan As a Serpent
What of the serpent that beguiled Eve into partaking of the forbidden fruit? Did animals in Eden have
the capacity to converse in the language of men, as some ancient traditions suggest? Was it then a
natural thing for Eve to have a conversation with a serpent? And what of the curse which consigned the
serpent to crawl upon its belly and eat of the dust of the earth? Does this suggest that snakes once
stood upright, having legs and arms, as they are so commonly depicted in ancient Egyptian drawings?
The key question is, Did Satan actually possess the body of a serpent and speak to Eve through that
medium, or did Moses choose to describe Eve's confrontation with the father of lies as a discussion
with a snake because a snake is such a vivid metaphor to dramatize the subtle, crafty, and dangerous
nature of the devil?
Whether a serpent was actually the agent of deception in the Eden story or merely a metaphorical
representation of the devil, it matters little. Neither point of view changes or tampers with the integrity
of the story. If, however, we assume the partaking of the fruit to have been a figurative representation
of what actually brought about the transformation of the earth from a paradisiacal to a natural or mortal
sphere, then it might follow that the speaking serpent would also have been figurative.
What, then, do we conclude of the Eden story? Was it figurative or literal? We answer by way of
comparison. It, like the temple ceremony, combines a rich blend of both. Our temples are real, the
priesthood is real, the covenants we enter into are real, and the blessings we are promised by
obedience are real; yet the teaching device may be metaphorical. We are as actors on a stage. We
role-play and imagine. We do not actually advance from one world to another in the temple, but rather
are taught with figurative representations of what can and will be.