You are on page 1of 10

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

International Journal of Biological Macromolecules


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijbiomac

Review

Galactomannan: A versatile biodegradable seed polysaccharide


Vipul D. Prajapati a,∗ , Girish K. Jani a , Naresh G. Moradiya a , Narayan P. Randeria a ,
Bhanu J. Nagar b , Nikhil N. Naikwadi a , Bhavesh C. Variya c
a
Department of Pharmaceutics, S.S.R. College of Pharmacy, Saily-Silvassa Road, Saily, Silvassa, U.T. of Dadra and Nagar Haveli 396230, India
b
Department of Pharmaceutics, Rofel Shri G. M. Bilakhia College of Pharmacy, Namdha Campus, Namdha Road, Vapi 396191, Gujarat, India
c
Department of Pharmacology, Shri G. H. Patel Pharmacy Building, M.S. University, Fateh gunj, Vadodara 390002, Gujarat, India

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Polysaccharides have been finding, in the last decades, very interesting and useful applications in
Received 26 April 2013 the biomedical and, specifically, in the biopharmaceutical field. Galactomannans are a group of stor-
Accepted 16 May 2013 age polysaccharides from various plant seeds that reserve energy for germination in the endosperm.
Available online 23 May 2013
There are four major sources of seed galactomannans: locust bean (Ceratonia siliqua), guar (Cyamopsis
tetragonoloba), tara (Caesalpinia spinosa Kuntze), and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.). Through
Keywords:
keen references of reported literature on galactomannans, in this review, we have described occurrence
Major galactomannans
of various galactomannans, its physicochemical properties, characterization, applications, and overview
Polysaccharides
M/G ratio
of some major galactomannans.
© 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Contents

1. Introduction to polysaccharides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83
2. Introduction to galactomannans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
3. Occurrence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84
4. Physico-chemical properties and characterization of galactomannans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5. Applications of galactomannans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
5.1. Viscosity development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
5.2. Gel formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
5.3. Hydrogen bond formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
5.4. Water absorption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
6. Major galactomannans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
6.1. Locust bean gum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
6.2. Guar gum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
6.3. Tara gum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
6.4. Fenugreek gum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
7. Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

1. Introduction to polysaccharides food reserve material (e.g., guar, locust bean, etc.), as mucilages in
the seed coats (e.g., psyllium seed, flaxseed, yellow mustard seed,
Seed polysaccharides are one of the most important categories etc.), and as cell wall materials of seed cotyledons and endosperms
of plant-originated gums used in the food industry, as they play (e.g., tamarind and soybean seeds). The chemical compositions,
important roles in both food processing and improving the mouth fine structures, and physical and functional properties of these
feel and texture of food products. The occurrence of polysaccharides polysaccharides can vary significantly with plant sources, grow-
in plant seeds is mainly in three forms: as nonstarch polysaccharide ing environments, and method of production. Seed polysaccharides
(nonstarch) are also an important source of dietary fiber, which
may exhibit bioactivities such as reducing calorie intakes, control-
∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 0982 4284159; fax: +91 0260 2681104. ling blood glucose and insulin levels, and reducing the risks of heart
E-mail address: vippra2000@yahoo.com (V.D. Prajapati). diseases and colon cancer [1].

0141-8130/$ – see front matter © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.05.017
84 V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92

Fig. 1. General molecular structure of galactomannan.

Carbohydrate molecules have complex structures. These are the gums is limited due to availability and price. Other sources of
most abundant of the natural products and the source of all bio- galactomannans have also been explored in the literature, but
logical energy. Being poly functional in nature, these molecules no commercial potential can be expected in the near future
participate in a multitude of chemical and biochemical reactions. [3].
They are composed of the polyhydroxy aldehydes, ketones, alco- Galactomannan is derived from the seeds of plant C.
hols, acids and their simple derivatives as well as their polymers tetragonolobus, a pod bearing legume grown commercially in India,
having linkages of the acetal type. Carbohydrates can be clas- Pakistan and the southwestern United States. The seed is composed
sified into monosaccharides, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides. of hull (15%), germ (45%), and endosperm (40%). The ratio of d-
Monosaccharides are the lower members of carbohydrates, which mannopyranosyl to d-galactopyranosyl units is about 1.8:1. The
cannot be degraded by hydrolysis. Oligosaccharides and polysac- average molecular weight of the Galactomannan is in the range of
charides are polymers of monosaccharides and their derivatives, 1–2 × 106 Da [6]. Galactomannan forms viscous, colloidal disper-
joined by acetal-type linkages. Oligosaccharides contain between sion when hydrated in water. It is being used as a viscosity builder
2 and 10 monosaccharide units, and polysaccharides contain more and water binder in many industries such as textile, food, paper,
than 10 units. petroleum, mining, explosives, and pharmaceuticals.
Polysaccharides, also known as Cinderella of biopolymers, hold The molar ratio of galactose to mannose varies with plant ori-
a wide range of different functions; sometimes they behave gin but is typically in the range of 1.0:1.0–1.1, 1.0:1.6–1.8, 1.0:3.0,
as energy storage materials and the well-known examples are and 1.0:3.9–4.0 for fenugreek, guar, tara, and locust bean gums,
starch, glycogen and some plant seed polysaccharides such as respectively. The conformation of the 1→4-linked ␤-d-mannan
locust bean gum, guar gum, tara gum and panwar gum. Some- backbone is similar to that of cellulose, so that it does not dissolve in
times they contribute to the structural integrity and mechanical water. The galactose side groups are considered to sterically disturb
strength of plant tissues by forming a hydrated cross-linked three- the interchain association and crystallization, thereby imparting
dimensional network (pectins play this role in land plants while certain water solubility to the galactomannans. As a result, the solu-
carrageenans, agar and alginate have an equivalent function in bility of the galactomannans increases with the degree of galactosyl
marine species). On the other hand, polysaccharides such as cel- substitution: fenugreek and guar gums are readily dissolved in cold
lulose and chitin and, less frequently, xylans and mannans can water, but heating is needed to reasonably solubilize locust bean
generate hard, solid structures or tough fibers by close packing of gum in water.
the chains. Polysaccharides may also act as protective substances; The two main groups of galactomannan polysaccharides are
protective polysaccharides are exemplified by the antigenic and those derived from (a) the endosperm of plant seeds, the vast
immunogenic exocellular microbial polysaccharides-that are fre- majority of which originate in the Leguminosae, and (b) microbial
quently highly specific for particular organisms or by the exudate sources, in particular, the yeasts and other fungi.
gums from plants, which appear to provide a preventive func-
tion by sealing off the injured parts of the plant against bacterial 3. Occurrence
infections [2].
The majority of galactomannans originate from Leguminosae
2. Introduction to galactomannans family. 70 species of the Leguminosae have been identified con-
taining galactomannans (Table 1). True galactomannans, as defined
Galactomannans are heterogeneous polysaccharides composed by Aspinall (that is, those mannans containing more than 5% of d-
by a ␤-(1–4)-d-mannan backbone with a single d-galactose branch galactose) have also been extracted from members of Annonaceae,
linked ␣-(1–6) (Fig. 1) [3]. They differ from each other by the the Convolvulaceae and the Palmae, Ebenaceae and Loganiaceae as
mannose/galactose (M/G) ratio. These gums are mostly obtained shown in Table 2. The general procedure to obtain galactomannans
from the endosperm of dicotyledonous seeds of numerous plants, from seeds combines extraction and purification processes. Briefly,
particularly the Leguminosae. The endosperm has several func- the seed hull is removed from the seeds and the germ is separated
tions: it serves as food reserve for germinating seeds and it from the endosperm. The most used separation procedures are: fil-
retains water, preventing the complete drying of the seeds [4,5]. tration, sifting and in some cases (e.g., lab scale) they are separated
There are four major sources of seed galactomannans: locust manually. The endosperm is dissolved in water (at temperatures
bean (Ceratonia siliqua), guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba), tara (Cae- that can range between 20 and 120 ◦ C), followed by a precipitation
salpinia spinosa Kuntze), and fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum step using alcohol (in a ratio water:alcohol that can range between
L.). Among these, only locust bean and guar gums are of con- 1:1 and 1:3). No effects of the alcohol on galactomannans’ structure
siderable industrial importance. The use of tara and fenugreek have been reported [6,7].
V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92 85

Table 1 and prevent the mannose cis-OH groups in forming the hydrogen
Galactomannans of various species of Leguminosae and their reported value of M/G
bonds [8].
ratio.
Comparing the different galactomannans, it is obvious that,
Botanical name M/G ratio Reference since additional cross linking via hydrogen bonds goes hand in
Subfamily Species hand with less solubility, an increase in substitution leads to higher
solubility. The best solubility is found with galactomannan-1,1
Caesalpiniacae Cassia absus 3:1 [48]
C. emarginata 2.70:1 [32] in which the high substitution by galactose obviously establishes
C. Fistula 3:1 [45] so much steric hindrance that it dissolves easily in cold water
C. leptocarpa 3.05:1 [6] and prevents attack for some time for degrading enzymes. How-
C. marylandica 3.76:1 [40] ever, galactomannan-1,2 where on average each second mannose
C. nodosa 2.7–3.5:1 [49]
C. occidentalis 3:1 [45]
unit is blocked by galactose, shows so much steric hindrance and
C. tora 3:1 [27] so little hydrogen bonding between the molecular chains that it
Ceratonia siliqua 3.75:1 [34] hydrates instantly. Galactomannan-1,4 does not dissolve in cold
Caesalpinia cacalaco 2.50:1 [5] water but its solubility in boiling water is already better than that
C. pulcherima 2.7:1 [50]
of galactomannan-1,5 due to slightly higher degree of substitution
C. spinosa – [5]
Cercidium torreyanum 3.38:1 [45] by galactose side groups compared to galactomannan-1,5.
Delonix regia 4.28:1 [32] M/G ratio varies considerably depending on the galactomannan
Gleditsia amorphoides 2.5:1 [13] source and typically ranges between 1.1 and 5.0 [5]. Variations in
G. triacanthos 3.2:1 [13] the galactomannans’ structure, particularly in M/G ratio and fine
Gymnocladus dioica 2.71:1 [30]
structure, cause significant changes in the solubility, viscosity and
Parkinsonia aculeate 2.70:1 [45]
in the interactions between galactomannans and other polysaccha-
Mimosaceae Besmanthus illinoensis 2.69:1 [5]
rides. Usually, galactomannans with higher galactose content (such
Leucaena galauca 1.33:1 [5]
as GG) are ready soluble in water and exhibit a lower tendency to
Fabaceae Sophora japonica 5.19:1 [30] form gels as a result of synergistic interactions, when compared
Genista raetam 4.14:1 [32]
with galactomannans with a lower M/G ratio (such as LBG). The
G. scoparia 1.59:1 [27]
G. cretica 1.56–1.67:1 [50] higher solubility of GG has been attributed to the presence of a
G. foenum-graecum 1.2:1 [45] higher number of side chains, which keep the main mannose chains
G. hamosa 1.17:1 [45] far enough to prevent effective intermolecular interactions. On the
G. monspeliaca 1.08:1 [5] other hand, galactomannans with fewer side chains (higher M/G
G. polyserata 1.13:1 [50]
G. radiate 1.17:1 [6]
ratio) can interact with other polysaccharides due to their long
Anthyllis vulneraria 1.33:1 [5] blocks of unsubstituted mannose units [5].
Lotus corniculatus 1.25:1 [6] From the foregone discussion, it can be concluded that galac-
L. pedunculatus 1.04:1 [45] tomannans are rich in hydroxyl groups; this enables them to
L. scoparius 1.13:1 [40]
bind and take up water and rich in cis-OH groups, which allow
Alysicarpus veginalis 1.14:1 [27]
Desmodium pulchellum 2:1 [30] aggregation from chain to chain via hydrogen bonding so that
hydration becomes more complicated if interchange cross linking
can take place. By substitution with galactose, nature establishes
steric hindrance between the molecules and thus enhances water
solubility.
4. Physico-chemical properties and characterization of The characterization of physicochemical properties of galac-
galactomannans tomannans (Table 3) can be performed using different tech-
niques (e.g., gas chromatography, high-pressure anion exchange
For a better understanding of properties of galactomannans one chromatography, size exclusion chromatography, 13 C NMR spec-
should know the basic structure of their building units. It is obvious troscopy, capillary viscometry, shear and extensional rheology).
that mannose is provided with cis-OH groups in the galactoman- The most important parameters that define the nature of a
nan polymer. Therefore, an enhanced deposition to form hydrogen galactomannan are mannose and galactose (M/G) ratio, average
bonds between the polymannan chains is expected as long as neigh- molecular weight, fine structure, and intrinsic viscosity. Mannose
boring groups like galactose do not develop steric hindrance to and galactose ratio, the degree of substitution and the degree of
prevent the galactomannan chains from coming too closer together polymerization have been reported to affect edible films proper-
ties [9]. No effect of the average molecular weight as been reported
for galactomannan films. The monomeric sugars content and M/G
Table 2 ratio are generally determined by gas chromatography or by high-
Galactomannans of various species of non-Leguminosae and their reported value of
pressure anion exchange chromatography after partial or total
M/G ratio.
hydrolysis catalyzed by acid. The molecular weight distributions
Non-leguminosae species of galactomannans M/G ratio Reference can be determined by size exclusion chromatography. The galac-
Family Botanical name tose distribution along the mannan chain can be characterized
by 13 C NMR spectroscopy, or by enzymatic methods with ␤-d-
Annonaceae Annona muricata 4.46:1 [5]
Convolvulaceae Convolvulus tricolor 1.75:1 [48] mannanase that specifically degrades the non-substituted regions
Ipomoea muricata 1.8:1 [52] of galactomannans [10]. Intrinsic viscosity can be determined using
Ebenaceae Diospyros virginiana – [6] a capillary viscometer, by application of Huggins’ and Kramer’s
Loganiaceae Strychnos nux-vomica – [51] equations [11]. Furthermore, the evaluation of the rheological
Palmae Borassus flabellifer 2.4:1 [5]
Cocos nucifera 2.57:1 [45]
behavior plays an important role in the characterization of galac-
Arenga saccharifera 2.26:1 [45] tomannan solutions, since these are often used to modify textural
Phytelephas macrocarpa 50:1 [48] attributes [12]. This characterization can be performed through
Hyphaene thebaica 19:1 [45] shear (steady and dynamic conditions) and extensional rheology
Phoenix dactylifera 10:1 [6]
[13].
86 V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92

Table 3
Galactomannans physico-chemical characteristics and its method of determination.

S. No. Characteristics Method to determine References

1 Monomeric sugar content & M/G ratio Gas chromatography & high pressure anion exchange chromatography [53]
2 Molecular weight distribution Size exclusion chromatography [56]
3 Galactose distribution 13
C NMR spectroscopy and Enzymatic method with ␤-d-mannanase [54,55]
4 Intrinsic viscosity Capillary viscometer, By application of Huggins’ and Kramer’s equations [11]

5. Applications of galactomannans of galactomannans are in dairy products, fruit-based water gels,


powdered products, bakery, dietary products, coffee whiteners,
Galactomannans are widely utilized in the industry due to their baby milk formulations, seasonings, sauces and soups, tinned meats
suitable functional properties, such as thickening, binding, and and frozen and cured meat foods. This broad range of applica-
stabilizing abilities. These functional properties are led by rhe- tions reflects a great number of different functional characteristics
ological behavior of galactomannans in an aqueous phase and including high solution viscosity, stabilization of frozen systems
also by intermolecular binding in certain conditions. Hydrated and mixed gel formation with other polysaccharides and proteins
galactomannan molecules occupy a large hydrodynamic volume in [4].
aqueous solution and control the rheological behavior of the entire Recently, some works showed the possibility of using galac-
solution. Galactomannans themselves are nongelling agents, while tomannans in the formation of films and coatings [6].
some galactomannans show synergistic interactions with other
polysaccharides such as agar, xanthan, carrageenan, and yellow 5.1. Viscosity development
mustard gum to form a three-dimensional gel network in appropri-
ate conditions [14–17]. Galactomannans thus find a wide range of Some galactomannans, especially guar, but also Cassia and
applications as texture modifiers or stabilizers in food and pet food locust bean gum and their derivatives (anionic, cationic and non-
industries. Applications of commercial and alternative sources of ionic) develop very high viscosity in aqueous solution. In the textile
galactomannans are given in Table 4. industry they are used to thicken the dyebaths in printing and
The world figures of galactomannan consumption differ quite dyeing of fibers, fabrics and carpets. The gums control the flow char-
considerably according to different sources. According to one esti- acteristics of the dye formulations, so that sharp, bright patterns
mate, around 90–100 thousand tons are consumed per year. The can be achieved. For different types of cloth and dyestuff, different
biggest consumption being that of guar gum with 70–80 thou- types of thickener are used – mostly in combinations. In the field
sand tons followed by locust bean gum with 12–14 thousand tons. of explosives, guar gum and derivatives are used to thicken nitrate
Reviewing the technical applications, attention is drawn to the salt solutions, which are the basic components of slurry explosive
chemical behavior of the different galactomannans. There are appli- formulations. These compositions are safer to use and can be for-
cations, which benefit from the excellent viscosity formation of mulated to demand as a viscous liquid or even as gels. It is well
some galactomannans or their derivatives and there are also appli- known that cracking and opening up the oil or gas bearing zones
cations, which benefit from water absorption or from the formation with hydraulic pressure can increase the productivity of oil and
of hydrogen bonds as well as gel formation. gas. Hydroxypropyl guar solution and other derivatives are used in
The three major galactomannans of commercial importance in this process which is known as hydraulic fracturing. In this aspect
food and non-food industries are guar gum (GG, C. tetragonolobo, another property of galactomannans is also of advantage: the abil-
M/G ratio: 2:1), tara gum (TG, C. spinosa, M/G ratio: 3:1) and locust ity to gel with elements like boron or transition metals in the form
bean gum (LBG, C. siliqua, M/G ratio: 3.5:1) [4,18]. However, the of their salts, which can be used to block or tighten wells. Since this
industry trends demand the introduction of alternative sources of gelling reaction is reversible with change of pH, it is used to control
seed gums and therefore it is important to search for such alterna- fluid loss in well.
tive renewable sources [19]. In some works galactomannans have The great advantage of galactomannans is their ability to form
been used in binary mixtures with other polysaccharides such as very viscous solutions at relatively low concentrations that are
xanthan gum, agar and ␬-carrageenan, to form gels with new prop- only slightly affected by pH, ionic strength and heat processing
erties [7,20–22]. Galactomannans can often be used in different [11]. Galactomannans’ viscosity tends to remain constant over a
forms for human consumption. Featuring different physicochem- broad pH range (1–10.5), mainly due the neutral character of their
ical properties, galactomannans are a versatile material used for molecules, and also is not expected that their properties will change
many applications: they are excellent stiffeners and stabilizers with ionic strength. However some degradation may occur under
of emulsions, and the absence of toxicity allows their use in the highly acidic and alkaline conditions at high temperatures. The
textile, pharmaceutical, biomedical, cosmetics and food industries viscosity and the stability of the galactomannan solutions upon
[23–25]. Particularly in the food industry the main applications storage depend on the time and temperature used during the

Table 4
Commercial and alternative sources of galactomannans and their possible applications.

S. no. Species of galactomannan Applications in various formulation as Reference

1 Ceratonia siliqua (locust bean gum) Thixotropic, binder, stabilizer, lubricator [57]
2 Caesalpinia pulcherrima Thixotropic, binder, stabilizer, lubricator [6]
3 Gleditsia triacanthos Stabilizer, thickener, emulsifier [13]
4 Cesalpinia spinosum (tara gum) Stabilizer, thickener, emulsifier [57]
5 Dimorphandra gardneriana Tul Stabilizer, thickener, emulsifier [10]
6 Cyamopsis tetragonolobus (guar gum) Stabilizer, thickener, emulsifier, firming agent [57]
7 Adenanthera pavonina Stabilizer, thickener, emulsifier [6]
8 Prosopis pallida (mesquite gum) Stabilizer, thickener [58]
9 Mimosa scabrella Stabilizer, thickener [7]
10 Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek gum) Stabilizer, thickener [57]
V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92 87

Fig. 2. Locust bean gum (a) pods, (b) seeds and (c) powder.

film-forming solution preparation. Heating the galactomannans at reagents onto the surfaces of talc and other gangues, which are
temperatures above 60 ◦ C tends to provide a high initial viscos- mined along with the valuable minerals.
ity but leads to an inferior stability (in terms of time-dependant
changes in viscosity). The most convenient temperature depends 5.4. Water absorption
on the galactomannan source. For example, locust bean gum must
be heated at 80 ◦ C for 20–30 min to guarantee its full dispersion, To protect water sensitive goods, they may be spread with galac-
while the optimal conditions to disperse guar gum involve heating tomannan powder and then packed. Dry guar is used to cover
at 25–40 ◦ C for 2 h [5]. Galactomannan solutions usually exhibit substances to prevent water from entering into cartridges filled
a non-Newtonian behavior, in which the viscosity decreases with with explosive powders, cables and so on. Cross linked galactoman-
the increase of shear rate [26]. The degree of substitution in galac- nan derivatives can be used in competition with synthetic polymers
tomannans profoundly affects their solution properties [27]. as absorbents for hygiene articles.
Obviously, the applications of galactomannans depend more or
5.2. Gel formation less on their ability to form hydrogen bonds, a property which
is counter played by steric effect of galactose side groups, which
Galactomannans are able to form gels with certain metal salts. help to achieve increased solubility. During the last several years
This effect is used in the field of textiles to print vat-dyestuffs in many plant species have been investigated for their galactomannan
two phases, which yields bright and sharp prints. On the other hand contents to improve their properties by chemical modification and
galactomannans affect carrageenan and agar gels which diminish increase their utilization.
from one galactomannan to another in the direction of increasing
galactose content. Thus it can be assumed that the mannose residue 6. Major galactomannans
of the main chain is mainly involved. Therefore, only galactoman-
nans with little or no steric hindrance by galactose groups may 6.1. Locust bean gum
show this effect. Such properties will be useful not only in food and
pet food but also in technical applications, where gels are used to Locust bean gum (Fig. 2) is a popular natural polymer which is
bear and bind odors, as in solid air fresheners. Transport of solid mostly used in food industry as well as in pharmaceutical indus-
powders like coal or ores suspended in such gels through pipeline try. This natural polymer is conventionally used as an excipients
could also be possible as these gels have excellent suspending force, in manufacturing different formulation which mainly depends on
which can be destroyed immediately when reaching the final point its thickening and gelling property [28]. Locust bean gum is a non-
of destination by heating to only about 50 ◦ C. starch polysaccharides consisting of galactose and mannose in the
ratio 1:4 and hence they are known as galactomanan [29]. The man-
5.3. Hydrogen bond formation nose elements from a linear chain linked with galactopyranosyl
residues at side chain at varying distance depending on the plant
Easy hydrogen bond formation is one of the characteristics of origin [30]. Being a galactomanan locust bean gum has a wide appli-
galactomannans. This is used widely in the paper industry where cation in pharmaceutical field. It is also known as carob bean gum
guar has replaced locust bean as wet end additive. and is derived from the seeds of the leguminous plant C. siliqua
Galactomannans replace the natural hemicellulose in paper Linn belonging to family Fabaceae. This gum is widely cultivated in
bonding. Since galactomannans absorb onto the hydrated cellu- the Mediterranean region and to smaller extent also in California.
lose fibers, as the hydrogen bonding effect is one of the major The brown pods or beans of the locust bean tree are processed by
factors in fiber bonding. Machine speed is increased by using galac- milling the endosperms to form locust bean gum [31].
tomannans and the retention of fine fibers during the process is Locust bean gum consists mainly of a neutral galactomanan
also increased. Carboxymethyl derivatives of Cassia gum also show polymer made up of 1,4-linked d-mannopyronosyl units and every
excellent hydrogen bonding effects, especially when used as wet- fourth of fifth chain is substituted on C6 with a d-galactopyranosyl
end additives and as sizing agent in paper manufacturing. Thus unit (Fig. 3) [32,33]. The ratio of d-galactose to d-mannose differs
lightweight papers can be produced with excellent tightness, so and this is believed to be due to the varying origins of the gum
that printing inks cannot strike through. In the mining industry materials and growth conditions of the plant during production.
galactomannans are used as chemical flotation agents by getting The physicochemical properties of galactomanan are strongly influ-
absorbed onto hydrated mineral surfaces. In flotation, the galac- enced by the galactose content and distribution of the galactose
tomannan functions as depressant to block the absorption of other units along the main chain. Longer galactose side chains produce
88 V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92

Fig. 3. Structure of locust bean gum consisting of mannose and galactose.

stronger synergistic interaction with other polymers and greater the distribution of the galactose units over the mannose backbone,
functionality. Since it is a neutral polymer and its viscosity and sol- being approximately 4:1 for locust bean gum [38], 3:1 for tara gum
ubility are therefore little affected by pH changes within the range and 2:1 for guar gum [39]. This ratio is main characteristic affecting
of 3–11 [34,35]. galactomanans solubility, as higher water solubility is afforded by
The production of commercial locust bean, guar, and tara gums higher galactose content [40], an effect that has been justified by
is similar, involving separation of endosperms from the seed hull the introduction of an entropic, and perhaps steric, barrier to the
and germ, followed by grinding and sifting of the endosperm into ordered mannose chains [37]. This observation makes guar gum the
fine particle-sized flour. Further purification is made by repeated most soluble and also the most widely used of the galactomanans.
alcohol washings. Most commercial gums contain more than 80%
galactomannan. The quality or purity of the final gum product 6.2. Guar gum
depends on the extent of endosperm separation and de-hulling.
Remaining fragments of the hull may appear as dark specks and Due to its unique rheology modifying properties, it is being
deteriorate product quality. The carob pod contains approximately widely used across a broad spectrum of industries viz. oil well
10% of seeds by weight. The endosperm is commonly called splits drilling, textile, paper, paint, cement, cosmetic, food, pharmaceu-
because two spherical halves constitute the endosperm surround- tical, etc. India is the major producer of guar in the world and
ing the germ. The splits are milled to obtain flours that give a cloudy its contribution to the world-production is around 80%. In India,
solution when dissolved in water. The flour is then dispersed into Rajasthan and Haryana States contribute 85% of the total produc-
hot water and insoluble particles are removed by diatomaceous tion of India. India is a major exporter of guar gum (Fig. 4); the
earth filtration. The clarified solution is then precipitated using iso- country’s export of guar gum was 186,718.4 MT worth Rs. 10.50 Bil-
propyl alcohol, washed with alcohol, pressed, dried, ground, and lion (US$ 235 Million) during the year 2005–2006. USA, China and
sieved. The final product is a white to cream-colored powder that Germany are the major importing countries accounting for more
should give a clear solution when dissolved in water. than 60% of export of guar gum from India. Chemically, guar gum is
Locust bean gum is comprised of a high molecular weight a straight chain galactomannan, which is 75–85% of the endosperm,
polysaccharides composed of galactomanans consisting of a (1–4)- has a chain of (1→4)-linked-␤-d-mannopyranosyl units with sin-
linked ␤-d-mannose backbone with (1–6)-linked side chains of gle ␣-d-galactopyranosyl units connected by (1→6) linkages to, on
␣-d-galactose [36], being thus neutral polymers [31]. INEC tech- the average, every second main chain unit (Fig. 5).
nical committee reports that the standard method using the The development of guar gum resulted from the shortage of
consumption of sodium chlorite is unsuitable and recommends a locust bean gum in the 1940s. The guar plant is an annual sum-
gel permeation chromatography method. This provides a molecular mer legume that is cultivated mainly in western India and eastern
weight range of 50,000–300,000. Pakistan, and to a lesser extent in tropical areas, such as South and
The various galactomanans can be differentiated by the dis- Central America, Africa, Brazil, Australia, and the semiarid regions
played mannose:galactose ratio (M/G ratio), the substitution pat- of the U.S. Southwest. The plant grows to about 1 m in approxi-
tern of side chain units and their molecular weight, the latter being mately 5 months and yields pods slightly smaller than the carob
influenced by harvesting and manufacturing practices, among pod. The guar pod contains no more than 10 seeds, in which the
other factors [37]. The M/G ratio varies, therefore, depending on endosperm corresponds to 35% by weight.

Fig. 4. Guar gum (a) pods, (b) seeds and (c) powder.
V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92 89

toward intra- and intermolecular aggregation that are relevant to


the extent of galactose substitution.
Modified Guar gum is widely used in pharmaceutical application
due to its viscosity increasing properties. The therapeutic effect of
Guar gum is due to its ability to swells rapidly in aqueous media to
form viscous dispersions or gels. When inhaled guar gum adsorbed
in stomach and halted or alters absorption of glucose, cholesterol
and possibly drugs.
Guar gum and its derivatives are used as binder and disinte-
grater in tablets to add cohesiveness to drug powder. Today, guar
gum is also used as a controlled-release agent for drug due to high
Fig. 5. Structure of guar gum consisting of galactose and mannose. hydration rate (swelling in aqueous media). It also used as thickener
and stabilizer in pharmaceutical formulation. When mixed with
Guar also known as cluster bean (C. tetragonoloba L.) a drought different ingredients in formulation of tablets it form protective
hardy leguminous crop. Guar is being grown for seed, green fod- layer and consequently, drug releases out from the guar gum tablet
der, vegetable and green manuring. It is an annual plant, about 4 in a sustained manner, achieving the desired kinetics effect. And
feet high, vertically stalked, with large leaves and clusters of pods. masked unpleasant taste and odor of drug and improve its stability
Each pod is about 5–8 cm long and has on an average 6–9 small and drug release properties.
grayish-white pea shaped seeds. The pods are used as a green veg- The role of guar gum and its derivatives to control blood sugar
etable or as a cattle feed besides the industrial extraction of guar is well know Diabetes is a chronic disease, which occurs when the
gum. Guar grows best in sandy soils. It needs moderate, intermit- pancreas does not produce enough insulin, or when the body can-
tent rainfall with lots of sunshine. The crop is sown after the first not effectively use the insulin it produces. This leads to an increased
rains in July and harvested in October–November. It is a short dura- concentration of glucose in the blood (hyperglycemia). The World
tion crop and is harvested within 3–4 months of its plantation. Guar Health Organization (WHO) estimates that more than 180 million
is a rain dependent crop; rainfall influences the yield of the crop. Its people worldwide have diabetes. This number is likely to more than
seed consists of seed coat (14–17%), endosperm (35–42%) and germ double by 2030. Dietary fiber decreases postprandial plasma glu-
(43–47%). It has attained an important place in industry because of cose, insulin and triglyceride concentrations, and has a clinically
its galactomannan rich endosperm [32]. relevant hypocholesterolaemic effect.
The gum is commercially extracted from the seeds essentially by Guar gum is also helpful in weight reduction and cancer therapy
a mechanical process of roasting, differential attrition, sieving and especially colorectal cancer most common form of cancer due to
polishing. The seeds are broken and the germ is separated from intestinal disorder.
the endosperm. Two halves of the endosperm are obtained from
each seed and are known as undehusked guar split. When the fine 6.3. Tara gum
layer of fibrous material, which forms the husk, is removed and
separated from the endosperm halves by polishing, refined guar The tara tree is a spiny evergreen shrub that grows to 3–10 m.
splits are obtained. The hull (husk) and germ portion of guar seed The tree is found in South American countries, including Bolivia,
are termed as guar meal. The refined guar splits are then treated Peru, Ecuador, Chile, and Colombia, but the major cultivator is
and finished into powders (known as guar gum) by a variety of Peru. The flat pod of tara is about 10 cm long and 1–3 cm wide
routes and processing techniques depending upon the end product and contains several seeds. Tara gum (Fig. 6) is extracted from the
desired. endosperm with warm or hot water. The industrial manufacturing
The molar ratio of galactose to mannose of guar gum is approx- process is essentially the same as that of locust beam gum and guar
imately 1:2. The side group substitution occurs irregularly: side gum.
groups are arranged mainly in pairs and triplets. The average The molar ratio of galactose to mannose of tara gum is approxi-
molecular weight varies, typically up to a few million, depend- mately 1:3 (Fig. 7). The side group substitution is considered to have
ing on growth and manufacturing factors. The persistence length random and blockwise distributions [41]. The average molecular
of molecularly solubilized guar gum has been reported to be ca. weight typically ranges from 0.2 to 2 million. The persistence length
4 nm, similar to that of molecularly solubilized locust bean gum and the Mark–Houwink–Sakurada exponent of molecularly solubi-
[37]. It thus seems that the intrinsic flexibility of the mannan lized tara gum have been reported to be 3 nm and 0.79, respectively
backbone itself is little influenced by galactose substitution. Dif- [37], similar to those of locust bean and guar gums. The intrinsic
ferences in functional properties between locust bean and guar flexibility of galactomannan backbone thus seems to be insensitive
gums may rather reflect differences in their solubility and tendency to the degree of galactose substitution. The galactose substitution

Fig. 6. Tara gum (a) pods, (b) seeds and (c) powder.
90 V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92

Fig. 7. Structure of tara gum consisting of mannose and galactose.

Fig. 8. Fenugreek gum (a) plant, (b) seeds and (c) powder.

ratio of tara gum is in the middle of highly substituted cold-water- linear mannan backbone has ␣, 1→6 linked single galactose grafts
soluble guar and the less substituted locust bean gum, which is only on nearly all the mannose groups of the main chain. Besides fenu-
a little soluble in cold water. Tara gum is partially soluble in cold greek, Lucerne (Medicago sativa) and clover (Trifolium pratense), less
water up to about 80% of the dry weight. The thickening ability of common galactomannans, have ∼48% galactose. Molecular weight
tara gum is higher than that of locust bean gum and comparable of fenugreek gum is ∼30,000 Da, corresponding to an average pres-
to that of guar gum. The freeze–thaw stability is superior to that of ence of 180–190 monosaccharide (mannose + galactose) units in a
locust bean gum. molecule. On an average, the linear mannan backbone of fenugreek
Tara gum also exhibits synergistic interactions with xanthan polysaccharide is built up of 90–95, ␤, 1→4 linked mannopyra-
and ␬-carrageenan. The magnitude of synergistic increments in gel nosyl units and each backbone monomer carries an ␣, 1→6 linked
strength is larger than the highly substituted guar gum but smaller galactopyranosyl group (Fig. 9).
than the less substituted locust bean gum. Therefore, there is a Fenugreek seed-endosperm galactomannan was not in indus-
trend in interactions between galactomannans and helixforming trial production till 1993. Currently some industries are producing
polysaccharides that synergistic effects are progressively enhanced and marketing a sizable amount of fenugreek gum, and other fenu-
with decreasing galactose content of the galactomannans. Similar greek products are finding increasing applications. Guar and Locust
to the case of locust bean gum–␬-carrageenan mixed gels, X-ray bean gum have been in industrial use for quite some time. Similar
fiber diffraction patterns of tara gum–␬-carrageenan mixed gels to guar gum, fenugreek gum is also a product from a widely grown
are essentially identical to those of pure ␬-carrageenan, suggest- annual agriculture crop, and hence its sustainable supply is well
ing the absence of discrete intermolecular binding between the assured. Besides, fenugreek seed also contains spicy oil, saponins
two polysaccharides [42]. Tara gum is still a little exploited func- and edible protein, thereby making it a cost effective agricultural
tional food ingredient despite its moderate functional efficiency. crop.
Organoleptic characteristics of tara gum are said to be much better Fenugreek gum is extracted from the endosperm or ground
than those of guar gum. whole seed with water or dilute alkali, and the yield varies from
13.6 to 38%, depending on the variety/cultivar and extraction
6.4. Fenugreek gum

Fenugreek (Fig. 8), T. foenum-graecum, is a 60 cm tall annual


leguminous plant native to southern Europe and western Asia and
has a long history as a culinary and medicinal herb since ancient
times. The plant is grown in northern Africa, the Mediterranean,
western Asia, northern India, and currently in Canada [43]. The
fenugreek pod is about 3–10 cm long and 1 cm wide and contains
10–20 seeds with a size of about 2–3 mm. The seed has a strong
aroma and is somewhat bitter in taste. Fenugreek polysaccharide
contains small amount of sugars other than mannose and galactose.
This discrepancy might be due to less efficient methods of purifi-
cation, contamination and the analytical method employed. M/G
in fenugreek gum, in most cases, is ∼1. Thus fenugreek gum has
the highest galactose (∼48%; M/G, 1.02:1) in its molecule, and its Fig. 9. Structure of fenugreek gum consisting of galactose and mannose.
V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92 91

methods [2]. Commercial fenugreek gum products, such as References


Fenupure and Fenulife, contain over 80% galactomannans with
about 5% proteins. Laboratory preparation involving pronase (a [1] M.S. Kök, S.E. Hill, J.R. Mitchell, Food Hydrocolloids 13 (1999) 535.
[2] P. Andrews, L. Hough, K.N. Hones, Journal of the American Chemical Society 74
nonspecific protease isolated from Streptomyces griseus) treat- (1952) 2744.
ments produces gum products of much higher purity with less [3] M.A. Cerqueira, A.I. Bourbon, A.C. Pinheiro, J.T. Martins, B.W.S. Souza, J.A.
than 0.6% protein contaminants [43]. Teixeira, A.A. Vicenta, Trends in Food Science & Technology 22 (2011)
662–671.
The molar ratio of galactose to mannose of fenu-
[4] M.J. Gidley, J.S.G. Reid, Food Polysaccharides and Their Applications, CRC Press,
greek gum is approximately 1:1. A reported value Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2006, pp. 181–216.
of the molecular weight is 1.4 million, compared to [5] M. Srivastava, V.P. Kapoor, Chemical Biology 2 (2005) 295–317.
1.3 and 1.2 million for commercial guar and locust bean gum, [6] M.A. Cerqueira, A.C. Pinheiro, B.W.S. Souza, A.M. Lima, C. Ribeiro, C. Miranda,
Carbohydrate Polymers 75 (2009) 408–414.
respectively [43]. The radius of gyration of fenugreek gum was [7] C.W. Vendruscolo, I.F. Andreazza, J.L. Ganter, C. Ferrero, T.M.B. Bresolin, Inter-
75 nm, which is in agreement with the range obtained by experi- national Journal of Pharmaceutics 296 (2005) 1–11.
ments and modeling for a gum with equal galactose and mannose [8] M. Vandana, N.K. Mathur, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 64 (2005)
475–481.
contents and a molecular weight of 1.4 million [44,45]. Solution [9] K.S. Mikkonen, H. Rita, H. Helen, R.A. Talja, L. HyvD onen, M. Tenkanen,
properties of fenugreek gum are typical of a random coil polymer Biomacromolecules 8 (2007) 3198–3205.
[43]. In steady-flow rheological tests, fenugreek gum solutions [10] P.L.R. Cunha, I.G.P. Vieira, A.M.C. Arriaga, R.C.M. de Paula, J.P.A Feitosa, Food
Hydrocolloids 23 (2009) 880–885.
exhibit pseudoplastic behavior at high shear rates. Mechanical [11] W. Sittikijyothin, D. Torres, M.P. Goncalves, Carbohydrate Polymers 59 (2005)
spectra of locust bean, guar, and fenugreek gums with comparable 339–350.
molecular weights are similar in shape, but with slightly smaller [12] M. Marcotte, A.R. Taherian, M. Trigui, H.S. Ramaswamy, Journal of Food Engi-
neering 48 (2001) 157–167.
moduli values for fenugreek gum. Fenugreek gum is a nongelling [13] A.I. Bourbon, A.C. Pinheiro, C. Ribeiro, C. Miranda, J.M. Maia, J.A. Teixeira, Food
galactomannan and shows resistance against freeze–thaw treat- Hydrocolloids 24 (2010) 184–192.
ments. In addition, little synergistic interaction was observed [14] P. Fernandes, M. Goncalves, J.L. Doublier, Carbohydrate Polymers 16 (1991)
253.
between fenugreek gum and other gums.
[15] P. Fernandes, M. Goncalves, J.L. Doublier, Journal of Texture Studies 25 (1994)
Polysaccharides are generally considered to be non-surface 267.
active, although in practice some surface activity of a gum spec- [16] C. Schorsch, C. Garnier, J.L. Doublier, Carbohydrate Polymers 34 (1997) 165.
imen may be observed in experiments. Such apparent surface [17] W. Cui, Carbohydrate Polymers 27 (1995) 1995.
[18] P.A. Dakia, C. Blecker, C. Robert, B. Wathelet, M. Paquot, Food Hydrocolloids 22
activity has been attributed to the presence of small amounts of (2008) 807–818.
protein impurities [46]. Fenugreek gum was reported to possess [19] H. Joshi, V.P. Kapoor, Carbohydrate Research 338 (2003) 1907–1912.
substantial surface activity and be able to produce stable oil-in- [20] T.M.B. Bresolin, M. Milas, M. Rinaudo, F. Reicher, J.L.M.S. Ganter, International
Journal of Biological Macromolecules 26 (1991) 225–231.
water emulsions with moderately small droplet sizes (2–3 ␮m) [21] P.B. Fernandes, M.P. Goncalves, J.L. Doublier, Carbohydrate Polymers 16 (1991)
[47]. In addition, physical separation of protein residues from the 253–274.
crude gum sample did not reduce the surface activity. It is there- [22] A.C. Pinheiro, A.I. Bourbon, C. Rocha, C. Ribeiro, J.M. Maia, M.P. Goncalves, Car-
bohydrate Polymers 83 (2011) 392–399.
fore tempting to assume that the surface activity is an intrinsic [23] S.K. Baveja, K.V.R. Rao, J. Arora, N.K. Mathur, V.K. Vinayah, Indian Journal of
property of the polysaccharide. However, a protease-treated fenu- Chemistry 30 (1991) 133–137.
greek gum sample containing less than 0.6% protein (calculated [24] Y.S.R. Krishnaiah, R.S. Karthikeyan, V. Gouri Sankar, V. Satyanarayana, Journal
of Controlled Release 81 (2002) 45–56.
from nitrogen content) exhibited a reduced surface activity. These [25] I.G.P.V. Vieira, F.N.P. Mendes, M.I. Gallao, E.S. De Brito, Food Chemistry 101
conflicting results may solely indicate that the protease treatment (2007) 70–73.
is more effective in eliminating residual proteins. Protein compo- [26] N. Garti, Z. Madar, A. Aserin, B. Sternheim, Food Science and Technology 30
(1997) 305–311.
nents in fenugreek gum ingredients may be tightly associated with
[27] M. Izydorczyk, S.W. Cui, Q. Wang, Food Carbohydrates: Chemistry, Physical
polysaccharide chains and capable of dominating some surface Properties and Applications, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, 2005, pp.
activity-related functional properties. 335.
[28] D. Paramita, S.A. Biswanath, M. Sabyasachi, International Journal of Pharmacy
and Pharmaceutical Sciences 3 (2011) 4–7.
[29] K.S. Parvathy, N.S. Susheelamma, R.N. Tharanathan, A.K. Gaonkar, Carbohydrate
Polymers 62 (2005) 137–141.
7. Conclusion [30] B.R. Sharma, N.C. Dhuldhoya, S.N. Merchant, Science and Technology
Entrepreneurship 3 (2008) 1–10.
Galactomannans are widely utilized in the industry due to their [31] C.E. Beneke, A.M. Viljeon, J.H. Hamman, Molecule 14 (2009) 2602–2620.
[32] I.C. Dea, A. Morrison, Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry
suitable functional properties, such as thickening, binding, and 31 (1975) 242–312.
stabilizing abilities. These functional properties are led by rheo- [33] M.P. Venkataraju, D.V. Gowda, K.S. Rajesh, K.H. Shiva, Asian Journal of Pharma-
logical behavior of galactomannans in an aqueous phase and also ceutical Sciences 2 (2007) 239–248.
[34] H. Deuel, H. Neukom, Advances in Chemistry 11 (1954) 51–61.
by intermolecular binding in certain conditions. Among all galac-
[35] H. Yang, S.B. Zhou, J. Deng, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 92 (2004)
tomannans, only locust bean and guar gums are of considerable 1625–1632.
industrial importance. The use of tara and fenugreek gums is limited [36] P. Daas, K. Grolle, T. Vliet, H. Schols, H. de Jongh, Journal of Agricultural and
due to availability and price. There are still several seed galac- Food Chemistry 50 (2002) 4282–4289.
[37] D. Picout, S. Ross-Murphy, K. Jumel, S. Harding, Biomacromology 3 (2002)
tomannans that are not investigated so far and studies on such 761–767.
sources can make significant contribution in this direction. There- [38] T. Coviello, F. Alhaique, A. Dorigo, P. Matricardi, M. Grassi, European Journal of
fore, in the years to come, there will be continued interest in Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 66 (2007) 200–209.
[39] C. Andrade, E. Azero, L. Luciano, M. Goncalves, International Journal of Biological
galactomannans and their potentiality aimed at the development Macromolecules 26 (1999) 181–185.
of better materials for food and non-food industries. [40] M. Rinaudo, Polymer International 57 (2008) 397–430.
[41] B.V. McCleary, Carbohydrate Research 101 (1982) 75.
[42] P. Cairns, M. Miles, V.J. Morris, International Journal of Biological Macro-
molecules 8 (1986) 124.
[43] Y. Brummer, W. Cui, Q. Wang, Food Hydrocolloids 17 (2003) 229.
Acknowledgements
[44] Y. Brummer, Physicochemical and Structural Characterization of Fenugreek
Gum, University of Guelph, Ontario, 2001 (M.Sc. Thesis).
The authors are highly thankful to SSR College of Pharmacy, [45] C.L.O. Petkowicz, F. Reicher, K. Mazeau, Carbohydrate Polymers 37 (1998) 25.
Silvassa for providing all the necessary support and the essential [46] E. Dickinson, Food Hydrocolloids 17 (2003) 25.
[47] X. Huang, Y. Kakuda, W. Cui, Food Hydrocolloids 15 (2001) 533.
library information resources. [48] G.F. David, Taxon 53 (2004) 753–776.
92 V.D. Prajapati et al. / International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 60 (2013) 83–92

[49] P.K. Virendra, M. Michel, R.T. Francois, R. Marguerite, Carbohydrate Polymers [54] F.R. Taravel, K. Mazeau, I. Tvaroska, I. Braz, Journal of Medical and Biological
25 (1994) 79–84. Research 28 (1995) 723–732.
[50] C.Y. Ragasa, J. Ganzon, J. Hofilena, B. Tamboong, J.A. Rideout, Chemical and [55] P.A.J. Gorin, M. Iacomini, Carbohydrate Research 142 (1985) 253–267.
Pharmaceutical Bulletin 51 (2003) 1208–1210. [56] F.A. Pettolino, N.J. Hoogenraad, B.A. Stone, Food Hydrocolloids 16 (2002)
[51] R.D. Govinda, A.N. Brahmam, D.N. Rao, ndian Journal of Biochemistry & Bio- 551–556.
physics 45 (2008) 341–344. [57] B.M. Prado, S. Kim, B.F. Ozen, L.J. Mauer, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem-
[52] G.W. Staples, G.W. Wiersema, N.A. Chambers, Taxon 54 (2005) 1075–1079. istry 53 (2005) 2823–2829.
[53] J.L. Ganter, A. Heyraud, C.L.O. Petkowicz, M. Rinaudo, F. Reicher, International [58] L. Chaires-Martinez, J.A. Salazar-Montoya, E.G. Ramos-Ramirez, European Food
Journal of Biological Macromolecules 17 (1995) 13–19. Research and Technology 227 (2008) 1669–1676.

You might also like