Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 05 EFBWShop - MVE - 18 Apr 13

    Uploaded by

    Екатерина Гринчик
    14 views6 pages
    The document discusses the division of competences between Member States and EASA for evaluating electronic flight bags (EFBs). Member States have general competence for activities in their territory, while EASA has competence for some executive tasks like design approvals and organization approvals outside the EU or with pan-European scope. Specifically, Member States are responsible for the operational evaluation of EFBs, while EASA can provide ETSOA (technical standard order authorization) and assist national aviation authorities, operators, and manufacturers through contractual arrangements to facilitate harmonization and share expertise.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    05 EFBWShop_MVE_ 18 Apr 13

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses the division of competences between Member States and EASA for evaluating electronic flight bags (EFBs). Member States have general competence for activities in their territory, while EASA has competence for some executive tasks like design approvals and organization approvals outside the EU or with pan-European scope. Specifically, Member States are responsible for the operational evaluation of EFBs, while EASA can provide ETSOA (technical standard order authorization) and assist national aviation authorities, operators, and manufacturers through contractual arrangements to facilitate harmonization and share expertise.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views6 pages

    05 EFBWShop - MVE - 18 Apr 13

    Uploaded by

    Екатерина Гринчик
    The document discusses the division of competences between Member States and EASA for evaluating electronic flight bags (EFBs). Member States have general competence for activities in their territory, while EASA has competence for some executive tasks like design approvals and organization approvals outside the EU or with pan-European scope. Specifically, Member States are responsible for the operational evaluation of EFBs, while EASA can provide ETSOA (technical standard order authorization) and assist national aviation authorities, operators, and manufacturers through contractual arrangements to facilitate harmonization and share expertise.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 6

    EASA EFB Workshop

    Competent authorities for evaluations

    Micaela Verissimo– Legal Department (EASA)

    18th April 2013


    General principles

    Decentralisation
    is the rule

    Centralisation
    the exception
    18/04/2013 2
    BR division of competences

    Member States EASA


    Competence for
    General some executive
    competence for all tasks
    activities in their •Design related approvals
    and certificates
    territory •Organisation approvals
    outside EU/pan-European
    scope

    18/04/2013 3
    What does this mean for EFB?

    Member States EASA

    Operational ETSOA
    evaluation

    18/04/2013 4
    What does this mean for EFB?

    EASA can assist NAAs,


    operators and
    manufacturers and
    participate in the
    process via specific
    contractual
    arrangements
    Facilitation of
    harmonisation and
    sharing of expertise

    18/04/2013 5
    EASA EFB Workshop

    You might also like