You are on page 1of 2

Midwifery 85 (2020) 102719

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Midwifery
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/midw

Editorial

COVID-19: 2020 is the International Year of the Midwife

Earlier this year I asked our Associate Editors and some of our most have had to be made about support for home births and re-allocation of
prominent midwife leaders internationally to contribute to a series of midwifery-led birth centres to triage centres for pregnant women who
personal perspectives on what the 2020 International Year of the Mid- present with symptoms of COVID-19. These decisions are impacting on
wife meant for them, and for the future of midwifery. The plan was to women’s choices and fears about their pregnancy and birth care and we
publish the series to coincide with the 2020 International Confederation should all be mindful that self-isolation could increase women’s risk of
of Midwives conference in Bali, where ‘Midwifery’ was going to be rep- perinatal anxiety and depression, and exposure to domestic violence.
resented at writing for publication workshops and plans were underway Nevertheless, all of the clinical colleagues I work with are continuing to
for a reception for friends and colleagues of the journal. Alas, as we all put women at the centre of everything they do in the most difficult of
now know, plans have had to be postponed. circumstances.
Millions of people across the globe are dealing with the impacts of Evidence of the impact of COVID-19 on maternal and infant out-
Novel coronavirus (SARS-COV-2), a new strain of coronavirus causing comes is accruing, with some evidence based on women diagnosed with
COVID-19. Life during the pandemic is on hold, the things we all took for COVID-19 when pregnant coming from China (Qiao 2020), and publi-
granted such as meeting up with family and friends, shopping or going cation of evidence reviews (Di Mascio et al., 2020). Several institutions
to the gym, the freedom to go out and about when and where we wanted are collating and regularly updating data on how the virus is impact-
no longer an option. The extent of the lockdown we have to comply with ing on maternal and neonatal outcomes. The National Perinatal Epi-
is wide-ranging and the duration uncertain. The urgency and importance demiology Unit at Oxford University has commenced a new study as
for our communities and healthcare systems of compliance with social part of their ongoing UK-wide Obstetric Surveillance System (UKOSS)
isolation are starkly laid out, but nevertheless, these restrictions have to determine the incidence in the UK of hospitalisation with Covid-19
left many of us feeling anxious about lives taken over by events we infection in pregnancy and assess outcomes for a woman and her infant
cannot control and fearful for the health and safety of loved ones. (npeu.ox.ac.uk/ukoss/current-surveillance/covid-19-in-pregnancy).
Our healthcare workers and all of the staff who support them deserve While initial evidence appeared to show that women infected by
our highest praise. Images on our TVs, in our newspapers and online COVID-19 during pregnancy did not have more adverse outcomes than
outlets of key workers in personal protective equipment (PPE) dealing pregnant women not infected, emerging evidence suggests that verti-
with the ‘tsunami’ of individuals affected by COVID-19 is alarming. The cal transmission could take place, but proportion of pregnancies af-
situation faced by health workers in countries with fragmented health fected and significance to the neonate have yet to be determined. It
systems, where there is poverty and conflict, does not bear thinking is early days and imperative that those supporting pregnant and post-
about. natal women regularly check latest updates provided by their lead pro-
Despite the difficult and uncertain time for the global community, we fessional or public health agencies as the numbers of reported cases of
have to look to the future. When the pandemic is over, 2020 should still infection and the ‘learning’ from these are constantly changing. Links
be considered ‘the International Year of the Midwife’, albeit for different to the current advice offered by the UK Royal College of Midwives and
reasons than planned. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, including for women
Midwives are at the core of the response to the pandemic. Women are with more medically complex pregnancies, are provided below. This in-
still getting pregnant, still giving birth and they and their families still formation (which is also subject to change) should be used alongside
need midwifery support and care. Pregnant women in the UK have been current guidance relevant to a woman’s maternity care, including care
classed as a ‘vulnerable group’ by our Chief Medical Officer, based on of pre-existing or new onset physical or psychological health problems
evidence that response to severe viral infection is compromised in some and ensuring women continue to be asked about their mental health at
pregnant women. This means that pregnant women should increase ef- every contact.
forts to socially distance themselves to reduce risk of infection. In re- Midwives can and do make a huge difference to the lives of women
sponse, UK midwives have been reassessing and revising the number of and families. Although 2020 is not the year of celebration originally
face-to-face contacts they offer women to reduce the risk of COVID-19 planned, midwives everywhere should be proud of the potentially life-
transmission from attending busy hospitals, as well as the need to ac- saving and life-affirming roles they are playing in these adverse cir-
commodate high levels of sickness among midwifery and other health- cumstances. Keep safe and well, and look after your loved ones and
care staff. Many antenatal and postnatal contacts are now being under- your communities; 2020 is the year when midwives internationally have
taken using mobile and web-based technology, and difficult decisions stepped up to meet this global crisis.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102719

0266-6138/© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd.


Editorial Midwifery 85 (2020) 102719

Debra Bick Qiao, J., 2020. What are the risks of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women? Lancet
Editor in Chief Midwifery doi:10.1016/S01406736(20)303652.

Professor of Clinical Trials in Maternal Health


Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School Information from the UK RCOG and RCM
University of Warwick, UK
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2020. Royal College of Midwives.
Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection in pregnancy. Information for healthcare pro-
E-mail address: debra.bick@warwick.ac.uk fessionals. Version 7. Published April 9th https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/
documents/guidelines/2020-04-09-coronavirus-covid-19-infection-in-pregnancy.pdf.
References Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2020. Royal College of Midwives
Guidance for maternal medicine services in the evolving coronavirus (COVID-19)
pandemic. Information for healthcare professionals. Version 2. Published April 9th
Di Mascio, D., Khalil, A., Saccone, G., Rizzo, G., Buca, D., Liberati, M., Vecchiet, J.,
https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-04-09-guidance-
Nappi, L., Scambia, G., Berghella, V., D’Antonio, F., 2020. Outcome of Coron-
for-maternal-medicine-services-in-the-evolving-coronavirus-covid-19-pandemic.pdf.
avirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID 1 -19) during pregnancy: a system-
atic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM
doi:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100107.

You might also like