159.9:331.101.

“
)

- .
,

.
„
“
,
.

: , ,
, , .

,
,
.
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
.

.
,

1
 ,

. „ “
.

.
, 4
: „ “,
“, „ “, „ “ [1].

,
.
:
E = F (T, S, A,I)
E , T
, S
(T S ), A
, I
,
, „ “,
“ . ( )

„ “
. (1. ;
2. , 3. ),
, , ,
.
,
,

, .

,
. 1-2
1-3
2-3 , „ “
„ “
“ „ “ [2].

2
 ,
,
.
(
) ,
. ,

,
.

,
, [1].

,
. ,
4
, ,
.
„ “,

. „ “ ,

, . „ “

, .
“
,
-
/ “.
.

“ - E = (3T + 2S + A) I

.
,
.

3
 .

: 1,5 / 1 1.5-
.
.
,
2- , , (
) .
, ,
.

. „ “

,
.

. .

[2].

-
,

. ,

“ ,
, ,
,

.
-

4
 ,
.

.
.
,

.
. ,

,
. ( )
, ( )
. ,

,
;
. : 1. ; 2. ; 3.
; 4.
; 5.
.
:

. ,
.
,
.
. : 1.

( ); 2.
, , ,
, .); 3.
: ( , ),
;
; 4.
; 5.

5
 ; : 1.
(
)* ; 2. ( , , ); 3.
/ ; 4.
; 5.
; 6. -
; 7.
; 8. ;
( ) ,
[3].
_________________________________________
*) - ,
„ “
, .
,
, .
.

.
( )
.
.
, ,
“
.
.
, ( )
.
,
. -
,
. ,
,
. ,
. ,
, „ “
,

. ,
( )
. , ,
[
2, . 88-89 ].

.
,
.

,
6
 .
,
-

„ “ ,
.
, ,
.

, ) :

( )
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
( - N )
I - :
( , , .);
** ( , , .);
II - :
(
( ));
( , , ,
.);
( - )
III - :
( );
( );
( )
_______________________________________
** ) - ,
.
. , ,
,
.
,
. ,
,
(
).
.

: 1.
( )
; 2.

7
 . ,
. ,
,
.
,
, ,
, ,
„ “, ,
. ,
,
. ,
, . ,
, ,
, .
,

[ 2, . 94-95 ].
10 ,
, ,

2018 ,
. , 4
, .

.
“

:
E = (3T + 2S + A) I
E ( ), T
,S , A
.
- I ( ),
- , , ,
„ “.

.
.

.
,

.
,
. ,

8
 . ,

. .
),
,
„ “
. ,
N ).

1. .
( ).
, , ,
, 2019 | No. 3(53), . 76-90;
2. .
(
).
, , ,
, 2018 | No .3(49), . 84-97;
3. .
. , ,
, , 2019 | No. 2(52), . 55-73;

The Need of use the "Progressive Model" of Organizational Behavior

in the Higher Education System
(Academic Staff Competition-Attestation Assessment)
Goroshidze George
Iv. Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University

Abstract

The article considers the most acute problem of the higher education system - a competitive
assessment of the teaching staff. The seriousness of this problem is associated with negative
processes that often occur due to improper operation of the criteria system during the competition.
The solution to these difficulties consists in developing an adequate model for assessing the
academic staff and creating on its basis a balanced system of assessment criteria. The article

9
proposes a “progressive model” for assessing the academic staff and a set of criteria for evaluating
the work within this model, which allows a comprehensive assessment of the work done by all
existing categories of teaching staff. This approach allows more efficient development of academic
work and scientific fields by preserving human capital.
Keywords: organizational behavior model, education system, competition, attestation, evaluation.

10
a) :

___________________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________

b)

: _____________________________________________________________________

: ___________________________________________________________________

c) - /

1. _____________________________________________________________________

2. ________________________________________________

3. ___________

*:

*) a, b, c
, .
, ,
.

I - P S
11
 -P
N

1.1 1 = 0.2 0.2 N * =

1.2 1 =2 2N =
1.3 1 =2 2N =

1.4 1 =1 1N =

1 -
1.5 5N =
5
1.6 a 1 - 3 3N =

1.7 1 - 1 1N =

1.8 1 - 1 1N =

1 . (25 )-1 1 .×N =

1.9

1 . (5 )-1 1 . ×N =
1.10

1.11 1 -1 1 N =

*) N .

: _________ 3- )

- S
.
)

N
1.11 : SCOPUS Google Scholar 1 -1 1N=

1.12 h- : SCOPUS Google Scholar 1h- -1 1N=

1.13 1 - 6N=
6
1.14 1 - 2 2N=
:
Scimago Journal Ranking, Scopus, Web of Science, ERIHplus)
1.15 1 - 2 2N =
(proceedings)

12
1.16 1 - 2 2N =
(conference
proceedings)
1.17 1 - 2 2N =

1.18 1 - 2 2N =

1 - 2 2N =
1.19
5 )
1.20 1 - 3 3N =
5 )

: ___________ 2- )

II - A
,
.
.

N
1(
2.1 ) 1 - 0.3 0.3 N =

2(
2.2 ) 1 - 0.5 0.5 N =

2.3 ( , , 1N=
1 - 1
)
2.4 1N=
1 - 1

2.5 1 - 1 1N=

2.6 1N=
1 -1

2.7 1N=
1 - 1

2.8 1N=
1 - 1

2.9 1N=
1 - 1

13
 : _______________________

II

III - I

3.1 /
.

: _______________________

3.2 /

: _______________________

3.3 /

: _______________________

III

14
 ( ) **

I - /

3P + 2S + A = ? = +
- = -

: ________________
+ -
) )

____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
:

____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
:

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

: ________________________

15
____________________________________________

** ) ( )
.

16