Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSRACT: Although laparoscopic surgery accounts for >2 million surgical Tamara M. Atkinson, MD
procedures every year, the current preoperative risk scores and guidelines George D. Giraud, MD,
do not adequately assess the risks of laparoscopy. In general, laparoscopic PhD
procedures have a lower risk of morbidity and mortality compared with Brandon M. Togioka, MD
operations requiring a midline laparotomy. During laparoscopic surgery, Daniel B. Jones, MD
carbon dioxide insufflation may produce significant hemodynamic and Joaquin E. Cigarroa, MD
ventilatory consequences such as increased intraabdominal pressure and
hypercarbia. Hemodynamic insults secondary to increased intraabdominal
pressure include increased afterload and preload and decreased
cardiac output, whereas ventilatory consequences include increased
airway pressures, hypercarbia, and decreased pulmonary compliance.
Hemodynamic effects are accentuated in patients with cardiovascular
disease such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, valvular
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on February 2, 2021
L
aparoscopic surgery accounts for >2 million surgical procedures per year in the
United States with cholecystectomy, appendectomy, colectomy, Roux-en-Y gas-
tric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and hysterectomy among the most performed.1
Although the overall mortality of laparoscopic surgery is low, ranging from 0.3% to
1.8%, preoperative consultation to estimate the risk of perioperative cardiovascu-
lar events is common.2,3 Laparoscopic surgery is frequently utilized in higher risk
patient groups, including the elderly, obese patients, and in those with preexisting
conditions, including cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. Frequently used risk Correspondence to: Joaquin
assessment tools, such as the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, have not been validated E. Cigarroa, MD, Knight
Cardiovascular Institute,
in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.4 Newer scores have been studied in Cardiovascular Division, UHN-
patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery, such as the American College of 62, Oregon Health & Science
Surgeons’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction or University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson
Cardiac Arrest score, which accounts for differences in surgical procedures based Park Rd, Portland, OR 97239.
on organ system; analyses restricted to risk prediction in laparoscopic patients have Email Cigarroa@ohsu.edu
not been published.5 Furthermore, established cardiovascular risk calculators and Key Words: cardiovascular
American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology perioperative guidelines complications ◼ surgery
do not incorporate laparoscopic approach when characterizing operative risk.2 Al- © 2017 American Heart
though laparoscopic surgery has a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality compared Association, Inc.
with open surgery, one must understand the unique he- are increased IAP and hypercarbia (Figure 2).17,18 Human
modynamic and ventilatory effects that may increase the and animal studies have demonstrated that hemodynam-
risk of cardiovascular complications in high-risk popula- ic consequences of increased IAP are secondary to me-
tions, including congestive heart failure, ischemic heart chanical and neurohormonal responses.19 Elevated IAP
disease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease, can lead to (1) inferior vena cava compression, (2) aortic
and pulmonary hypertension.6 By understanding the ef- compression, (3) decreased splanchnic blood flow, (4)
fects of abdominal insufflation during the different phases decreased renal blood flow, and (5) diaphragmatic dis-
of laparoscopic surgery, identification of patients at in- placement.20
creased risk is possible and discussion of approaches to Inferior vena cava compression from increased IAP
mitigate the risk may be entertained (Figure 1). leads to complex changes in venous return and venous
resistance.17 In an experimental swine model, inferior
vena cava pressure parallels the increase in IAP, which
ABDOMINAL INSUFFLATION results in an initial rise in right atrial pressure (RAP),
which plateaus at an IAP of 15 mm Hg.21 The initial in-
(PNEUMOPERITONEUM)
crease in venous return results in an early rise in cardiac
Laparoscopic surgery begins with intraabdominal place- output (CO) at an IAP of 5 mm Hg in normovolemic ani-
ment of the insufflation needle or trochar, followed by mals, but as IAP rises, venous return and CO levels de-
carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation of the abdominal cavity crease.17 The initial rise in venous return is secondary to
to an intraabdominal pressure (IAP) of 12 to 15 mm Hg.7,8 compression of the splanchnic vasculature, which shifts
CO2 is an ideal gas for pneumoperitoneum secondary to blood volume into the central venous system.21 As IAP
its low combustibility and high blood solubility, which de-
patient in the left lateral decubitus position, and adminis- decrease CO.24 Studies in healthy individuals have dem-
tration of 100% FiO2.15,16 onstrated an abrupt rise in SVR and MAP within the first
The 2 main components of CO2 insufflation, which im- 5 minutes of abdominal insufflation caused by abdominal
pact the cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal systems, aortic compression and neuroendocrine effects.20,24–27
Studies have demonstrated elevations in plasma nor- This result defines the critical IAP threshold of 15 mm Hg
epinephrine, epinephrine, cortisol, vasopressin, atrial where further increases in IAP decrease CO.
naturetic peptide, renin, and aldosterone levels.27 A re- TEE has provided additional insight into the cardio-
duction in renal blood flow, secondary to mechanical vascular consequences of increased IAP during laparo-
compression of the renal arteries from increased IAP and scopic surgery. TEE demonstrated within 3 minutes of
a decrease in cardiac output, stimulates renin release.24 abdominal insufflation a significant rise in left ventricular
Elevations in renin and aldosterone temporally correlate preload (left ventricular end diastolic diameter), afterload
with an increase in MAP.24 CO changes as IAP increases (left ventricular end systolic wall stress), and a decrease
during abdominal insufflation. Although the overall trend in cardiac function (fractional area shortening).29,30 These
is a reduction in CO when IAP is >15-20 mm Hg, a bipha- changes, however, returned to baseline after 30 minutes
sic response occurs with an early rise in CO secondary to of insufflation in healthy individuals.25
an increase in preload, followed by a reduction in CO as Pneumoperitoneum has important effects on renal
a consequence of subsequent decreased venous return physiology. Direct compression of the renal vasculature,
and increased afterload.10,21,26,28 At an IAP of 7.5 mm Hg, ureters, and kidneys can lead to a reduction in renal
RAP, left atrial pressure (LAP), and CO all increase.21 As blood flow, glomerular filtration rate, and oliguria.16,31,32
IAP further increases to 15 mm Hg and 30 mm Hg, RAP Although uncommon, laparoscopy poses an increased
remains elevated, whereas LAP declines but remains risk of acute kidney injury in patients with chronic kidney
above baseline, and CO drops below baseline (Figure 3).21 disease.31,33
of myocardial ischemia and heart failure in the period evaluation (Table 1). Intravascular fluid volume status can
immediately after surgery. attenuate or accentuate the hemodynamic consequenc-
es of laparoscopic surgery. Venous return and ventricu-
lar preload are key determinants of CO.21 Studies show
HEMODYNAMIC EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL that after the initial increase in CO as IAP increases, CO
AND PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS decreases. The decrease in CO is accentuated by hypo-
volemia and attenuated by hypervolemia.17,49 Minimizing
Patient Positioning the duration of fasting, adequate preoperative hydration,
Trendelenburg (head down) or reverse Trendelenburg and the use of IAP <15 mm Hg may reduce the decrease
(head up) position provides optimal visualization of the in CO.
surgical field. The Trendelenburg position is necessary
for visualization of the lower abdomen and pelvis dur-
Special Patient Populations
ing gynecological or urological procedures, whereas re-
verse Trendelenburg position is used for upper abdomi- It is critical to identify patients who are vulnerable to ad-
nal surgeries (Table 1). verse hemodynamic and ventilatory changes to create
In the Trendelenburg position, the diaphragm and a comprehensive operative plan with the preoperative
abdominal contents move cephalad, which reduce consultant, anesthesiologist, and surgeon. Laparoscopic
pulmonary compliance and increase peak airway pres- surgery increases preload and afterload and decreases
sures. While pulmonary compliance is compromised, CO. These changes are accentuated or attenuated by
the Trendelenburg position increases venous return intraoperative patient positioning, intravascular fluid vol-
and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), ume status, and underlying cardiovascular conditions
which prevents the decline in CO after abdominal in- such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart dis-
sufflation.7,8,26,27 The neuroendocrine response to the ease, valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease,
Trendelenburg position is notable for an increase in pulmonary disease, and obesity (Table 2).50 In patients
noradrenaline levels and an increase in plasma NT- with cardiovascular disease, laparoscopic surgery can
proANP (N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide), which cause substantially higher elevations in RAP and PCWP
suggests increased atrial stretch caused by increased and a decrease in CO.47 Mechanisms to counterbalance
venous return.27 these changes should be identified preoperatively, in-
cluding adequate hydration, positioning, use of lowest
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on February 2, 2021
Acute coronary ↑ inflammation & Peri/postoperative Continue aspirin if Continue β-blockers Continue aspirin
thrombosis hypercoagulable state myocardial previous coronary
infarction stent
Myocardial ↑ SVR, ↑ LVEDP, HR Peri/postoperative Continue β-blockers Humidified Double product control
supply-demand variability myocardial peritoneal gas to (HR/BP),
ischemia infarction reduce postop pain pain management
Bradyarrhythmias ↑ IAP, ↑ CO2 Asystole Slow insufflation;
consider atropine
or glycopyrrolate
preinsufflation if
resting bradycardia
Congenital heart disease
Cyanotic heart ↑ RAP, ↑ PVR, ↓ CO ↓ CO, R→L Measure arterial CO2 Measure arterial CO2
disease shunt, hypoxemia
Fontan/surgical ↑ RAP, ↑ PVR, ↓ CO Shunt thrombosis Minimize PEEP
shunts
ASD/PFO ↑ RAP, ↑ PVR, ↓ CO Hypoxemia, Consider TEE for
R→L shunt, shunt monitoring
paradoxical
embolism
Other conditions
COPD ↑ peak and plateau airway Acidosis, Avoid steep
pressures, ↑ CO2 bullae rupture, Trendelenburg
subcutaneous angles
emphysema,
pneumothorax
(Continued )
Table 2. Continued
Hemodynamic Changes
With Laparoscopic Potential Pre-Op Peri-op Post-op
Patient Population Surgery Complications Management Management Management
Pulmonary ↑ CO2 → pulmonary Right ventricular Pulmonary
hypertension vasoconstriction failure vasodilators*,
avoid acidosis, avoid
N2O
Chronic kidney ↓ GFR, ↓ RBF Oliguria, acute Avoid hypolemia IAP <15 mm Hg Monitor UOP
disease renal failure
Morbid obesity Diaphragmatic displacement, Acidosis, higher Avoid steep Avoid early extubation,
high baseline IAP, increased ventilation Trendelenburg extubate to CPAP/
airway pressures, ↑ CO2, ↓ requirements angles. BiPAP
pulmonary compliance sequential
compression devices
ASD indicates atrial septal defect; CHF, congestive heart failure; CO, cardiac output; CO2, carbon dioxide; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
GFR, glomerular filtration rate; HR, heart rate; IAP, intraabdominal pressure; LVEDP, left ventricular end diastolic pressure; N2O, nitrous oxide; NSR,
normal sinus rhythm; PAP, pulmonary artery pressure; PCWP, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; PEEP, positive end expiratory pressure; PFO, patent
foramen ovale; PVR, pulmonary vascular resistance; RAP, right atrial pressure; RBF, renal blood flow; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SVR, systemic vascular
resistance; TEE, transesophageal echocardiogram; and UOP, urine output.
*Milrinone, nitric oxide, iloprost.
myocardial ischemia.51 Although the overall incidence of verity of regurgitation in 93% secondary to changes
myocardial ischemia and infarction during laparoscopic in both preload and afterload.56 Left-sided regurgitant
surgery is low, it is not well defined in the literature, with lesions may lead to decreased CO and pulmonary
limited studies in the elderly reporting myocardial infarc- edema, which can precipitate myocardial ischemia in
tion in 0.3% to 0.6% of patients.52,53 Myocardial isch- patients with ischemic heart disease.56 In patients with
emia is precipitated by increases in myocardial oxygen left-sided regurgitant valve lesions, preoperative anti-
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on February 2, 2021
demand, which can be amplified during laparoscopic hypertensive medication titration is essential to avoid
surgery secondary to increases in HR, MAP, SVR, and systolic hypertension, whereas perioperative care fo-
left ventricular end systolic wall stress.29 Hypercarbia cuses on afterload optimization and maintenance of
impairs hemoglobin affinity and oxygen transport, which adequate preload to maintain forward CO.2 Stenotic
may contribute to myocardial ischemia.45,54 The exist- valve lesions such as aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral
ing literature does not provide specific data on whether stenosis can substantially impact the hemodynamic
ischemic events are lower in patients treated with lapa- changes as IAP increases. Left ventricular hypertro-
roscopic procedures. phy, decreased ventricular compliance, and suben-
Optimal β-blockade before surgery and during the docardial myocardial ischemia associated with AS
perioperative period can prevent myocardial ischemia make the left ventricle more sensitive to changes in
in patients with ischemic heart disease who are chroni- afterload and preload.57 Induction of anesthesia is a
cally on β-blockers. It may be reasonable to start β- critical time point for AS secondary to the vasodilatory
blockers preoperatively in patients with intermediate- to effects of anesthesia. In patients with AS, hypoten-
high-risk ischemia on stress test or an Revised Cardiac sion and subsequent reduction in coronary perfusion
Risk Index score of >3, but they should not be started pressure should be avoided. Perioperative vulnerability
the day of surgery because of increased risk of stroke, secondary to hypotension and tachycardia can lead to
hypotension, bradycardia, and death.2,16,40 Peri- and cardiovascular collapse. Intraoperative hemodynamic
postoperative pain predispose patients to myocardial monitoring with arterial line placement and TEE is pre-
ischemia and should be mitigated with adequate anal- ferred, but pulmonary artery catheter placement may
gesia.2,55 be considered in selective high-risk patients.2 Obstruc-
tion to blood flow makes patients with mitral stenosis
sensitive to changes in HR, LAP, and pulmonary artery
Valvular Heart Disease pressures during laparoscopic surgery. Perioperative
Regurgitant valve lesions lead to volume overload, management of HR with β-blockers is essential to
whereas stenotic valve lesions lead to pressure over- maintain optimal diastolic filling time preventing further
load. In patients with trace-mild tricuspid or mitral elevations in LAP, which in turn can cause pulmonary
regurgitation, abdominal insufflation increases the se- edema in patients with mitral stenosis. Pre-operative
evaluation should identify patients with valvular heart insertion of the needle into the peritoneum and slower
disease and optimize intravascular fluid volume status, abdominal insufflation. In the period after surgery, un-
HR, and systemic arterial pressure. Perioperative man- explained hypoxemia not reversible with 100% oxygen
agement must avoid hypotension in AS, tachycardia in should trigger an evaluation for atrial septal defect/
mitral stenosis, and increased afterload in left-sided patent foramen ovale. TEE can be performed intraop-
regurgitant valve lesions. eratively to monitor for shunts in patients at risk.
nal insufflation pressures <12 mm Hg, and minimized higher airway pressures are required to ventilate pa-
intrathoracic pressure through intermittent positive tients during laparoscopy, predisposing patients to bul-
pressure ventilation.62 Because of the critical nature of lae rupture.
patients with Fontan and cyanotic hearts, a multidisci-
plinary approach involving a congenital heart special-
ist, anesthesiologist, and surgeon should outline crite- Morbid Obesity
ria for termination of procedure, conversion to open Given the obesity epidemic, the number of laparoscop-
surgery, and management of cardiovascular collapse. ic bariatric surgeries has increased.66 Morbid obesity
ETCO2 monitoring is not accurate in patients with cya- is associated with comorbidities, including restrictive
notic heart disease, and therefore arterial blood gas lung disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity hypoventila-
monitoring of CO2 with an arterial line rather than tion syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, and chroni-
ETCO2 is essential.60 Another vulnerable population cally elevated IAP. Studies have demonstrated similar
includes patients with an atrial septal defect, patent cardiovascular and respiratory perturbations in mor-
foramen ovale or fenestrated Fontans, which predis- bidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
poses to right-to-left shunting causing hypoxemia or compared with nonobese patients.66 However, morbid-
paradoxical CO2 gas embolism.63 Subclinical CO2 gas ly obese patients have lower respiratory compliance
embolism was seen in 17.1% of patients without an and higher peak airway pressures requiring higher
atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale because minute ventilation to maintain normocarbia compared
of placement of the insufflation needle into the venous with nonobese individuals, with further reduction in re-
system or injured vessels within the peritoneum.11 El- spiratory compliance with pneumoperitoneum.67 Simi-
evations in RAP greater than PCWP lead to right-to-left lar cardiovascular effects of pneumoperitoneum are
shunting during all phases of laparoscopy, especially seen but are less pronounced because of the chroni-
in the Trendelenburg position.64 Minimizing positive end cally elevated IAP of 9 to 10 mm Hg in morbidly obese
expiratory pressure and administering inhaled nitric ox- patients.66,68 Venous stasis and risk of thrombosis are
ide to lower pulmonary vascular resistance and RAP higher in morbidly obese patients and are exacerbated
reduces the RAP-LAP gradient decreasing right-to-left because of decreased femoral venous blood flow from
shunt.65 CO2 gas embolism can be avoided by careful increased IAP.66
CONCLUSIONS 2. Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beck-
man JA, Bozkurt B, Davila-Roman VG, Gerhard-Herman MD, Holly
Preoperative consultation to determine perioperative TA, Kane GC, Marine JE, Nelson MT, Spencer CC, Thompson A,
cardiovascular risk remains an integral component Ting HH, Uretsky BF, Wijeysundera DN. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline
of consultative cardiovascular medicine. Current risk on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of
patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American
scores have not been validated in patients undergoing
College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
laparoscopic surgery. Newer indications and procedures on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e278–e333. doi:
have increased the number of patients treated laparo- 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000106.
scopically while maintaining an overall lower risk profile 3. Aminian A, Brethauer SA, Kirwan JP, Kashyap SR, Burguera B,
than open surgery. Despite the lower risk, understanding Schauer PR. How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery? Diabetes
Obes Metab. 2015;17:198–201. doi: 10.1111/dom.12405.
the unique hemodynamic and ventilatory consequences
4. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, Thomas EJ, Polanczyk
of laparoscopic surgery is essential to identify vulner- CA, Cook EF, Sugarbaker DJ, Donaldson MC, Poss R, Ho KK, Lud-
able populations at risk of cardiovascular complications. wig LE, Pedan A, Goldman L. Derivation and prospective validation
Increased IAP and hypercarbia are the main components of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac
leading to hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–1049.
5. Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, Kaushik M, Fang X, Miller WJ,
surgery. Prevention of cardiovascular catastrophes can
Esterbrooks DJ, Hunter CB, Pipinos II, Johanning JM, Lynch TG,
be accomplished by: Forse RA, Mohiuddin SM, Mooss AN. Development and validation
1. Understanding the hemodynamic and physiologi- of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Cir-
cal consequences of laparoscopic surgery. culation. 2011;124:381–387. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.
2. Optimizing preoperative intravascular fluid volume 110.015701.
6. Boersma E, Kertai MD, Schouten O, Bax JJ, Noordzij P, Steyer-
status to avoid hypovolemia.
berg EW, Schinkel AF, van Santen M, Simoons ML, Thomson IR,
3. Utilizing slow abdominal insufflation with maximum Klein J, van Urk H, Poldermans D. Perioperative cardiovascular
IAP of <15 mm Hg coupled with minimized dura- mortality in noncardiac surgery: validation of the Lee cardiac risk
tion of extreme patient positioning.16 index. Am J Med. 2005;118:1134–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.am-
4. Hemodynamic monitoring with direct arterial line jmed.2005.01.064.
7. Cunningham AJ. Anesthetic implications of laparoscopic surgery.
and TEE placement in selected high-risk individuals.
Yale J Biol Med. 1998;71:551–578.
5. Placing an arterial line for monitoring of partial 8. Gannedahl P, Odeberg S, Brodin LA, Sollevi A. Effects of pos-
pressure of CO2 in patients whom ETCO2 may be ture and pneumoperitoneum during anaesthesia on the in-
unreliable. dices of left ventricular filling. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on February 2, 2021
18. Cullen DJ, Coyle JP, Teplick R, Long MC. Cardiovascular, pul- 36. Ott DE. Subcutaneous emphysema: beyond the pneumoperito-
monary, and renal effects of massively increased intra-abdomi- neum. JSLS. 2014;18:1–7. doi: 10.4293/108680813X136934
nal pressure in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1989;17: 22520882.
118–121. 37. Wahba RW, Béïque F, Kleiman SJ. Cardiopulmonary function and
19. Odeberg-Wernerman S. Laparoscopic surgery: effects on circula- laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can J Anaesth. 1995;42:51–63.
tory and respiratory physiology: an overview. Eur J Surg Suppl. doi: 10.1007/BF03010572.
2000;166:4–11. 38. Grabowski JE, Talamini MA. Physiological effects of pneumoperito-
20. O’Malley C, Cunningham AJ. Physiologic changes during laparos- neum. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:1009–1016. doi: 10.1007/
copy. Anesthesiol Clin North America. 2001;19:1–19. s11605-008-0662-0.
21. Kitano Y, Takata M, Sasaki N, Zhang Q, Yamamoto S, Miyasaka 39. Myles PS. Bradyarrhythmias and laparoscopy: a prospective
K. Influence of increased abdominal pressure on steady-state car- study of heart rate changes with laparoscopy. Aust N Z J Obstet
diac performance. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999;86:1651–1656. Gynaecol. 1991;31:171–173.
22. Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Dulchavsky SA, Saxe J. Effect of increased 40. Wijeysundera DN, Duncan D, Nkonde-Price C, Virani SS, Washam
intra-abdominal pressure on hepatic arterial, portal venous, JB, Fleischmann KE, Fleisher LA. Perioperative beta blockade in
and hepatic microcirculatory blood flow. J Trauma. 1992;33: noncardiac surgery: a systematic review for the 2014 ACC/AHA
279–282. guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and manage-
23. Windberger UB, Auer R, Keplinger F, Längle F, Heinze G, Schindl ment of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the
M, Losert UM. The role of intra-abdominal pressure on splanch- American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task
nic and pulmonary hemodynamic and metabolic changes dur- Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:2246–2264.
ing carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000104.
1999;49:84–91. 41. Jung KT, Kim SH, Kim JW, So KY. Bradycardia during laparo-
24. O’Leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, Cunningham AJ. Laparoscopic scopic surgery due to high flow rate of CO2 insufflation. Korean
cholecystectomy: haemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses J Anesthesiol. 2013;65:276–277. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.
after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. Br J Anaesth. 65.3.276.
pneumoperitoneum in patients undergoing operative laparoscopy. 45. Sharma KC, Kabinoff G, Ducheine Y, Tierney J, Brandstetter RD.
Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:128–133. Laparoscopic surgery and its potential for medical complications.
28. McLaughlin JG, Scheeres DE, Dean RJ, Bonnell BW. The adverse Heart Lung. 1997;26:52–64.
hemodynamic effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg En- 46. Beaver J, Safran D. Pneumopericardium mimicking acute myocar-
dosc. 1995;9:121–124. dial ischemia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. South Med J.
29. Branche PE, Duperret SL, Sagnard PE, Boulez JL, Petit PL, Viale 1999;92:1002–1004.
JP. Left ventricular loading modifications induced by pneumoperi- 47. Portera CA, Compton RP, Walters DN, Browder IW. Benefits of pul-
toneum: a time course echocardiographic study. Anesth Analg. monary artery catheter and transesophageal echocardiographic
1998;86:482–487. monitoring in laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients with cardiac
30. Larsen JF, Svendsen FM, Pedersen V. Randomized clinical trial disease. Am J Surg. 1995;169:202–206.
of the effect of pneumoperitoneum on cardiac function and hae- 48. Harris SN, Ballantyne GH, Luther MA, Perrino AC Jr. Alterations
modynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. of cardiovascular performance during laparoscopic colectomy: a
2004;91:848–854. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4573. combined hemodynamic and echocardiographic analysis. Anesth
31. Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I, Ristkari S, Lindgren L. Splanch- Analg. 1996;83:482–487.
nic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cho- 49. Diamant M, Benumof JL, Saidman LJ. Hemodynamics of increased
lecystectomy: a comparison of the carbon dioxide pneumo- intra-abdominal pressure: interaction with hypovolemia and halo-
peritoneum and the abdominal wall lift method. Anesth Analg. thane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1978;48:23–27.
1997;85:886–891. 50. Hein HA, Joshi GP, Ramsay MA, Fox LG, Gawey BJ, Hellman CL,
32. Dunn MD, McDougall EM. Renal physiology: laparoscopic consid- Arnold JC. Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecys-
erations. Urol Clin North Am. 2000;27:609–614. tectomy in patients with severe cardiac disease. J Clin Anesth.
33. de Seigneux S, Klopfenstein CE, Iselin C, Martin PY. The risk of 1997;9:261–265.
acute kidney injury following laparoscopic surgery in a chronic kid- 51. Devereaux PJ, Goldman L, Cook DJ, Gilbert K, Leslie K, Guy-
ney disease patient. NDT Plus. 2011;4:339–341. doi: 10.1093/ att GH. Perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing
ndtplus/sfr071. noncardiac surgery: a review of the magnitude of the problem,
34. Güldner A, Kiss T, Serpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Canet J, Spieth PM, the pathophysiology of the events and methods to estimate and
Rocco PR, Schultz MJ, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M. Intraoperative communicate risk. CMAJ. 2005;173:627–634. doi: 10.1503/
protective mechanical ventilation for prevention of postoperative cmaj.050011.
pulmonary complications: a comprehensive review of the role of 52. Kannan U, Reddy VS, Mukerji AN, Parithivel VS, Shah AK, Gil-
tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure, and lung recruit- christ BF, Farkas DT. Laparoscopic vs open partial colectomy in
ment maneuvers. Anesthesiology. 2015;123:692–713. doi: elderly patients: insights from the American College of Surgeons-
10.1097/ALN.0000000000000754. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. World
35. Forkin KT, Nemergut EC. Miller’s Anesthesia, 8th Edition. Anesthe- J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:12843–12850. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.
siology. 2016;124:977–978. i45.12843.
53. Rao A, Polanco A, Qiu S, Kim J, Chin EH, Divino CM, Nguyen neonates with cyanotic congenital heart disease? J Pediatr Surg.
SQ. Safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the 2001;36:1234–1236. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.25775.
elderly: analysis of 15,248 patients using the NSQIP database. 61. Eagle SS, Daves SM. The adult with Fontan physiology: systemat-
J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217:1038–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcoll- ic approach to perioperative management for noncardiac surgery.
surg.2013.08.001. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25:320–334. doi: 10.1053/j.
54. Crystal GJ. Carbon dioxide and the heart: physiology and clinical jvca.2010.12.003.
implications. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:610–623. doi: 10.1213/ 62. McClain CD, McGowan FX, Kovatsis PG. Laparoscopic surgery in
ANE.0000000000000820. a patient with Fontan physiology. Anesth Analg. 2006;103:856–
55. Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P. Epidural analgesia reduces post- 858. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237294.88298.8e.
operative myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 63. Girard E, Sicot E, Leroux L, Morteau B, Level C, Kherchache A,
2001;93:853–858. Plouvier F, Galiacy JL. . Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2005;24:1282–
56. Fahy BG, Hasnain JU, Flowers JL, Plotkin JS, Odonkor P, Fergu- 1286. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2005.04.031.
son MK. Transesophageal echocardiographic detection of gas 64. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes
embolism and cardiac valvular dysfunction during laparoscopic due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during
nephrectomy. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:500–504. laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39:
57. Danzig V, Krska Z, Demes R, Danzigová Z, Linhart A, Kittnar O. 949–955.
Hemodynamic response to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: im- 65. Helmers RA, Chandrasekaran K. Nitric oxide therapy for post-lap-
pacts of increased afterload and ischemic dysfunction of the left aroscopic surgery associated patent foramen ovale: incidence,
ventricle. Physiol Res. 2005;54:377–385. mechanisms, diagnosis and therapy. Heart Lung. 2014;43:155–
58. Maxwell BG, Wong JK, Lobato RL. Perioperative morbidity and 157. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2013.12.003.
mortality after noncardiac surgery in young adults with congenital 66. Nguyen NT, Wolfe BM. The physiologic effects of pneumoperito-
or early acquired heart disease: a retrospective cohort analysis of neum in the morbidly obese. Ann Surg. 2005;241:219–226.
the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Am 67. Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T, Warner DO, Hubmayr RD, Ham-
Surg. 2014;80:321–326. mel J. The impact of morbid obesity, pneumoperitoneum, and
59. Taylor KL, Holtby H, Macpherson B. Laparoscopic surgery posture on respiratory system mechanics and oxygenation during
in the pediatric patient post Fontan procedure. Paediatr An- laparoscopy. Anesth Analg. 2002;94:1345–1350.
aesth. 2006;16:591–595. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2005. 68. Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Fleming NW, Moore P, Lee SJ, Goldman CD,
01826.x. Cole CJ, Wolfe BM. Cardiac function during laparoscopic vs open
60. Wulkan ML, Vasudevan SA. Is end-tidal CO2 an accurate measure gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:78–83. doi: 10.1007/
of arterial CO2 during laparoscopic procedures in children and s00464-001-8159-x.
Downloaded from http://ahajournals.org by on February 2, 2021