ArPan/ESP DEPARTMENT 2ND LEARNING ACTION CELL (LAC)

SESSION GUIDE
AUGUST 14, 2019

SESSION TITLE : CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY

Duration of the Session: 4 Hours
Link of this session to Test Construction, TOS and Item Analysis
the previous session:
Learning Objectives 1. Distinguish validity and reliability.
2. Discuss methods establishing validity and reliability of classroom
assessments.
3. Revise the First Quarter Assessment based on the validity and
the reliability measures.
Key Concepts:  Assessment refers to the activities undertaken by the
teachers and by their students in assessing themselves,
which provide information to be used as feedback to modify
the teaching and learning activities in which they are
engaged.
 Validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory
support the interpretations of test scores entailed by
proposed uses of tests
 Reliability refers to the consistency of measures when the
testing procedure is repeated on a population of individuals
or groups.
Reference: PPST Resource Package Module 3
METHODOLGY: KEY POINTS TRAINING SLIDE TIME
AIDS/TOOLS NO. ALLOTMENT
Introduction: The quality of educational Slide Decks 1-3 30 min
decisions is only as good as
the information that leads to Reflection
them. If inappropriate Sheets
information is collected or of
it is collected without
precision, the decisions that
follow will logically be
inaccurate. Two key
characteristics of all
assessments are validity and
reliability.

Teachers need to ensure

that assessment tools
administered to students are
evaluated as to evidences of
validity and reliability.

METHODOLOGY TRAINING SLIDE TIME

KEY POINTS
AIDS/TOOLS NO. ALLOTMENT
Activity : Teacher will reflect on the Slide Decks 4–6 60 min
importance of assessments Manila Paper
to learners by presenting a Markers
given situation.
Analysis:  In what ways do the Power Point 7 – 30 45 min
teachers’ practice Presentation
differ?
 Which teacher Manila Paper
practice is more Markers
relevant for the
assessment of
learning? Why?
 Which teacher
practice will create
more meaningful
learning decisions?
 If you are the
teacher in the
situation, how will
you develop your
own assessment
material?

Abstraction : As teachers, we should be Slide Decks 31 40 min

equipped with knowledge
and skills and have
understanding of how
learning assessments are
structured so we can
formulate assessments that
will yield meaningful
results. Thus, relevant
learning decisions will be
developed.
Application : Teachers will be grouped Slide Decks 32 – 33 60 min
by grade level. Task is to
develop instructional Curriculum
materials/DLL/DLP Guides
highlighting activities
employing questioning
techniques.

METHODOLOGY KEY POINTS TRAINING SLIDE TIME

AIDS/TOOLS NO. ALLOTMENT
Closure As proficient teachers, Slide Deck 34 -35 5 min
we need to reflect on our
own classroom practices.
Do away with the
traditional way of
constructing
 assessments. LEVEL UP
to develop valid and
reliable test materials.

Prepared by : Noted by :

JOSEFIVARLEO C. TUBO ROSTICO D. ARCO

LAC Speaker MT-I/LAC Coordinator

Recommending Approval :

MYRNA S. LLOREN
Asst. Principal II/LAC Leder

APPROVED :

RUSTICO S. PELONIO, JR.

Principal II/ LAC Leader