You are on page 1of 6

Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 382–387

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Optics and Lasers in Engineering


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/optlaseng

Measurement of temperature and electrons density distribution


of atmospheric arc plasma by moiré deflectometry technique
Fatemeh Salimi Meidanshahi a, Khosro Madanipour b,c,n, Babak Shokri a,d
a
Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Department of Physics, Tehran, Iran
b
Optics, Laser and Photonics Institute, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Street, Tehran, Iran
c
Optical Measurement Central Laboratory, Amirkabir University of Technology, Hafez Street, Tehran, Iran
d
Shahid Beheshti University, G.C., Laser and Plasma Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: In the present paper, the refractive index, electron density and temperature distribution of atmospheric
Received 6 September 2012 arc plasmas are measured by moiré deflectometry. The deflection angle of rays passing through the
Received in revised form plasma is obtained by moiré fringe analysis. Then by using inverse Abel transform integral for this
11 November 2012
axisymmetric plasma, the refractive index distribution is obtained in different points of plasma and
Accepted 30 November 2012
Available online 25 December 2012
environment. Considering the relation between plasma temperature and refractive index, the spatial
temperature distribution of the arc plasma is evaluated. Also, in contrast to conventional models to
Keywords: obtain electron number density, in which the refractive index of plasmas is approximately assumed
Moiré deflectometry equal to the electron refractive index, a model is used for accurate and absolute measurement of the
Atmospheric arc plasma
electron density profile. This technique is especially suitable for measuring axially symmetric plasma
Electron
parameters.
Ion and molecule number density
& 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction phase objects or reflection surfaces [26–29]. Moiré deflectometry in


contrast to interferometry methods is simple and is not sensitive to
The spatial distributions of temperature and electron concentra- vibration with no complicated and expensive measurement set-up.
tion are important characteristics in optimum design and application Also, interferometric methods are not efficient at high gradient
of variety of plasmas. So it is desirable that a technique applied for temperature and density due to decreasing fringe spacing and
plasma diagnostics is non-interfering and capable of in-situ and on- difficulty of recording and analyzing of the fringes.
line measuring the probe volume. Plasma diagnostic techniques can The main advantage of moiré deflectometry technique is that
be divided into two categories: the method based on the electric the spatial profile of considerable parameter can be obtained by
probes and the optical methods. In the first method, several one time measurement but laser beam deflectometry and spec-
difficulties in use of electrical probes, as a simple method, restrict troscopic methods provide only pointwise data. Also plasma
the advantage of this method. For example, the dimensions of the diagnostics by moiré deflectometry in contrast to spectroscopic
probes perturbing the plasma and the need for complicated analysis methods does not need restricting assumption of the local
for some plasma conditions are essential restrictions. thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE) state of plasmas.
Several optical diagnostic methods give very high accuracy due to In the present paper, moiré deflectometry technique is applied
non-intrusive probes [1,2]. Among them, holographic interferometry to determine the electron density and temperature distribution of
[3–6,9], Schlieren and shadowgraphy techniques [7–11], optical atmospheric arc plasma. In contrast to conventional models to
emission spectroscopy and laser absorbtion [8,9,12–15], Thomson obtain electron number density, in which the refractive index of
scattering [9], Michelson, Mach–Zehnder and Nomarski polarization plasmas are approximately assumed to be equal to the electron
interferometry [16–20], laser beam deflectometry [21] and digital refractive index and ignore the ions and neutral particles con-
holography [22–24] can be mentioned. tributions, a model is used for accurate and absolute measure-
Moiré deflectometry is a method of wave front analysis in which ment of the electron density profile.
both Talbot effect [25] and moiré technique is applied for measuring

2. Theory
n
Corresponding author at: Optics, Laser and Photonics Institute, Amirkabir
University of Technology, Hafez Street, Tehran, Iran. Tel.: þ 98 9122498819;
fax: þ 98 21 64543140.
When a plasma is transparent with respect to a probe light, it
E-mail addresses: madanipour@aut.ac.ir, can be assumed as a phase object. The light beam passing through
kmadanipour@gmail.com (K. Madanipour). the plasma medium is deflected due to the refractive index

0143-8166/$ - see front matter & 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2012.11.018
F.S. Meidanshahi et al. / Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 382–387 383

Y According to the dispersion relation in the plasma and phase


α δd velocity definition, the electron density distribution can be
evaluated in terms of contribution of electrons to the plasma
rf
yf refractive index [32]:
Y0
2pme c2
P1
x0 xf
P2 X Ne ¼ 2
ð1nÞe ; ð4Þ
e2 l
Z where me and e are electron charge and mass; n, c, l and Ne are
G1 G2
the refractive index, light velocity in vacuum, probe wavelength
and electron number density, respectively.
Fig. 1. Light beam deflection, passing through the phase object and gratings G1
and G2.
The contribution of electrons to the plasma refractive index
can be rewritten as
2
gradient. By measuring the deflection angle, the refractive index e2 l N e 2  
ðn1Þe ¼   4:46  1014 l N e l : cm,Ne : cm3 : ð5Þ
and subsequently, different parameters such as electron, ion and 2pme c2
molecule concentrations and also temperature distribution can be The refractive index of neutral molecules can be expressed
obtained. Among the different optical techniques for temperature as [33]
measurement, Moiré deflectometry is a technique of wave front  
1 B
analysis based on geometrical optics. Deflection of the light beam ðn1Þm ¼ A þ 2 Nm ; ð6Þ
L l
passing through the inhomogeneous medium is utilized to obtain
the different parameters distribution. As it is shown in Fig. 1, a where, L is the Loschmidt number (L¼2.687  1019 cm  3), Nm is
coherent collimated light beam propagates through a phase the molecule number density and A and B are constant quantities
object (plasma) as the probe beam and the beam is deflected depending on molecules or atoms for oxygen and nitrogen that
due to the refractive index gradient in the object. For simplicity, are A¼2.83  10, 4 B ¼2.03  10  6 [33]. Mostly, the contribution
the pitches of two gratings should be the same (d). So the self- of ions to the refractive index can be neglected but one can
image of grating G1 lines on grating G2 is displaced by dd. consider the contribution of ions in the refractive index of the
Ultimately moiré pattern is shifted by ddM. According to Fig. 1, plasma as follows:
the ray deflection angle a can be calculated by [20]  
1 B
ðn1Þi ¼ Z A þ 2 Ni ; ð7Þ
dd d ddM ðy,zÞ L l
aðy,zÞ ¼ ¼ ð1Þ
Xk Xk dM
where Z is the relative specific refractivity (specific refractivity of
where d and dM are the pitch of gratings and moiré fringes ions with respect to molecules). It is well known that the
2 refractive index of a gas depends on its microscopic properties
spacing, Xk is kth Talbot distance given byX k ¼ kd =l where l is
the wavelength of the probe beam. Eq. (1) shows that the and mass density distribution. So the refractive index of the
resolution of moiré deflectometry in diagnosing the refractive plasma can be rewritten as
index can be increased by using the gratings with smaller pitches  
1 B   2  
and higher Talbot distances. n1 ¼ Aþ 2 N m þ ZN i 4:46  1014 l N e l : cm,N e : cm3 :
L l
For an axially
pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ffi symmetric object, where n(x,y,z)¼n(r,z) and ð8Þ
r ¼ x2 þ y2 , the refractive index can be written in cylindrical
coordinates as [20] As air contains roughly (by volume) 78.09% nitrogen and 20.95%
Z oxygen, for atmospheric plasmas by substituting A ¼2.83  10, 4
nf rf aðy,zÞ B¼ 2.03  10  6, and Z ¼0.8143 for air [34], and the probe wave-
nðr,zÞnf ¼  pffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi dy; ð2Þ
p r y2 r 2 length 632.8 nm into the above equation, we obtain:

where n(x,y,z) and nfs are the refractive index of the phase object n ¼ 1:0709  1023 ðNm þ0:8143N i Þ1:7859  1022 Ne : ð9Þ
and air (ambience), respectively; x0 and xf are the limits of the
Eqs. (8) and (9) show the negative effect of the electron
phase object in the propagation direction. Therefore, the sensi-
number density on the refractive index and indicate that n is a
tivity of this technique is proportional to the accuracy of measur-
function of probe wavelength, and electron, molecule and ion
ing the deflection angle. So the sensitivity can be increased by
number densities. The contribution of an electron is almost 17
optimizing the pitch of gratings and Talbot distance and by
times than the contribution of a molecule and 20.5 times than the
increasing the moiré spacing. By numerical solution of this
contribution of an ion.
inverse Abel integral [30], the refractive index distribution is
It should be mentioned that Ne and Ni and Nm can be calculated
determined.
by considering the first and second ionization of the dominant
Edlen equation can be used to calculate the air refractive
substances in the atmospheric arc plasma and solving the Saha
index, nf, by measuring the ambient atmospheric conditions
equation. Assuming quasi-neutrality of plasmas and making use
including air temperature, pressure, and relative humidity [26].
of the ideal gas state equation, the final relations are [34]:
To determine the plasma temperature distribution, the relation  
between the refractive index and temperature should be K 1P 2K 1 K 2 P
N3e þ 2K 1 N2e þ 3K 1 K 2  Ne  ¼ 0; ð10Þ
calculated. kT kT
The refractive index of the plasma as an ionized gas including
the contribution of neutral molecules, ions and electrons is equal K 2 þ Ne
Ni ¼ Ne ; ð11Þ
to [31] 2K 2 þ Ne

ðn1Þ ¼ ðn1Þe þ ðn1Þi þ ðn1Þm : ð3Þ P 2N2e þ 3N e K 2


Nm ¼  ; ð12Þ
kT Ne þ 2K 2
Three right terms of Eq. (3) correspond to the refractive index
of electrons, ions and molecules, respectively. where P is the plasma pressure.
384 F.S. Meidanshahi et al. / Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 382–387

According to Eq. (9) and above equations, the relation between By focusing lens L3 with 200 mm focal length, a CCD camera
the refractive index and electron number density can be calcu- records reference fringes and deformed fringes. For eliminating
lated. Fig. 2 indicates the dependence of the refractive index on the lines of gratings and recording only moiré pattern, a dia-
electron density which is a useful criterion to determine the phragm placed at the focus of L3 serves as a spatial filter that can
plasma region. Corresponding to plasma definition, even partially let only the zero spatial frequency pass through.
ionized gas as few as 10 electrons per cubic centimeter can have As seen in Fig. 4, the measured atmospheric arc plasma is
the characteristics of plasma [35]. When the refractive index produced by using a power supply with 12 kV voltage. The
distribution versus distance is evaluated experimentally from distance between the two electrodes is 3.20 mm and the electro-
Eq. (2), the plasma region can be determined. The relation des are made of non-magnetic stainless steel. When the plasma is
between temperature and electron density can be obtained by generated, temperature and refractive index gradient is created in
solving Eq. (10). Moreover, by measuring the electron density the plasma medium and the air around the plasma. These
distribution, the temperature distribution can be calculated. gradients cause the deformation of moiré fringes. Fig. 5 shows
two images recorded by the CCD camera before and after
temperature gradient: (a) shows the reference deflectogram;
(b) shows the deformed moiré deflectogram after generating the
3. Experiments and results plasma. The deflection of moiré pattern is obvious in Fig. 5b. By
image analysis, the moiré fringes position is found. This position
In this section, the temperature distribution and electron is shown in Fig. 6; the moiré fringe deflection versus the moiré
number density of the atmospheric arc plasma are measured by fringe spacing ddM =dM is obtained in each point of the image. The
moiré deflectometry method according to the approach described ray deflection angle data, a, is evaluated from Eq. (1) as illustrated
in Section 2. The schematic of the experimental set-up is pre- in Fig. 7. The amount of the moire deflection, ddM, is the difference
sented in Fig. 3. A He–Ne laser with wavelength 632.8 nm is the between reference and deflected fringes position.
probe light source and lenses L1 and L2 are used as a beam The laboratory temperature, pressure and relative humidity
expander. A precision pin hole (PH) with diameter 8 mm is was recorded 29.2 1C, 660.65 mmHg and 38.4%, respectively.
positioned at the intermediate focal point of lenses for spatial Therefore, the ambient refractive index is calculated from Edlen
filtering. equation as nf ¼1.000228570.000000039 [36]. The refractive
Two Ronchi gratings with the pitch d ¼0.1 mm are used in the index distribution versus distance from the arc plasma center is
measurement set-up. Grating G2 is placed on the 12th Talbot shown in Fig. 8. As can be seen, the refractive index reaching to a
distance of grating G1. In this distance which is about 190 mm, the fix value is compatible with the ambient refractive index
visibility of moiré fringes are maximum. 1.0002285. By the described approach, since plasma density can
range from just a few electrons (approximately 10 electrons)
present in a cubic centimeter for Lab plasmas, the plasma region

Fig. 2. Distribution of refractive index (n  1) versus the logarithm of the electron


density. Fig. 4. Moiré deflectometry experimental set-up.

ARC

PH

Laser

L1
PC
CCD D
L2
L3 G2 G1

Fig. 3. Schematic diagram of moiré deflectometry. L1, L2 and L3 are three convex lenses. G1 and G2 are two gratings with a pitch of 0.1 mm. PH, TO, D, CCD and PC stand for
pin hole, test object, diaphragm, camera and computer, respectively.
F.S. Meidanshahi et al. / Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 382–387 385

Fig. 5. (a) Reference fringes, and (b) deflected fringes by temperature gradient of the measured atmospheric arc plasma and the air around it.

Fig. 7. The ray deflection angle versus distance from the arc plasma center.

the plasma is 111111 K in the center of the plasma. Also, diameter


Fig. 6. The found position of moiré deflectogram. of the plasma is obtained approximately as 2.53 mm. As expected,
the measured ne and T profiles are not the same at different r
can be determined. It means that according to Fig. 2, the plasma positions and both of them decrease with the increasing distance
region is valid when the number of electron carriers per cubic from the plasma center.
centimeter is higher than 10 (cm  3). Fig. 9 shows the spatial
distribution of the refractive index of the plasma. The plot of the
electron number density versus distance is presented in Fig. 10. 4. Conclusion
By inserting the laboratory pressure as the plasma pressure
and the electron density of the plasma into Eq. (10), the The work presented in this paper concerns atmospheric arc
temperature profile versus distance from the arc plasma center plasma diagnostics. The refractive index, electron number density
is evaluated, shown in Fig. 11. Both plots in Figs. 10 and 11, show and temperature distribution of the plasma is obtained by
an approximately symmetrical distribution of the arc plasma. calculating the temperature dependence of the arc plasma refrac-
From Fig. 10, the highest number density of electrons is tive index and the relation between electron density and the
3.37  1016 cm  3 and from Fig. 11, the highest temperature of refractive index of the plasma. It appears that this optical
386 F.S. Meidanshahi et al. / Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 382–387

Fig. 8. Refractive index distribution versus distance from the arc plasma center.
Fig. 11. The temperature distribution of the arc plasma versus distance from the
arc plasma center.

consequently to determine the optimum condition for every


plasma application. This confirms that the present method has
several advantages with respect to the most popular methods in
plasma diagnostics such as Longmuir probe, spectroscopy and
Mach–Zehnder interferometry. This technique, with no compli-
cated and expensive setup, is simple and not sensitive to vibra-
tion. Also the test object should be transparent with respect to the
wavelength of the probe light. The advantage of moiré deflecto-
metry with respect to interferometry is the direct evaluation of
the refractive index gradient and its simplicity. Also for large
temperature gradients, interferometry is limited and can produce
erroneous information while moiré deflectometry is able to be
used with more certainty. The accuracy and the sensitivity of
moiré deflectometry technique can be increased by varying the
Talbot distance and the pitch of moiré fringe.

Fig. 9. The dependence of the refractive index of the plasma region on distance Acknowledgments
from arc plasma center evaluated experimentally.

Authors would like to acknowledge Mr. Mohhamad Reza Khani


for his great help in the plasma laboratory.

References

[1] Daltrini AM, Moshkalev SA, Swart L, Verdonck PB. Plasma parameters
obtained with planar probe and optical emission spectroscopy. J Integrated
Circuits Syst 2007;2(2):67–73.
[2] Bhatti KA, Khaleeq-ur-Rahman M, Rafique MS, Shahzad MI, Latif A, Parveen N.
Electrical diagnostics of laser ablated platinum plasma. Vacuum 2008;82:
1157–61.
[3] Vest CM. Holographic interferometry. New York: Wiley; 1979.
[4] Reuses DL. Temperature measurement in a radially symmetric flame using
holographic interferometry. Combust Flame 1983;49:207–9.
[5] Reuses DL, Scolex PH. Interferometric temperature measurements of a flame
in a cylindrical tube using holography. Appl Opt 1987;26:1661–7.
[6] Posner JD, Dunn-Rankin D. Temperature field measurements of small, non-
premixed flames with use of an Abel inversion of holographic interferograms.
App Opt 2003;42:952–9.
[7] Prevosto L, Artana G, Mancinelli B, Kelly H. Schlieren technique applied to the
arc temperature measurement in a high energy density cutting torch. J Appl
Phys 2010;107(2):023304–5.
[8] Muraoka Katsunori, Maeda Mitsuo. Laser-aided diagnostics of plasmas and
gases. Bristol and Philadelphia: Institute of Physics Publishing; 2001.
Fig. 10. The electron density profile of the atmospheric arc plasma versus distance [9] Ovsyannikov AA, Zhukov MF. Plasma diagnostics. Cambridge Publishing;
from the arc plasma center. 2000.
[10] Settles GS. Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
[11] Thiyagarajan M, Scharer J. Experimental investigation of ultraviolet laser
deflectometry as an accurate and automatic method can be induced plasma density and temperature evolution in air. J Appl Phys
2008;104:013303.
one of the best way to experimentally study the transparent [12] Feldman U, Doschek GA. Plasma diagnostics using high-resolution spectro-
axially symmetric plasmas with high temperature gradient and scopic techniques. J Opt Soc Am 1977;67(6):726–34.
F.S. Meidanshahi et al. / Optics and Lasers in Engineering 51 (2013) 382–387 387

[13] Haidar J. Departures from local thermodynamic equilibrium in high-current [24] Sharma S, Sheoran G, Shakher C. Digital holographic interferometry for
free burning arcs in argon. J Phys D: Appl Phys 1997;30:2737–43. measurement of temperature in axisymmetric flames. Appl Opt
[14] Corliss Charles H. Temperature of a copper arc. J Res Nat Bur Stand-A. Phys 2012;51(16):3228–323.
Chem 1962;66A(1). [25] Chandra Shakher, Daniel AJPramila. Talbot interferometry with circular
[15] Blagojevic B, Popovic MV, Konjevic N, Pavlovic Z. Electron temperature grating for the measurement of temperature in axisymmetric gaseous flames.
measurements in medium electron density plasmas. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Appl Opt 1994;33:6068–72.
Transfer 2000;66:571–9. [26] Song Yang, Yun Chen Yun, He Anzhi, Zhao Zhimin. Theoretical analysis for
[16] Akhtar K, Scharer JE, Tysk ShM, Kho E. Plasma interferometry at high moiré deflectometry from diffraction theory. J Opt Soc Am A 2009;26:882–9.
pressures. Rev Sci Instrum 2003;74(2):996–1001. [27] Bar-Ziv EE, Glatt I, Kafri O. Measurement of temperature distribution of
[17] Camacho JR, Beg FN, Lee1 P. Comparison of sensitivities of Moiré deflecto- flames by moiré deflectometry. Appl Opt 1981;20:4263–6.
metry and interferometry to measure electron densities in z-pinch plasmas. J [28] Kafri Z. Refractive index measurements by moiré deflectometry. Appl Opt
Phys D 2007;40:2026–32.
1982;21:3326–8.
[18] Wan AS, Da Silva LB, Barbee Jr. TW, Cauble R, Celliers P, Libby SB, London RA,
[29] Wang Ming. Fourier transform moiré tomography for high-sensitivity map-
Moreno JC, Trebes JE, Weber F. Application of x-ray-laser interferometry to
ping asymmetric 3-D temperature field. Opt Laser Technol 2002;34:679–85.
study high-density laser-produced plasmas. J Opt Soc Am B 1996.
[30] Kolhe PS, Agrawal AK. Abel inversion of deflectometric data: comparison
[19] Weiss CO, Teuber K. A laser interferometer for measuring electron densities
of accuracy and noise propagation of existing techniques. Appl Opt
in an arc plasma. Opt Commun 1976;16(3):399–401.
[20] Shakher C, Nirala AK. A review on refractive index and temperature profile 2009;48(20).
measurements using laser-based interferometric techniques. Opt Lasers Eng [31] Yun-yun C, Yang S, An-zhi H, Zhen-hua L. Applicability of moiré deflection
1999;31:455–91. tomography for diagnosing arc plasmas. Appl Opt 2009;48(3):489–96.
[21] Brockington SJE, Horton RD, Hwang DQ, Evans RW, Howard SJ, Francis Thio [32] Krall NA, Trivelpiece AW. Principles of Plasma Physics. New York: McGraw-
YC. Plasma density gradient measurement using laser deflection. Rev Sci Hill; 1973.
Instrum 2005;76:063503. [33] Allen CW. Astrophysical Quantities.Athlone; 1963.
[22] Sharma S, Sheoran G, Shakher C. Temperature measurement of axi- [34] Salimi Meidanshahi F, Madanipour K, Shokri B. Investigation of first and
symmetric flame under the influence of magnetic field using lens less fourier second ionization on optical properties of atmospheric plasmas. Opt Com-
transform digital holography. Appl Opt 2012;51:4554–62. mun 2012;285:453–8.
[23] Sharma S, Sheoran G, Shakher C. Investigation of temperature and tempera- [35] Peratt AL. Advances in numerical modeling of astrophysical and space
ture profile in axi-symmetric flame of butane torch burner using digital plasmas. Astrophys Space Sci 1997;242:93–163.
holographic interferometry. Opt Lasers Eng 2012;50(10):1436–44. [36] /http://emtoolbox.nist.gov/Wavelength/Documentation.asp#AppendixAIVS.

You might also like